Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060802WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 301-791-3065 TDD/Hearing Impaired: 301-791-3070 FAX: 301-791-3017 AGENDA HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND CONFERENCE ROOM 1A & B WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE ANNEX 80 WEST BALTIMORE STREET August 2, 2006 7:00PM M A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Minutes — July 12, 2006 D. Communications & Bills E. Unfinished Business 1. Building Permit #2006-06252, 24808 Pen Mar Road, Continue review of building plans for new dwelling in Pen Mar Rural Village zoning.* F. Budget G. New Business 1. Building Permit #2006-0XXXX, 24812 Pen Mar Road, new dwelling in Pen Mar Rural Village* 2. Building Permit #2006-05882, 4304 Main Street, Building addition in Rohrersville Rural Village* 3. Building Permit #2006-06319, 14624 Water Company Road, building addition in Cascade Rural Village * 4. SP -06-040 Site Plan, Ringgold Church of Christ, 14416 Barkdoll Road, New construction in Ringgold Rural Village * 5. Effects on historic resources- 11664 Mapleville Road, increase 112 foot monopole to 156 feet * 6. Effects on historic resources- Trego and Rohrersville Road, proposed 150 foot monopole H. Other Business I. Executive Session J. Adjournment * = written material enclosed \HDC\Aaug06.DOC NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MAY MEET IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.508, STATE GOVERNMENT ARTICLE, ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CON'T'ACT' PERMITS DEPARTMENT AT (301) 791-3065 VOICE/POD TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. RECYCLED PAPER t J !t WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2006-06252 Project No: P2006-1454 Permit Type: RES-NEW Inspector Area: B2 Job Address: 24808 PEN MAR ROAD CA Location: LOR 24808 PEN MAR ROAD Parcel No: 014-19-0354-00042 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: C Applicant: FULMOR WILLIAM C & RHONDA J 24808 PEN MAR RD CASCADE, MD 21719 Phone Number: 717-762-3091 Owner: FULMOR WILLIAM C & RHONDA J Contractor: KEYSTONE CUSTOM HOMES Phone Number: 717-464-9060 Contractor Lic. No: HB-2937 Applied: 07/24/2006 Approved: Status: PENDING District/Acct No: 14002847 Description: 1 STORY MODULAR RANCHER KEYSTONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH 2 CAR ATTACHED GARAGE, FRONT PORCH, ELDORADONINYL EXTERIOR, PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES, SHINGLED ROOF WITH FULL UNFINISHED BASEMENT WITH ROUGH IN FOR FUTURE BATH. Foundation Size: 1553.97 Type of Heat...: HEAT Public Sewer...: Y Public Water...: Y Gas............: N Electric.......: Y Exterior Finish Air Conditioning: Septic........... Time Existed: Well............ Time Existed: Construction Type: Construction Valuation: $170,000.00 Code Enforced: 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL C Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Proposed .33 ACRES .33 ACRES 25 12.7 100 5.3 VINYL STONE Y NA NA NA NA MOD No. Of Bathrooms: 2 No. of Bedrooms: 3 Minimum By Ordinance 30,000 30,000 25 25 5 5 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240-313-2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 a 'z'" N 0 NTAIN T Rp 2 4 0.7 = O� 0 P�� y31 bM /p e����� � ¼jJe lf( 3UENA N Qe ig Ca 0 m oox _ v£mm D CD C NC• OC u mD• w1 . (AZ o o J) orcO omm O < () 4-)<)< oC>X VI'VE O: NN (n Z n /T] wCc Ti =C)> r w c �r zo J COD m zr - �� D C) n z Q din O m 0_° II j� �O 0 3o • CD go 0'O /�cPO 0'O h D 00 _ x tiF�s D \ 2 m o tsz N w N D N N 1 Z C- ?2Rss• 5 0 %0 2 za �Ze ��oo � oaoda Sr 0��86� DATUM PLAT #3093 > v _ P a -> oi' ® 13 O 13 n 0)A In m r m D 4 L ss A 0 2 A' D xt x• pST KeL (39 o e, x` Prepared by TAYLOR & TAYLOR ASSOCIATES, INC. Historic Preservation & Community Development Specialists 9 Walnut Street Brookville, PA 15825 814-849-4900 1999 DISTRICT MAP Scale: 1" = 300' / Z&soB Legend: TZ I District Boundary - ss� / C FAQ Mb Contributing Resources Non-contributing Resources O 60 /AP$4? Ltvj�T iok hA-P Z111o� P M NUYJ�lCO e� 437 ♦♦�58 y5 yN \ 51 5b C (1 NPS Fo1T 1UAUU-8 (c -as) vr.r ..yym.ar ..u. mervum United States Department of the Interior National Park Service jonal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page Pen Mar Historic District Washington County, MD 30. 14507 Maryland Avenue (Brun family summer home): two-story vernacular residence of wood construction, built on a raised foundation on a sloping lot; intersecting gable roof with partial return on the cornice; windows are flat-topped, 1/1 lights; a broad veranda extends across the facade and wraps around a portion of both right and left side with original chamfered posts and sawn ornament (c. 1907) 31. Southeast corner Chestnut Street and Roosevelt Avenue (Crout's Hotel site): wooded corner lot surrounded by a short dry-stone wall. On this site stood the Crout's Hotel, one of the many hotels in this resort area and one of three large hotels which stood within the district, none of which are extant. A short stone obelisk, approximately 21/2 feet in height, memorializes a dog and is set along the Roosevelt Avenue side of the lot; it was carved by Leon Werdebaugh and Roy Moore and originally was on the Park View Hotel property, diagonally across Chestnut Street to the northwest. It was relocated to its present site c. 1970. 32. 14525 Roosevelt Avenue: 11/2 -story Bungalow of wood construction built on a raised foundation with laterally -oriented gable roof and gabled dormer on facade; roof extends over a recessed front porch which is supported by three square columns and is trimmed with a unornamented solid wood balustrade; the original lattice porch apron is intact; windows are flat-topped, 6/6 lights, and are set singly and in groups with simple moldings; the exterior finishes are clad in asbestos shingles (c. 1920) 24808 Pen Mar Road: 21/2 -story vernacular residence of wood construction, synthetic -sided, with an intersecting gable roof and partial return on the cornices; a one-story porch is on facade with turned columns and replacement turned balusters (c. 1912) 34. 24810 Pen Mar Road: two-story vernacular residence of wood construction with a gable roof, gable - end orientation to the street, and a partial return on the cornice; clad in shiplap siding; two -bay facade with a one-story hipped- roof porch extending across the facade and wrapping around a portion of the left side; windows are flat-topped with simple heads and 2/2 lights; a fixed four -light sash is in the pediment of the gable; a repetitive house type and a twin to its neighbor on the right (c. 1900) 35. 24812 Pen Mar Road: two-story vernacular residence of wood construction with gable roof and gable - end orientation to the street with partial return on the cornice; a fixed four -light sash in the pediment of the gable; two -bay facade; windows 2/2 lights, with exterior synthetic shutters; clad in instil -brick; one-story wraparound porch extends across the facade and portion of the left side; a repetitive house type and a twin to its neighbor on the left (c. 1915) 36. 24816 Pen Mar Road: two-story vernacular residence with gable roof and gable -end orientation to the street; two -bay facade; exterior veneer of fieldstone; one-story shed roof porch extends across the facade and a corner of the right hand side (c. 1929) 37. Rear, 24816 Pen Mar Road (Pen Rock Hotel foundation): a high, open foundation of rubble stone, approximately fifteen feet in height. This is all that remains of the Pen Rock Hotel which burned c. rtLLnnun j f-1 L$1Zr/C WASHINGTON COUNTY (J BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2O06-6 XXXX JC Applied: Project No: P2006-1454 Approved: Z4S5 IZ_ Permit Type: RES-NEW Status: PENDING �fGv✓ Inspector Area: B2 -z'1 'I Z. District/Acct No: 14002847 JQr / Job Address: •4QQ PEN MAR ROAD CA Location: LOR 24889 PEN MAR ROAD Parcel No: 014-19-0354-00042 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: C 7vvw j v• /c, 6IIP `c ci e -' Applicant: Z4�l'Z 400S PEN MAR RD • CASCADE, MD 21719 Phone Number: 717-762-3091 `<_J�.� Owner: v Qa i`-J"&fj2" Contractor: Phone Number: 717-464-9060 Contractor Lic. No: HB-2937 Description: 1 STORY MR RANCHER 1dE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING W��I_n nnn n'rr 1 I LL�MI"l'C'I T-/"1� ALAI r n nn p C�nl.i !1 u rl n(�p n/l/1 /IAIVI , ZvviV'tOcnwyv�l-C SHINGLED ROOF WH 4 rr e ^.,A,,.�`� ANT h1Iu RBI Iru Inl Fllo I Irl R o rH, Foundation Size: 1553.97 Type of Heat...: HEAT Public Sewer...: Y Public Water...: Y Gas............: N Electric.......: Y Exterior Finish: Air Conditioning: Septic............ Time Existed: Well............ Time Existed: Construction Type: Construction Valuation: $170,000.00 Code Enforced: 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL C Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Proposed .33 ACRES .33 ACRES 25 12.7 100 5.3 VINYL STONE Y NA NA NA NA MOD No. Of Bathrooms No. of Bedrooms Minimum By Ordinance 30,000 30,000 25 25 5 5 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313.2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240.313-2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 em M O a id rrm lip 0 lB t:4Hll H L r U d F S n N N H N 3 S N 7 �N i iI is P% II a � I Z i a a � a 2 n N �. 1 T � pl 3 • Z �.. >. `3 �' Q o (o 0 NTAIN T RDy ;-•'{) f , Lsj 1 va •�N IIQ a Q W z d{�1 .4 hnsw�' � CT & k�c 3UENA Ml C \ > q -\ . 7 I- . _. . ; | \ : \/\ � § i � o v r A0 02 > o° y W S9 C o�off. 4 r -O C) oo. O C z /o,, nn J = LD m W O nl A P Z c S�' \\ i s tm1' O N D 11 8 r 4≤ s 0 js A A \ W o 'O A tJC N W N C A g Zco -<pmoy5 Zg4Zb w' d0 o o o W cn W C0 or<p wum vii_ \ >< Z m DATUM PLAT #3093 m Dz C C- c =�D rW rn zo F N O m D OTn h -u X0 O Z m -i N A O•a ® • > Q CI) O p hzl .Zm7 v n ` D CO CO ��_ �^ A Wa .{y 1 n Zj Z03 *b .rn r o o a Any R O y o g ? n m v —I m ' * u a II o zoo o o $, , 'g ' - 0 ` Pen Mar Historic District Pen Mar, Washington County, Maryland • Prepared by TAYLOR & TAYLOR ASSOCIATES, INC. Historic Preservation & Community Development Specialists 9 Walnut Street Brookville, PA 15825 814-849-4900 1999 DISTRICT MAP Scale: 1" = 300' Zfso6 7 Legend: Vii— Nom} iZ 00 'yb District Boundary Contributing Resources [] Non-contributing Resources O [ - -t0 zyJv� P�-N M�2 7/ &�w � �O Gb n `FHVF �.� e zz ®y/© ti flt4 as 'I Mti 1 t9 / Lime O 551 5by5 vy\ \moo �1 NPS Forth to-7wa (9-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service t .<='onal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Pen Mar Historic District Washington County, MD Section Number Page 30. 14507 Maryland Avenue (Brun family summer home): two-story vernacular residence of wood construction, built on a raised foundation on a sloping lot; intersecting gable roof with partial return on the cornice; windows are flat-topped, 1/1 lights; a broad veranda extends across the facade and wraps around a portion of both right and left side with original chamfered posts and sawn ornament (c. 1907) 31. Southeast corner Chestnut Street and Roosevelt Avenue (Crout's Hotel site): wooded corner lot surrounded by a short dry-stone wall. On this site stood the Crout's Hotel, one of the many hotels in this resort area and one of three large hotels which stood within the district, none of which are extant. A short stone obelisk, approximately 21/2 feet in height, memorializes a dog and is set along the Roosevelt Avenue side of the lot; it was carved by Leon Werdebaugh and Roy Moore and originally was on the Park View Hotel property, diagonally across Chestnut Street to the northwest. It was relocated to its present site c. 1970. 32. 14525 Roosevelt Avenue: 11/2 -story Bungalow of wood construction built on a raised foundation with laterally -oriented gable roof and gabled dormer on facade; roof extends over a recessed front porch which is supported by three square columns and is trimmed with a unornamented solid wood balustrade; the original lattice porch apron is intact; windows are flat-topped, 6/6 lights, and are set singly and in groups with simple moldings; the exterior finishes are clad in asbestos shingles (c. 1920) 3 24808 Pea Mar Road: 21/2 -story vernacular residence of wood construction, synthetic -sided, with an intersecting' gable roof and partial return on the cornices; a one-story porch is on facade with turned columns and replacement turned balusters (c. 1912) 34. 24810 Pen Mar Road: two-story vernacular residence of wood construction with a gable roof, gable - end orientation to the street, and a partial return on the cornice; clad in shiplap siding; two -bay facade with a one-story hipped- roof porch extending across the facade and wrapping around a portion of the left side; windows are flat-topped with simple heads and 2/2 lights; a fixed four -light sash is in the pediment of the gable; a repetitive house type and a twin to its neighbor on the right (c. 1900) 35. 24812 Pen Mar Road: two-story vernacular residence of wood construction with gable roof and gable - end orientation to the street with partial return on the cornice; a fixed four -light sash in the pediment of the gable; two -bay facade; windows 2/ 2 lights, with exterior synthetic shutters; clad in insul-brick; one-story wraparound porch extends across the facade and portion of the left side; a repetitive house type and a twin to its neighbor on the left (c. 1915) 36. 24816 Pen Mar Road: two-story vernacular residence with gable roof and gable -end orientation to the street; two -bay facade; exterior veneer of fieldstone; one-story shed roof porch extends across the facade and a corner of the right hand side (c. 1929) 37. Rear, 24816 Pen Mar Road (Pen Rock Hotel foundation): a high, open foundation of rubble stone, approximately fifteen feet in height. This is all that remains of the Pen Rock Hotel which burned c. s � r 5' C N 0 � a a p. w � N h U z 3 d I0 W U IrZ t Z w V^ I - 2 te, ¢,� 2. pp j � ' 1 J w O 1n o Wo€Y N Q j i 161�a1 I I I I l i l I s N 0 0 W Cr H z O 8 z O Cr Cr A W z a can zI O ~ P Oo XWw % 0 O z ; z o O =N M fl 4 Cr v ro Cm Y 00' COG) M H 4) 0 r� ENEH N a C M M � -44 ro .4W0 00 W .14 W ✓ 040 rou 0) 0 000 N✓ NY NN H 0 {4 W 00 0 O P W M. 0 L c H-4) 4 C 14 4 4. 30 H AOH 0.46 yOy+T� Wt ON0 H ~ N pG ❑❑ N N'-1 ,40i A. 0 .-I 000 =Z '9t -.4C e H £ O N 4) 04 404It N N N 0 . 0409 '0-4 m,9rooi e�>"aO 400 roa;, W -44 V Q. WN O -44)9 4404 it roN 000 ro W CCn N'OG FF 60) Eq CO (4 i m R0rtGR H p aovm xo.mI d wow oo !s7 m tto 7m o•N r•p NMNMi-'H 2 ° �" Vt n C•i Fart HWHry N6 "H?C oa•ort — m 7`C Ii,,, Hw o tll WHm r•On Ny FNw O n - z '.+m< Om,- m o_ 1-•-4w II c w m0o m i R N 1i i m• a' p .mrt•o w H -M °Ni y rt G`GmOH n oa o G E�CN•omO m�r�•9Gr'•nrt z • ,_Jo 1100 m. m frt D O m?rt`4 X rt° O•N F'N, o n mI rMG P44 ii NmRmp Om r O y rtrrm rtw M Ito mmoo O 'mi 0 y 0 0 g I DC 2 } G m 9 N J n m H W m w o nIlbm o n • •o YRww a e 2 mwnm 0.0 wF'Y•ww woa H H E? O w ME li 0 _ o 00q0 o g o w m ... wna•o w 0) _ • m '1mO rt 7 Y G �y^yrnT y 9 LLLLLL, mHjT H-0 y n 8$ y N w N [Y 3 Ii n 0 '•m$ n n b o O H rt u E 01: v n M w N m N N I I t4k R Nrrytn m rt G z 0 9 9 - x n Y 4 'tom F' w rt0 c o e roH r•rt 2 ).' Z a n m m () ? 0 7 0 '" 2 [i1 m H'o o m m• tl ^o Part m s iry!m 9 I I 5i T F. ^ S b H W H o z n o °S [4 R m E O i 2 w Y•M a c m P.ma m o a n a mrtm " III II IIm m Y•P• 70�''<�f�O 2 r+aE � m °So 4 o HTH m C H 00 I I I -4 rtam i e a H o c" m C m n y 2 W03 ry 5o 2 tim,-' F' otolt R rt i t1T(JK'7 I LI P � C Y 1 /� rtc A Q ....dam D I 1 .. i td ' : $ I. '. 7 t .o) ketl - it }' ' �� 7d FJ. , �� H. ..- - i r . ..�, - _ _ i/ I N M N a WI N ON T0I-11 00 O O N NH, -IN 0) 4444 H14 UN OH HAY CM r N � U r O 4 vii U = N � = N a Q z uJ w I DZ z I II W N I �sWW - 40 I u 4 I I i I I 0O 00 O N o IcJot Woo • U N o- d N o a 0 o u F. N 6 d C - N 6 N NN N J = ] 6 m 9�l 1 t I - =yzwl o s•e O w n s oI" c s W g 0 0' N ow .4 h W InC o 140 w 4 E Ca Ca z a c O sa z iU m w O w O p as a a F ry U b7° ���E�� a � f i I . :. 6ON rn Vspa �� I1fl' t 9 cam N 00' roOl uc44J.. cal4 �.4i Go0 'a~ N 000 14 M20 ON 0.00 '0.0 OI o x N N p N 0 d Hw W NO • qN 00.0 4441C44 GN1J WOO' N Hro bHa Aro'4 ONl0 O Wt H •M r 0 a V 0 0>>,, v m N 0140 w0Sa .yroN im 44i>00) 00,d.-4 9x .1 >, 000 044,1-I .0014 ON 0x >0� N.CO� 1.) w C N lO HOP,— N 0 • '" 0,'O 1 ro' >1, $4000 , C ai { x "b0 £F4� > F0> row0D D1 'an.'. >0000 >>41444)0 E H0 0114 £ 'tin N W 0 a NOG ✓@ O .0>0000H ENE F RC _ � ■ ` .,, E r§°7=w * ) /d0 O 0OO'4 OF'lb § 2 to 0 -tap- | (. } \ Cl rna\ fl rn'd0:E Cl \ 6 ; '-z to | 2\/ \ /� 0-•0>E rnHO'N (\)(0 | 0-' ( . !: .. .. .. . [ NO' Cr to ( mao N 08O. Cl a O 013 - rtotN }\ 3 O 13w OriNo //\(00 tO to to to 041 III ))(()« 9 1 .!U U ) \ ` §§�(■\� \ !|•;;.� � !! ! LULLL'I )§/o�c!\.. O § ! § (. } :,6[[[; /( ;` i; � )( O O !1 ''4J ": �� €'��_''"`..% �A,!.� fig' 3Ar .� 1� tfl a �r y. ai44A li, y� it �yrrx �e�.r ✓ !r / ` w - j rt/ J > r;i rr s ri y\ r �r \ Y.. y. t t5 "M M 'r"+S< I,3 F I -' :t- L..d�?, .. ;' _ �.af' . Ike t s t>i � u.f . 1 ... ... i _ ., _ - ' _ ..I .._ J,ytrT y>+ft31 ��S f'��7r etrry!{ ' T t y., fY� k>r 'T Y.: J r _ 3 rv} .f .r� � Y ( Fir ! tJ r S .. r r L I ��,,�� _ ,om i r,_ w r � a �"ot'•`i. f 1 .J ,. ._.,:+F .i 1-.;.. yr _< ,r. /✓ .' 0 N a - n I a N ••' N. 3 ¢ O -I 4 ' 6 NO N 00 N W I� I N HY UH} > a ' te w a Nb N z nm o ° w 0W• ,h W w = N - n N •a �[ °�- d � = � Awo iw O y i LL °m a u" 9 W C7 z O � �I o9abd:w O ►►w11 �+ z � O wi!i o F w° =ydo to fGS �' W II a3 a c a z W a a3 a. '.14* 9 tl N m 0 N 44 U 0 C T•N N OH .i H W Ht F a m .m+ a •.1 a U00 N W O 0 N w •.1 14444 0-14)44 AO O N N N N N N H Y P.O •a H 4)O. U v' 0. y LU O a d a+ . Qo }0 ' ONU Ot0N EVN L444 4)044' H t Fm� .0tH OHO N NN'.44t❑5O lit 40>14-> mo HO O . N)m '.404 ?� GI. H0£H �-I ~� N.Ti mm U 404 ON £ 4)0 ry 0 44 > N.i �440 N N0 • H 00 > gro-. 01 '0)0400 C am≥ Z H.IJ'ta m9A O >s )4 Cua N mm 14004 0Al0 7Z. SN roppON N'O0 EWW FA.C HN6 .'i 2 a_ o m ro y oP ff co "�y C M - G r• o r• r• rn o rhoN ao O�mm o 0 rt g$ w O rtW N d N O d H• 0Dl fNi •� "y CO Md 00 0- dWb a 6 2 p Y w w O W rt O' W N Y O Y G Y OD DO m r., 09MNd o' 0.00 K m NCO °' drora wa°ur• in M n w N Co CO w w W n w n Y rt N" 3 Y`4 G rn y v .y. Dl ..w0nNYWO O• 0 M N Di p £wN Z H rtOw MYROG N r1r•Yw IT(N ° _ a I1 Dl 00y W Wm It tt n4 N70 x w d a w n nac O w H.ctO n r DiCofl -" p� M NHn WNNR'w WO x ycS Co v o N. w n °•-° m n 2 c 0 wd H roO•No d rtr'I Wn 2 oa m wrd•••wd 0 m = A� H Goa. (IIIM W w O w w n o 0 O N YN N w H tM1nd 7`GOwWMW 9 D w Y a 0 N om N O Y O• II om4104 Cdocn 0 ry ONmp. r• �pHpvikw o 0000.• Z o n o rt7 m d° roW O n d N .i. rZil N w m 8 8 P 8: o 3 c r 0 0 y - mme r O- 0 a w � s�l�gl6. £N z m wFn ro In m py om y M rt003 �Q Cro a> � LH nr• o�s� Ra3� i$) f :0 0; 2_ w y x R e 7 3 o n lJ O x y o < 9'.. Co m N ; O M I. m i r 0 W III � � II .Ai i S MY4dJ fiGl ~�rM� 9rp E E t< 1 S 7`4+ r Crr ♦ " 8 i, ,.' e'. �.c,.. �tl�+ c a� A . elf, Bi!a.:•.,eTy d . -:j e1t'- a' a _ '�' rt• ,• �; 7.. y t � a i m .. } t .Y . . '� ,a �r w '.' � _. ��/ U z O U 0 FO 0 El I ra 0 04 0 o jxf v to a, CO N 0 N C WC lid 444. N5 S4 U C N C >r•N 0-H o H H w bj H p a p Ill 00C C H H'F1 O 00 w 'H w u U 0.90 "a 4 -k N N N.A H NON Y N U 3U Wk M V >rNa 140 ai H p• N N O o N a' • o u T a+ s+ 1 O'O m P m H F C '4 W .i •.V Ca (0 > NN a,o0 H 'O M ANN "HIT N y' UNN N NTJ •H H • S m 0 C N m N r. H $ N N C N HN 44 44 Cl/lbHN (0020 • H pp7 'OH �' ,0 040CC 'a PN N OH£Hi6" O 9> G C V a 14 -�N>Hl.�O F NGW. >>y0 Na'N 9No Z 6• GGr o NN N'OC E ra C~ S '- F .a Ici H H N C 03 °04 w � o .8 ol > 1 M O I rt w m H 1-0 O N 'OJ ° o N O rtH° n2O'-4 a I lu d Q a m • Cl ? g C7 H O£ < X r m O"db H m H d 0. o 0 n m 3 m 7 m Q Cl0400H40 N m H N w 4 --Colt mN(L?O' n a y N N N N S OO w t- O Y• COON`<m O N w<.7NF'MN TN N n y z ro N w M 3o'mEaaeHw m 2 Ic r>o'Domn00 m M n N O. •O'Y-rtH x 9 x'm o p C d C m m N N$ y H O CO'w m ro n to I g Imp o N 2 C w rt rt o o' Ym Hm O mY H"naw00H0'CO o =N y rtn0mrt0H 0 Ii odH O No o PC H D tO O N IY IY N C H ID CO N Ip'd P. n N N O T pp4�1 n Ss O 'd YYm H 'C .c m rtn E N ty n to N O '~" 2 K 70 Y•w•Og w IYSY' F map Y•m o M'd m i = = o OO N 0. rt� A0 04040 O'p' i 0 aN COH O C N m O n a itnpo PCnrr -'0rr. n am tort 00_m 9 E-,0- D O W rt dlr'r D ;c N O P H 4 -'-CO Z rt O H tY N 0 0 0) ° J! ry D O --horn 0 O . •OQ MOO Y• MrtYHo oT' m N•w �N I-M rtg .7 400440r1 < IV rt R w N N w •�',.Y O'r N Mb •9 C £ w ro rt N HY•HnY•w • r'-iSyan° OG Cl I -H O•d rt0 CO CO Ir) t-"drnHrr A x_ Z 04-h w0 z �°'r z been^° ° ro•a' rr'.Y .H H o m ^ z o°rtw7 CO CO In z z i + c 0 rt N r• w ft s g q ;; c "HcMC O ° 'O' a gc rw 4 C) r rtr'q O Y N 10 1-' n Cl •.. 3 °°Hrow6 rt rt 00 n Wna"dm a 0_n m m o a 9 w n N rn LIII I N H m o rn y O C. rti oTi C�ZSOmL p OO'H CO Zj V1 a 0t -'-41-'-r? 21 O rtH - _i i; y Z x= N H [ii T N •1 T. m 0 s O n - - O H m rt n - Y•Y•k Y• O O i Z Y J] N O rt O _ 3 __ m G O w H w O 0 n 01-ti01-ti z x 40 •%d' rt 2II I m ~> TJ m m 0 2 ° r Y•rt .2 SC m H -HO O. 00400 HMUN N N —I i +� w O w m OW m p7Hr• Ott tort M O O d Mm MO rt 19 1 1 I^ H a'wrIo 1 0 0 R G rtP rtN<o OlOt 2; 1D N n ' c m 0> Cl C w M Og rt0H -C-- - z 00 COO 3 C000 p n 2 J jC1 ' 1 .&S7!(//!'l./l:. l't-fit s 0 '0 In N. _ C. N N I-.. n N w W CO >4n.1Ii1a W 'Xi II I I iIC.4U _ w > B F o D N WIn=1F '0 Ii Z I N w N Ou N I F p Y sw0 _ Q vii 00 NGr`. • U 01 " 2 zwG o a „UaDa — _ I I N O z N J >- O I� r u o y F a r z =:<�m�s ° 6 C ° Q W Q i m d a z z • < IKI . ii P. " •H va y p o 0 0 0 ° z_ I- u 0 4-Sz 1iYgi x .4 w 0 0. m NC o O a6 'i ti Q y a W N ¢ t C Z (ii O o88 }i W 2(x� N 0 - a H U a e N � • s i U w 44, W a 6 UVS W Y a Q w u Ur a `o I" a W .C•v 00 0 O m 0 -i a 4 o a z ... a i a < o 0, a�•�. yj; O �.C7� a m a = NFY4;- 4eya 11 Of"<°"e u 8 ®gwoaCaJt 0 0. 4000 S0\ x.x N O 0 ri.404 It pa , ro l L 0P SW H0 44J 4,54 U C 4 4 C A•.i O•H N M .1 C 0 C C 54 H w O 00 W 'H ,444 w NY 7 0.00 a) NH 'H 4,04] HY U 41 300 wC O •hP 40 ° YU 050) 45 . k"a •14J-4 0104, 9IS-4 0100 C C 4- E Y N > ul N 0 O' .i •O 1Yf.i� '0ro4 N O+Q 05'1 IS NN•CtlC 00 0 0a)I4(0 NGN >I>.N m5Se WISH 4 .i (L M 0 .H 4)054 N Oi£ > O.i 10.50 ."iv0•ii "C'W 54000 014a)C V14'. 0 C5 E rC " v o .i CCOUO 0 I4aI)0 401 I0✓ 99{a11000 (1) HO gNg LG "CN v 01'OC y Hades.. ° H4a s O z fr.q Z to z 00 (CO 0Y to hl !O] tJ rtfl C•%r m w rt 00 0 1°-+ C moo w o rt HiH (1 Y• O p m m 8 m 'Ion N 1- HO O E N Y'J n Yw N N N Y• w R . X ti O n n n O Xn O m v E N 2 00 N n o w nro m z N aw 7 n (00_n N G = • rtfr O N ww •d z •d n n ° m w 030 fl_ o rt OY• n N 2 2- <0 Hi o n ° x z o m x 9H z ° = O ° T A TH K N np a Co mao 0) o 40'> N 0. v X N D 3 Z 0-0)g O ZOO '0 of - m 0l -- 40 - (CO 7 <H m rt N I Ni 1 1 1 ! S 8 = - o n e ffi n o 0 N I I 0 o b b (D L o no 5> LLLLLLkL m3N _Horns z z a n _x n x o `c ~ I I I ° . it 6i'l• -, f EBI C O N S U L T I N G www.ebiconsulting.com July 20, 2006 Mid -Atlantic Regional Office 6876 Susquehanna Trail South York, PA 17403 Tel: (717)428.0401 I Fax: (717)428-0403 Mr. Steven Goodrich Washington County Historic District Commission, County Planning Office 100 W. Washington Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Subject Invitation to Comment in Section 106 Consultation Process 10290 /SMITHSBURG MD 1 1664 Mapleville Road, Smithsburg, Maryland 21783 EBI Project #61062566 Dear Mr. Goodrich: In accordance with FCC NEPA rules and Section 106 of the NHPA, the above -referenced telecommunications project is being evaluated by EBI for its potential effects to districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, or culture that are listed, or potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Based on EBI's review of the characteristics and location of the proposed project, the project does not meet the exclusions stated in the "Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission," dated September 2004, ("Nationwide Agreement"); therefore, the project is required to undergo Section 106 review with the State Historic Preservation Office. This letter is to invite Washington County Historic District Commission, County Planning Office to review the attached plans for a proposed telecommunications facility located at the address noted above. On the date of EBI's site visit, EBI observed a wireless telecommunications facility that generally consisted of a monopole telecommunication tower upon which approximately 8 antenna arrays were collocated. The antenna arrays were collocated at an approximate elevation of 100 feet above the base of an existing 102 -foot monopole tower. The height from the base of the monopole to the top of the antennas Is 112 feet above ground level (AGL). Additionally, an emergency generator located adjacent north-northwest of the monopole, equipment shelter located adjacent west of the existing monopole and telecommunications support equipment adjacent north of monopole were observed. The emergency generator, equipment shelter and telecommunications support equipment were observed to be located within an enclosed tower compound (Project Site). Telco cabinet located adjacent north and a pad -mounted transformer located northeast outside the tower compound were also observed. American Tower Corporation (ATC) proposes to extend the existing 112 -foot monopole including all appurtenances to an elevation of 156 -feet. The Project Site Is currently covered by gravel. On behalf of American Tower Corporation (ATC), we are inviting comment on the project's potential effects to districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, or culture that are listed, or potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP. We would appreciate any comments you wish to provide regarding the potential effects of the proposed facility on any historic property in a letter directed to the address noted above within the next 30 days. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or concerns on the proposed project. Respectfully Submitted, Ebenezer Agbobli Staff Scientist (717)428-0401 ext. 1217 Appendix A — Figures, Drawings, and Maps ENVIROBUSINESS, INC. LOCATIONS I ATLANTA, GA I BALTIMORE, MD I BURLINGTON, MA I CHICAGO, IL CRANSTON, RI I DALLAS, TX I DENVER, CO I EXETER, NH I HOUSTON, TX I LOS ANGELES, CA I NEW YORK, NY I PHOENIX, AZ I PORTLAND, OR I SAN FRANCISCO, CA I SEATTLE, WA I YORK, PA a=EBI C O N S V L I N C; (rooting Value fo, Your llueineos ! d b If Legend * Project Site L ®e Site Buffer at 250,500', 1000' and 1 /2 mile Figure 1 - Site Location Map 10290/SMITHBURG MD 11664 Mapleville Road Smithsburg, MD 21783 PN: 61062566 Source: Selected data from ESRI. EBI and NWI A O 0 500 1000 feet C O N S U I. T I N C CreaAng Volae (or You, flits fists, ,/may.. 1i , fi `_'~ e • « ILI y(`ti. t 1 t 3 � � � (�'�{ �IV�,I tltlb^iW#'►` Id Y R��A 'aeF• \�6tl�Yut ti f .♦♦�G11; a ltl dia l,r'^'� f9 rPk f It $ # � p tl �.. �1 3 � rl�il I � 41 \' vS-v'' �II� $ I ',i• 11 t 14�A ♦'1it�s N6e I� r(♦ &, ♦ R k k IP 1� .� i t" E'p&ais c`�e a �♦ .r;�prfP �4 ( � a' m,,. I - r ,' S: `At1:Mx*k . t a s a wr„�* e e ♦ p �`! Y q+ , a ♦a �1p t �Y e x 11 ♦ ..,�afl x 1 u 6 ..k a Y IL;\ 11 ! e f ;// /'(/)11 1 6.�.���t J i �`��♦- ( `� 1 � � Legend * Project Site d° Site Buffer at 250, 500', 1000' and 1/2 mile USGS 24k Quad: Smilhsburg, Maryland Source: Selected data from ESRI, EBI and USGS Figure 2 - USGS Quad Location Map A 10290/SMITHBURG MD 11664 Mapleville Road Smithsburg, MD 21783 0 Soo 1000 PN:61062566 feet CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards?' Areas in which the Principal Investigator meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards: Other "Secretary of the Interior qualified" staff who worked on the Submission Packet (provide name(s) as well as well as the area(s) in which they are qualified): 3. Collocations and Site Information a. Street Address of Site: 11664 Mapleville Road City or Township: Smithsburg County / Parish: Washington State: MD Zip Code: b. Nearest Cross Roads: Republican Avenue / c. NAD 83 Latitude/Longitude coordinates (to tenth of a second): N 390 38 ' 18.33 "; W 770 35 ' 39.74 " d. Tower or non -tower structure height above ground level, including proposed collocation:7 156 feet; 47.55 meters e. Description of antennas to be collocated (e.g., type, number, shape, dimensions, color): American Tower Corporation (ATC)proposes to extend the existing 112 -foot monopole including all appurtenances to an elevation of 156 -feet above ground level (AGL) and collocate antennas on top of the monopole. f. Approximate height of collocation above ground level: 156 feet; 47.55 meters; if antennas to be located on different levels, describe their placement. g. Structure. This Form CO pertains to collocation of antenna(s) on: ® a communications tower or ❑ a non - tower structure (check one). If a non -tower structure, briefly describe the structure: 6 The Professional Qualification Standards are available on the cultural resources webpage of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior: <http://www.cr.nps,gov/local.law/arch_stnds_9.htm>. The Nationwide Agreement requires use of Secretary -qualified professionals for identification and evaluation of historic properties within the APE for direct effects, and for assessment of effects. The Nationwide Agreement encourages, but does not require, use of Secretary -qualified professionals to identify historic properties within the APE for indirect effects. See Nationwide Agreement, §§ VI.D.I.d, VI.D.I.e, VI.D.2.b, VI.E.5. 7 Include top -mounted attachments such as lightning rods. Applicant's Name: American Tower Corporation Project Name: SMITHSBURG MD Project Number: 10290 Page 3 FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours American Tower Corporation (ATO proposes to extend the existing 112 -foot monopole including all appurtenances to an elevation of 156 -feet above ground level (AGL) and collocate antennas on top of the monopole h. If the antennas will be collocated on a communications tower, check the appropriate box: ❑ guyed lattice tower ❑ self-supporting lattice M monopole ❑ other (briefly describe tower) i. Structure Completion. Indicate the date that the existing communications tower or non -tower structure was built (date on which construction activities ended): May 24. 2000 J. Section 106 Review. Has the communications tower or non -tower structure been the subject of SHPO/THPO review pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act? If so, identify the company that made the submission, the date it was submitted, and the SHPO/THPO reference number. k. Based on the Applicant's research (see Attachments 8 and 9), Is the existing communications tower or non - tower structure listed or eligible for listing in the National Register? ❑ Yes ® No 4. Current Status of Collocation:' a. ® Construction and/or installation not yet commenced; b. ❑ Construction and/or installation commenced on [date] ; or, c. ❑ Construction and/or installation commenced on [date] and completed on [date] _ 5. Applicant's Determination of Effect a. Direct Effects (check one): i. ® No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects ("APE") for direct effects; U. ❑ "No effect" on Historic Properties in APE for direct effects; Iii. ❑ "No adverse effect" on Historic Properties in APE for direct effects; iv. ❑ "Adverse effect" on one or more Historic Properties In APE for directs effects. b. Visual Effects (check one) I. Z No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects ("APE") for visual effects; Ii. ❑ "No effect" on Historic Properties in APE for visual effects; Hi. ❑ "No adverse effect" on Historic Properties In APE for visual effects; iv. ❑ "Adverse effect" on one or more Historic Properties in APE for visual effects. Failure to provide the Submission Packet and complete the review process under Section 106 of the NHPA prior to beginning construction or other installation activities may violate Section 110(k) of the NHPA and the Commission's rules. See Section X of the Nationwide Agreement. Applicant's Name: American Tower Corporation Project Name: SMITHSBURG MD Project Number: 10290 Page 4 FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET-- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060.1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Certification and Signature I certify that all representations on this FCC Form 621 and the accompanying attachments are true, correct, and complete. Signature Stephen Forrest Printed Name July 14. 2006 Date Historian Title WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (U.S. Code, Tide 47, Section 312(a)(I) AND/ OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Tide 47, Section 503). Page 5 Applicant's Name: American Tower Corporation Project Name: SMITHSBURG MD Project Number: 10290 FCC Form 621 January 2005 j O G s N Z O O I I 4 1 1 1 N A. ¢ a 4 . u 'ten s 8 41 M .] W a O 0 1 I" N d Cl) OVC O NW N. WY 4-I`O N NNE N ` b N 0ll C MC >,•ti O• q, N. a, N0C ro- 01, .740 M �1'ir1 aH 5 000 $4 W 0 7. ry O N W 00 14-44-I OAU '0Y N U NON MY NL NH H 1{4 0. 1100 O a N ✓• 0 a Y v 41-4-Jr-I-M. CCY A RJ '4H 1-1 T H U N O 1401, m 0) '0 10104-I O. *0m O O � 0 M N N N ti W ..4 O~pIp yO'40 mmr! O H£ O N W 00, -IN OX uN 17'1 o L 0 O H0 .' 14 roy ~ y ro rl ca w. a u ..Irk. u wet 140)00 M +1 0) p1 41W0 '014.4 C 0 �0 0 O P•.ZE4I4" 0 H U 'OW '0 0 ❑0UO HUVW Q14441a, d C >0 H O 0CI $4014 E +I N 01 1 0 Pi C 1 C 0.'w Y o� f L� a' O N N'0 0 F c o Q? a u a :a W04L w'0 0ao n H f4 z to P HW N ....E w H T N n40 R o-rt µ a oao m a' 0 G m WtOow Ommel as ,— H Hm r,RW v Z q H ry y CC 99 W C M k d m O m n - a n F m w g w x 0 0 rtaHm µO• n Z p H HP' 0- rt`G n m 0 m "< m x M R W s H t} N H P' Cono rym o O O m, -t0 0 M o mdw 2 on rrttrtP "l O m n<OP'Yrtrt rtry0`CmOH£ 2 C --n ,-ontmo z CGontma di'G z - o c -too • r O rt 0 m m o m o�n'1 = x HOHmo' - +, 1 1 n nd i Y` m P•wlm-M m₹ x tmtnOda."<a f O r H (9 CO on w o . z v A o in {DEP 9wOP' W O W0nmP) it. rtwM m m r o n COcoon CD P o > - 01100 I4 - C m 9 000 r mill --COP) n 2 flat p NCa . m m R v₹ x n !01-'n000fl. •°wnm v�7 m Pm wrY•ww wao HOHH WE'P' OME UPwoo -0 OtJon wrtGo p O Y. mm il rt?. aROH c LLLLLL.V rto•H n 88 § i a c-totM S �° n MRWO a Lffiue $ 4i m C -1 m L -H,mom rt N rt{ n W IIyy��ppn��II I n S 4 1 n 9 n Ct D m 2 ~ nor? y ldiq i oc (Gr SOH Y•rt O 0 0 O m - - _ n Mw CD 00 Onfl_OJ no ^n mna �rtO•£ L LL M L. rl << T 0 o on H W Y• •C D 3 m WR w < M n II I I I I Q cs Dort 0-. £ m Y•n. o2v. OH- P E m s W 0o in rnE s no - s P• H - r p y 4- MOCO H -onto So H m r W W 9 R R 0 ja -Pk-✓ /xa �.� � ��JF s l .� � j# r io b 'ciT IJ 'IB 35 09 . 1 m!vexs c-: t-tfr�y._ a �s .s -v. ,.{s.. - ri P p i __ _ U TC July 13, 2006 Mr. Steven Goodrich Washington County Historic District Commission Washington County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 RE: Historical Inquiry MD2482A — Rohrersville Trego Road/RohrersvilleRoad Rohrersville, Maryland 21779 Dear Mr. Goodrich: 8989 Herrmann Drive, Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21045 www.atcassociates.com 410-381-0232 Fax 410-381-8908 WAStUNCTOrI COUNT" PLAP N!NG DEPT. Nextel of the Mid -Atlantic, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications is planning to construct a 150 -foot tall monopole north of the intersection of Trego Road and Rohrersville Road, in Rohrersville, Maryland. The proposed facility will consist of the location of a 150 -foot tall proposed monopole with an eight -foot tall lightning rod and placement of associated equipment within a 60 -foot by 60 -foot fenced area. Any comments regarding the potential effects of the proposed facility on any historic property should be directed to: Mr. Randolph Hoenes, Staff Scientist, ATC Associates Inc., 8989 Herrmann Drive, Suite 300, Columbia, MD 21045 or by phone (410) 381- 0232. Please provide comment as to whether the placement of telecommunications equipment and the antennas will affect any historic property of interest to your organization. I have included a USGS Quadrangle illustrating the site location and a copy of the lease exhibits. ATC appreciates your timely response to our request. Sincerely, ATC ASSOCIATES INC. Randolph Hoenes Staff Scientist Enclosures ENVIRONMENTAL, CEO TECHNICAL AND MATERIALS PROFESSIONALS _ v�NtS t r e - t II) i / 1a 1 , I n e`J �.� fir p, it ' ,t�'fI� 12 ' .r' �� '° +rc 4- )4' i".h ri �i i� N li aI Ili.l , ,? F . ...A... i�•. il� t. '.,";,,,1 1 W s n x 2 € - a Zo6Fa" c I s w w I I I' I I I F o Q O '0 = Wo _ Y _O�maGc� U N O 6 ¢ -I_2 -w W _o - O Q 4D i t �., 3awwg 2 va�i s 4 I I I}Ip4 o z O 0 0 Z u �. w 3 N > p z O W o tl 8 z;< z m o 3mz;>dw O o OR N x Wwo i N O ¢ - H :.C &-h°i w Z !Jd C' F GW� ' ` W y U z a W O O C a 0 0. N IflO3 4p a 00 O rkm k 0 OT 0.4 A H v� H a w Ct U) z U m o O O d o w W 0 i U U a o- N(60 Ob' dC Ni NM Hrom C>, ab app 0 0 0 k w W Y W H L O 0 0.-I H N O N k w 0 N Y (6W k 04 NWo. 0001 ' U' >we 14(6.1 40 HNN W H•M M b/� Arok �0 ONN H •>1 Nat '0 ro odU 00)4W W £H m m�>, 14.104 M.00 0 w N O "N £ 0'A COHN 0£ > N H (6 (60 (600 � 0� k m S{N +C > '(1I4..4row �� £H 0 00E (6 04;I k O U W ro .->>�Nrod v0M 0 H .4 U� 140'44 (6 (1) (644 tok y N N'0 GCG EARH a) H(E 01 f t4„ § :OO " k \2Hrt0 § 2 DO § ;;)2 to • \ } }o � d !�d \®E } 8 ; 100 nO§ | ;! 2\/ /| (to{\�/ [ ; In ! t > E /tO ! ,3 ;a ..�.� .. [ /\\H, \I \ 000 q\ \/`E rto H' On 0100 ortHon \ }}orotiw to IU LLLLLL., t ) ;;��■�� \ r° ;° p to :(§:§:,/( ))|!4■§§§ {'.T;§| ( )(',\ )| () ` )| / C \\ LI v :;!rr a . ;4!D a!!sI'#! i. v�K3f�i 4: l>;i:P Y , fitj '4I 'r c, �y PPPP xl 7 - I II \ ` �, it \\ t v t t%t Sr lil 31 ' t } li k: vt4^t'T.yd ` �'�I\•\Y�Nr( {.�� L�°"'�`s°�IT�w�'.. ; � i '1 �`�. rir .'A a, g �r.,f _ � +rTSY-H^m fn') yr' � C 'P'1•` �+ t4 c 9� e 1 ti r 1 t ae f�.a RyA �'`ii, aM e' YY F + I I "l • r v� .- .'}" sue.-.�a-,..'" tk--,..,:. "'�' --'� _ -,,.. s ;.'- _ - r ? l j 6; r y ••) r ,ix Dr • __ __ v , x .,.�d.,A••xa'Yti��'rt?jry-�'.RF Mk],d. n .ZBrt. d.T i}t ` LL�Ji�^II W\ Ip� (•. e �c d ^ n 3 fit" ..ry( )J�` YF f ky k. ) 'r '`"t- t,"'7� t'll \ .��-.'z � c4:iJ i F f �:4 : _ .n In. o O on a U, U, vIus o N N H = w u r U LL NNu Q'04 W I� >HIn01 i r 0y FINP.H U'w - a x O?xF=r x W V1.O <'.4 tQ N6 > r3 fa Fi W £ CL a z u F w a $ N W Nl r -I C _ Z iS ¢ u Q _ x F !� p .. .. 0' t- z we N O. F'. Ca Q Wwo 4 u~i oS'm_ G: 17 1 — = N Q=N = z (Yi Q w q o ¢�oyu¢n c0 y ro U Ca J O w F W O N W Q W u. o a C7 ows z W .a a C a=≥aW o ii a o Z ti p �' G G Wm C. ,. wN O w w W ? s z • w • m .114 a. ¢. V 0 N roro NMO)14 ~ •.W o O A o N mom 3 .� 0 e' • • CND 1 v 0m .aa "'4 O. -I 0..1 M N O01 'a)4J 0)..4 NN a 0 H O W mom 01 H H u N .d - NOo HYN i•N H C+q O 0)iat - U1 I N N pro H00)0 02Z a+ w 4.'0)0) O 4) �o °a0 u .4O)O. M 41 4J 0 �Am 01 ON Eaa- H F AroIi 0.0 m>�a>i li'H P.- >I1� q OOO O, N FO> "°v .A vN' >O , wo O 44O)4 ENB N ONN .I H o0'I,'m •.N4 0 E H O4N O. Em Z4 o E' 5151 Z it CY OY•S£N H'rtO H•w 1 C MOO HHG H' Y G'M 7 w.0 M w w `i w w m E m n M mo "•w ny pp o9 OMYG Y O' MM Qpagawo % aOrtwaPC • COo N• p ro rtrt a w C d OH a•H rtYw w l> N•N a0MY000 a FROM MYM�EN w M 0Htw-'H 0I --'w g O w M y O Y c -t '0 00wGL� a'm7mpN•c owo rt01 'd w 0000141 m H H w w w ,T 0'O CD G C`e O0 a'd P•H `C row HOH•PH ro N00 rtH H -re 'O•M rtfH-y ',YMN AIO04C"O W H G'Coa M0M M4 410' C CD '4 rtpwKg AHOO a OwCM6 GMDgH �p n7 H%M o o'MF °G •rown� rt µ p m a M M mop a CCfi o � M b z p z � m o ^ o o D y $ y LtkL 1 1 1 1 ��88�8$ o m y Dy+ � a ^ � • s F ^cw M 3 Cc oc Z • mro i ym 2zR� �7 n o 7 9 ^ a 0M LI till H'N• o x c c= i L O •E01 z�gno;�3� Y i≥ n m Zr ^ 0 2. y - ac > I. y p m H f H' 0 m 0- ' 0 LLLLL 9N��2mc i Ff°�°✓f 2h\ 1� ��l J /;ice, \,,?r .I .` f' rvo � 1 -� ` xi; yam•,. +`� 5 r /%: %,��Smithsbu t s ' Q n/b fly / q✓� dP�f °At \I' 8 ii .. rE— Sem O /� ` ll_ _-' (H 0e --, rstoolnn / I yi •[( _ I V " Yn�i. �+ /� � R � '' jz 'Y`�-mot 1 /( � d t ',` iW �� q \ l T p MYE - 't -t :7:;t N5 3oiu r[L.i 'V Ins 35 Is ea � b .. ' /f - r .�- ,f .�r �t� t �•"�' t>,{ � `"^ '� '''x*.�rT.^+ wr r 'F 8� 1 r 1 L an �� 1MtFll8 It, ♦Y e � r tlt!I t3���t P` I .. r�7,p Mp �, i�l�\ rr�"1, U r J" rO 0C4 M N cc) O U U -l-I U FI N GHC1 ❑£M W 0 - N D O V = O N Q O = N N O K N z O U- W 5 O -C > N m z w C z ox o w; o Za ,C z d av wH 0 z v a.d Ca C7 z Ca W z z a F z y a H U C N Q a,a, C H p I- m N H UC4 E GG NH >i M O .H 0 0 i Nrom 0>I C U 0 I~ U O C O M W 0 O W IS, W '144. w mu 0.00 ro u d a, ---, H1 U O 00N N U N 41 5 aC u 00 z w a ¢ t 0a, !J r ^J 0 V z m N O 3 CbU CCU HUN • 0 U M> (WV� O� H U N N Z "' w O N ro ..I .i v`ti rode oo ✓� W ro C H N N N m HM I.7 mbM V C E ¢ v W ou H 000 >I. i G J O .Oi Ft N S OC roH• a c E E o W 6 O W G> U .ou > C N - - x .i°a Wrom 4roiC O >>N.. UVLL >O E LO Z aNaNN o w 114 ENO 1 yy W O < G4 ro Oa 014 a x E 6 uS m ._. W C S 2 .0001 C1 E D R .-i F N fi 01 oVe Wi '�`o "o >0 '-ho ,-•R w NH N H w m 2 O 0.043 o n rt H (N rt H !m d H£ 0 E 7 m m- 0 0 O R ° y N r S rt 00h0 C"1 4320d 'd H m H .d ro w o m N H m w N o 0 .. N N N N 3Qr3 r O wwwy--iii Y- w7om`m Cl O O w<7NrrnN n z m33043 2 m m n' c Co Rn z 0 o rt n C I l r m 7 7 r n m o. H- o H• R H ci CC K m 0 2 C d C m -o m 'J N N Y- H= Hrt rwm0 'R0o7.7WRrt z ° m O' p r< w aQ 7 a• N Z 0. N m G W m m H m N a H O o 2 N H£ H 0 M - RnmmICH C, 00tH cop, 430 H m43 2 N rtrt0 C H m P. rt 0 -op -oft- N md aRN00 = '� • n di -•h -f0 H z i rt O E 7nm N m 090 a.QQ w f ' x FIn0 z 0430 H00.C r•mmwnQ o roam(. RorvCd A0 0-0-43 Crt.m'd Erm0 N rpm- HH000. O N C 'd N 6}CE m P Y•rt9wmm Yp.• r 7 2 d 2 d R Y• v - m m rt 000' 9 . 0H,CN p•000 N• y �n fl 2 HRY•0 D °n m 0000 z rt O H 7 m 0 0 N a rn n m R Y• - 0 7 0H a rn rn00 7rtw >m rtmHo w• Y•°Q •� m n< m R rt N 0 0 0 '.H`d O'9 G G E W r o rt H N (-Co IY•w m-4 0 • 0-000-0.R nw w rna (--add N H n 0 (0.437 WNE 030 00 w 0. Y• 0w rrt00 O no r0030- R OH 0-< m N w m w on43 o G w n 0'H 7C IF -'0 rw 0 m m 0 r d 0. ft rnrwpN Wrt 7•dm rt m H 7n 430 w n 0 M H m 0 0 n 0 w. R c -f O Ot nGo 0 r•R n G 0 m z•m 0 0. H m rt Y• Y• .0 NOR O O w w H Y• 2 (-'.0 � " mHH • k7 rt 1(3P OH - 43 N m w N m 0.13 43 Y•H0 a d m C F QQ Cl N wowm P3 2m• w M7o0 Mm to o H a' N R0 R o my m C am R N H H Cl 4303 00 N 2 n R 0.(-" hr 1 1 L L 1 - o "•oe o d E El Ca I 01, ti fa O O H A 0 4-3 t Iy z F y z z a i•i v 4) CN +)COO O T 4<0 N.C LH 444-3- NE M ° k G PC H H W COCH 4<0 .1 J CO 00<0 N .1 W 0 O N W 4 3444-3 0-40)4-I J 0 va 4-I 0 0m N roa°+ NN H ak .4 00 0 'T 0 4-40 +.I 40 yym� 2. IIJ�+ 4.4 4) N 000'0• N CO ,-1 O0G HNN 0)<030)0 444 > N V 0 0 P N ro ro' NOQ UNN 0)'tl -I H <3 '0 ro ro.✓ im O0)i4 Caro >. >, a"i A0Ze N H WHO. 0 H .rod ?I 0 0 0 xx 'I •°> H4 -43W c°a .N <331 0M 000 CNN HN O.- 4.2 Si Nko 14W2 0 '0344 F n '00102 3WQ.•4 0000 '0 ro .l�trod d4 0� 0 � >Uw H a aivd 4-) O 'O 2 0 O CCN N'O C F Si>iE4.QGH H N d Cs--, Y O 2 k 09 Y m03°q H ' 4 c y (0 N N N ml 0 O G m axrt o 2 O my E O O n a y N N O_ m crn rn N C -c -ti-' o v y ro n ° m w 00- Ii- v 0 rt 0- C) N N M m G X ' n x >01 c m z 00' 0-i F ° 3 o N O n T a Y Y• O N 000 w ' No. m o n c= ad co S 0' • m z n C „ m m aE O n- Sn- N m w m rt m N I L O k N m 9 art• 9 4 L L L L w - b 4o $ y Cm00 noo e e em ee w o o y ° ft MY• Y• rt N n n•by N a - S - O O a 3 Z~ i i i [y^• N Y•OGO n C O C 0m n i r S m o c y LLnn Hon [J, mHw m ywo no ac -ti, M rtmm 9 LU III 0310 ° iz4 oO G0 ° n k rt '-C m HG. c Ee r ; n 'O F m = z IDI rt ° wo x x P' `* ^ I Ic 1 1 on . m F n n t11-0 rt < Y•m n rt 0 o 10-0 5 '-4cI n l 1 1 b Y• H N 0-0 g- m m 00 05 _ rt Y• z P 03 &Iwc.�.0 � /.�/,/`; l f✓ /fir i( Y�I ` o ... y r / J;. -- y . ISzm O (% 1Jv JI/ ca 9. ±w. ! V ia coo , 18 35 7 ,, `^'y 3 % i TOPOI map printed on 06/23/06 from "Untitled.tpo" 77°40.000' E WGS84 77°39.000' E I' I• / ��-�,f _f J'1 _ — �o\ 9°?€° 1a„ {@off 2LMS?J 'CZ � $4!O ffiTh I 1er� + r N N R 'rA_.rm '�8 Gans 1I u•\,� 603 S !`7� .�� / �% �i �1 ' ,1 �* � �� /(�Cc KSi _______ �. 3t tS\ Qy _ f i '{ > u_.- t •.nom J -_ �� o A / / ler i i N 77°40.000' E WGSB4 77°39.000' E MN JTN 1 1 MILE 10'/:° ®DDO FEET 0 500 1000 METERS Map created with TOPOI® @2002 National Geographic(wu°w.nationalgeographic.corritopo) SITE VICINITY MAP - NEPA (VATC bID2482A-Rohrersville Keedysville, Maryland -West Virginia Trego Road/Rohrersville Road SCALE: As Shown Rohrersville, Maryland 21779 ASSOCIATES I N C. - J tV � 4-+1 0UGHTNINO ROD zn .- m n >j - z 'd' = O TOP OF LIGHTNING ROD 150' AGL TOP or NIIENNA62' AOL \ vo TOP Of„TOWER 160' AOL O NoP C,z m BOTTOM OF ANTENNA 148' AOL o ¢ m zz J 0 o PROPOSED (12) NEXTEL PANEL N F n io ANTENNAS, (3) TWA'S ANO (16) 00) fi q <�� 1 6/8' COAX CABLES. (4) K o ANTENNAS, (1) ETA AND (5) W a CABLES PER SECTOR, 3 z o z SECTORS TOTAL SECTOR t (y ORIENTED TRUE AT 30', 61O 160'. AND 270 160', AND R1 O' TRUE NORTH. < a RAD CENTER 160' AOL 0,o W J 8 � wN Z Y h � W fR1A� ID 0 to w Cj 0) 0 J Z o r� S N r CS W Nz c -C ¢' o m U O o Jo J w o Z o m o LT ww� F- o CPS ANTENNA .w (/) cO Z I- O (TYP. OF 3) L_ 0 _ IW O PROPOSEDPROPOSFIT utw NEXTEL I 12'x20' NEXTEL o o q m p w �, P ICE BRIDGE EQUIPMENT °o6 R C= O = w PROPOSED 8' FENCE SHELTER z v m¢zz �. J Q J n z W m C � ¢ m>` )n LLJ Q I 141$09F "�a z 200 flThvvoavk <�azo U a z3 zaz'° JEEz 00 UZ >Z PROPOSED MONOPOLE DETAIL N.T.S. u�zyW oo¢�¢ r¢v zOSzm EIWO o�aoa ((/) ci / >E M. \ ( W ^ J ' r cc:. to/ \ .c 0] � a %) o.° - o5 /} e /§ f ) ) [ J / k ) )�9 2 ! §$ ) Ii C% 2\/ // °§)§ \ , ®(�t§/ It �§��§\ vm : 7 H 2 B m§0 h /§. , d 00 $ |§ `® ;x\\ / a 6M 2 \ .. Li.! g \ \K • / .ccf / LU 00 . 0 0 E 3 © 3G 0O /(s z �e0 //\\ u . �i� /�T\ U, \®\4 ±Lii e z e\ \ \ �� §\§ I— © « §\ ) 0 7 / » z@ E(l/ / / r- 0 § § z)() ZZ 2\[; 0 < Z. N-% §(}[) . �m ;)]} , x \K§!§ § NZ u Ito In. •o• .�` i 'WGo RE --.. .. Su SOURCE: Maryland Historical Trust F- L Q 2Th dY �.°� HISTORIC PROPERTIES MAP (M%TC ASSOCIATES I N C NEPA bID 24S2A-Rohrersville Trego Road/Rohrersville Road Rohrersville, Maryland 21779 � WA iii d23 1� �, I��'. sir( I 11 WA -111-00a II 31 { WA I 1 022 1 ry W !IC -003 1 7 1 na .r, 4 - l' ��- WA iII-005` - `t 9 ,WAII1@21 2; / 1 H jF, 3 WP. III-O5'I_ W Aii it73 ! P"\n!05() 0513 3ri2r i. WAI000G` 111 04!, r 1 i %' J A (i1 020 WA III 054 " WA1107% ,rn ''i'r Isle , i :jj J\LijtNA1U079 I/\ 'IF i I a y,�ei(A S � It r. A+ A I i ' It r it - < +11 WFllI:0lt ' � ' ' Nv Fi I F 1 )E'F. r 1� I /AWA111007 1 \WAW0H/ F ' fl U /J" f it T IJFItI / '� 1 '�Y i r i 1 ( (Il 'I�1 1`1 �� 1 I Ji' �I , l 1 I � , -- � ( ,� � � 'ice /4 � I,/',,(�� � �4:nax7+�. / WA-i110b$ r�����1'��, �i� L,Ii� I `�,/` �� 1 ) 1 } 11� J \"i r 3 �l � � �� � �� 11 � � � i�1lti l__ I�i lil//I `' -'�{I '�'1 \��I' ! ,f �r._.. F/F i' WA-1I06A F \ h l ' A / t � 't E �` j 33 ' WA 1i1-056 , , _ a s7 �i // yVAI11038 I�. �1 j WA -III -028 l` l i ;/ `�� �.' L( (nin.ni_tie ., t i �l,�I (4;/%",%/ t ("�� U m'. 0 0\ O Nm ti o c1N O O N 1 0 U H HO a .44-4 0>4>- I rn CCo>1+ -'ft -'4 •^ > 3 Ri+W U � U d v� u = O w = N Z O � a Y I W m W K J L c O Wro E �. to C, p Nm -to [.1 N 1 4-4 >4 z J Co 9 1 U cc) Y CC' to •-,c UL Y• 44-4 ft>4 O Q CC CC 440 T 0' N N W 'Ito ON C p C H C .{ 0 p 1400 4 -,-I1440 004 W ..V W WA C J 0 0 Om WN W .i NON 4Y U C.)) Ca 4 3 00 •ti U TWv hit) Y H 441).'4 0,010 4 40,4 o o CC Y F Y N > 0 00 0' .ib ab�M urvm 1-icQ W o'0) •i •-1 .aro v 404 4) 00>4m .0(0 >,TW VI JZa' N Y ti T 0 C O X •~ 0 >440Z 010 C40'4 • CE >04,4 0 c00 .-pima-, HOC (0.UC 40.4 --4.0 W C b • '00) C J> Z F Q -- t w O E p 0ed c 0 0 W 'O • -4-4)00. 04-4-H O F 4q a >4UW p p U1 Cob O Z Z N 4 40 Coon Y 0 W Cr W'OC (I F ASH COW U I w;I Z'-hO H 20P1000" 00 <- m rt 0 n m¢ 01 0 n rt 000" 0n. 0-0 0 m Y E w 0 n n 0 Y.N m w an coo 0 7•0 p1011(0 n w pr I --P1 0 m w 0000 0 mm O O Y. n n 0 n I-0 0 N ¢ 2 n w < 01000 w 0 £ '10 w 0 rn 1100. Y. 10 m 0 I- -•MC0Uc 0 '4 0 - OH" m m cc 0 0 000<00 0 % rn w n w n m 0011 M N O ON 0 0 o r NO 0 0 n m n m O 00 r00 r.Omm¢ 00-00 rN• 010110- 0 m m7 < mm 0 m 0 ram ra GM�0 K 0 C N d 030 K< 0 0 HO I. 010-04 n n no 0 o•3d H Tn n 0E r•0" -0•r•0 m 0 0- mnGOxa 00.~00 O w m C 0 OH" mo m.00 HO - m g 0 0 •0 001 0 2 m 01 ≥ H oP C) I0- 7 C 9O a I I I 2 o 0 YXc n 0 A . m 0 a - z C) y i i a 1 y�.a'^ - ? K 3..S(t.s.+� yti�, --�• f^ t. i . r � "'xktir . <aS"'hT. ».� �r 1 "$ �: �` _ �. r Y h .T i, •. � 1� Y i s-+y."ti z+ e4 '5� YrJ✓f t�}y {l4'`'� ra.{! �+ tt�! 'n 1 `�' �R �Fl`•+ OFt �jY��t, Yt f `• A `;1� f.'.''! ^. �}a a"', 4 C�J.'.'iU<}.y,4.�'(..\ v; s ARi �.�J��'V. �'r �°t F:4�3:'.__r c'fH Ve�' .•��:. _ _ It N • A N m m - o O N Y 4 N 9� 4m HIJ OH UYj w$ N F 1' N � U o N _ S N Q U - C O LL z LU z P9 JO 2 Oy IIN Na q V n 0 a nT a b w 0 �1 ss m j W' Wr W N H' d rl Hi N W C z c > 0 Ii W Z . •0 W ❑ W Y 001 N N N C WS. Y. 4 ✓ - N 11 U R Ew CX HC >rd 0'-t .-4 .-1 w H•Om G> N C H 40 0 0 N U O C 4 •.1 w O O W (44 (4-44) W N4) 0 0.00 '0 ✓ 0 NON 4Y U N✓ NN H 0 0 0 >iW' 4 U ✓ .1 a. N0 0 0 0'0o 4440,-I 0 N U O I . >44 0001 _1 •0 0414 .0'C.4 40 -IC H P R 4 O N N NO] . 4C>. 44 j• W '0 N NY 0040 Y •O C 4 4)01400, V)4(4,4 (4-40. r1 O - -1 >r 0 0 c 0 .^.. x• 1 a 4 4 N£ W N (04 -IN 0J£ W CN0 .NINa.. 400 • H 0 .0 >. N ^I ... y U C •044•'0 .0 NC cm to (00> £ H R' t'4400 C (00 00 0 •0 N .1 >,0C -.44ta 0144 >,GW NQ H 4 + .' 7' N N W 000 Z N4Y COQ W Cr- 0'0C H .0(00 ..0>1(001 < -I a fa a 'n Rmo,f,. t°n Rojm �m.� Qm o1 ft Oft m w w n m c m n° O m e Gp ft.- v n g cy m ' n " 0. Y p M ft ca R W 6 g Y P O Y OO0nm W N p a' S ^% rn O 6 0 O M f R m° n m b i n r 9 ^ p p n mym pm aOaR90.m OMnm ftftftS" V 6 ni �'1 O '10.0 0 R m O a o • ms O �9° am n �t �r n pr.c m n�'O ftpt o' Z r figg!! S M m pn 0 ft O O r P p m r S m m• • n c.mfl m D M 9 O A rym u c p z w m ; 0'000 M 1�• n m p ^ 0 m m i- wrFoft_m :: ft CR: m0 a o p PO O m0. 00 'C p r O p R O --1i qR m m N o .O Y m m p q Cppp p w p w O a. M g m p O Yp m m 0 e o!W M IB" ° a� n ° 8 'A ft X1 M > m m i+ R S p m µ n p 0 m . 9ci''2 �9E R3"�R Mme 09 i A< m C R 0 m = ° m p mp S O Y r n n y {n m ® m0'°0^0.mo ftft m.py pR Y� • 0O p h G'$ g m y m . ° 6 p P m1 '1 W '1 mp 0' p ft 1••���� N' wm Pft m n Pg vo Yrym, 9 S O ffll 9 oror5.� a� ee Wn 6W c.� w w o 9 Ap o. ( p/ qm m m g{ m q p m n n n o? m $ W e 6M i fl p m C W p n P 0 m z P • POm ym ftft yr O 0 W ggp�` 0 n9m'g� no O. I. tO� 0 0 µ m w04 M O y •ai tft g' ft Pm 66N pm dawn• rS n m' ft-pmm� m o m a flft 0' CO co LNNLLL d m m 0" ; rn pV> m r§m En% 888888 i a 'ft o a,• �C V W ?d w 3 n n N o N n 7 �W e n Rmr m$mom� H en88e� ml mm 0.0 Wm a Worn A^ p Y J 00.0 pp 0 2 m Cp c A n. T i 3~ C, 0 mY n n to n M M 6 pp n{yy if V R (t •o z • A i P.Og n '°J r O L p Y M z - c C ft M n n Q p m R _ n m } mm OS� a0.? gp O m rtO m ft;t r0 r A ftft m V w m ^n69 r0 9 P `O Coo RAC S2o 6'o c° mp Ed. . P m 0 T g PF. nm�j p� n7 • n $t� • <_ c 8 i spy 0 If C 6 m 0 'yi 0p'�..{{ Y= H C i v n 2 L41'I \ O p 0S W9P P 00. O N n N O m Y'9 ' o T ft P Y P 6 p •nl ^f BWC Y� m R Ry�1 o ^' 2> '00'. 0d p • nrnF m on os_n Y or yyp rt n ygw T S M 0 rr n 0 • 0100' OS R 6 fpt n !!! 1 1 1 1 n R �o R wm ft :=35Foa w Oft P p m O. pM C m ftcS M p n ono O pp B Y 9ft a ft to' OO O n S Y no _ n M 0 Y. n mnfl 'C m m Rmprm ft. 'O y' Fym O wV n ; - n 0'' O r o P O. 2000' _ m n J42 rO m W". Pm mn a F M OP m0 " 00.M.O M M O C �: 9 M 7 m m p Yqqon J W c P W P W Om " mm ,.'0 n mPt Hnn S �� 00 CR�n+m°nnt°n _ 2 S x 0~ 0.'0 M ftftA w. on Keedysville Quad rim i , g - 't In N • mm mH N N ou NN r UHHO H L6 V HJJ I M ¢ r U, U, ti N � U F- < N v = o i o z O o >- z z an N N F H C NO C a -' .. .. 0 m a d WI 9� 110 Fj a W 00 � g 3 Ct o a C i Y C La La m O514 w C rl °'0a .i Twn a yy y u i 50 8 C u ; � of 05 o UE 55 is ro 1 W C W N O Oi Ito .i C NX u -H HY% NEH O -It E 1101 C 1G T• O•.I .-1 .-1 w m 4014-4 .44 J N 0OC FI w4 wv a 0 u � W WA .i worn 1111 U 016, 44 3u we We >,0) 110 uV-4 °' a • tiic 4-44.1.4 O'0 0 - M 40.4 6400 444.1 F L N w.. -1--I C CA w H N40 N. WV .WI .-1 E00 ymti l0,'.-90 MO 400014 xxNr U J.N w HN C 0. 'O3•Mb 0 >0H 0,4 g� • H09 > > CII ,.CCW0• N� WCO ,_ al W C -0 4.444, '0W 049> £ F Q V v w E 409....4 01 000) U W 'O 40P i -+0. >0N O 54 k.419 140144 40 N N 0 2 2:C -1i W 6: W°CN W WR1 C F 51.QI'.4 11440 . . . . . ... . . .v d _ ,.... ... . . ... . |/ . . . 7 ■ § ii . ) .§) . .. . 2 in 0 . . . . • |7 . . . \ • . /\ • \ I I p. / ° { )(§ . ..2 \.' \ 0; .. . . �• � | . .. y. � | )f ))\)[ ■ . { ; ! §ki(6 / \ -i ffl / § ` iii I L•!: (. < \ / . ; : > Ea Out � ® . 0•§ ))�)() ` \ }\. 2 Pu021C i2 C2 ' �< .. 2 to �m2§apt :s i 1 y } # L{ h ! c y_ i I a A I t a' N • m o 4 U m N H $1 d N C H u C V 1 ni 0.14 U s osam� w U, N U, W � N � U - U, V = O o N 'to O O z LU D z 0 N - z U 0 F a fi W G 0. N F w " 0 {. .. CIE o wI FI ICI I I 'I W o I F a O 0"-1 A 0 a w h 0 0 '0)1 K n44 0th p y '40 .C H N L ..4 HL NW HOpm H 2 0 i i C w 4 N 0 .4 0 .N b U000 0 c 4 0 ww' wL 0 w 0 H rt0.00 00)44 ) N O N 14.1 0 IO 14 >Y d0 .'4 S. z H O 0 0 0. >,W'7 44Q 44 N N o 4 CL N < ' = ,. 004) Y.• 'oil'' 0 EYry w o CND CFL V FC 0 u 4HM .1 A N Z N C.4H Ab'M UNN 01 H a(4 V ¢ N 0) 0) •4 140>1 G mNH 44 NVOI N1�•1 W I O n 4 wro 0 •.1 O N >1>, N N O E a N 'M E G N�-HIN d °' W « H kE NNa U H of >v.+ mA0 2 2 H N 44 0-i oto'oto F6' O i % 0)0 0 H O❑ 4-4 •o G a o p 5 m .4 ,0 v O '0)14d ,0 0' L G W a ro v ❑ o > Z04.14" v z m u •m ro w 0 0 ro p, a flC<& o Q 0 1". ."'N ro w 0)44"4W�J 0 U "QNm a ' J P yvo z o xhF� CL W,+m0e you o C d m a a' 000f u u v Cn 0)010 0>100 000 a OS c< >c2.0 i ; H L' a m ow R.. w IJ . ..... .. ... . � .. .. �. . .... �. . . . . ® ! . ■ § | { . & |\ 7hi )�) § ` ° /| . . r : . hi . \ 0• »cI ( *� 0 ) 0- 0 z . ; -! . Vi \. /(( \ PS .: . . . ..• . !'!` /[. n 0 . . ((§\ 0. Ott ((n . \ to . !F )/§(§}) 9 . f- ..:. � . . . // \ m ( �0 no ( § L1'111,}§ nn CA . . . . . ... \. -_ . . ; _- [ . ! CO �§ |to \ § /'E[[( CA § - ` . ! U j 3 I e v' ':�' ±77TTTt7T 1 4 -- V ±'±< r• - . i.,.7 ilw- 4 d •p L 4517.2 r J L:4- � � L � l R S } iY AY�I 1 W y{ r 0 I P In N O) -J N 00 H-+ m ~'- r H u U H Itl a N a � O l— N N � � V � c O J 4 N I U = � w = N D � O z W z W W .+-ia no a° i $ Wo �a t O O 3 7 u b N w a � y Sq+ as at N O a 0 w a a o O m H " w U' o C m a00 Cd z " {O " 3 3 mO F Q w 0 s = N a oQ VFo 88 - N W 00 a 16 0) m 01.0 W. 44J- E1614C `�L NO m V N TM ..1 w0 ti ro m C T z � N M 'O '-IC 0 a N� c N UO t_+ 000 N ..IW O ON ¢ a'N� R W 'i W W XE OA. ¢ N NWi H N CON. 14 4) U M O '3 ~• W 0 2. H w 0 W U Ww O Q M>. - Mw N 0 W N ¢ CNM CCo F.N✓PH1 U o 0 yh O 0.114 A'w w H o+R N U N N w wro Z o u c N N 4 Y m n W �y a u "" ro N H C N T W W C ' a C W N 0) 16 CC. -4N U 0 1412 Vy Z 2 C N " C N N .`^�I N a^ O Ou YI L 4000' HOC 4 01 C O 0116 o O! 9 .l o C •O M N C m R" o u 0 w C C> i 60.4 a W W z u C7 w c Q a H a F 0) Cu O N ),'0)C •• O8 U Q O " HJ1roa wN•O 0 O 10 2 .T. ` o C0) C NN 000 a 0 C i j < tlz U' NOe coil W 7 p O 00 H Oai of€ o u z w Cr- woo C El .0061 a ` yn ax N.O/.N O H O O.4 s W 5 ep m m 6 mm °o �b °Lmbmm 1 mx � RmS�S� a❑❑a 0 av m'fi°m•µPP �ory a E.n p z in Z an. c i b 5$,, N R Y •1 m m = i -- °mw �a a aNc N CMmfl �C YI�. o °@@ M Pla' 2 g606< j ° m w mwnmp nS• mn.n m , YXc 2 6 n O °'0 wn. I. z aoa o On n m O M Y 2 A m N Oe T n •°+W�Fy0 O`< Li to WTtfppo '4 mO apro as 3oX Ci npp I+ nyµ CY ° m c In ry lCmi (My W 0 ry n ) F M a n m m. 0 in P .. D • aRo n ° fl Nn m r�r� y 9 IXI 1 1 ii mmF 88p8i x " s or' r b I e {{e,,,� n a y . px D n n Y DXL L �R� r i30zt"xpxx ^ cz G4 mm °$ cm p OP nXC s r LLI I I a 2 p o Pi m N c Q y a°m 0 nmw 'TI, m - 0 um Y 2 ZIT 7 m h I-' LLLL C 1in F m nx _ S i D So�e7 oni > Pa M S M n z m > N m Y D K • � � 3 t m vm r n o $gyp 2° w my c °z Y R v a > m O m C D s 55 P ° b I sn�N � 6 n � op ✓ � i i v ' f , � �� �` . • �� 1�,,��i � ; ` f `' Jam,,• .. E a � i )^ _ `'�`' � .. � � W1'r•' BPITIMONE C� � l� �y '. ,\ � I a�. > YW2 NAY L y 4? aT rTlthY.. V. ",j. . SIS ?- ,F.t+.: "f2�.r�sm�.-n•-r wsl't` s a�..e 3+.�+«sa._m:_ - : %y= -I±:----- __-- �v� r .w . » m 0 : � °:4®+k tn' ' Y a 't,F , .F. 1. M.1 wsT t{ x11 i�1 YI }3 '.x't"-.o-:... f !+ I �e... `jlaf+ i t Y, e r y i5]ie rr b: !T 'T ,r/'*'fx=",s alb � ot� ni � k` e } n 5 s <� -' (n )> �PJ h�l a c!.: r61+t k t g7 � z *t t t y !t i'�s i rb S� f •F t r ^ u. / i t� z a P. } fa?��- ��� � t ': � ryty rti yi <qi rit Y,.l �y'+^�i. tf5 t. qnf (f Vx4 % � (� t lx jt sfta ylu t z Cu d' / t -.x�tt(AY yk'� ..,�T' 4 u.)rcRwt�� s�'c4xY-'ill t'�• t L . �. l �� 8 �' 1- ! Yt 1 4� �,( yA ti��frc ��1� �✓�t[ �'�+ i >� lY{ It-� .. r/ rLi 'S iC5'tx vlt i;rt l t '�`) xYt�� �3."yt. .ttn]'S�ntn ��r ��>�` t r f .f1'4y S+Ser�..:+•�' test It. �tt '{f� L s h 's.:, f ya`f �. .S,•fYA�t:IN fs'C '{ "r js s t ,. v ilr 7J. gI.r✓ ✓t 1T x f It 5 .+ 1 st.i t J,S t F � i 3 7 t f (r)l ] t f ' ti d ' 1 7 .� !-r.0 ) f c43z3 ,cam e IC Arc. 1 VE-F_. €LL;Y (toff li I€& ";,i ) Er'x.`[C_*, XfeTit.lrl (�t>ftt w 1�i AT °Z `"c'of ¶ZT ee ST't-)PIrY/ eH E r1I P -t ACA. F AjCH (ij' fN v)ooP LF Pg2uAR 5 ;rJcS 1r3>- L11W2E W1r.iirOIs 1 WI(. -L HAT(,iI )efjJr4& I'm F cr;t. s P-[ OF: rniu *. n'a 21Lf«W X Lf5 NiSH cPJTEjzc 1V P E >2 r-oUa_; P tv,,a'fIf"1, d IG ' GNL( C1 A'H E ISp +ASt f ktDF WALLS -Vk/ y1v 7:L 4� o4 € r�Itj •1r. PfiN&f i'krfr5 61 ✓//r y727 a" 7°3-972—/33V Au mmnn I4 A -I L ao n LN ₹jvvSE I r!TC if-tJ AnPPfITIC J t-1117/LATEPOO? Il; IDt4 (VUNP, Tlo ) ftfvkficti l4 '_ f1cH o t JC7Sfbfrl jtft r— i'Nt?,t 5EL-0 JP `0 t pD C 1.. V,?✓•it YSTRY &"P. &Y'WfjG? VTL. eve, 4 ELL LAfl t it -rvKL1r 5r{0 -S 2-'Jti5 y,x L LQ4 9 S A<R ?t E.MZ y% 12! t L -C Vt] m d 'S4 L4 & d 7« E'( xr: ¼ 7\> wrcL me Fr'va P..rd nl / (;$$OU N D REftAcE XfSTJN½ — %!7 tXi57;�>td mLP%4-AlEcii dry I fi Z ₹^ U f c2 `.6?`r , I..§A F. j� �A L. UVt1 I(V - 1 C* t! # tU fF "PICKF-i Tic -tr F,cHaTt, VILL. I(7 r7 i0 8b2 I 5 AL,E Y��:l�a� 9 Va v 3'-4" 5'-4" 2'-2'/a" 4' -II" 3-4" o o 2. 8.. x 5 2. 2. 8.. x 5' 2 E vi o v v Z O o u i F�oT�Z , t11 d) I LL1 L O y_ _ Ill T X > m y C N H IY= v 0voo v a h 3 uv za�3 o m p `- n c o o `o Z c�cL'o MASTER - 5 E o 4 BEDROOM Q ~ovocy SD Q io v m c rn r Iv ( N A F C 3 N ?I N x x O ry LL O.. 2. 6.. M Q IIjIdtl m O Ill J N 3L5BaTI-IRMLL NU1,�.C.EF�' cn II'l laate. cLL1 11 ' -----I n � IIIIm°" L Iltllllll quo II -- tiY O v 11j� J �J W° —IQ z w uP M m 111 QPEAPPR0VAL Z LL 4 1 i W Z m Z z r ,lli 3'-10a 2'-45" 5'-1O' 2'4h' I'-6' 4'-9' 2'-415' 4'-24SHEET REV A-2 N N II v VALLEY v BY MFG (DESIGN BY MFG) 0 0 v ROOF TRUSS >0<E SHINGLES ON 30• ROOF FELT ON a N c� E C OU L z (DESIGN BY MFG) 12 5/5" 05B SHEETING W/ CLIPS ROOF RAFTER O NO`o omw AN ICE BARRIER SHALL CONSIST OF y, VOi N N C (2) LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT CEMENTED , TOGETHER OR OF ASELF-ADHERING BAFFLE TO PROVIDE I" AIR GAP W 0 U Q UJ = POLYMER MODIFIED BITUMEN SHEET AND FOR VENTILATION N C JU SHINGLES ON 30• ROOF FELT ON FROM THE EDGE H t� I 5/S" OSB SHEETING W/ CLIPS INCHES POINT AT LEAST (24) INSIDE THE ONT >, C N CIC YY EXTERIOR WALL LINE. N .i U O R-30 KRAFT FACED 12 R -3S BLOWN IN OR E) N 0 +' a O BATT INSULATION TRIM/CORNICE PER PLAN - - - - - - GATT INSULATION r✓ v a 0 3 OR OWNER'S SPECIFICATIONS pxj pCj LEDGER BOARD SCISSOR TRUSSES: VAPOR BARRIER O T - XX / 12 EXTERIOR PITCH Z a N s O BAFFLE TO PROVIDE I° AIR GAP - Vi'! 12 INTERIOR PITON W W D a D FOR VENTILATION W 0 z O 0 C EXISTING ROOF SYSTEM s C _ o PER PLAN z N 0 E C w 2x4 STUDS o I6" O.G. W/ R13 OR 2x6 StUD5 ® 16" O.G. W/ RI9 Ot C E O VAPOR BARRIER FACED INSULATION a TRIM/CORNICE (TTP. SECOND FLOOR) F a w C C PER OWNER'S 2x4 STUDS ® ib" O.G. W/ RI3 ,p U y�j C p, avi .N SPECIFICATIONS PER VAPOR BARRIER FACED INSULATION N ? N •- PER PLAN (PER SECOND FLOOR PLAN) PLAN O BACKFILL AGAINST FOUNDATION WALL SHALL CONSIST OF FREELY DRAINING SANDS 4 GRAVEL CLASSIFIED AS GROUP I ACCORDING TO THE U.S. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM OR SOILS HAVING AN EQUIVALENT FLUID WEIGHT OF LESS THAN 30 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT. HEIGHT OF UNBALANCED BACKFILL SHALL NOT EXCEED: - 5'-0" FOR 5" O.M.U. WALLS 6'O" FOR 10' C.M.U. WALLS. CONTINUOUS WATERPROOF RUBBER MEMBRANE SPRAYED ON TO FOUNDATION 1-1/2" x 3" (APPROX) KEYWAY LOCKS FOOTING CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL. 4" CONTINUOUS PERFORATED DRAINPIPE W/ GRAVEL (MIN. 4" ALL SIDES)" WI FILTER FABRIC, SLOPE TO DAYLIGHT, SUMP, OR STORM SEWER (BOTH SIDES OF FOOTER) CONTINUOUS HORIZONTAL REBAR PER LOCAL CODE OR A MINIMUM OF TWO •5 HORIZONTAL REBAR BOTTOM OF FOOTING TO BE LOCATED ON LEVEL, UNDISTURBED SOIL A MINIMUM OF 24" BELOW GRADE. SIZE PER FOUNDATION AND ELEVATION PLANS SCISSOR TRUSSES DIMENSIONAL LUMBER OR ENGINEERED 1-1/4" RIM JOIST O BATT INSULATION UN UNCONDITIOII SPACE BELOW i/I6 IN. OSB SHEATHING OF ENTIRE EXTERIOR GARAGE WALLS INTERIOR FINISH SHALL BE 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD. WHERE HABITABLE SIDING PER PLANS, SPACE IS LOCATED ABOVE GARAGE, 5/5" REFER TO ELE AT10NThfl TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD IS REQUIRED ON DRAWINGS, THE UNDER SIDE OF THE FLOOR JOTS"5. ALL BEAMS, COLUMNS, STUDS, HEADERS, AND WALLS SUPPORTING FLOOR ABOVE REQUIRE 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD PROTECTION. 2x6 (OR 4) P,T, MUDSILL ON CONTINUOUS SILL GASKET —� BOND BEAM WITH (2) •4 REBAR� AT OR BELOW TOP COURSE -S" C.M.U. FOUNDATION WALL (EXISTING FOUNDATION) 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT W/ BITUMINOUS WATERPROOF FILLER. ade fr-.o_,o 4" 2,500 PSI AIR ENTRAINED CONCRETE SLAB W/ 6x6 10/10 W.W.F. ON 6 MIL. POLY. VAPOR BARRIER ON 4" GRAVEL (MIN) BLOCKING BETWEEN JOISTS IF NO RIMBOARD REQUIRED. IIi III p rf',i 1-1/4" RIM JOIST AS REQUIRED I'II, z Cl ON FLOOR STRUCTURE DWGS. II11111 p a - 1111111 c N N U- 0ifl 111111 , C II11II ii "-DOUBLE 2 x 4 TOP O PLATE ON BRG WALLS. IIIIIIII VIII' (III M U STUDS c 16" O.O. W/ RI3 VAPOR BARRIER FACED INSULATION 3/4" TIG SUBFLOOR GLUED ( NAILED DIMENSIONAL LUMBER OR ENGINEERED JOIST/TRUSS PER PLAN OR MFG ?CFE2E�ce L�2A\,J1t3C-1 "-1/2" GALV. ANCHOR a 6' OC < I' MAX FROM CORNERS OR APPROVED CONCRETE ANCHOR STRAPS R-13 BATT/BLANKET INSULATION MECH. FASTENED TO INTERIOR FDN WALL FOR AREAS WITH UNFINISHED BASEMENTS OR LOCATE IN FRAMING FOR FINISHED AREAS. TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED UJ J H H H & 00 SHEET S-1 I- 4 F — REV ALLOWABLE SPANS FOR LINTELS SUPPORTING MASONRY VENEER 1,3 SIZE OF STEEL ANGLE NO STORY ABOVE ONE STORY ABOVE TWO STORIES ABOVE NO. OF 1/2" OR EQUIVALENT REINFORCING BARS 3" x 3" x 1/4" 6'-O" 4'-6" 3'-O" I 4" x 3" x 1/4" S' -O" 6'-O" 4'-6" 1 5" x 3-1/2" x 5/16 10' O" 8'-O" 6' O" 2 6" x 3-1/2" x 5/16" 40" 9'-6" I' O" 2 (2) 6" x 3-1/2" x 5/16" 2O' O" 12' O" 9' 6" 4 1 LONG LEG OF THE ANGLE SHALL BE PLACED IN A VERTICAL POSITION. 2 DEPTH OF REINFORCED LINTELS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 5' 4 ALL CELLS OF HOLLOW MASONRY LINTELS SHALL BE GROUTED SOLID. REINFORCING BARS SHALL EXTEND NOT LESS THAN B" INTO THE SUPPORT- 3 STEEL MEMBERS INDICATED ARE ADEQUATE TYPICAL EXAMPLES: OTHER STEEL MEMBERS MEETING STRUCTURAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS MAY BE USED. T. POSTS PER PLAN STAND-OFF POST BASE ANCHORED INTO CONCRETE -I" MIN. WITH A 1/2" DIA. CONCRETE ANCHOR BOLT. Z -III- o D ho - J •,,�:., V °m a .. O I- -III=III- O 0 —III= o- D o- CONCRETE SLAB a W d VIII —III- ° o ° °k PER PLAN. w -III 1 0 ° 1 'A j- VIII=III= ':r> —III- o D o ° GRAVEL F a III; i FOOTING TO BEAR ON LEVEL, UNDISTURBED EARTH. TURNED DOWN SLAB (4) 1/2" DIA. ANCHOR — BOLTS W/ EXPANSION ANCHORS OR EPDXY. CONC In STEEL COLUMN PER PLAN FILL AREA IF SLAB IS SET PRIOR TO COLUMNS STEEL ERG PLATE c CONC. FTG. CONTINUOUSLY WELDED PER PLAN AROUND STEEL COLUMN (SIZE PER PLANS) STEEL COLUMN FTG TURN DOWN SLAB 16" — WIDE TO FROST LINE OR PROVIDE A CONC. FTG. 24" x 24" x 8" e EACH POST BRG. PT. m IO'-2'h" at N 13'-O4" r------------------------- - 2O" X 2O" x I CONC. FTG. BLW. II STL. COLUMN. m L a d 0 d I I O w I 1 KITCHEN SLAB: 4" THICK 2,500 P.S.I. U V, CONCRETE SLAB W/ 6x6 1O/1O W.W.F. Z z = ON 6 MIL. POLY VAPOR BARRIER O O z ON 4" GRAVEL (MIN.). , Z I I ti CONC. FTG. BLW, ra STL. COLUMN. I N W 01 �I II S 1 1 rjd_'X 1 - t D > I I 2" THICK CLOSED -CELL RIGID I EDGE INSULATION SHALL EXTEND DOWN FOUNDATION WALL UNDER I SLAB TO BELOW FROST LINE OR SHALL EXTEND INWARDS UNDER I SLAB A MINIMUM OF 2'-O". I 1 I 61" I i I I 2O" x 2O" x 1O" CONC. FTG. BLW. STL. COLUMN. II �. I I I II 2" THICK CLOSED -CELL RIGID I I I I I I EDGE INSULATION SHALL EXTEND EXISTING FLOOR JOISTS I I I I I i (APFROX. 3 x 4 ROUGH DOWN FOUNDATION WALL UNDER SAWN OAK JOISTS) 1 SLAB TO BELOW FROST LINE OR I I SHALL EXTEND INWARDS UNDER I_ I I I L SLAB A MINIMUM OF 2'-O". _ I I I I i t INSTALL TWO NEW 1.115" x S.S" 1.9E I 1 I I 1 MICROLLAM !.VL TO PROVIDE I ( 1 INTERMEDIATE JOIST SUPPORT. LIVING ROOM SLAB: 4" THICK 2,500 P.S.I. I I I I I I CONCRETE SLABW.W.F. ON6 MIL. POLY VAPOR BARRIER ON 4" GRAVEL (MIN.). BASEMENT UNDER I I I THIS SECTION (EXISTING) I I I I II I -_II ------------i i I I 1 2S'-3" 1.-24 " MICROLLAM, PARALLAM, TIMBERSTRAND, OR OTHER WOOD BEAM. SEE PLAN FOR SPECIFIC SIZES. 4" (4) 1/2" DIA. MACHINE BOLTS 1/2" STL PLATE WELDED TO COLUMN. SEE PLAN FOR PLATE SIZE REOT). STEEL PIPE COLUMN PER PLAN WOOD SEAM / COLUMN CONNECTION U, o w a E .a v c7 o n y J a o o c w 2- vYrnimu r�A =220W v V m L TL 0, Uf Of U C 4+ I - l_ N>. 0 O O > L a C v Oi N c o2 c z aQ) L t O z 3 o av 0 z m2E>''y W L m 0 m m e E o H a nw o. l0 O to C 01 o3vm'�.- oF m N m Ilpull IIIIHU N O W f Q p �* W n Un v n W fl y I - FE. APPROVAL > O Q W LL m \ � AR�'1jL✓.I � � to a • P°l4J' s 0 = W f � SHEEE T REV S-2 TYPICAL JOIST STRUCTURAL NOTES: FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS t ' III4" h ALL JOISTS SHALL BE 16" O,O. UNLESS. OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE DRAWING.N INSTALLATION OF ALL JOISTS TO BE PER MANUFACTURERS SPECS, E d N (6 REFER TO SPECIFICATION SHEETS SUPPLIED W/ MATERIAL. r E G O = Z CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF BEAMS, HEADERS, 1 - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - U D. 0 O m LU O COLUMNS, AND OTHER STRUCTURAL MEMBERS PRIOR TO ORDERING AND INSTALLATION. r`. I ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN THE STRUCTURAL PLANS AND FLOOR PLANS Q] SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR ANY SUBSITUTION OF MATERIALS SHALL HAVE THE WRITTEN 0- N W 4" DIA. II GUAGE N N Oft N C7 O W RESOLUTION. PRIOR 1 L APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. J I ADJ. STL. COLUMN. - u m o Ui I9 X3a I I 4,8k LB MIN. RATING +� 4- CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ANY ADDITIONAL FLOOR JOISTS DIRECTLY UNDER ALL .d. �^ y CU NON-STRUCTURAL WALLS RUNNING PARALLEL TO THE FLOOR JOIST SYSTEM WHERE THE F d I . h WALLS ARE MORE THAN I/3 OF THE FLOOR JOIST SPAN. F N i d 'D N O 0 ddb I ) I el 1.25" x 11.815" 0,8E o ALL ENGINEERED LUMBER IDENTIFIED ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE MANUFACTURED �q TJ-STRAND RMBD. xd N d yDj 3 h 0 BY TRUSJOIST MACMILLAN. ANT SUBSTITUTION BY AN ALTERNATE MANUFACTURER REQUIRES THAT THE SUBSTITUTED FLOOR JOISTS BE APPROVED 1 I Qf (TYP 6 PERIMETER) U. O ✓- d O BY A RECOGNIZED TESTING AGENCY. THE FLOOR JOISTS SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR A MAXIMUM LIVE LOAD I S Z N L y -O 3 rp U at DEFLECTION OF L/6OO AND SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT ARE SIGNED I X AND SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE WHERE THE ( Z p C JOB IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. I W 1 � II MANUFACTURER OF THE ENGINEERED LUMBER SHALL PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED II jETHE 1 I I•81 TJI 360 y 4" DIA. II GUAGE Z m E c .� W J ID HANGERS, SHEAR PANELS, BLOCKING, AND ERECTION DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER LLl r m 6f I -----" ADJ, STL. COLUMN, Of C E 0 PRIOR TO FABRICATION. ° 4 II e 16 Q•C• 1 ILBk LB MIN. RATING a d PROVIDE SOLID BLOCKING EQUAL TO THE IDENTIFIED COLUMNS TO TRANSFER POINT X in N O a O ao.o v ~ 0 N T G N LOADS AROUND JO15TS TO SUPPORTS BELOW. N m 0 a 1III i o1 o 3 ALL BEARING COLUMNS IDENTIFIED ON THIS DRAWING AND THOSE COLUMNS (I s N 12 I- ≤ N 3 IDENTIFIED FOR STRUCTURES ABOVE THIS FLOOR ARE TO BE CARRIED TO THEIII FOUNDATION, BEAMS, OR HEADERS BELOW, THE FLOOR SYSTEM HAS NOT BEEN 1 I 1 (2) LTS" x 9.5 1.9E DESIGNED TO CARRY ANY POINT LOADS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AND III t1 MICROLLAM LVL CALLED OUT ON THE DRAWINGS. DROPPED BEAM JOISTS ARE CLEAR SPAN. FLANGES ON ENGINEERED LUMBER SHALL NOT BE NOTCHED OR CUT. 1 I INTERMEDIATE WALL IS NOT I - pGl II Tull LJ v A 1-1/2" DIA, HOLE WILL BE ALLOWED ANYWHERE IN THE JOIST WEB NOT CLOSER A LOAD BEARING WALL. ( 11111 o lI 1111 THAN 1'-0" FROM SUPPORT BEAMS. CLOSEST SPACING IS I' -O" O.G. - I S II 01 "I E (Illlll. REQUIREMENTS FOR LARGER HOLES OR RECTANGULAR CUTOUTS IN THE WEB o'-" I T N N SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL, I I lllI IIII THE FLOOR SYSTEM IS NOT DESIGNED TO SUPPORT ANY ROOF LOADS I I 1 pp1ny II1111II V o UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL ROOF LOADS ARE CONSIDERED N - O >> M TO BE CLEAR SPANS.II 4" DIA. II GUAGE _+ III 1 IRC ALL WINDOW AND DOOR HEADERS ARE TO BE PER IRC 2003 SECTION R6O2.1, i 1 1 ADJ. STL. COLUMN, II! TABLES R5O2.5(U AND R5O2.5(D, AND SHALL BE HEM -FIR •2 OR BETTER. n 4.2k LB MIN. RATING IIIIIIII M IIII ,..I U NMINIMUM HEADER SIZE SHALL BE (2) 2 x 6 HEM -FIR "2 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESE DRAWINGS. HEADERS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A MINIMUM OF (U JACK r - - - - - - - - - ------------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1-____ STUD AND (I) KING STUD EACH 51DE THE SAME THICKNESS AS THE WALL UNLESS 1 r - -I I ADDITIONAL JACKS ARE IDENTIFIED ON THESE DRAWINGS. 1 11 WHERE OPENINGS ALIGN VERTICALLY, CONTRACTOR SHALL INCREASE THE REQUIRED I I W NUMBER OF JACK STUDS BY (I) FOR EACH FLOOR OF VERTICAL ALIGNMENT. I I O/L IL 9 I ALL HEADERS USING DIMENSIONAL LUMBER SHALL USE 1/2' PLYWOOD, OSB, I I OR OTHER APPROVED SOLID WOOD FILLER TO ALLOW FOR A HEADER THICKNESS I ` EQUAL TO THE WALL THICKNESS WHICH CONTAINS IT, PROVIDE ONE SPF u2 JACK 1 1 a SPF "2 KING STUD EACH SIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWING. v I EXISTING FLOOR STRUCTURE I I PROVIDE BLOCKING • 4'-0" O,C, AT ALL PERIMETER WALLS WHERE JOISTS ARE N I I I I ~ in PARALLEL TO THE WALLS. — 11 II Q N MASONRY VENEER SHALL NOT SUPPORT ANY VERTICAL LOAD OTHER THAN THE I C)) I DEAD LOAD OF THE VENEER ABOVE IT. MASONRY LINTELS TO BE PLACED I I a< Lu Q OVER ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS PER IRO 2003 R-1O3.t3. THE LINTELS SHALL HAVE ( Ml IL O P.E. APPROVAL A LENGTH OF BEARING OF NOT LESS THAN 4 INCHES. - N _ .._1 N JJ 'Q Z > LL �'-' Z m II Y_tin I �,NeoVg z aj pg ✓ls �wror ¢� Web ald'e"a°'„ e" eia�rer maRFmem hole. Q a -ire" - 2O"rEdiammrF.vimum I roras.irz• leiearer blcKFe5 t';ct\ I paes [a.a uum u" a y. oerorc.rn.,e. U I- L- boero na.on L .•. "`! ; ••••'•..O..... .: �.' Z ------------------------------------------J ®wm S O a UJ 1— Cl)W ) C/)i SHEET REV ALA 9'-:9a" fijPl S-3 I9 -I C v ROOF STRUCTURE NOTES: 2 x 4 LOOKOUTS UI A REFER TO FLOOR PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS. ANY DISCREPANCIES l2) 2 x 6 CsABLE (2) 2 x �' s 16" O.C, OX BETWEEN THIS DRAWING AND THE FLOOR PLAN DRAWINGS OR IF O v TRUSS MANUFACTURER HAS DEVELOPED AN ALTERNATE TRUSS E PLAN, BUILDER SHALL IDENTIFY DIFFERENCES TO THE ENGINEER REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL E C OU L 'a7 PRIOR TO ORDERING, FABRICATING, OR ERECTING ANY FRAMEWORK. _ _ - _ _ - -• ' O o(0- -O ,= : f_iTHE DRAWINGS FOR ALL ROOF E.°2 W REFER TO FLOOR PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS PITCHES REQUIRED. / G v��z OF TRAY, CATHEDERAL, VOR COFFERED CEILINGS. v ,� z ALL RAFTERS SHALL BE 16" O.G. UNLESS OTHERWISE C � z O t0 0) O W INDICATED ON THE DRAWING- ftj FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING 0) cjlO i BALLOON FRAME SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ROOF TRUSSES TO BE DESIGNED BY THE MANUFACTURER. x GABLE END WALL % Ol U C ♦- ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IF AN ALTERNATE PLAN HAS 1111 CM ORDERING AND INSTALLING `O BEEN DEVELOPED SUCH THAT BEARING POINTS SHOWN ON 1111 "o' E -moo o o > THIS PLAN ARE DIFFERENT THAN INDICATED, ANTICIPATED MATERIALS. ° '' BEARING POINTS HAVE BEEN SHOWN BY GIRDER TRUSSES, a o 3 m ROOF TRUSSES SHALL BE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT ALL REQUIRED I I I U" 2 T G JACK TRUSSES AND ALSO TO SUPPORT ANY RAFTER LOADS Z d W L i O 3 IMPOSED UPON THE ROOF TRUSSES AS IDENTIFIED BY THIS PLAN. OID a'D SCISSOR TRUSSES I I w2 v v INSTALLATION OF ALL TRUSSES TO BE PER MANUFACTURERS DESIGNED BY MFG, Z O O C E C SPECS, REFER TO SPECIFICATION SHEETS SUPPLIED W/ MATERIAL I G C ID Y O ROOF TRUSS MANUFACTURER SHALL IDENTIFY AND SUPPLY ALL I I I E C N REQUIRED HANGERS, STRAPS, TIES, ETC, REQUIRED FOR TRUSS W ,N Ip O INSTALLATION, INCLUDING REQUIRED HURRICANE STRAPS. I I -&C E O ROOF TRUSS SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER in — FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ORDERING AND ERECTION OF ROOF 9 I• O pl >, a TRUSSES, -BUILDER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING ENGINEER 0 Q - 3 N N .01 j,, RECEIVES ROOF TRU55 LAYOUT AND INDIVIDUAL TRUSS SHOP DRAWINGS, O -C of - S m ROOF TRUSSES SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR AN 18" OVERHANG FROMIN x x OUTSIDE OF THE FRAMED WALL TO THE FACIA FACE. PROVIDE AN III III I'M n ALLOWANCE FOR A 2 x SUBFACIA AND A 5/4 x FACIA BOARD. 1111 IIIry 1111 1111 PROVIDE SOLID BLOCKING TO TRANSFER POINT LOADS AROUND H PJ IIII11l1 W JOISTS TO SUPPORTS BELOW UTILIZING COLUMN SIZES IDENTIFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ONE 2 x COLUMN MEMBER FOR EACH PLY I I I (II. N I OF A GIRDER TRUSS AS A MINIMUM. II I II'I111� FLOOR SYSTEM IS NOT DESIGNED TO SUPPORT ANY ROOF LOADS UNLESS INDICATED. ALL ROOF I 111111111 W E OTHERWISE LOADS I I II4 LL ARE CONSIDERED TO BE CLEAR SPANS. IO244" I9 Ii4 11 11u o 71 1 'I a� G to ALL BEARING COLUMNS IDENTIFIED ON THIS DRAWING ARE I I 11111 II I' TO BE CARRIED TO THE FOUNDATION, BEAMS, OR HEADERS i O BELOW. THE FLOOR SYSTEM HAS NOT BEEN DESIGNED TO I I I I II r+ CARRY ANY POINT LOADS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED I N O AND GALLED OUT ON THE DRAWINGS. -I- IIIIIIIIIYI� IIII I I I It I YYY ALL WINDOW AND DOOR HEADERS ARE TO BE PER IRC 2OO3 R6O2.T. J ` i MINIMUM HEADER SIZE SHALL BE (2) 2 x 6 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED - II ON THE DRAWINGS. ALL HEADERS SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE SPF "2 JACK STUD PER BIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWING. REFER TO DETAIL THIS SHEET SHOULD ROUGH OPENINGS FOR WINDOWS / DOORS / TRANSOMS REQUIRE I REMOVAL OF ONE OR BOTH TOP PLATES, NOTE: vJ�co ALL HEADERS AND RAFTERS SHALL BE HEM -FIR "2 UNLESS OTHERWISE I VALLEY TRUSSES SHALL BE Y Qty INDICATED ON THE DRAWING, ALL DIMENSIONAL LUMBER COLUMNS DESIGNED TO EVENLY DISTRIBUTE Q SHALL BE SPF "2 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE DRAWING. I THE LOAD ACROSS THE EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING ROOFING ROOF SYSTEM, Jp lyV� I MATERIAL DOWN TO SHEATHING.fli I Q w m � RIDGE < Lui N_ Q N I - I P.E.APPR0VAL Z F- - -ZG N i w m I I LL O z 0 (n EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE I ,� �A. r '�Y O < 4 c - IO I mo ` ti 's.,d���p �` ...,.... � �C w d N UI llflt ,1Ttig 2 SHEET REV 29'-3s/ J S-4 I, GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A, THE TERM "WORK" AS USED IN THESE NOTES SHALL INCLUDE ALL PROVISIONS AS DRAWN OR SPECIFIED IN THESE DOCUMENTS AS WELL AS ALL OTHER PROVISIONS SPECIFICALLY INCLUDED BT THE OWNER IN THE FORM OF DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS AND APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE TO VERIFY ALL PLAN AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT, IN WRITING, OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. C. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAMILIAR WITH PROVISIONS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS AND SHALL INSURE COMPLIANCE OF WORK TO THOSE CODES CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANT DISCREPANCIES TO CODES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK OR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. D. THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. SAFETY. CARE OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS SPECIFIED IN THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR CONTRACT I5, AND SHALL BE, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. E. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS. METHODS, TEECHNIGJE5, AND SAFETY PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK. F. IF IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT BETWEEN LOCAL STATE, AND NATIONAL CODES, THE MORE STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN, G. ALL CONSTRUCTION 15 TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING COMES, — INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR ONE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS - 1003 EDITION — MARYLAND UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE - 2003 H. ANT AND ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION& FOR SITEWORK, PLUMBING. WASTE, GAS LINES ELECTRICAL CIRCUITING, AND HEATING. VENTILATION. AND AIR'CONDITIONING SYSTEMS NOT CONTAINED IN THE •LIST OF DRAWINGS" ON THIS PAGE ARE NOT A PART OF THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO THE OWNER BT TIMM ENGINEERING UNDER THEIR AGREEMENT, 11, STRUCTURAL SPECIFICATIONS A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS I. THE CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS STATE. IN THESE SPECIlICATIONE, SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR CONFORMANCE TO ALL CODES AND CONDITIONS, IN THE EVENT CO ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES AND CONDITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF THE DISCREPANCY AND SPECIAL ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE APPLIED TO INSURE THE BUILDING'S STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, 1. THESE REQUIREMENTS MAY BE SUPERCEDED BY MORE STRINGENT INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THE DRAWINGS. THE MORE STRINGENT SHALL OE FOLLOWED. 3, SOILS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: -- SOIL BEARING CAPACITY= MINIMUM 1$00 LBS/SQ FT --WATER TABLE. MINIMUM 1'-0" BELOW BOTTOM OF ALL CONCRETE SLABS FOOTINGS, I WALLS 4, THE BOTTOM OF ALL FOOTINGS SHALL EXTEND TO BELOW THE FROST LINE OF THE LOCALITY OR TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 2'-S BELOW GRADE. 5. FREE DRAINING GRANULAR BACKFILL SHALL BE USED AGAINST ALL FOUNDATION WALLS. FOUNDATION WALLS WERE DESIGNED FOR A SOIL EQUIVALENT FLUID PRESSURE OF 45 FOR S. ALL BACKFILL UNDER SLABS AND FOOTINGS SHALL BE CLEAN, POROUS SOIL COMPACTED IN B" LAYERS TO 95% DENSITY, WHERE DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF FOUNDATION WALL EXCEEDS I6", BUT IS LESS THAN 4'4". PROVIDE BACKFILL AS DESCRIBED ABOVE OR REINFORCE WITH '4 REBAR a 2'4" O.C., I'l- BEYOND EDGE OF UNDISTURBED SOIL AND 1'-0" INTO FOUNDATION WALL, B. CONCRETE I. ALL CONCRETE SHALL ATTAIN THE FOLLOWING 2B DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHS. - BASEMENT WALLS I FOUNDATIONS NOT EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER: 3500 PSI -- BASEMENT SLABS AND INTERIOR SLABS ON GRADE (EXCEPT GARAGE SLABS): 1$00 PSI EASEMENT WALLS. FOUNDATION WALLS, I OTHER EXPOSED VERTICAL SURFACES, 3,000 PSI 5 5 I OTHER EXPOSED HORIZONTAL SURFACES: 3500 PSI PORCHES, STEPS . SMALL CONFORM LAB SHALL MLL TO ASTM AO STM NEW , WITH MINIMUM 60. 2. RdNFORCING STEEL LL 3. WELDED WIRE MESH lu.W11) SEA" CONFORMAN A .LUTE M A -ES, WI OF MINIMUM LAPS OF W. S. CONCRETE EXPOSED SLED MPIN SHALL CO WITH LL BE 5% MA 1% AIR OF 5", S. ALL S WIHEL EXTERIOR PR CONCRETE UREMSHALL H ES .a AIR ENTRAINED ORNS SHALL CONFORM RTO ASTM C46O. 6. WALLS WITH LATERAL PRESSURE SHALL BE SNORED OR FLOOR/ROOF CON&TRUCTION SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO EACKFILLING. 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 31555, I. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SPECIFIED IN THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-36. 3. STEEL PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-53. 3, ALL WELDS SHALL COMPLY WITH AUS STANDARDS 4. ALL BOLTS IN BOLTED STEEL CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A.325. S. ALL REQUIRED STEEL ANCHORS, STRAPS, CAP., )01ST HANGERS, ETC., SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF CODE APPROVED GALVANIZED STEEL, S. ALL CONNECTION. SHALL CONFORM TO AISC STANDARDS. O. WOOD I. ACL STRUCTURAL WOOD JOISTS, RAFTERS AND HEADERS SHALL BE STRESSED GRADED '2HEM-FIR, I9% M.C. IN ACCORDANCE WITH NDS BY NPEPA, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, 3. ALL WOOD SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS: '2 HEN FIR, <IEW M.C. STUD GRADE SPRUCE, PINE, FIR (5PF), 19k M.C. EN MIN, 050 PSI SINGLE MEMBER USE EN MIN, 6T5 PSI SINGLE MEMBER USE E MIN. 1300.000 PSI E MIN. 1300000 PSI F MIN, T5 PSI Fv MM. TO PSI FE MIN, 1.900 PSI (PARALLEL TO GRAIN) FE MIN, TIE P51 (PARALLEL TO GRAIN) FE MN. 405 P51 (PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN) FE MIN. 425 PSI (PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN) '2 SPRUCE, PINE, RR ('2SPF), XIS% M.C. LAMINATED VENEERED LUMBER (LVL) EF, MIN. BT5 PSI SINGLE MEMBER USE RA MIN, 2*00 PSI E MIN, 1,400000 PSI E MIN, 1,900,000 PSI Ps' MIN, TO PSI Fl, MIN, 2.5 PSI Fs MIN. 1,150 PSI (PARALLEL TO GRAIN) FS MIN, 2,510 PSI (PARALLEL TO GRAIN) Fa MIN. 425 PSI (PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN) FE MIN. 150 PSI (PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN) '2 SOUTHERN PINE ('3 SYP), <IS% M.C. PARALLEL STRAND LUMBER (ESL) 3'4' THICK. 13" WIDE IS, MIN. 4900 PSI FE MIN, 915 PSI SINGLE MEMBER USE E MIN. 3,000,000 PSI E MIN. IbOOOOO PSI Ps' MIN. 2S. PSI FV MIN, SO PSI Fa MIN, ZEOO PSI (PARALLEL TO GRAIN) FE MIN. IF5O PSI (PARALLEL TO GRAIN) Fe MIN, 15C PSI (PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN) FE MIN, 565 PSI (PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN) LAMINATED STRAND LUMBER (L5U 1.3E EN MIN. (PSI) SINGLE MEMBER USE (,TOO E MIN. (PSI) 1300.000 Fs' MN. (PSI) 400 Fc MIN, (PSI) PARALLEL TO GRAIN (.400 FE MIN. (PSI) PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN 650 1.5E LIE 3]50 3,600 1300.000 1,100,000 400 400 L95O 33SO 150 550 S. ALL MANUFACTURED WOOD TRUSSES AND TRUSS HEADERS SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE MANUFACTURER ACCORDING TO TPI AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED BY LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITIES, THE TRUES MANUFACTURER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING A COMPLETE SET OF SHOP DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SEALED BT A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE GOVERNING-URISDICTION. 4, ALL WEATHER EXPOSED STRUCTURAL WOOD 4 WOOD IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH CONCRETE SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED AGAINST DECAY AND INFESTATION BY TERMITES AND MOISTURE, S. ALL WALL SILL PLATES SHALL BE SIZED PER PLAN AND SHALL BE ANCHORED INTO FOUNDATION WALLS WITH APPROVED GALVANIZED STEEL ANCHORS PER IRC 2003 AND THE DETAILS ON THE TYPICAL SECTION DRAWING. 6. ALL EXTERIOR WOOD FRAMEWORK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF B" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE, T. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATHING SHALL ER 1/16' (MIN,) OWE OR BETTER. S. PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS DOUBLE TOP PLATE ON ALL BEARING STUD WALLS. S. ALL STRUCTURAL WOOD POSTS UNDER BEAMS AND HEADERS OVER A 4"0" SPAN SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF (2)1 v 4 SPF '1 STUDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 10. ALL BEARING PARTITIONS SHALL BE 11 4 SPF'] STUDS • 16" CC. UNLESS OTHERWISE VOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. II, PROVIDE SOLID BLOCKING AT 4-0" O.G. DENIEEN RIM JOIST AND FIRST INTERIOR PARALLEL JOIST. 13. ALL FRAMING SHALL BE DETAILED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFWPA MANUAL FOR HOUSE FRAMING AND RC 3003. 13, ALL CERAMIC TILE SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE TILE COUNCIL OF AMERICA SPECIFICATIONS. 14. ALL PLYWOOD SUBFLOORS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 53" T 4 G, APA RATED STIRD-i.FLOOR, GLUED AND NAILED WITH ELASTOMERIC STRUCTURAL ADHESIVE AND BO COMMON NAILS • 6" O.C. AT PANEL ENDS AND S" O,C, AT INTERMEDIATE BEARINGS, 15, ALL WOOD POSTS LABELED "SOLID BLOCKING" OR "CONT." SHALL SE CAPABLE OF TRANSFERRING THE BEARING LOADS UNDER THE BEAMS, HEADERS, AND/OR TRUSSES TO BEARING STEEL OR CONCRETE. 16, ALL ENGINEERED WOOD BEAMS, HEADERS. STRINGERS, ETC., ON THIS PLAN ARE LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER (LVL), PARALLEL STRAND LUMBER (PSL). OR LAMINATED STRAND LUMBER (LSL) AS MANUFACTURED BY TRUSJOIST MACMILLAN CORPORATION. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY SUBSTITUTIONS SHOULD ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S PRODUCT BE' UTILIZED, IT. ALL PLYWOOD ROOF. FLOOR, AND WALL SHEATHING SHALL BE APA APPROVED. IS. ALL EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR LOAD BEARING WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF SPF 43 a I6' O.C. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 19, ALL INTERIOR NON -LOAD BEARING WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF STUD GRADE SPF r IS" 0 G UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS, Xl, ALL SOLID WOOD POSTS 1.e. 454', OR 5,15',) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF SYP '3 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS, E. MASONRY I, MATERIALS - MORTAR: TYPE "5" ASTM C -T0. - HOLLOW CMU: ASTM C-EO. - FACE BRICK: ASTM CO16, -- GROUT AGGREGATE: ASTM C -4T6. 2. ALL MASONRY SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING FOR NOT LESS THAN 46 HOURS AFTER INSTALLATION AMC SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED BELOW 40 DEGREES F WITHOUT PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO PREVENT FREEZING, NO ANTI -FREEZE ADMIXTURES SHALL BE ADDED TO THE MORTAR, 3, BRICK VENEER SHALL BR ATTACHED TO WOOD FRAME WITH MINIMUM 33 GUAGE GALVANIZED CORRUGATED STEEL TIES 1/B" WIDE A MAXIMUM OF 16" O.C. VERTICALLY AND 24" O.C. HORIZONTALLY, 4. WEEP HOLES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE FIRST COURSE ABOVE GRADE AND THE FIRST COURSE ABOVE STEEL LINTELS, WEEP HOLES SHALL BE 4" DIAMETER 5 32' O.C. MAXIMUM, 5, THE TOP COURSE OF ALL MASONRY BEARING WALLS SHALL DR CONSTRUCTED OF SOLID MASONRY UNITS OR GROUT FILLED HOLLOW UNITS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE DISTRIBUTION OF LOADS, 6. ALL MASONRY WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE. REQUIREMENTS OF ACI 530-95/ASCE 5-96. III, DOORS I WINDOWS A. ALL DIMENSIONAL IDENTIFICATIONS GIVEN ON THE DRAWINGS TO DOOR AND WINDOW OPBIINGS DEFINE THE INTENDED AESTHETIC SIZE AND TYPE BY INDICANNG GENERIC UNIT SIZES. CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE THE MANUFACTURERS' SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROUGH OPENING OF THE SPECIFIC MAKE AND MODEL FOR FRAMING AND EXTERIOR MASONRY VENEER. CONTRACTOR SELECTION OF OPENINGS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE R/U VALUES INDICATED IN THE ENERGY MODEL COMPLIANCE FORMS. IV. THERMALS MOISTURE PROTECTION A. ALL BLABS ON GRADE IN CONDITIONED SPACES SHALL BE INSULATED WITH A MINIMUM R-5 RIGID INSULATION FROM THE TOP OF. THE SLAB DOWNWARD TO 34 BELOW THE SLAB OR INWARDS 34" FROM THE EXTEE'OR OF THE SLAB AT ALL SLAB PERIMETER AREAS. REFER TO TYPICAL WALL ELEVATION FOR DETAILS. B. WATERPROOF ALL EXTERIOR WALLS BELOW GRADE AS SPECIFIED/DETAILED ON THE TYPICAL WALL ELEVATION DRAWING, C. FLASHING SHALL BE PROVIDED PER IRC 3003 RTO3.E, 0. AN APPROVED WATER RESISTANT HOUSE WRAP (SUCH AS DUPONT TYVEK OR LODES BARRICADE) SHALL BE APPLIED OVER THE EXTERIOR OSB STRUCTURAL SHEATHING PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, V. SAFETY A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ERECT ALL TEMPORARY HANDRAILS 4 GUARDRAILS WHERE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY, B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL FINAL HANDRAILS 4 GUARDRAILS ARE PRONGED AND INSTALLED PER IRC 1003 SECTIONS R311 4 R313, C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL LIGHTS ARE GLAZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH IRC 3003 SECTION REDS, D. SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE LOCATED AND INSTALLED PER IRC 3003 SECTON 3(3, E CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL MISS UTILITY (OR THE CORRESPONDING LOCAL AUTHORITY) FUR THE IDENTIFICATION OF ALL SUBTERRANIAN UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION WORK REQUIRED TO BE PERFORML'), F. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SOIL PRETREATMENT FOR TERMITES WHERE REQUIRED BY TIE LOCAL AUTHORITY. G. FIRE BLOCKING 4 DRAFT STOPS I. FIRE BLOCKING 4 DRAFT STOPPING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO CUT OFF ALL CONCEALED -RAFT OPENING& (ROTH VERTICAL 4 HORIZONTAL) AND SHALL FORM AN EFFECTIVE BARRIER BETWEEN FLOORS. BETWEEN TOP STORY AND A FLOOR OR ATTIC SPACE 2. PROVIDE. AT ALL INTERCONNECTIONS BETWEEN CONCEALED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SPACES SUCH AS OCCURS AT SOFFITS, DROP CEILINGS, AND COVE CEILINGS, 3. PROVIDE AT CONCEALED SPACES BETWEEN STAIR STRINGERS AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE RUN AND BETWEEN STUDS ALONG AND IN LINE WITH THE RUN OF STAIRS, 4, PROVIDE AT OPENINGS AROUND VENTS, PIPES, DUCTS, AND SIMILAR OPENINGS WHICH .'FORD A PASSAGE FOR FIRE AT CEILING AND FLOOR LEVELS, WITH NONCUMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. VI, CONDENSATE DISPOSAL A, AN APPROVED MEANS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF CONDENSATE FROM THE AIR-COOLING EQUIPMENT TO OUTSIDE THE BUILDING OR OTHER APPROVED LOCATIONS, B. WHERE THE COOLING COIL OR CONDENSING FURNACE 15 LOCATED ABOVE A LIVING SPACE OR WHERE STRUCTURAL DAMAGE MAY RESULT FROM A CONDENSATE LEAK OR OVERFLOW, A WATERTIGHT FAN TII`4 A SEPARATE DRAIN THAT IS READILY OBSERVABLE SHALL BE INSTALLED, VII, ABBREVIATIONS AD) ADAISTABLE MC MEDICINE CABINET A.S.F, ABOVE SUBFLOOR MFG MANUFACTURER A,F F, ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR NG, NATURAL GAS BF BIFOLD O.P. OVERALL BM BEAM O.C. ON CENTER B.O,J, BOTTON OF JOIST OPT, OPTIONAL CLG CEILING PART, PARTITION CMJ CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT PLWD PLYWOOD CO. CASED OPENING PL PLACES COL COLUMN P.T. PRESSURE TREATED CONC CONCRETE R/A RETURN AIR CONT CONTINUOUS R.C. ROUGH CUT C5 CASEMENT REF REFRIGERATOR CVAC CENTRAL VACUUM RIO RANGE/OVEN D DRYER RO ROUGH OPENING DEL DOUBLE R. RAIL I SHELF DES DESIGN SD SMOKE DETECTOR OH DOUBLE HUNG S.F. SQUARE FOOT (FEET) DR DETAIL SHWR SHOWER O.V. DIRECT VENT SIN SIMILAR D. DISHWASHER SL SLIDING DOORAWINDOIW ES EXHAUST FAN STD STANDARD FD FLOOR DRAIN 5TL STEEL FR DR FRENCH DOOR TIG TONGUE I GROOVE F,P, FREPLACE I.S. TOP OF SLAS FDN FOUNDATION TOE. TOP OF WALL FTG FOOTING TR TRIM GFCI GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERUPTER TYP TYPICAL GPDW GYPSUM DRYWALL W WASHER HDHGHT WINDOW HEAD HEIGHT WD WOOD HDR HEADER W/O WALL OVEN HFL HEAT/FAN/LIGHT W,W.M, WELDED WIRE MESH HWH HOT WATER HEATER INEUL INSULATION LT LAUNDRY TUB VIII. DESIGN LOADS LIVE LOAD USE DEAD LOAD USE SO BALCONIES (EXTERIOR) 10 WALLS (PER SO FT) 40 DECKS 10 ROOF (TOP CHORD) SO GARAGES (PASSENGER CARS ONLY) T ROOF (BOTTOM CHORD) 10 ATTICS MO STORAGE W/ ROOF SLOPE LESS THAN 3/E) IS KITCHEN 20 ATTICS (LIMITED STORAGE ARE9) IS BATHROOMS 30 GROUND SNOW LOAD IS FOYER 30 ROOF 15 TILE FLOORS 40 DWELLING UNITS (EXCLUDING SLEEPING ROOMS) IS HARDWOOD FLOOR AREAS 20 SLEEPING ROOM. E CARPET AREAS 40 STAIRS 300 GUARDRAILS I HANDRAILS (CONCENTRATED LOAD) DESIGN WIND SPEED: SO MPH (3 -SECOND GUST) LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION: L/600 IX, AREA CALCULATIONS 4 AREA CALCULATIONS INCLUDE GROSS FLOOR AREA TO THE EXTERIOR BEARING OF FRAMED WALLS FOR ALL CONDITIONED SPACES AND EXCLUDE UPPER LEVELS OF MULTISTORY SPACES. B. BASEMENT SPACE IS IDENTIFIED SEPERATELT AND BROKEN OUT INTO FINISHED SPACE AND UNFINISHED SPACE AND IS MEASURED TO THE INTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY WALL EXTERIOR AND TO THE FACE OF FRAMED WALLS, IF APPLICABLE. FIRST FLOOR AREA 0,0 S.F. SECOND FLOOR AREA 551.5 S.F. THIRD FLOOR AREA NM S.F. TOTAL AREA 551,5 S.F. FINISHED BASEMENT 0.0 S.F. UNFINISHED BASEMENT 0,0 S.F. TOTAL EASEMENT 0.0 S.F. X. LIST OF DRAWINGS THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE ITEMIZES THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED FOR THIS PROJECT BY TIMM ENGINEERING, SHEET TITLE A -I NOTE PAGE A-1 SECOND FLOOR ADDITION LAYOUT 5-I TYPICAL WALL SECTION S3 FIRST FLOOR STRUCTURE S-3 SECOND FLOOR STRUCTURE 5-4 ROOF STRUCTURE 5.5 S.. qv11II III IIIkiII E o C, iiflIP uiI Ii H IIII ppaJJ U_ C IIII II Gn n nS > 0 m O O ` IIIIIIII DVII M "' I'll v J F — o F-' W x w a (n Go SHEET REV A-1 9' x T White, Insulated, Solid (No Windows) Garage Door Page 1 of 2 Let's Buitd Something Together' Welcome, Carl! (Not Carl?) Keywords or item# Lowes.com fl IlY STORE WAYNESBORO, PA (Change) More Store Locations Search 1--T CART (0) items Register I LogIn GIFT CARDS I GIFT ADVISOR j INSTALLATION SERVI Redeem Your Gift Cards Onlin Home: Building Products : Doors : Garage _Doors, Openers & Accessories : Garage Doors Click to Enlarge Wayne® Dalton 9' x 7' White, Insulated, Solid (No Windows) Garage C Item #: 39198 Model: 9100 $369.00 See Store for Availability Description L Galvanized steel panel exterior - provides strength & rigidity R-8 polyurethane insulation - for better temperature stability & sound absorption Wood textured, raised panel design Pinch -resistant panel joints - designed to push fingers away from closing door TorqueMaster'M Counterbalance system - safe & easy to install Life of home warranty Product Availability: This item is currently unavailable for through the WAYNESBORO, PA store the store at (717) 387-4000 for othe change your store to check another t area Selec Need Help? • Help • Contact Us • Find Your Loca • Rebate Center Inspiration and • Product Guides Be informed before you buy • How -To Library Projects and id for do-it- yourselfers. • Project Calcula Plan your projE with these help tools. Lowe's Credit Finance your ide No annual fees. monthly paymer Viewing Image Of: RAILING, PICKET: Novaline Baluster Set 42H x 96W Square Balus... Page 1 of 1, RAILING, PICKET: Novaline Baluster Set 42H x 96W Square Baluster 888-FENCETOWN (888-336-2386) www.FenceTown.com, FenceTown Close Window -IH 0,1nc. WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION ° 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 301-791-3065 TDD/Hearing Impaired: 301-791-3070 FAX:301-791-3017 MEMORANDUM TO Lisa Pietro Senior Planner FROM Stephen Ooodricltll Chief Planner SUBJECT Historic District Commission review of S-06-001 — Lot 9 Susan Harris SP -06-040 — Ringgold Church of Christ DATE July 26, 2006 S-06-001 The subject parcel is located in the Rural Village zoning associated with the village of Tilghmanton. The proposal creates a new 2.71 acre residential building lot from existing Lot 5. There are no structures on the site that are listed in the Tilghmanton historic inventory. It is not necessary for the Historic District Commission to review this simple subdivision application. However, the applicants and any future lot owners need to be aware that the Rural Village zoning on the proposed new lot requires HDC approval of the exterior appearance of any new construction over 100 square feet (See Article 5D - Rural Village, Section 5D5 -Architectural Review in the WC Zoning Ordinance). That review and approval usually occurs during building permit approval. I would recommend a note to that effect be placed on the plat before subdivision approval. SP -06-040 The subject parcel is located in the Rural Village zoning associated with the village of Ringgold. The site plan proposes construction of a new 29,542 square foot building to be used for church services, classrooms and a multi -purpose area. Also proposed are a 209 space parking lot and a stormwater management facility. The Rural Village zoning on the parcel requires HDC approval of the exterior appearance of any new construction over 100 square feet (See Article 5D -Rural Village, Section 5D5 - Architectural Review in the WC Zoning Ordinance). That review and approval usually occurs during building permit approval. I would recommend a note to that effect be placed on the site plan before approval. Although RV zoning does not specify HDC review of site plans, the HDC's duties enumerated in Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Section 20.3) do say that the Commission '...shall review ...any...site plan... affecting historic preservation.., and may make recommendations thereon to the appropriate authorities." Since the proposed construction is so large and the village of Ringgold is an inventoried historic village it is appropriate for the HDC to at least be ® RECYCLED PAPER MEMORANDUM TO: Lisa Pietro Page 2 informed of the proposal at this stage. I have placed the item on the HDC's agenda for the August 2 meeting. If the HDC offers recommendations I will provide them after the meeting. STG/me Cc: Frederick, Seibert and Associates Associated Engineering Sciences, Inc. (ATTN: Rob Holmes) Ringgold Church of Christ SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL FORM TYPE : SITEPLN VERSION : 502 DATE 07-18-2006 TO FROM PLANNER : LISA KELLY PIETRO ATTACHED HEREWITH : SP -06-040 NAME : RINGGOLD CHURCH OF CHRIST DESCRIPTION : PROPOSED EXPANSION OF CHURCH FACILITIES LOCATION : WESTSIDE OF BARKDOLL ROAD DISTRICT 0 LAND USE ZONING : RURAL VILLAGE PARCEL : 013-19-0112-00001 ACRES 10.13 LOTS 0 OWNER : RINGGOLD CHURCH OF CHRIST SURVEYOR : ASSOCIATED ENG SCIENCES INC SUBMITTED BY THIS OFFICE FOR YOUR: WCS SENSITIVE REVIEW NEEDED APPROVAL OBSERVATION & COMMENT _INFORMATION ATTACHEMENTS(S) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ROAD ADEQUACY WORKSHEETS FOREST CONSERVATION PLAN _OTHER: LKP i rs. nL� `f.(I u, J -)y / /Jtao t& D11-Aicf- WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2006-06319 Applied: 07/25/2006 Project No: P2006-1463 Approved: Permit Type: RES-ADD Status: PENDING Inspector Area: B2 District/Acct No: 14009973 Job Address: 14624 WATER COMPANY ROAD CA Location: LOR 14624 WATER COMPANY ROAD Parcel No: 014-22-0294-00000 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: C Applicant: TYDINGS RICHARD G RELIABLE CRAFTSMANSHIP 14022 POPLAR GROVE ROAD HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 Phone Number: 301-791-1508 Owner: HETTICH RONALD L & MARGARET M Contractor: TYDINGS RICHARD G Phone Number: 301-791-1508 Contractor Lic. No: MHIC-66924 Description: TWO STORY ADDITION WITH GARAGE AND STORAGE ROOM IN FOUNDATION AND GREAT ROOM ABOVE WITH ATRIUM CONNECTING TO EXISTING DWELLING, OPEN WOOD DECK OFF EXISTING COVERED PORCH, CONCRETE FOOTER AND BLOCK WITH CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR, FRAME CONSTRUCTION W/EL DORADO STONE VENEER AND VINYL SIDING EXTERIOR, PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSS ROOF WITH SHINGLES, NON-COMBUSTIBLE WOOD STOVE IN GREAT ROOM Foundation Size: 34'X39' Exterior Finish: STONE & V/SIDING Air Conditioning: Y Type of Heat...: HEAT Septic........... Public Sewer...: Y Time Existed: Public Water...: Y Well........... Gas............: Time Existed: Electric.......: Y Construction Type: A/R Construction Valuation: $145,000.00 No. Of Bathrooms: Code Enforced: 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE No. of Bedrooms: 0 Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Proposed 1.30 ACRES 1.30 ACRES 96 65 50 77 Minimum By Ordinance 20,000 SQ FT 20,000 SQ FT 25 25 5 5 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspec and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any ques please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4: Monday through Friday. JUL25 r \NASI11P1i31C!�''.�� ���� DEP fl \\ a o is y IT 0 NTAIN T R0 s �, N Q Oy QQwC _3Z \, O p b oYIN •v'o� ����� s as N Q Q C\ N )(y-- '-' It, Ll • • •• .Jw (g" OMB No. 1024-0018 NPS Form 10-900 (zev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service r: °'ional Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. historic other names/site numb�i 2. Location portions of Military, Highfield, Hilltop, Water Company, ana street & number Rowland Hill Roads and Third and Eyler Avenues N/A not for publication city or town Cascade N/A vicinity state Maryland code MD county Washington code 043 zip code 21719 s- the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _ nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _nationally_ statewide _locally. (_See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifyingofficial/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property — meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. (_ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau I hereby certify that this property is: entered in the National Register _ See continuation sheet. determined eligible for the National Register See continuation sheet. determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register — other (explain): Signature of the Keeper Date of Action Highfield/Cascade Historic District Name of Property Washington County, MD County and State (Check as many boxes as apply) private _ public -local _ public -State public -Federal (Check only one box) — building(s) X district site structure object Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC/ single dwelling DOMESTIC / secondary structure DOMESTIC/multiple dwelling DOMESTIC/hotel from instructions) LATE VICTORIAN/Queen Anne Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets) Refer to continuation sheets Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously -listed resources in the count) Contributing Noncontributing buildings sites s1 udt ies objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register none (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC/single dwellin DOMESTIC/secondary structure COMMERCE/TRADE/specialty store DOMESTIC/multiple dwelling (Enter categories from instructions) foundation STONE/sandstone: CONCRETE walls WOOD/weatherboard; BRICK; WOOD/shingle roof SYNTHETICS/asphalt; STONE/slate; METAL other Highfield/Cascade Historic District Name of Property Washington County, MD County and State in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property tal Register listing) A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. _ B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. V C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Mark "X' in all the boxes that apply.) Property is: _ A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. B removed from its original location. — C a birthplace or a grave. D a cemetery. E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. F a commemorative property. G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) Areas of significance (Enter categories from instructions) ARCHITECTURE Period of Significance c. 1890-c. 1940 Significant Dates N/A Significant Person (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) N/A Cultural Affiliation N/A ArchitectiBuilder unknown „Cteth or...7 (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested. previously listed in the National Register previously determined eligible by the National Register _ designated a National Historic Landmark recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # Primary location of additional data: State Historic Preservation Office Other state agency _ Federal agency Local government University Other Name of repository: Highfield/Cascade Historic District Name of Property Washington County. MD County and State Acreage of Property 70 acres U'i `References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) Zone Easting Northing Zone . Easting Northing 18 287460 4399300 3 18 288400 4399180 18 288440 4399340 4 18 287400 4398760 5 18 287280 4398940 N/A See continuation sheet. Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) nameltitle David L. Taylor. Principal organization Taylor 8s Taylor Associates Inc. date July, 1999 street & number 9 Walnut Street telephone 814-849-4900 city or town Brookville state PA zip code 15825 Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) or street & number telephone city or town state zip code Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or rmine eligibilityfor listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response tothis request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic ,ervation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden forthis form is estimated to average 18:1 hours per response including the timefor reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing theform. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this formtotheChief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. OMBAPPmvdNa 1024001E NPS Form 10-900-a (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service K Donal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 7. Description, Page One Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD The Highfield/Cascade Historic District is a primarily residential area of 70 acres, located on the slopes of South Mountain, in the Blue Ridge range, in rural Washington County, Maryland. The Mason-Dixon Line (which serves as the boundary between Pennsylvania and Maryland) forms a portion of the north boundary of the area, which is approximately twelve miles northeast of the county seat of Hagerstown. The area encompasses parts of two interconnected, unincorporated settlements, Highfield and Cascade, which lie immediately east of the former U. S. Army installation of Ft. Ritchie,' in Washington County Election District 14, which is known as the Ringgold District. The communities essentially run together, with neither political nor natural differentiating bound- aries to separate them. Approximately sixty resources are found within the documented area, of which approximately 51\ (c. 80%) contribute to the character of the district and the remaining are non-contributing fea- as. Contrib tresources were built within the approximately half -century Period of Significance of the district (c. 1890-c. 1940) and retain physicalc aracteristics which reflect their historic appear ante. Non-contributing resources date from outside the Period of Significance and/or have been physically altered to the extent that they no longer convey a suitable sense of historicity. Non- contributing resources are dispersed widely throughout the area and fail to detract from the overall character of the district as a cohesive unit. As noted above, the vast majority of the properties within the Highfield/Cascade Historic District are domestic in character. Among these are single-family residences of v scales, as well as larger buildin s su esting revious uses as boarding houses or modest hotels. Most build- ings are of wood construction, built upon foundations of stone an capped with gabled or hinped roof systems; Dutch Colonial Revival -style buildings exhibit the distinctive gambre roof which defines that particular design mode. Fenestration incorporates flat-topped windows with double -hung sash. Variations on the flat-topped window form are found in some Colonial Revival -style properties which incorporate Palladian windows. Many buildings retain their historic brick chimp; the Queen Anne -style "Stone Manor" at 25624 Military Road, built of ashlar stone, features tall brick chimneys with corbeled ornament. Chimneys on other properties have been removed, likely with the installa- tion of central heating systems. Typical of mountain resort communities, many of the homes retain broad wood verandas which often extend across more than one elevation. Due to the topography, many of these are found along the south side of Military Road, including the Hilltop Apartments at 25625 Military Road, as well as 25461, 25502, 25613, and 25461 Military Road , and the aforemen- med "Stone Manor." (When the Army closed Ft. Ritchie, the property was transferred to a private -sector community development corporation for re -use. O MB Appra2l A0.1024-001 f NPS Forth 10-e00a (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service hlonal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 7. Description, Page Two Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD The topography of the district is somewhat rugged, since the communities are situated on the side of the Blue Ridge. Many of the buildings are on spacious lots with well -maintained lawns, mature trees, and other landscape features. Building setbacks vary considerably, ranging from large expanses of setback from all sides to others lots with comparatively little setback. Several properties have stone walls around the perimeter of their respective building lots; features such as these contribute to the overall character of the district but are treated as background landscape structures and are not included in the estimated resource tabulation. Throughout the district are diverse depen dencies, ranging from automobile garages from the first third of the twentieth century to mass- produced outbuildings from the latter decades of the century. These buildings are also treated as landscape features and are not included in the resource tabulation. The streets within the Highfield/ Cascade Historic District are arranged in a grid. Military Road ryland Route 550) is the principal roadway and bisects the district, entering near the southwest corner and running in a northeasterly direction. Perpendicular to Military Road are Highfield and Hilltop, and Rowland Hill Roads and Eyler Avenue. Interspersed among the major roadways are a series of unnamed and in some cases, unopened alleys. The principal roadways have cartways of between twenty and twenty-five feet in width and are paved with asphalt. Most alleys are unpaved and have cartways of approximately ten feet in width. The dominant character of the Highfield/Cascade Historic District is that of a late nineteenth - and early twentieth-century rural mountain resort community. With reference to the Nation esister Criteria or uation, the distract retains an acceptably high degree of physical integrity. OMBAppov&No 1024001( Nps Fonn l O -900-a (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service t� :ional Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 8. Significance Page One Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD This documentation of the Highfield/Cascade Historic District was undertaken with reference to National Register Criterion C, for architecture, characterizing the investigated area as an intact Western Maryland mountain resort community, residential in character, dating from the late nine- teenth and early twentieth century. This document supplants Maryland Historical Trust Inventory No. WA -IV -057, which included minimal narrative and photographic documentation of the area. The district is of particular significance to Washington County and to western Maryland as the tangible reflection of technological advance (namely, the development of the railroad) upon the growth of recreational and leisure activities, evidenced in the predominating character of the documented area as a resort community. The Period of Significance for the district begins c. 1890 and ends c. 1940, dates which span the approximate dates of construction of the area's historic resources and encom- pass the formative years of popularity of the area as a summer resort. The district consists of small - d medium scale domestic architecture executed in several of the architectur les popular i. Ang the Period of Significance, including Queen Anne, Colonial Revival, Dutch Colonial Revival, and Bungalow. Little information exists regarding either the genesis or the subsequent development of these two communities, portions of which were referenced on early maps as "Germantown." The settle- ments were never incorporated and are typical of a series of similarly -sized Blue Ridge Mountain communities which straddle the Pennsylvania -Maryland border within five miles of each other: Pen Mar, Blue Ridge Summit, Monterey, Charmain, Cullen, Highfield, and Cascade. Among these, Cascade, Highfield, and Blue Ridge Summit spill over into each other without regard for political jurisdictional boundaries, and, according to a local newspaper article, have stories and "exact histories and boundaries [which] are so diverse as to be legendary. "2 In 1872, the Western Maryland Railway, under the inspired presidency of former Confederate Army engineering officer John Mifflin Hood, completed its line into this portion of Washington County. Stations were established at nearby Pen Mar (site of the WMRR's celebrated resort/ park) and at Highfield; both of these stations were across the Mason-Dixon Line in Pennsylvania and neither are extant. In the 1877 Illustrated Atlas of Washington County,3 very few buildings are depicted on the future site of Highfield and Cascade (See Fig. 1); it is likely that few, if any, of these early buildings survive. In August, 1877, the railroad opened Pen Mar Park, about one mile west of the nominated area, and the development of this regionally -famous outdoor attraction, combined 2Minnick, Rosemary, "Why Some Washington County Towns Were Named," unattributed clipping in the files of the Washington County Historical Society, Hagerstown, Maryland. 3An Illustrated Atlas of Washington County, Maryland (Philadelphia: Lake, Grilling, & Stephenson, 1877). OMB App ro vaJ Ab. 1024-OO U NPSFomi 10-9,00-a (8-66) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service A.'"aonal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 8. Significance, Pam Two Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD with the marketing of the slopes of the Blue Ridge as a summer retreat, contributed significantly to the development of the Highfield/Cascade area. In chronicling the history of Pen Mar, Judith Schlotterbeck reproduced an unattributed late nineteenth-century newspaper comment regarding the flurry of activity in the entire area: A building boom has hit the Blue Ridge Summit? The entire slope between the Summit and Highfield is just specked with new buildings. Quite a village has sprung up in the last few months and the sign [sic] looks as though this trend will continue 4 An unattributed 1903 regional map, (Figure 3), reproduced in a Washington County historical magazine,5 shows major development along the slopes of the mountain, suggesting that many areas r ` ale two communities were fully developed by that time. Schlotterbeck reported that "by the early J0s there were over one hundred hotels and boarding houses in the Pen Mar vicinity [within which is the nominated area] serving thousands of summer guests."6 Most of these hotels were of wood construction and either burned or were demolished after the railroad razed Pen Mar park in the early 1940s and passenger service was discontinued to the area shortly thereafter. Post Offices were established at Highfield and Cascade in 1890 and 1898, respectively; the Highfield Post Office was closed and at the time of writing the Cascade Post Office serves both communities from a modern building on Military Road, outside the district to the east. As the popularity of the area increased, the Western Maryland Railroad instituted excursions into the Blue Ridge from Baltimore and similar urbanized areas. To serve the throngs which began to visit, the Buena Vista Ice Company acquired 638 acres and created two lakes just west of the district, on the eventual site of Ft. Ritchie. During the first forty years of the twentieth century, the area remained popular with a broad spectrum of vacationers, some of whom came to take up resi- dence in the area's boarding houses, while others occupied their own summer homes, with spacious lawns and magnificent mountain viewsheds. The Hagerstown newspaper commented on the charac- ter of the area, noting, "If ever a town could be successful at hiding from the world while sitting in the middle of it, it will be Cascade"7 4Schotterbeck, Judith A. The Pen Mar Story (Funkstown: Tri-State Printing, 1977), p. 105. 5Maryland Cracker Barrel 27:2 (August -September, 1998), p. 5. 6Schlotterbeck, op. cit., p. 105. ?Undated newspaper clipping in "Cascade" vertical file, Washington County Historical Society, Hagerstown, Maryland. OMBAppmvdAb 1024-O0lE NPS Form 10-900-a (886) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service tv. ionai Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 8. Significance, Page Three Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD The majority of the architecture of the district reflects its position as a mountain resort commu- nity. Within the historic district were two hotels, the Hotel Maryland and Highfield Springs, with a combined capacity of one hundred seventy-five guests. A series of cottages in Highfield could accom- modate an additional two hundred fifty. These include the Afton and Pine Hill Cottages, the Mary- land Inn, Quirauk View, Chestnut Grove, Mountain View, Maple, Wantz's, Chestnut, Midview House, Rose Villa, Laurel Grove, Jester, and Fox House.8 The status of these facilities has not been deter- mined. The heyday of the Highfield/ Cascade Historic District matched that of the nearby Pen Mar Historic District, whose fortunes rose and ebbed with those of the Western Maryland's playground - park at Pen Mar. The Highfield/Cascade Historic District was inextricably linked with the passenger s< -vice of the Western Maryland Railway. With the rise of the automobile in the 1920s and 30s, the g 1ularity of rail passenger travel faded. Passenger service to the area was discontinued in the 1940s, Pen Mar Park was dismantled 1943, and the entire area, including the Highfield/Cascade communities, shed its shared character as a seasonal railroad resort. While some seasonal occu- pancy continues at the time of writing, after the 1940s the area settled into a subdued existence as a primarily year-round rural residential community nestled into the mountains. Due to its relatively isolated location atop the Blue Ridge range, the documented area nonetheless continues to convey its historic sense of a nineteenth- and early twentieth-century resort community. With reference to Criterion C, the Highfield/Cascade Historic District is significant because of its concentration of historic resort architecture, large and small, representing many of the styles of design which were in vogue throughout the Period of Significance. Within the historic district, the Queen Anne style, with a typically irregular plan, multiple roof system, and corner tower is repre- sented by the "Stone Manor" at 25624 Military Road. The Dutch Colonial Revival style —represented by 25625 Military Road --incorporates design features from the pre-Revolutionary War Dutch settle- ments in and around New York and always includes a distinctive multiple -pitched gambrel roof. The Bungalow is a purely twentieth-century American design style, and is typically one- to one and one- half -stories in height and incorporates a recessed front porch shielded by an integral sloping roof which is often punctuated by dormers; within the district, Bungalows include 25459 Military Road, 25501 Military Road, and 14614 Hilltop Road. Viewed in its entirety, the Highfield/Cascade Historic District stands as a generally cohesive lection of largely domestic buildings dating from the fifty-year period between c. 1890 and c. 1940 which represents specific architectural styles and associated with the communities' ties to the rail- 8schlotterbeck, op. cit. p. 122. OMBAPPMM No. 10240011 NpS Fonn 10-900-a (8.86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service h_ onal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 8. Significance. Page Four related recreational/leisure history of Maryland. Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD OMBAppmva'Na 10240014 NPS Form 10-900-a (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service K -zonal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Highfieid/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD Section Number Page ,MARYLAND COMPREHENSIVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN DATA Geographic Organization Western Maryland Chronological/Developmental Per- Industrial/Urban Dominance A. D. 1870-1930 iod(s) Prehistoric/Historic Period Themes(s) Architecture/ Landscape Architecture/Community Planning Social/ Educational/ Cultural Resource Type Category: District Historic Environment: Village Rural Historic Function(s) and Use(s) Domestic/ Single dwelling Domestic/Secondary structure Domestic/multiple dwelling Domestic/hotel Known Design Sources None OMBApprorS Ab.1024004 tiPS Form 10-900-a (8.88) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service t..Zonal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD JU1AO1Ua .*z,nmtt snit 'o7s g i/i,PEN MAR �\ i �/ \\� \: \• � ��'wi \\\` 'N ` i�/ ti �SCADE \ \ `•�� jj = . . , rF shy \\\\ �>`,\ giTCHIE 77at�7 T \\ ; FOR \I� �� - /z�u.lfJJm47tun *Yz1IP'* ' ✓�" .i eonfl D�sn, ♦ Kss • '. SYcubirr 'S..B '- �� /fi `. rltixxuy�Fx� t //7ib7ter .l@us Figure 1 This excerpt from the 1877 Lake, Grilling, & stepnenson musrrareu nuns u. w „OiI1Is5LU,..,.,u=.�,,, •••••-r•• shows the area of Highfield/Cascade to be only sparsely settled at that time. The Western Maryland Railway had opened its line to Blue Ridge Summit, Pennsylvania, in the early 1870s, but significant growth in the Highfield/Cascade communities was still two decades away. OMBAppyora'No 1024 -CON NPS Form 10-800-8 (8.86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service k..jonal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD C y"�+Y` Iror z t n♦v Lb ; , �.., t � B 6 � �'---r �'_a� ✓ d �\ '� r is � - `�" 1 sY "�.. al✓r� �4 ^". - 3 ✓xs � ��e s � �� " : ,F' -id_ r F}i �IamY o�3a`✓" �'�,�-- ' xr %. T�s..� �v° •LP .,0' : 1Pt yRrri M PORTIONS of S 7, �. ��AR'tf>I,.!.NID un.l �ARTT3Sii1Nt1YIA fti \ Y d �`° + a1.Mug(6o CROSSING.1, 11m t , �b Qr� a` tiAat'; ar> BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS"' -'p . i' by the °.- --WESTERN MARYLAND RAILROAD. 1 o R �' .Ti' yMf i 1 mal the REGION 1I�ar eul to PEN -MAR PARK a4 - -t .r. • Blue MOUNTHIN.. MONTEREY h'i ✓.. ." 1885. �•eA_�"-.�f0 v,r, .. 77 ,(1' - g y c� ��. n P ✓ '� !-s.xS� ate of Er �I ilx, ry. x1 t '- �`;? { a♦ hay 3 I / �L. Figure 2 This 1885 Western Maryland Railway map, drawn oy crvu w.ru.CC. oo.........s, ••••-.•-........ beginnings of the development in the area that was to become Highfield and Cascade; it is shown on the map as "Germantown," an earlier name for the settlement. Pen Mar, located northwest of Highfield/Cascade, became the WMRR's showcase resort park, and was active from the later 1870s until World War Two. OM9Appmval Ab. 1024-0011 MPS Form 10-900-a (S-60) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service _ional Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD Q•wr••r a0(;ti.• cra •. .c n14 Spit! ,GL** oe_ 41JU \ .her! • x b od "s'. 9R a A O J L I1�}L` �•�y�0x�.x P[MMARIIM. ♦ L 'QrW6aw•!• • . y_i • !V iNRKM1 4 spy •QW,+a 44'P _� 1 4006 + ONOCAtfY ere,- -`a•LeMT!•T M; p,eyl ____-ace44 �M4M•�K0 n� dAlc• a4°44bti!=M�`yiyfy "`� qua ? ba" AOOR M ~ a + 44 we 4y ,aa • ! Sb Mtx.� 6 brb 17C Figure 3 This 1903 map shows the area around ntgnuela area uascaue (siui IOLOLIGU LU a- +. 1 -e -••------- developed, particularly when compared to the 1877 Atlas mao shown in Figure 1. The body of water is Lake Royer created as a source for ice for the new Blue Ridge Mountain resort communities; it is presently part of the former Ft. Ritchie site. OMB Appmv1024001 f NPS Form 10-900- (896) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service h'onal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD Section Number Page 9. Major Bibliographical References. Pace One An Illustrated Atlas of Washington County, Maryland (Philadelphia: Lake, Griffing, & Stephenson, 1877). Cook, Roger and Zimmerman, Karl The Western Maryland Railway -Fireballs and Black Diamonds (San Diego: Howell -North Books, 1981), 244. "Map of Pen Mar Region -1903," Cracker Barrel 27:2 (August -September, 1998), p. 5. Laing, John, C. E., "Topographical Map of Portions of Maryland and Pennsylvania Showing the Crossing of the Blue Ridge Mountains by the Western Maryland Railroad," (1885). Schlotterbeck, Judith A. The Pen Mar Story (Funkstown: Tri-State Printing, 1977). Minnick, Rosemary, "Why Some Washington County Towns are So -Named," (unattributed newspaper article on file at the Washington County Historical Society, Hagerstown, Maryland) OMBAPWov'WNa 1024-007[ NPSPomi 10-900•a (6-80) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service A'. ;Donal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 10. Geographical Data Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD Beginning at the northwest corner of Third Avenue and Rowland Hill Road, then northwesterly along the east curb line of Rowland Hill Road c. 225' to the south curb line of Military Road (Mary- land Route 550); then easterly along the north curb line of Military Road c. 375' to a point opposite the northwest corner of Military Road and Hilltop Road; then north along the west curb line of Hilltop Road c. 300' to the Mason-Dixon Line; then westerly along the Mason-Dixon Line c. 900' to the former Western Maryland Railway right-of-way and following the railroad right-of-way c. 525' to the northeast corner of the property at 25510 Heiston Lane; then southeast c. 225' along the rear prop- erty lines of the properties at 25510, 25527, and 25529 Heiston Lane to the southeast corner of 25529 Heiston Lane; then southwest c. 750' along the rear property lines of the properties front,n Military Road and crossing Highfield Road to the northwest corner of the property at 2q'7152 Military Road; then southeasterly along the southwest property line of 25742 Military Road and crossing Military Road to the southeast curb line of Military Road; then southwesterly along the southeast curb line of Military Road c. 525' to the southwest corner of the property at 25461 Military Road; then southeasterly c. 150' to the southeast corner of the property at 25461 Military Road; then northeasterly and easterly along the rear property lines of the properties fronting on Military Road c. 1,350' to the southwest corner of the property at 14624 Water Company Road; then easterly along the south property line of 14624 Water Company Road to the east curbline of Water Company Road; then southwesterly along the east curbline of Water Company Road c. 300' to the southwest corner of 14607 Water Plant Road; then easterly c. 525' to the east curbline of Hilltop Road; then south along the east curbline of Hilltop Road c. 75' to the southwest cornea of the property at 14615 Hilltop Road; them easterly along the south property line of 14625 Hilltop Road c. 300' to the Frederick - Washington County Line; then northerly along the east property line of 14615 Hilltop Road c. 225' to the northeast corner of 14615 Hilltop Road; then westerly along the north property line of 14615 Hilltop Road c. 150' to the north curbline of Third Avenue; then easterly along the north curbline of Third Avenue c. 375' to the place of beginning. These boundaries are drawn to encompass the architecturally -significant and generally uncompromised residential architecture of the Highfield/ Cascade communities and to exclude newer buildings as well as those with neither architectural importance or historical associations. NPS Form 10.900a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Resource Inventory Page 7 Highfield Historic District Washington County, MD raised foundation with a single -story porch extending across the facade; at the front of the house, near the road right-of-way, is a 1½ -story two -bay garage of wood construction, with a gabled roof; extending around the perimeter of the property is a native stone wall (c.) 1900 57. 14618 Water Company Road 21h -story vernacular cottage built on a somewhat larger scale than normal for a summer house in Highfield, shiplap-sided with a multiple roof system clad in asphalt shingle roof and flat topped windows (c.) 1920 GL 4WatereompanyRoad two-story vernacular residence ofwoodconstructionwithasphalt-shingled gable roof; non - historic siding; single -story veranda extends across the facade; windows are flat topped with exterior shutters (c.) 1909 59. 14700 Eyler Avenue 2'h -story residence ofwood construction with laterally -oriented gable roof and flat-topped multi -light windows, two -over -two and six -over -six, with exterior wood shutters, seven - bay facade with open porch extending across a portion of the facade, supported by simple columns; large brick exterior chimney (c.) 1900 ili 1Jout/4 O o C,; s1 L7 , o � F2 VENUE 9 ' �s ?AVENUE P)cc-n /H)6+ WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2006-05882 Applied: 07/10/2006 Project No: P2006-1371 Approved: Permit Type: RES-ADD Status: PENDING Inspector Area: 84 District/Acct No: 08008094 Job Address: 4304 MAIN STREET RO Location: LOR 4304 MAIN STREET RO Parcel No: 081-10-0172-00000 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE *=�ar,ua Floodplain: C dd g Applicant: PICKETT ROBERT W & ELIZABETH M 16916 BERRY BRAMBLE LANE PAEONIAN SPRINGS, VA 20129 Phone Number: 540-882-4721 Owner: PICKETT ROBERT W & ELIZABETH M Contractor: Phone Number: Contractor Lic. No: Description: TAKING EXISTING 1/2 STORY ATTIC SPACE AND MAKING IT A FULL STORY TO MATCH THE REST OF THE HOUSE TO INCLUDE A MASTER BEDROOM, FULL BATH AND WALK-IN CLOSET. KITCHEN AREA WILL BE REMODELED ADDING STEEL COLUMNS TO SUPPORT THE NEW 2ND STORY AND A POURED CONCRETE SLAB IN THE KITCHEN AND LIVING ROOM. EXISTING BATH WILL BE RELOCATED OFF OF KITCHEN AND A LAUNDRY ROOM WILL BE ADDED. PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED. RI:.Cf-P E0 JUL 11 2006 W.ASHINCTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. Foundation Size: 19X20 Exterior Finish: WOOD, Air Conditioning: N Type of Heat...: Septic............: PROPOSED Public Sewer...: N Time Existed: NA Public Water...: N Well ............: PROPOSED Gas............: N Time Existed: NA Electric.......: Y Construction Type: A/R Valuation: $45,000.00 No. Of Bathrooms: 1 Code Enforced: 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE No. of Bedrooms: Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Proposed .24 ACRES .24 ACRES 0 0 Minimum By Ordinance 40,000 40,000 25 25 5 5 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240-313-2460 Fax: 240.313-2461 a Ye, 1 S 0 O m V C- > Cflm mm vmO Co p. z 4Th 41 N I - c to fio-- t0 5 0) r Wi d Cal 2 i a - Z it - 0 xN�kYYL U� `.O A , " •• • O Lr ' 'YK is 1'3-�� ___________ - )7 $ � i. 5 afny �x s :«o art o' ao m noa Om 3 aa' 0 0 m Z 'J.O O i3 o� y s o� rt .� 3; v aspa2 J o O o �Jao 0 0 3n GJ '• o 0� a a �c to 013 O 00 c (D to 3 0 0 y J J 3 N SLOto (D =0 aa Q O D) w•�J O O J N O oT J -.Q ,moo O>m O Oo 0ml!0"Ns0N ZJ n `m J A X N J 0 3 Ta3o m ITI D.o CD o a Z 0a (O> °o0 0 3 o.�o,m d g \c tD !� m .?.m f a m T rt S S0 N 0 D. a Th 3 N N �`y �m3 m� 5 Z. -2Z �m J. rt 2.' A c0 O 0 to R N Q * 0 y 0 §1 O 00 a 0 C - CD _ 2 O 3 L4 r N N O rt CD n r ≤. p O CD ?. a. O 0 O a .i- N Cp ❑ (-I) S "`.a. C < a '4 Si O F- 0 0 0 O w etlands P eserve s 19800 vv ILLE 'hr sville Rohrersville Comm Park Rv ,� t o a iocu- A P.231 P• N Z \' 2�N �� 9 P.480 R24 P.479 ROHRERSVIL LE gowt t fVV -on4l r t_ 37. 138a P. 25 \ giis=T f2 J1 /1 ,77 CDGP.W F• P.'ZO CZAFtP-A , TP- 4.4.99O 49 .3o A. I.. 359 '• 1CD1 I " `'*\ P•Co4 P.fo5J.—_ p4' Survey No. WA -III -025 Rohrersville Rohrersville, Washington County Historic District WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 301-791-3065 TDD/Hearing Impaired: 301-791-3070 FAX: 301-791-3017 July 21, 2006 Robert W. and Elizabeth M, Pickett 16916 Berry Bramble Lane Paeonian Springs, VA 20129 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Pickett: The permit you have applied for to add a second story to a portion of your dwelling at 4304 Main Street in Rohrersville, MD will require Washington County Historic District Commission approval. This letter is to inform you that the permit review has been scheduled for the Commission's next meeting on August 2, 2006. The meeting will start at 7:00 pm and will be held in the conference room of the administration annex building located at 80 West Baltimore Street in Hagerstown, MD. Although your permit application includes excellent detailed engineering drawings of the proposed construction, there is additional information that will be important for the Historic District Commission to consider in its review. The Commission is authorized to approve the exterior appearance of the construction. Please provide as soon as possible accurate scaled elevation drawings of the 3 sides of the completed construction showing finish materials (siding, trim, shingles, etc.), roof pitch and overhang, window and door placement and styles, and any other information that will describe what the completed structure will look like. You can send or deliver the requested information to the address on this letterhead. Rohrersville has been determined to be a historic Rural Village. The purpose of Historic Commission approval is to insure compatibility of new development and construction in rural villages with existing historic structures. I am enclosing the design guidelines the HDC will be using to review your application. It includes a highlighted description of the Rohrersville Rural Village, text from the Historic Preservation and Rural Village zoning districts (with highlights) and the Secretary of the Interior's guidelines. Feel free to call me at 240-313-2438 if you have questions about the Historic District Commission review. nice tephen�ch Chief Planner Enclosure STG/me RECYCLED PAPER Maryland Historical Trust Survey No. wA-111-025 ,State Historic Sites Inventory Form Magi No. DOE yes _ no 1. Name of Property (indicate preferred name) historic and/or common Rohrersville 2. Location street & number Along Main Street and Rohrersville School Road _ not for publication city, town Rohrersville vicinity of congressional district state Maryland county Washington 3. Classification Category Ownership Status x district public x occupied building(s) x private unoccupied structure both work in progress site Public Acquisition Accessible _ object in process x yes: restricted being considered yes: unrestricted x not applicable _ no Present Use agriculture commercial - educational x entertainment government industrial _ military museum park x private residence x religious scientific transportation _ other: 4. Owner of Property (give names and mailing addresses of all owners) name Multiple ownership street & number telephone no.: city, town state and zip code 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Washington County Courthouse Liber street & number 95 West Washington Street Folio city, town Hagerstown state Maryland 6. Representation in Existing Historical Surveys title Washington County Historic Sites Survey date 1973-1978 _federal x state _county _local depository for survey records Maryland Historical Trust city, town Crownsville state Maryland 7. Description Condition Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered x good ruins x altered fair unexposed Survey No. WA -III -025 Check one x original site moved date of move Prepare both a summary paragraph and a general description of the resource and its various elements as it exists today. Resource Count = 68 Rohrersville is a village located in southern Washington County, eighteen miles southeast of Hagerstown, the county seat. Surrounded by rolling farmland, the village is nestled in the fertile plain of Pleasant Valley between Elk Ridge and South Mountain. Extending from both the northern and southern points of the village's Main Street is Route 67 which was built to by-pass Rohrersville and leads to the former National TurnpikeToll Road to the north and the Shenandoah River to the south. Principally residential in character, Rohrersville's public buildings and sites include churches, a post office, a band hall, mill ruins with a cooper's building, a former school, and a cemetery. The Rohrersville district contains 42 contributing buildings and sites. The village portrays the architecture and development of an early 19th to early 20th century rural trading center in southern Washington County. The villages of Washington County grew to service surrounding farms to meet their marketing and daily needs, and generally evolved as either crossroads or linear plans. Reasons for development included locations along a major transportation route or near a grist mill or tavern. Rohrersville is the largest village in the Rohrersville District, however it is smaller than some of the other villages In the county such as Keedysville and Maugansville. It developed as a linear plan adjacent to a grist mill. Rohrersville Is rather unique in the county in its size and establishment of a number of cultural institutions without being located along a major transportation route. • The present town plan is composed of Main Street; and a short cross street, Rohrersville School Road. Main Street curves gently through the community on a slight slope that rises north to south. The Antietam Creek flows east of, and passes through the district at its northern end where a concrete bridge crosses Main Street. The majority of the lots are generally long and narrow. Some properties have, in addition to a house, one or more support structures. Most of these are of frame construction and are small barns and garages. Buildings have small side yards and are set back a few feet from the public right-of-way. Building placement generally is spaced farther apart on the north and south ends of Main Street with a tighter cluster of buildings in-between. Flanked by human -scale architecture, the street has a pedestrian environment. Trees are a common feature of the village with some trees lining the street and others located on the lots. Sidewalks traverse most of the district, particularly in the central portion along Main Street and some properties contain stone retaining walls. The Rohrersville Ruritan Club maintains a park with picnic grounds along the north side of Rohrersville School Road, opposite the school. The district is basically surrounded by farm land on all four sides with some mid- to late twentieth century residential buildings to the south. These buildings are located on larger lots than those in the village. Despite the addition of the new Route 67 in the 1960s the surrounding environment retains the historic rolling farmland appearance. The overall appearance of the village was formed In the early 19th to the early 20th century. The character of the town is a mixture of residential and institutional. Buildings of different time periods are interspersed throughout the village, with the exception of a group of turn -of -the -century buildings south of Rohrersville School Road, and it appears that properties may have been subdivided over time to create this mix. A significant portion of the buildings are three or four bay -wide vernacular brick or frame houses. Other types of dwellings include Gothic Revival, Second Empire, and two American Foursquares. Only three one-story dwellings exist from the post 1950 period. There are no commercial buildings. The principal Industry was the grist mill which is in ruins, however a cooper's shop associated with the site and the Miller's house exist. Rohrersville's cultural and social character is seen in three churches dating from the late 19th century, an early 20th century school, and the 1916 band hall which also served as the town hall. Maryland Historical Trust State Historic Sites Inventory Form Section Number Page 2 Survey No. WA —III -025 Magi No. DOE yes _no Rohrersville development began in the early 19th century and grew up around its grist mill, later known as Barkman's Mill. Varie's 1808 map shows two grist mills in the approximate location of Rohrersville, one of which may be Barkman's Mill and the other located about a mile away from the village. Continuing into the mid -19th century, maps from 1859 and 1877 indicate that close to three-quarters of the village existed. Buildings appear from the mill at the north end of town, up the west side of Main Street to include three of the existing buildings at the intersection of School House Road, thence traveling south on the east side of the street to include seven buildings. A side street known as Pig Alley contained four dwellings, of which only one remains today, and a school at the south end of town which u p no longer exists. Rohrersville's first phase of building is represented in its buildings constructed between 1810 and 1870. It is estimated that 16 buildings and the mill (WA -III -139), were built during this time, with the mill being the oldest. These buildings illustrate what is known as a vernacular, or traditional, style of building that is common to a region. Of these buildings at least eleven are of log construction (WA -III -126, 128, 130, 141, 143, 150, 151, 152, 156, 157, and 164). Most houses are frame or brick, three- or four -bays wide, side gabled, with 2/2 light sash, some with additions and rear shed extensions. Porches have simple design elements including round columns and straight railings that signify the period before mechanization made elaborate detailing available. One of the village's three churches (WA -III -125) and the cemetery (WA -III -124) existed. Rohrersville's second phase of building in the later 19th century include the traditional style as well as the popular styles of the Victorian period. Victorian buildings are represented by one Second Empire (WA -III -163) and five Gothic Revival (WA -III -132, 140, 146, 160, 162) dwellings. Building characteristics of the Victorian period include decorative features that became popular after the advent of the railroad and industrialization made mass production of design elements available to a wide market. Porches on Rohrersville's Gothic Revival houses generally feature Victorian influenced characteristics in their turned columns, fancy posts, and gingerbread brackets. Late 19th century public buildings include three Gothic Revival style churches. All of the dwellings in the village, regardless of age, have front porches (only one has been enclosed) or built-in two-story porches. Besides dwellings, two churches were added (WA - 111.131 and 144), one on each side of Main Street, and the extant Colonial Revival school (WA -III -124) was built at the west end of School House Road in 1919. Rohrersville's last phase of building in the early 20th century is represented by two American Foursquares, examples of a type that was popular from 1910-1930 (WA -III -138 and 152). Early 20th century public buildings include the 1916 vernacular band hall (WA -l1-129) and the 1919 Colonial Revival school (WA -III -166). Only three contemporary mid- to late -20th century one-story dwellings have been constructed within the district. Rohrersville no longer has some buildings associated with its historic commercial activities including blacksmith shops, a wagon maker shop, and the marble works which was demolished for construction of the band hall. The former stone millhouse is in ruins, however the cooper's shop and the Miller's House associated with the mill remain. Two buildings that housed stores (a millinery and a general store) and residences have been converted to all residential. Alterations to the dwellings over time generally include rear additions and a relatively small number of modern surface treatments of aluminum and vinyl siding and 1940s asbestos shingles. Changes to • public buildings vary, but are generally limited. The two-story frame post office has been altered over time with an enclosed porch and vinyl siding. An earlier post office was at one time part of one of the Maryland Historical Trust :State Historic Sites Inventory Form Section Number 7 Page 3 Survey No, WA -III -025 Magi No. DOE yes no stores that has been converted to a residence. Architectural elements of the band hall have been covered over, but remain intact. Rohrersville School, built in 1919, appears to be relatively unaltered on the exterior. Two of the churches have replaced their steeples, the St. Mark's Evangelical Lutheran Church may have modified its tower, and an addition was added to the rear of the United Brethren Church at the corner of Main Street and Rohrersville School Road; however their integrity remains intact. The overall character of Rohrersville is conservative and traditional in keeping with the rural character of its surroundings. Due to limited demolition and alterations, the entire spectrum of Rohrersville's architectural past can be viewed. Despite the loss of its commercial support activity, Rohrersville retains a cohesive and intact village atmosphere. The Rohrersville District with its residential and public buildings, winding tree -lined rural road, and stone walls retains the character and feeling of a rural historic village that grew from the early 19th to the early 20th century. 8. Significance Survey No. WA -III -025 Period Areas of Significance Check and justify below prehistoric archeology -prehistoric community planning landscape architecture religion 1400-1499 archeology -historic conservation law science 1500-1599 agriculture economics literature sculpture 1600-1699 x architecture education _ military x social/ 1700-1799 art engineering music humanitarian 1800-1899 x commerce exploration/settlement philosophy theater 1900- communications industry politics/government transportation invention other(specify) Specific dates N/A Builder/Architect Various unknown check: Applicable Criteria: x A _ B x C D and/or Applicable Exceptions: A B C D E F G Level of Significance: national state x local Prepare both a summary paragraph of significance and a general statement of history and support SUMMARY Located in southern Washington County, Maryland, Rohrersville was settled in the 1820s and initially developed in response to Washington County's strong agricultural economy, its location along an early wagon road and major transportation route, and a marble works industry. The village's mid -1 9th century development was influenced by the arrival of the railroad in 1867. By 1920 much of the extant village had been erected. Aside from the loss of its commercial character and limited alterations to its building stock, Rohrersville retains its mid -19th to early 20th century architecture that portray the cultural and historical trends of the time. Rohrersville is significant as an excellent example of a rural historic village in Washington County reflective of the prosperity of the surrounding agricultural region and the marble industry that supported it, and the 18th and 19th century transportation systems that made the community viable. COUNTY BACKGROUND Washington County was formed as a political entity in 1776 when it was divided from Frederick County. It received its present western boundary in 1789 when Allegany County was formed. The county experienced initial settlement from the 1730s with the first white settlers being hunters and fur traders. However, by the 1760s, the broad limestone valley which spanned much of Washington County came to be highly regarded for its fertile, productive soil. By the mid -1 8th century a few communities such as Hagerstown, the future county seat, were well -established. The county's 1790 population of 15,800 increased to 18,659 by 1800. Despite the increase in the number of people in Washington County, much of the land remained in large uncultivated tracts, as the majority of the population was centered in towns. Besides Hagerstown, Varie's 1808 map identifies the towns of Boon's Borough (Boonsboro), Sharpsburg, Williamsport, and Hancock within Washington County. None of the county's present day villages appear on the map. Settlement patterns outside the towns were mainly isolated farmsteads as Pennsylvania Germans and Scotch -Irish immigrated south along the valleys of the Allegany Mountains and established farms and villages'. The lower Cumberland Valley became renowned as a grain growing region with emphasis on small grains including wheat, oats, rye and barley. Washington County produced significant quantities of grain resulting in a demand to establish many grist and flour mills along the county's creeks. For example, fifteen grist mills operated along the Antietam Creek in the 18th century alone. By 1870, Washington County had the highest yield of wheat in bushels per acre in Maryland2. As the county's population increased in the early 1800s, transportation networks spread to the west as the farm markets played a crucial role in supporting rapidly growing urban centers. Road, railroad, and canal networks Worden, Amy, 2 Reed, Paula S. "Washington County Historic Site Survey," on file with the Maryland Historical Trust, 1983, p. 1. "Keedysville Survey Report." Preservation Associates, Inc., Hagerstown, Maryland, 1993, p.4. Maryland Historical Trust SurveyNo. WA -III -025 .)State Historic Sites Inventory Form Magi No. DOE yes no Section Number 8 Page 2 As the county's population increased in the early 1800s, transportation networks spread to the west as the farm markets played a crucial role in supporting rapidly growing urban centers. Road, railroad, and canal networks provided market access from Baltimore westward beyond the Ohio River and south to Georgetown. Grain products from Washington County were shipped by wagon to Baltimore and Philadelphia, or floated down the Potomac River to Georgetown. As a result of the combination of transportation networks, the farming skills of the immigrants, and the availability of rich farm land, towns and villages began to emerge to service the farming community. "Many of Washington County's towns and villages were established during this period as commercial centers along major transportation routes. Villages grew up around taverns or mills as small trading centers to service surrounding farms. These commercial centers normally continued in this role through the late 19th century with little change. Where a change occurred, it was usually brought about by changes in transportation, especially those caused by the development of the railroad".3 The rich grain resources of the county were, in part, the impetus for construction of two of the nation's earliest railroads, the Baltimore & Ohio extending west from Baltimore and the Franklin (later the Cumberland Valley Railroad and the Pennsylvania Railroad) extending south from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The Cumberland Valley served as a bread basket until after the Civil War when grain production shifted to the midwest; grain production in the valley gradually gave way to dairy farming and orcharding. Today the rich farmland Is disappearing beneath housing and industrial developments as a highly developed interstate highway system, the legacy of the 18th and 19th century transportation system, puts the valley within commuting distance of the metropolitan areas. RESOURCE HISTORY Settlement and early growth, 1810-1860 Pleasant Valley, home to Rohrersville, is located on the south end of the county and borders Frederick County. The valley was settled by ancestors of many of the principal families which still live in it, the Botelers, Clagetts, Grimms, Browns, and Rohrers. According to Varie's 1808 map, the valley had a church, a saw mill, and three grist and merchant mills. Reportedly the first settlers in the valley cleared the forest and planted tobacco. Rohrersville was the principal village of Rohrersville District No. 8 and much of Rohrersville was formed from a tract of land containing 1,550 acres called "Park Hall" that was granted to a William Parks in 1732. A resurvey of Park's Hall by Andrew Grim comprising 510 acres occurred in 1766. Reference is made to Park Hall in the land records of some of the parcels in the village. Frederick Rohrer was a French emigrant who settled in what would become Washington County in 1766 on a farm near the present day Rohrersville. Frederick Rohrer was the progenitor of the Rohrer family which founded Rohrersville, and for which the district of Rohrersville was named.5 A mill later known as the Rohrersville mill was in use before 1783.6 Given the mill's name it may have been built by Frederick Rohrer. An 1806 deed conveys a mill named "Rohrers Mill" to Frederick Rohrer (Liber S, Folio 560). Vane's 1808 map shows two grist mills in or near what appears to be the area that would become Rohrersville and a saw mill just to the west. 3 Worden, p. 6. " Scharf, J. Thomas. History of Western Maryland. Vol. II. Philadelphia: Louis H. Everts, 1882, p. 985. 5 Williams, Thomas, J. C. A History of Washington County, Maryland. John M. Runk & L. R. Titsworth, 1906, p. 963. 6 Frye, Susan Winter. "Evolution of Mill Settlement Patterns in the Antietam Drainage, Washington County, Maryland." Thesis, College of William and Mary,1984, p. 93. Maryland Historical Trust SurveyNo. WA -III -025 State Historic Sites Inventory Form Magi No. DOE yes _no Section Number 8 Page — Frederick Rohrer had nine children, some of whom settled in Rohrersville. On August 20, 1816, Frederick Rohrer sold 76 and one-fourth acres of a tract of the Park Hall land to his son David. Under the deed, David was to let Samuel Rohrer, his brother, have full liberty and privilege on the part of Park Hall containing a dam made for the use and benefit of the grist mill erected on Samuel Rohrer's land. David was to let the water run through to the mill without any hindrance; otherwise David had the privilege to shut the floodgate belonging to the mill for use of saving water when the saw mill was in use (Liber BB, Folio 774). Seven days later, Frederick Rohrer sold to his son Samuel Rohrer, 78 and one/fourth acres and "the use of the race and water that runs from the Dam on David Rohrer's land to the mill" for $5,045 (Liber BB, Folio 463). It is unknown whether the mill referred to in the deeds was for the late 18th century Rohrersville Mill or for an early 19th century mill later become known as Barkman's Mill. By 1836, the town was called Rohrersville after David Rohrer who lived in a two-story brick home 400 yards east of the village. Today this home is visible from Route 67 which runs parallel to Rohrersville's Main Street. David Rohrer's brother-in-law, George Kefaufer, reportedly built the first house in the village. A genealogical work, notes that George Kefaufer's wife, Mary Ann Rohrer, was left part of Park Hall in her father's will.7 Besides milling and agriculture, another industry that existed in the area was marble quarrying. Marble was discovered north of Rohrersville near the current junction of Marble Quarry Road and Route 67. This quarry most likely furnished the marble for a marble works in Rohrersville and was a source of employment for its residents. Taggart's 1859 map emphasizes the importance Rohrersville had achieved as a farm trading center in Pleasant Valley. The road running south from Rohrersville down the valley is referred to as the "Road from Rohrersville to Weverton". The road traveling north from Rohrersville, west across the top of the Summit of Elk, and then south outside the valley is referred to as the "Road from Rohrersville to Harpersferry." Large land holdings surround the village and include names such as Rohrer, Thomas, Mullendore, Clopper, and Beeler. Common names in the future village are of course, Rohrer, as well as Mullendore, a prosperous farming family, and the Beelers who would at one time own the grist mill in the village. Besides serving as a farm trading center, Rohrersville became a vibrant community with social, educational, and cultural interests and needs. In 1837, a brass band was started by the village's marble quarry owner Washington McCoy, and was originally known as McCoy's Band. Apparently community bands at this time were gaining momentum as a popular cultural attraction in the country: "The brass band movement in America began in the early 1830s among people who could find little else in the way of entertainment that wasn't immoral. That musicianship claimed a whiff of culture gave it added attractiveness. Rohrersville's band was similar to other groups that sprang up in every community, and it provided music at fairs, parades, church picnics, and rallies".9 In 1850 a new school replaced the original school that was located south of Rohrersville. The new school was located in the village at the south end of "Pig Alley" (origin of name unknown), a small pedestrian thoroughfare extending from Main Street by the post office to the present day Ruritan Park. The first church in the village was constructed of logs in 1842 on one acre of land bought from David Rohrer and was located where the cemetery now exists. Neal, Wickliffe B. The Rohrer Families: A Genealogical Work. Arlington, Kentucky, 1991, p. 275. e Woodring, Frank. "Mother Leaves Priceless Legacy." Cracker Barrel, Feb./March, 1994, p. 22. Kemp, Sherry. "Rohrersville Band Defies History to Contribute 156 Years of Musical Enjoyment." Maryland Cracker Barrel, December/January, 1993, p. 18. Maryland Historical Trust Survey No. WA -III -025 State Historic Sites Inventory Form Magi No. DOE yes no Section Number 8 Page 4 No information was forthcoming regarding Rohrersville's role in the upcoming Civil War with the exception of a letter dated February 8, 1863. The writers stated that they "heard" that churches and homes in Rohrersville were full of wounded from the Battle of Antietam.70 Other battles in Pleasant Valley that may have affected Rohrersville in September 1862 were the battle of South Mountain and the battle of Crampton's Gap. 11 The Railroad and subsequent growth, 1860-1900 The 1860 census for the Pleasant Valley District showed the major occupations as farmers, day laborers, and farm hand, along with other occupations such as magistrate, blacksmith, wagon maker, carpenter, physician, and druggist. These occupations signified that the area existed as primarily rural with scattered villages that provided professional and service support to the surrounding agricultural area. The farmers in the valley as well as Western Maryland faced difficult times following the Civil War, as Midwestern producers worked relatively larger fields that yielded heavy corn and wheat crops. This resulted in driving prices down and making it useless to farm marginal land. Farm laborers migrated west as they followed farming jobs. Relief to the labor shortage came during the age of mechanization when new agricultural implements became available in Hagerstown and Baltimore. Access to a broader market for farmers became an issue in the mid -1 9th century. As early as 1857, a movement began for the construction of a railroad running through Pleasant Valley that would provide transportation for a large and fertile section of the county which at that time had no access to the markets except by wagon and mostly over extremely bad roads. In 1865, three of the county commissioners, one of whom was Elias E. Rohrer, met with the Baltimore and Ohio Company to discuss this situation. Eventually the company subscribed for stock in the amount of $750,000 with more funds forthcoming from Washington County and individuals. In November 1867, the last rail was laid and the trains began running from the valley to Hagerstown, the county seat where four rail companies eventually merged providing access to a wide market place.13 The legacy of the branch line is a series of stations, warehouses and small businesses along its path. The 1877 Atlas showed depots located at Trego just west of Rohrersville, Clagett Station, Brownsville and Barthalow Station at the southern tip of the district. Train service on this line continued until 1953. The 1870 census reflected the new jobs the railroad brought to the valley with listings of railroad laborer, repairman, and foreman added to those of farming related occupations. It appears that as a result of the railroad, Rohrersville prospered. The 1877 Atlas indicates that Rohrersville was the major village in the Rohrersville District and consisted of a grist mill, marbleworks, cemetery, school, store, and approximately twenty residences. Comparatively, the next largest village, Brownsville, contained two stores, nine residences, a tannery, post office, church and cemetery. Occupations in Rbhrersville included farmers, teachers, merchants, carpenters, and a railroad conductor. The population in 1887 in the Rohrersville District was 1,304, including Rohrersville which contained 106 inhabitants. By comparison Brownsville had 68 inhabitants. Farming strengthened again in the 1880s in the Pleasant Valley area following the discovery that fruit, first peaches and then apples, grew well along the mountain sides. Land formerly thought to be useless became io Woodring, Frank. "Civil War Footsteps: Rohrersville Churches, Homes House Wounded From Antietam According to 1863 Letter." Maryland Cracker Barrel., October/November 1995, p. 10. 11 Williams, p. 330. 12 Brugger, Robert J. Maryland: A Middle Temperament. Johns Hopkins University Press, Maryland Historical Society Press, n.d, p. 328-329. 13 Williams, p. 401. Maryland Historical Trust .' State Historic Sites Inventory Form Section Number 8 Page 5 Survey No. WA -III -025 Magi No. DOE yes no valuable and commanded high prices. With the railroad traveling through the valley and the use of refrigerator cars it was possible to distribute the products of Washington County orchards over a large part of the country.14 The advent of fruit and vegetable canning profited the valley and Western Maryland growers in general who increased their apple and peach acreage during this time. Products grown on the 100 and 200 acre farms in the valley were shipped to markets in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. The agricultural prosperity apparently fostered enough development in Rohrersville to support three churches and a new school. In 1871, the former United Brethren Church moved its congregation to a new building on the corner of the "public square" on one acre purchased from David Rohrer. This church is now known as the Bethel United Methodist Church. In 1882 and 1883, there was trouble in this church regarding secret societies. Two divisions were formed known as the Liberals and the Radicals. The Radicals broke away from the church and built the Central United Brethren Church on Main Street in 1888. St. Mark's Evangelical Lutheran Church, organized in June 1879, stands on the ground where the first building was erected in this village.15 The new four - room school was built in 1880 near the site of the extant school on farm land that the Mullendores sold to the Board of Education. Quiet years, 1900-1930 While in the midst of the industrial era that created growth in the county's large towns, Rohrersville experienced a period of relative tranquillity accompanied by limited growth. The 1912 USGS map shows an increased number of buildings, particularly on the east side of Main Street. The population in 1920 was 150 people and this number would increase only slightly in the town's future years.16 Rohrersville's community remained composed mainly of farmers and railroad workers. By 1930, as in previous years, no new roads had been built.17 Rohrersville had numerous general stores and one store operated a millinery shop in the same building. Apparently a second marble shop operated in town in what is now a garage. Marble came to the Trego Station and a two -horse wagon transported the marble to the shop. Farming continued around Rohrersville as reported by one family who bought a farm at Rohrersville in 1922 and raised lima beans, blackberries, and raspberries.18 The village's fourth and final school was erected in 1919 and closed in 1978.79 In 1916, McCoy's Band changed its name to the Rohrersville Band and built the town hall it uses for practices to this day. The town hall was used for meetings and for many years was the scene of almost all the community events in Rohrersville until churches constructed facilities that helped to ease the demand on the town hall. The band has the distinction of being the oldest in Washington County as well as one of the oldest continuous bands in the country. Shift to modern times, 1930 -present Farming continued in the rural areas surrounding the village in the 1930s. One dairy was started around 1931, but today dairy herds no longer exist, most likely due to costs associated with pasteurization. The mill went out of business sometime after 1920 and Baer's Nursery operated in a cooper's building associated with the mill until 14 Williams, p. 375. 15 Ibid, p. 507. 18 Nelson, John. "Rohrersville-Heart of Pleasant Valley." Washington County Network, May/June 1994, p.1. t7 Washington Map Company. Map of Washington County and City of Hagerstown Maryland, 1930. 18 Woodring, Frank. "Nostalgic Moments: Life on Farm ofRohrersville Founder Recalled by Area Women." Maryland Cracker Barrel, February/March, 1994, p. 32. "Nostalgic Moments: Rohrersville Schools Provide Community with Common Bond.", Maryland Cracker Barrel, February/March, 1994, p. 6. Maryland Historical Trust •7 State Historic Sites Inventory Form Section Number 8 Page 6 Survey No. WA -III -025 Magi No. DOE yes _no the 19605.20 Since the Depression, the physical fabric of the village has not changed significantly. Rohrersville developed very little during this period with only three one-story contemporary dwellings built along Main Street. Main Street through Rohrersville became Route 67 by 1953. The development of Rohrersville remained stable up to 1953 with no new road additions. The 1990 US census shows 191 people living in Rohrersville which may be attributed to construction just outside the district boundary to the south?1 Long time residents of the village remark that people living in town no longer work on the railroad or work the farms, but rather commute to Washington DC via carpool or train from Brunswick. Ali the general stores and businesses have been converted to residential use, but the buildings remain. A new Route 67, built in the 1960s, is located east of Rohrersville and the old Route 67 has once again become Main Street in a serene setting. Rohrersville remains pristine in character both within the village as well as the surrounding rural countryside. HISTORIC THEMES Architecture Rohrersville's architecture portrays the development of the village. The architecture reflects both the modest rural farming influence of the surrounding community as well as the trends and styles of the later Victorian era and the American Foursquare. The prosperity of the community in the 19th century is seen in the abundance of the early log buildings and the popular vernacular architecture. Buildings reflecting the industrialization age brought on by the railroad are seen in the Victorian styles of the late 19th century that in part developed as the railroad transported mass produced components such as windows and decorative detailing at relatively low cost. Economics Rohrersville's economic development was dependent on the surrounding farms and also a nearby marble quarry and reflects broader patterns of development and industrialization in rural areas of Western Maryland. Businesses existed in Rohrersville from the early 19th century to the mid -20th century. Industrial economic activity was evidenced in Rohrersville in its grist mill followed by a marble works. Commercial activity included at least two stores and a millinery. Social/Educational/Cultural This theme is very significant to the overall quality that made Rohrersville a rural village and a place where people lived, worked, and played within a concentrated setting. The small village supported three churches of German heritage that is an indication of the German heritage of the settlers In the village and the surrounding area. The construction of three schools in the village over time reflected the growth of the community. Lastly, the time honored tradition of the band is today represented by not only the continued existence of the band, but the existence of the hall built by the band. Transportation Rohrersville was profoundly affected by transportation systems dating back to the early 18th century. According to Varies' 1808 map, Rohrersville was in the vicinity of early roadways leading south through the valley to the river, east across South Mountain through Crampton's Gap and Fox's Gap as well as west. In 1859 it was located on the major roadway through the valley and was in close enough vicinity to the future train station at Trego that it was called the Rohrersville Station. The National Pike was close by to the north, forging a link between Baltimore and the lower Cumberland Valley. The B&O in its heyday had three to five trains a day. By 1872, however, the Western Maryland Railway was providing direct service from Hagerstown to Baltimore, and the B&O spur became more of a local service route. It was Rohrersville's location along a major early road that allowed access to its early 19th century grain mill and the railroad which brought new jobs and a new market to farmers, in turn bringing prosperity to Rohrersville. 20 Ibid, p. 14. 21 Ernde, Laura "The House was Rohrer's." The Daily Mail, March 25, 1994, n.p. Maryland Historical Trust State Historic Sites Inventory Form Section Number 8 Page 7 HISTORICAL CONTEXT: Survey No. WA -III -025 Magi No. DOE _ yes _no MARYLAND COMPREHENSIVE PRESERVATION PLAN DATA Geographic Organization: Western Maryland Chronological/Developmental Period(s): Agricultural -Industrial Transition, 1815-1870 Industrial/Urban Dominance, 1870-1930 Prehistoric/Historic Period Theme(s): Architecture, Landscape Architecture, and Community Planning Economic Social/Educational/Cultural Transportation Resource Type: Category: District Historic Environment: Village Historic Function(s) and Use(s) Known Design Source: None Cemetery Religion/Church Domestic/Single Dwelling Band Hall/Town Hall Industrial/Grist Mill Education/School 9. Major Bibliographical References survey No. WA -III -025 See continuation sheet 10. Geographical Data Acreage of nominated property approximately 62 acres Quadrangle name Keedysville Quadrangle scale 1:24,000 UTM References DO NOT COMPLETE UTM REFERENCES Al 11 1 1 1 1 1. 1 11, I 1 1, I BL_LJ I I, I„ H1 1 I II Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing L_(I'll 11i1 1„! DI -I 1111„111111,11 EL_JI,I,,II,I,!,,I Fu1h111111 1,1h1hh1 Gill 111111111111111 HIIILI11L1111I,Ii I Verbal boundary description and justification The district extends north and south along Main Street from its northern point at parcel 190 on the north side of the bridge containing an 1860s dwelling facing Main Street. -,. The remainder of the land to the north is open space. The south boundary extends beyond School House Road to parcel 165 on the east and parcel 235 on the west containing late 19th century buildings exhibiting the same setting characteristics as the remainder of the village. Properties to the south of this point are situated on larger parcels of land than is characteristic of the village. The boundary extends east on School House Road to include the cemetery and west to include the school. List all states and counties for properties overlapping state or county boundaries state code county code state code county code 11. Form Prepared By name/title Susan Cianci Salvatore organization Woodward -Clyde date June 1997 street & number 200 Orchard Ridge Drive telephone 301 670-3300 city or town Gaithersburg state MD The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 supplement. The survey and inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringement of individual property rights. return to: Maryland Historical Trust People's Resource Center 100 Community Place Crownsville, MD 21032-2023 410-514-7000 WA -III -025 Rohrersville Washington County Continuation Sheet 9.1: Major Bibliographical References Brugger, Robert J. Maryland: A Middle Temperament. Johns Hopkins University Press, Maryland Historical Society Press, n.d. Erode, Laura. "The House was Rohrer's." The Daily Mail, March 25, 1994, in vertical file, Washington County Historical Society, Hagerstown, Maryland. Frye, Susan Winter. "Evolution of Mill Settlement Patterns in the Antietam Drainage, Washington County, Maryland." Thesis, College of William and Mary, on file in the Western Maryland Reading Room, Washington County Free Library, Hagerstown, Maryland, 1984. Kemp, Sherry. "Rohrersville Band Defies History to Contribute 156 Years of Musical Enjoyment." Maryland Cracker Barrel, December/January, 1993. Lake, Griffing and Stevenson. An Illustrated Atlas of Washington County, Maryland. Philadelphia, 1877. Maryland State Roads Commission. Washington County, Maryland. 1937, 1953. Mueller, Julianne. "Town of Smithsburg." Maryland Historical Trust State Historic Sites Inventory Form, 1991. Neal, Wickliffe B. The Rohrer Families: A Genealogical Work, Arlington, Kentucky, 1991. Nelson, John. "Rohrersville-Heart of Pleasant Valley." Washington County Network, May/June 1994. Reed, Paula S. "Funkstown Research Design Report." Preservation Associates, Inc., Hagerstown, Maryland, 1995. _____ "Keedysville Survey Report." Preservation Associates, Inc., Hagerstown, Maryland, 1993. Scharf, J. Thomas. History of Western Maryland. Vol. II. Philadelphia: Louis H. Everts, 1882. Taggert, Thomas. A Map of Washington County. 1859. U.S.G.S. Antietam Quadrangle, 1912, and Keedysville Quadrangle, 1985. Varle, Charles. A Map of Frederick and Washington Counties. 1808. Washington County Land Records. Washington Map Company. Map of Washington County and City of Hagerstown, Maryland, 1930, Western Maryland Room, Washington County Public Library, Hagerstown, Maryland. Williams, Thomas, J. C. A History of Washington County. Maryland. John M. Runk & L. R. Titsworth, 1906. Woodring, Frank. "Nostalgic Moments: Seclusion Within Pleasant Valley Enables Rohrersville to Retain Charm." Cracker Barrel, December/January, 1993. "Mother Leaves Priceless Legacy." Maryland Cracker Barrel, Feb./March, 1994. _. "Nostalgic Moments: Life on Farm of Rohrersville Founder Recalled by Area Women." Maryland Cracker Barrel. February/March, 1994, _____ "Nostalgic Moments: Rohrersville Schools Provide Community with Common Bond.", Maryland Cracker Barrel, February/March, 1994. _. "Civil War Footsteps: Rohrersville Churches, Homes House Wounded From Antietam According to 1863 Letter." Maryland Cracker Barrel., October/November 1995. Worden, Amy. "Washington County Historic Site Survey," on file with the Maryland Historical Trust, 1983. Towp B:p�. - '<r ::,•I 1ri"'• ' '.< c ct•IIIL ,;ti i ✓.FeaJ v D 9�l/ Eat .xr. 0 .r .\ .E: 4, v 4 1 irna ) i$I)- i;.aC:%. 1 :q JtJ' 'FI B..rm.'rN • •. 4��.�•ay'LII(J:I .111(Y1 , w yx� t .,,in9"a I,idl/J14 a \�n•n. i •�4 flintJ 1n NilA4ro.,,t P` ;.,r.0n... n � eti1 _ _ ) ., .i aro i rr •• � 9, BurNrc ` � `� . d ,3 r � mww y Sample C� •l' /f try ✓w It Iln .w "w3 l 1— > �i AI frm N+��P:'-y 7y w yi.7rr• _ ARROLTOW/ e (ANON I VE1 \. Survey No. WA-III.025 ! Rohrersville Rohrersville, Washington County I �` ^Q Vane's 1808 Map of Frederick & Washington Counties /017 Joy / ' r'Y ! 96 r/, ri/' �l `✓3 `i:.�( \2'�//i [ i-/r',ti ` r \Y y � /J h'ohrer '� f Mirave if 1> 3 r9 . 4 �dl rUe C.Thomar ' 4 : ,%ein• %eder ix T L'PY 1 4a __ k n " —'\ Cmne w / • U t CYI 43t l:* \/ ,i:!' I ry I T. 9: (riJrWC -'4 / T tjt33 fi P / a P%> \. a`\ i' : �.:. _,� \ • _ iii, �i�lk`��\ti,'`. 3 ' ' r eoi 8 dowlew : • Ay\� q 1 42rotrn •• 8 Ji, \\aj� l.iti .`f?.y ! , ��� -' ' e 1`• ♦ \ y "it .i:..: (it 6 -. Survey No. WA -III -025 Snw. • +„ Rohrersville e;� : • • Rohrersville, Washington County \ x.: Ta&eert1859 Man .J.OYnnd rust i+ 7'' tiIST. Na.S i/o 7 zru.•has}n Lka dflla- S. 9hsr7nr•. I EIIBIIfE8S Rust. ,r. EIRCE. DeJmli Groctris, Dry Good. i clesesn, at. Also, Whole E EUSIAEBB ALI'IIR- UNCEB. 'rim Dry Goods, Gmsriq and T. Snui,r • / .. Crockesy ad Gl.se.rc d Florin sad Grower if JI' ,5'/F ri.Yr/r omens of Monisenb, Taab- &c.GrdmtEsnkfwl7r«dvrdied /'C..f'hrY r . a Simple end FsncyDry Goods. ., Gp. Croctii , ppt.eos*ere, Drip, Mtdioes, hint., Gib, / vg ehs sdlels siJ17 kept in a ss of R, MW, Fe 1. &t. Plowing :Ny Floe, MeJ, Fad, ka�aa. ,, I (i sjxw o" idllyvrt ! F. r .T.Sna06 J \R .Tm.Zask'a.-• M$Stii r. IJ.Cn _mrnv. t�y. j V 6nmrs 7, °7 rmrr/Gr r:Ptian9 17.a(orrzs • J.7nnq zStiYr• C aa;8n"' tt� ✓ ��+}. .ice _ ::�. DUST. dlnli/Rql WO to an In at $P ffnffatl ira J..7JrLxc S [&I ndoe \ r^i'ao7Aol OWNSVILLE ROHRERSVILLE DIET. &a& ROFad° to an Inds. ase7v Survey No. WA -III -025 sir.Cnrr sr . w,\' / rtRohrersville .. F.. rn.rnaL• Potrer Rpest'd� .�_�`�,yir 'R>� Rohrersville, Washington County .lL A7mes' r1,a Fd � .?`� _ ... z r , tDGAR F. T� 112 �O 1? 20 ctAR A , rR . y 44.9 39O p.231 2iN 2. 49 .-moo A. P•480 ax4 P.294 P•479 \ \ zero 7 e i ROt/RERSVIL L.E V. G8m191 37.1dA. • P.25 ,\ r �2 P. Ifo% DIAL Survey No, WA -III -025 Rohrersville Rohrersville, Washington County Historic District / / !I /rp.b L ± / i( (/ / , iIT i I L_ J o Park H 1 ^� �� a � ' �,' ' Grove'_ i �•;/.',"� ' rti 1, o �J \i' tea O.e � ;�/ � ,� _ J'7 I,,' )2kt4\ c ) /7".�•\\' II I/ I f 1 \ Summit •" � ' ' 'o 0 C tub v - ( � % / ' \ Survey No. WA -III -025 ';// lI^ � of ' oy Rohzersville '' / \ o ; % /% o Keedysville Quadrangle n County Survey # WA -III -025 Rohrersville private x public x Rohrersville is a village located in southern Washington County, eighteen miles southeast of residential Hagerstown, the county seat. Surrounded by rolling farmland, the village is nestled in the fertile plain of Pleasant Valley between Elk Ridge and South Mountain. Extending from both the northern and southern points of the village's Main Street is Route 67 which was built to by-pass Rohrersville and leads to the former National Turnpike Toll Road to the north and the Shenandoah River to the south. Principally residential in character, Rohrersville's public buildings and sites include churches, a post office, a band hall, mill ruins with a cooper's building, a former school, and a cemetery. The Rohrersville district contains 42 contributing buildings and sites. The village portrays the architecture and development of an early 19th to early 20th century rural trading center in southern Washington County. Rohrersville was settled in the 1820s and initially developed in response to Washington County's strong agricultural economy, its location along an early wagon road and major transportation route, and a marble works industry. Mid -19th century development was influenced by the arrival of the railroad. By 1920 much of the extant village had been erected. Aside from the loss of its commercial character and limited alterations to its building stock, Rohrersville retains its mid -19th to early 20th century architecture that portray the cultural and historical trends of the time. Rohrersville is significant as an excellent example of a rural historic village in Washington County reflective of the prosperity of the surrounding agricultural region which supported it. Survey # WA -III -157 Approximate date Ca. 1850-75 Street Address 4304 Main Street Town, State Rohrersville, Maryland 21779 private __&_, public _ Located on the west side of Main Street, between it and "Pig Alley" is this two story, three bay brick house with a one story log kitchen wing to the rear. The bricks are laid in common bond at the front elevation and painted. The facade has a door, window, window arrangement, unusual in Rohrersville. The windows in the end wall nearest to the entrance indicates that the plan of the house is not a side hall and parlor. Windows have single pane sash beneath flat arches of brick A shed roof porch extends across the front. At the time of the site visit, it was being reconstructed. It is supported by turned posts. The roof is of standing seam sheet metal. Brick chimneys are inside the gable ends. This house appears to date from the third quarter of the 19th century. This assessment is based on the use of common bond brickwork at the facade, narrow window and door frames as well as the overall form and proportions. According to the 1877 Atlas map, the house was standing and belonged to W.O. Grimm. Behind the house is a frame shed or hog ban'. 2 contributing buildings. MARYLAND COMPREHENSIVE PRESERVATION PLAN DATA I. Geographic Organization: Western Maryland II. Chronological/Developmental Period(s): Agricultural -Industrial Transition 1815-1870 III. Prehistoric/Historic Period Theme(s): Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Community Planning IV. Resource Type: Category: Buildings Historic Environment: Village Historic Function(s) and Use(s): Domestic/Single Dwelling, Shed Photo Reference: Photo # 34 Form Prepared By: Paula S. Reed, PhD, Architectural Historian Woodward -Clyde 200 Orchard Ridge Drive Gaithersburg, MD 20878 Date: 6/97 Mt 2V ®f� \ . � y z.�±::. 3 J A|& ! J w O z �9 z,, YIv 5 c TXZtw E'( Lfof Cpl N c1Tv f�o+IRrF-C,v -E-, V\I[2! lr;l., c(AtE I'o„ X4-0 882 f 15 fYZouN2 G2vEL_ Ft fLlriL hfKic EIGCte !z r= I 'Y t°' u^OF T S7ar Plf,c 5-nf( # 3 ? T 'Jd._ J? 5E3ccti2 1M IN WOU17 GLPP oti2 2 5 2,N6 AF P 'sX • 4-&/ W f 7E ON ENcgiriE p5 1p..gA INC VjwovvJ1 WILL MATC41 EX1�a1rNiG N Fr-0r-+i PAT' DF Hou r� p $ z`'-F"w x Lj5"HIc.H. �r 6U ''eE Yz pouts Q W ITS '�/-P J7o P 3Pr4 Wt2T4 N } OF tX1a71Nb /'7fIG -]Lt G{-{PN6iC [S`Z2 R .1SE `-1-t PWV k - WALLS si vv.r AzF.tu ? fLlag`L{ o4 HA,J N HALL 4 I' HviE TccTg7777p (2) mt 6ULLAP- DCEN; G? /WVQW N P—re}jEM / r1?r"aNf F'IIP/LATE f800S (fIEPIONE UPA"rID 1�0E--4 EL-VA:ONJ �itPLE fl lo" rT1 1—=;; Fii5 Lofrt rz_ Ef VOV1jr, LE VEd 'LPa ELIrtiY E (lI 3 IGKFYT ,5qo fs2 =/ 75 C'IROUtJJ V -.. . rte C' 7 (T, I '... — G�rwN LI₹�E'c'$ aT L V/ f1Pt`J 1 JJ J J 4tTF ?ILK "? ydj,lInfl yko 8`6Z �i�5 v ASSOCIATES I N C. July 13, 2006 Washington County Planning Department 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21734 RE: Historical Inquiry MD2482A — Rohrersville Trego Road/RohrersvilleRoad Rohrersville, Maryland 21779 To Whom It May Concern 8989 Herrmann Drive, Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21045 www.atcassociates.com 410-381-0232 Fax 410-381-8908 WASHINGTON C0i;iITY PLANNING DEPT. Nextel of the Mid -Atlantic, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications is planning to construct a 150 -foot tall monopole north of the intersection of Trego Road and Rohrersville Road, in Rohrersville, Maryland. The proposed facility will consist of the location of a 150 -foot tall proposed monopole with an eight -foot tall lightning rod and placement of associated equipment within a 60 -foot by 60 -foot fenced area. Any comments regarding the potential effects of the proposed facility on any historic property should be directed to: Mr. Randolph Hoenes, Staff Scientist, ATC Associates Inc., 8989 Herrmann Drive, Suite 300, Columbia, MD 21045 or by phone (410) 381- 0232. Pleaseprovide comment as to whether the placement of telecommunications equipment and the antennas will affect any historic property of interest to your organization. I have included a USGS Quadrangle illustrating the site location and a copy of the lease exhibits. ATC appreciates your timely response to our request. Sincerely, ATC ASSOCIATES INC. Randolph Hoenes Staff Scientist Enclosures ENVIRONMENTAL, GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS PROFESSIONALS TOPO! map printed on O6/23/O6 from "Untitled.tpo" 77°40.000 E WGS84 77°39.000' E A �•. 7\ iijc,: - z •1 'scp Roh vile k p Z i i\ \ ;Parka �,: :�..� , b _- ° I t'.0 0)1 t j' FKr�avil0.+iv.` 1! ;a 11ctCI�,"-� , - Q \ \ N 1 BM i �- fiilB-` l $o >. `/ 1 )aa ` c SITE . ° Sc - `- a - %P o It x�—s ` R� - -- I____ I'• �� / 1 I �O , Z V o o e.= rri ter= J cv N ° r .•ti_ A / `'.i ate/ ` , (� -? 77°40.000' E WGS84 77°39.000' E MN'tTN 0 5 1 MILE 10'/.° lY! ®WO FEET 0 500 1 WO METERS Map created with TOPOI® O2002 National Geographic(www.nationalgeographic.comftopo) SITE VICINITY MAP NEPA MD2482A-Rohrersville Keedysville, Maryland -West Virginia Trego Road/Rohrersville Road SCALE: As Shown (:VYATC Rohrersville, Maryland 21779 a f a a e l A T r a I k 0 Cd i� 0' LIGHTNING ROD z N i m n z �r o C/) N� TOP OF LIGHTNING ROD 158' AGL O a n TOP OF ANTENNA 162' AO OF TOP OF TOWER 160' AOL o ,v p m BOTTOM ANTENNA 148' AGl b J J PROPOSED (12 NEXTEL PANEL ANTENNAS, (3; TTA'S AND (15) N ova � a o Cl C Q 1 5/8' COAX CABLES, (4) O{ o •ANTENNAS, (1) TTA AND (5) m CABLES PER SECTOR, 3 O n N SECTORS TOTAL SECTOR M ABRANGEMENT E 60, AND270' TOTRUE NORTH. RAD CENTER 160AGLSi 412_U 1H E., ^I N W D0 r N m `d` cJ 0)0 zo r� 5 N N, z0 O •U ( o_ o WO -Jo w o o> o S Li_ w WW z o0c F -a O aOU 0 E - CPS ANTENNA OW W V1 �O Z I— O YP. OF 3) Li j CD W �.O PROPOSED 12'x20' NEXTEL I PEQUIPMENT po q J m 0U PROPOSED 8' FENCE 4NEXTEL SHELTER Co N< -Z J (n W N9_ m Z am ><2 Q "�<� z Go 4 0° < U� pjZJ 2� �U U�SZ PROPOSED MONOPOLE DETAIL ODUI N.T.S.O z oo<� J2p QU QpQ}Z F�smN J o oz <F�a,.< W N j § .y ) ` \ 5 \ ` [ §a >\� A§% . j ) § 0 §�\\ /§M /n 0 ~ p§ r \w a® /\ \ / $ * 2 / 26 &m® 3»m> \ / R/ / » E §: j \ �\ \§! e / z' / ( /owpt \\\\ §())pt ZW o —J /)\:` «§_:; ,� El HISTORIC PROPERTIES MAP SOURCE: Maryland Historical Trust (VATC ASSOCIATES I N C NEPA IvID2482A-Rohrersvile Trego Road/Rohrersville Road Rohrersville, Maryland 21779 EBI C O Ni S U I. 'I' I N G www.ebiconsulting.com July 20, 2006 Maryland Preservation Officer Division of Historical and Cultural Programs 100 Community Place Crownsville, Maryland 21032-2023 Attn: Ms. Tania Tully Mr. Steven Goodrich Washington County Historic District Commission, County Planning Office 100 W. Washington Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Mid -Atlantic Regional Office 6876 Susquehanna Trail South York, PA 17403 Tel: (717)428-04011 Fax: (717)428-0403 Subject: Submission Packet, FCC Form 621, for proposed Telecommunications Collocation Project 10290/ SMITHSBURG MD, 11664 Mapleville Road, Smithsburg, Maryland 21783 EBI Project Number: 61062566 In accordance with FCC NEPA rules and Section 106 of the NHPA, the above -referenced telecommunications project is being evaluated by EBI for its potential effects to districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, or culture that are listed, or potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Based on EBI's review of the characteristics and location of the proposed project, the stipulations of the March 16, 2001 "Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the Collocation of Wireless Antennas" (Collocation Agreement) are not met; therefore, the project is required to undergo Section 106 review with the State Historic Preservation Office. In accordance with the "Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission," dated September 2004, ("Nationwide Agreement"), please find the attached Submission Packet, FCC Form 621, which presents the details on the proposed project as well as efforts that have been taken to identify, assess, and make determinations of effect on the impacts of the proposed project on Historic Properties. We would appreciate your review of the data for the proposed project presented above and shown on the attached form and attachments. On behalf of American Tower Corporation, I would appreciate your comments on this proposed telecommunications installation in a letter directed to the address noted above. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or concerns on the proposed project or the information contained in this Submission Packet. Stephen Forrest Historian (617) 715-1817 ENVIROBUSINESS, INC. LOCATIONS ] Al LANTA. CAI BALTIMORE. MI) I BURLINGTON. MA l CIIICAGO. II. CRANSTI)N. RI DALLAS, TX I DENVER, CO I EXETER, Nil I IIOUSTON. IX I LOS ANGELES. CA NU./ YnuV LAIN' I n,. If11 ANl IV A7 I IWUYII ANIII nn I WA NI I:u A Nlr'Icrn ('A I IFA'I P, W "I A I \'(u,( uA CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OM8 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Collocation ("CO") Submission Packet FCC FORM 621 Introduction The CO Submission Packet is to be completed by or on behalf of Applicants who wish to collocate an antenna or antennas on an existing communications tower or non -tower structure by or for the use of licensees of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC").' The Packet (including Form CO and attachments) is to be submitted to the State Historic Preservation Office ("SHPO") or to the Tribal Historic Preservation Office ("THPO"), as appropriate, before any construction or other Installation activities on the site begin. Failure to provide the Submission Packet and complete the review process under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act ("NHPA")z prior to beginning construction or other installation activities may violate Section 110(k) of the NHPA and the Commission's rules. The instructions below should be read in conjunction with, and not as a substitute for, the "Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission," dated September 2004, ("Nationwide Agreement"), the "Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the Collocation of Wireless Antennas" ("Collocation Agreement"),3 and the relevant rules of the FCC (47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1301-1.1319) and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ("ACHP") (36 C.F.R. Part 800).' Exclusions and Scope of Use The CO Submission Packet should be submitted only for those collocations that are subject to Section 106 review. The CO Submission Packet should not be submitted for collocations that have been excluded from Section 106 Review by the Collocation Agreement or the Nationwide Agreement. Where a collocation is to be completed but no submission will be made to a SHPO or THPO due to the applicability of one or more exclusions, the Applicant should retain in its files documentation of the basis for each exclusion should a question arise as to the Applicant's compliance with Section 106. The CO Submission Packet is to be used only for the collocation of an antenna or antennas on an existing communications tower or a non -tower structure. New tower constructions that are subject to Section 106 review should be submitted using the New Tower ("NT") Submission Packet (FCC Form 620). A "communications tower" is a structure built for the sole or primary purpose of supporting FCC -licensed antennas and their associated facilities; other structures upon which antennas may be collocated are referred to as "non -tower structures." 2 16 U.S.C. § 470f. 3 Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the Collocation of Wireless Antennas, 16 FCC Rcd 5574, 5575-5581 (WTB: March 16, 2001)("Collocation Agreement"); see also Fact Sheet Regarding the Implementation of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement with Respect to Collocating Wireless and Broadcast Facilities on Existing Towers and Structures, Notice, 67 Fed. Reg. 5282 (Feb. 5, 2002). 4 Section II.A.9. of the Nationwide Agreement defines a "historic property" as: "Any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register maintained by the Secretary of the Interior. This term includes artifacts, records, and remains that are related to and located within such properties. The term includes properties of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or NHO that meet the National Register criteria." Applicant's Name: American Tower Corporation Project Name: SMITHSBURG MD Project Number: 10290 Page I FCC Form 621 January2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours General Instructions: Form CO Fill out the answers to Questions 1-5 and provide the requested attachments. Attachments should be numbered and provided in the order described below. For ease of processing, provide the Applicant's Name, Applicant's Project Name, and Applicant's Project Number in the lower right hand corner of each page of Form CO and attachments.' Applicant Information Full Legal Name of Applicant: American Tower Corporation Name and Title of Contact Person: Jenna Lamontagne Environmental Compliance Manager Address of Contact Person (including Zip Code): 10 Presidential Way, Woburn, MA 01801 Phone: 781-926-4536 Fax: 781-926-4755 E-mail address: EnviroServices(�)AmericanTowercom 2. Applicant's Consultant Information Full Legal Name of Applicant's Section 106 Consulting Firm: EnviroBusiness Inc d/b/a FBI Consulting Name of Principal Investigator: Stephen Forrest Title of Principal Investigator: Historian Investigator's Address: Four A Street City: Burlington State: MA Zip Code 01803 Phone: 617-715-1817 Fax: 617- 715-6597 E-mail Address: sforrest@ebiconsultingcom 5 Some attachments may contain photos or maps on which this information can not be provided. Applicant's Name: American Tower Corporation Project Name: SMITHSBURG MD Project Number: 10290 Page 2 FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Attachments Provide the following attachments in this order and numbered as follows: Attachment I. Resumes / Vitae. Provide a current copy of the resume or curriculum vitae for the Principal Investigator and any researcher or other person who contributed to, reviewed, or provided significant input into the research, analysis, writing or conclusions presented in the Submission Packet for this proposed collocation. Please see attached Resumes of Principal Investigator and other contributing personnel. Mr. Stephen Forrest, Historian Mr. Ebenezer Agbobli, Staff Scientist FCC Form 621 January 2005 EBI CONSULTING SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Stephen Forrest Environmental Scientist Stephen Forrest is a Environmental Scientist specializing in environmental investigations, site assessments, and NEPA environmental reviews for the telecommunications industry. Mr. Forrest has conducted numerous environmental due diligence assignments for a wide range of properties throughout the New England region. These assessments have been performed to evaluate site conditions, potential off -site liabilities, historic site and vicinity usage, environmental control systems, and site remediation costs in order to advise prospective buyers, current operators, and owners of potential and existing environmental concerns. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Environmental Site Assessments: Mr. Forrest has successfully completed ASTM Phase I Site Assessments and Preliminary Environmental Site Screenings for a variety of properties located within the New England area. These assessments have been performed to evaluate site conditions, potential off -site liabilities, environmental control systems, and site remediation costs in order to advise prospective buyers, current operators, and owners of potential and existing environmental concerns. These properties have included industrial, commercial, multi -family residential and mobile telecommunications properties. NEPA Assessments: In addition to environmental assessments, Mr. Forrest prepares and manages NEPA reviews and Environmental Assessments for telecommunications sites throughout the New England area. Mr. Forrest has helped clients facilitate the environmental review process to ensure compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Environmental reviews include analysis of historic properties, wetlands, endangered species habitat, floodplains, and other areas of environmental concern and the possible impacts of telecommunications installations on these sensitive areas. EDUCATION Bachelor's Degree History/Political Science Villanova University, Villanova, PA EBI CONSULTING SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Ebenezer Agbobli Environmental Scientist Mr. Agbobli is an Environmental Scientist. He completed his Bachelor's degree in Planning in 2000 and obtained his Master's degree in Geoenvironmental Studies in May 2005. Most recently, Mr. Agbobli did an internship as a Geographic Information Systems (GIS)/Urban Planning intern. As an intern, he carried out preliminary field investigations for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement. He also conducted surveys for the preparation of "conservation by design" zoning maps and multi -municipal comprehensive plans for the Letterkenny, Fannett and Lurgan Townships in Pennsylvania. He also inspected road construction and storm water management systems during the construction of a Wal-Mart store. Mr. Agbobli has also done an internship as a Watershed/GIS intern where he performed various duties. Among some of the projects that he worked on were using aerial photographs to map out Agricultural Areas in Fulton County, Pennsylvania. In addition, he evaluated the impacts of changing land use on storm water runoff in the Borough of McConnellsburg, Pennsylvania. After his Bachelors Degree, Mr. Agbobli worked as a Project Planning and Monitoring Officer. During that period, he prepared Environmental Management Plans, monitored construction projects, and planned project implementations. Other duties he performed were the preparation of survey instruments, data collection and analysis. Additionally, he has also assisted with project research evaluations. Mr. Agbobli has experience in GIS analysis and mapping. At EBI Consulting, Mr. Agbobli will focus on conducting Phase I Environmental Site Assessments in accordance with ASTM standards and completing projects under the National Environmental Policy Act for the Telecommunications Division. EDUCATION BS Planning - University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana MS Geoenvironmental Studies - Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania. TECHNICAL/PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS ASTM Phase / Environmental Site Assessments for Commercial Real Estate - Denver, CO TSCA Tlde// Certification: Asbestos Building Inspector - Boiling Springs, PA PROFESSIONAL AFFIUATIONS Member, Association of American Geographers (AAG) and Pennsylvania Geographical Society (PGS) CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Attachment 2. Additional Site Information Describe any additional structures, access roads, utility lines, fences, easements, or other construction planned for the site in conjunction with the proposed collocation and related facilities. Use this attachment to provide additional details needed to provide a full and accurate description of any structural alterations, additions, or other construction activities that will take place to complete the collocation. The proposed telecommunications equipment will be installed on a tower constructed in 2000 addressed as 11664 Mapleville Road, Smithsburg, Washington County, MD (Subject Property). The Subject Property is located south-southwest of the intersection of Mapleville Road and Republican Avenue. American Tower Corporation (ATC) proposes to extend the existing 112 -foot monopole including all appurtenances to an elevation of 156 -feet. On the date of EBI's site visit, EBI observed a wireless telecommunications facility that generally consisted of a monopole telecommunication tower upon which approximately 8 antenna arrays were collocated. The antenna arrays were collocated at an approximate elevation of 100 feet above the base of an existing 102 -foot monopole tower. The height from the base of the monopole to the top of the antennas is 112 feet above ground level (AGL). Additionally, an emergency generator located adjacent north-northwest of the monopole, equipment shelter located adjacent west of the existing monopole and telecommunications support equipment located adjacent north of monopole were observed. The emergency generator, equipment shelter and telecommunications support equipment were observed to be located within an enclosed tower compound (Project Site). Telco cabinet located adjacent north and a pad -mounted transformer located northeast outside the tower compound was also observed. The Project Site is currently covered by gravel. Attachment 3. Tribal and NHO Involvement At an early stage in the planning process, the Nationwide Agreement requires the Applicant to gather information from appropriate Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations ("NHOs") to assist in the identification of historic properties of religious and cultural significance to them. Describe measures taken to identify Indian tribes and NHOs that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by the collocation within the Areas of Potential Effects ("APE") for direct and visual effects. If such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, list them and provide a summary of contacts by either the FCC, the Applicant, or the Applicant's representative. Provide copies of relevant documents, including correspondence. If no such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, please explain. EBI completed the Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) on June 23, 2006. The attached FCC Notification email lists the Tribes identified through the TCNS process. Follow up correspondence, if necessary, will be completed via the methods listed on the attached email considered acceptable to that Tribe. FCC Form 621 January 2005 OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #1 From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 3:01 AM TO: ssagan@ebiconsulting.com Cc: kim.pristello@fcc.gov; diane.dupert@fcc.gov subject: NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #1176083 Dear Sir or Madam: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the information you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). Persons who have received the information that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally -recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native villages (collectively "Tribes"), Native Hawaiian organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation officers (SHPos). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribes and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribe and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribes may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current seat of Government. Pursuant to the commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal communications Commission (NPA), all Tribes and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribe or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The information you provided was forwarded to the following Tribes and NHOs who have set their geographic preferences on TCNS. If the information you provided relates to a proposed antenna structure in the State of Alaska, the following list also includes Tribes located in the State of Alaska that have not specified their geographic preferences. For these Tribes and NHOs, if the Tribe or NHo does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribe or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, section Iv.F.5). In the event such a Tribe or NHo does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribe or NHO, you must seek guidance from the commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Declaratory Ruling released on October 6, 2005 (FCC 05-176). 1. Chief - Leo Henry - Tuscarora Nation - via: Lewistown, NY - regular mail Exclusions: If the Applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Tuscarora Nation within 30 days after notification through TONS, the Tuscarora Nation has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must IMMEDIATLY notify the Tuscarora Nation in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction. 2. THPO & Tribal Administrator - Rebecca Hawkins - Shawnee Tribe - Miami, OK - electronic mail and regular mail Exclusions: if you have received this notification through the TONS, then the Shawnee Tribe is interested in consulting on the tower for which that notification was received. Please consider this our official indication of interest. The Shawnee Tribe wishes to review co -location projects ONLY IF new ground Page 1 OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #1 disturbance is anticipated (such as from an expanded compound or access road, or construction of an ancillary structure). The Shawnee Tribe does NOT wish to review co -location projects where no new ground disturbance is anticipated. The Shawnee Tribe considers the Tower Construction Notification System's weekly e-mail to be the first notification that a tower will be constructed in an area of our concern, we do not view the TCNS notification as completion of 106 consultation obligations. The Shawnee Tribe has developed streamlined consultation procedures for cell tower developers and their subcontractors. If you do not have a copy of the procedures that have been updated for 2006, please contact us, as you must follow these procedures to consult with us on cell tower projects. call us at 918-542-2441 or fax us at 918-542-2922. PLEASE DO NOT SEND US INFORMATION, QUERIES, OR COMMENTS ELECTRONICALLY. WE WILL NO LONGER, AS OF 1 DECEMBER 2005, HANDLE ANY CELL TOWER CONSULTATION CORRESPONDENCE VIA E-MAIL. The information you provided was also forwarded to the additional Tribes and NHOs listed below. These Tribes and NHOs have NOT set their geographic preferences on TONS, and therefore they are currently receiving tower notifications for the entire United States. For these Tribes and NHOs, you are required to use reasonable and good faith efforts to determine if the Tribe or NHO may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by its proposed undertaking. Such efforts may include, but are not limited to, seeking information from the relevant SHPO or THPO, Indian Tribes, state agencies, the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs, or, where applicable, any federal agency with land holdings within the state (NPA, Section Iv.B). If after such reasonable and good faith efforts, you determine that a Tribe or NHO may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties in the area and the Tribe or NHO does not respond to TCNS notification within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort to follow up, and must seek guidance from the commission in the event of continued non -response or in the event of a procedural or substantive disagreement. If you determine that the Tribe or NHO is unlikely to attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties within the area, you do not need to take further action unless the Tribe or NHO indicates an interest in the proposed construction or other evidence of potential interest comes to your attention. None The information you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA. 3. SHPO - Lisa Burcham - Historic Preservation Office - Washington, DC - electronic mail 4. SHPO - Rodney Little - Maryland Historical Trust - crownsville, MD - electronic mail Page 2 OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #1 5. Deputy SHPO - Jean Cutler - Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Comm, Bureau for Historic Preservation - Harrisburg, PA - electronic mail 6. Deputy SHPO - Susan Pierce - West Virginia Division of culture & History, Historic Preservation office - Charleston, WV - electronic mail and regular mail 7. Deputy SHPO - Susan Pierce - West Virginia Division of Culture & History, Historic Preservation office - Charleston, WV - electronic mail "Exclusions" above set forth language provided by the Tribe, NHO, or SHPO. These exclusions may indicate types of tower notifications that the Tribe, NHO, or SHPO does not wish to review. TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribes, NHOs, and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal, as well as Tribes and NHOs that have not limited their geographic areas of interest. However, if a proposal falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribe, NHO, or SHPO. Exclusions may also set forth policies or procedures of a particular Tribe, NHO, or SHPO (for example, types of information that a Tribe routinely requests, or a policy that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre -construction review). if you are proposing to construct a facility in the State of Alaska, you should contact Commission staff for guidance regarding your obligations in the event that Tribes do not respond to this notification within a reasonable time. Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 06/16/2006 Notification ID: 17059 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: American Tower corporation consultant Name: Shaun Sagan Street Address: EBI consulting 6876 Susquehanna Trail South city: York State: PENNSYLVANIA zip code: 17403 Phone: 717-428-0401 Email: ssagan@ebiconsulting.com structure Type: POLE - Any type of Pole Latitude: 39 deg 38 min 18.3 sec N Longitude: 77 deg 35 min 39.7 sec w Location Description: 11664 Mapleville Road City: smithsburg State: MARYLAND County: WASHINGTON Ground Elevation: 207.9 meters support Structure: 47.5 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 47.5 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 255.4 meters above mean sea level if you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic mail form located on the FCC's website at: http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/notification/contact-fcc.html. Page 3 OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #1 You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission Page 4 CO SUBMISSION PACKET-- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Attachment 4. Local Government a. Has any local government agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party pursuant to Section V.A. of the Nationwide Agreement? If so, list the local government agencies contacted. Provide a summary of contacts and copies of any relevant documents (e.g., correspondence or notices). A copy of the FCC form 621 is being sent to the Washington County, Maryland to notify them of the proposed project and also to invite the Washington County, Maryland to comment on the proposed project. b. If a local government agency will be contacted but has not been to date, explain why and when such contact will take place. N/A Attachment 5. Public Involvement Describe measures taken to obtain public involvement in this project (e.g., notices, letters, or public meetings). Provide copies of relevant documentation. Attached please find copies of legal notices regarding the proposed telecommunications installation that were posted in The Herald- Mail on July 17, 2006. As of the date of this letter, no letter, calls, or emails regarding this notice have been received by either EBI or Project Proponent. Should a response be received, copies will be forwarded as an addendum to this submission packet. FCC Form 621 January 2005 I -EBI CONSULTINC www.ebiconsulting.com June 16, 2006 Attn: Ms. Candyace Vincent The Herald- Mail 100 Summit Avenue Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Subject: Request for Public Notice EBI Project #61062566 Mid -Atlantic Regional Office 6876 Susquehanna Trail South York, PA 17403 Tel: (717)428-04011 Fax: (717)428-0403 EBI CONSULTING (EBI), on behalf of American Tower Corporation, would like to place the following ad in your paper for print on Wednesday, June 21, 2006. Please place this ad in the paper for two consecutive weeks and send an Affidavit of Publication of the ad for confirmation to the Burlington address noted on the letterhead. The following is the text of the Public Notice: American Tower Corporation is proposing to extend the existing monopole located at 11664 Mapleville Road, Smithsburg, Washington County, Maryland. The existing tower is a monopole design and is 112 feet in height. American Tower Corporation proposes to extend the existing 112 -foot monopole including all appurtenances to an elevation of 156 -feet. American Tower Corporation seeks comments from all Interested persons on the impact of the tower on any districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture, that are listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Specific Information about the project, including the historic preservation reviews that American Tower has conducted pursuant to the rules of the Federal Communications Commission (47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1307(4)) and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (36 C.F.R. Part 800) will be made available to interested persons who request the Information from the contact below. All questions, comments, and correspondence should be directed to the following contact by July 21, 2006: American Tower Corporation 10 Presidential Way Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 Envi ro.Services@americantower.com Please call me to verify this letter was received and I will provide my credit card number for payment. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Ebenezer Agbobli Staff Scientist (717)428-0401 ext. 1217 ENVIROBUSINESS, INC. LOCATIONS I ATLANTA, GA I BALTIMORE, MD I BURLINGTON, MA I CHICAGO, IL CRANSTON, RI I DALLAS, TX I DENVER, CO I EXETER, NH I HOUSTON, TX I LOS ANGELES, CA I NEW YORK, NY I PHOENIX, AZ I PORTLAND, OR I SAN FRANCISCO, CA I SEATTLE, WA I YORK, PA CO SUBMISSION PACKET-- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Attachment 6. Additional Consulting Parties List additional consulting parties that were invited to participate by the Applicant, or independently requested to participate. Provide any relevant correspondence or other documents. No additional Consulting Parties have been identified to date. Attachment 7. Areas of Potential Effects a. Describe the APE for direct effects and explain how this APE was determined. The APE for direct effects is limited to the area of potential ground disturbance and any property, or any portion thereof, that will be physically altered or destroyed by the Undertaking. The only new federal undertaking pursuant to the 3/7/05 Nationwide Programmatic Agreement is the tower height extension. No excavation outside the current boundaries of the existing lease area will take place. b. Describe the APE for visual effects and explain how this APE was determined. The APE for visual effects is the geographic area in which the Undertaking has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character -defining feature of a Historic Property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register. Based upon EBI's walkover and windshield survey of the proposed Project Site and vicinity, the visual effects APE for this project was determined to be an area within a /2 mile radius of the proposed collocation. The proposed installation will be visible within '/2 mile to the west, south, southwest, southeast, and northwest of the project site and within 1,000 -feet to the north, northeast, and east of the project site due to the presence of a dense wooded area. Attachment 8. Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Visual Effects a. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each property in the APE for visual effects that is listed in the National Register, has been formally determined eligible for listing by the Keeper of the National Register, or is identified as considered eligible for listing in the records of the SHPO/THPO, pursuant to Section VI.D. I.a. of the Nationwide Agreement° Based on EBI's review of files at the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) on June 14, 2006, no Historic Properties were identified within the APE for visual effects. b. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each Historic Property in the APE for visual effects, not listed in Attachment 8a, identified through the comments of Indian Tribes, NHOs, local governments, or members of the public. Identify each individual or group whose comments led to the 9 Section VI.D. I.a. of the Nationwide Agreement requires the Applicant to review publicly available records to identify within the APE for visual effects: 1) properties listed in the National Register; ii) properties formally determined eligible for listing by the Keeper of the National Register; iii) properties that the SHPO/THPO certifies are in the process of being nominated to the National Register; iv) properties previously determined eligible as part of a consensus determination of eligibility between the SHPO/THPO and a Federal Agency or local government representing the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and, v) properties listed in the SHPO/THPO Inventory that the SHPO/THPO has previously evaluated and found to meet the National Register criteria, and that are identified accordingly in the SHPO/THPO Inventory. FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET-- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours inclusion of a Historic Property in this attachment. For each such property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). No additional Historic Properties have been identified. c. For any properties listed on Attachment 8a that the Applicant considers no longer eligible for inclusion in the National Register, explain the basis for this recommendation. None of the Historic Properties referenced above in 8a are recommended ineligible for inclusion in the National Register. Attachment 9. Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Direct Effects a. List all properties identified in Attachment 8a or 8b that are within the APE for direct effects. Based on EBI's review of files at the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) on June 14, 2006, no Historic Properties were identified within the APE for direct effects. D. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each property in the APE for direct effects, not listed in Attachment 9a, that the Applicant considers to be eligible for listing in the National Register as a result of the Applicant's research. For each such property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). For each property that was specifically considered and determined not to be eligible, describe why it does not satisfy the criteria of eligibility. No additional Historic Properties have been identified. c. Describe the techniques and the methodology, including any field survey, used to identify historic properties within the APE for direct effects.10 If no archeological field survey was performed, provide a report substantiating that: i) the depth of previous disturbance exceeds the proposed construction depth (excluding footings and other anchoring mechanisms) by at least 2 feet; or, ii) geomorphological evidence indicates that cultural resource -bearing soils do not occur within the project area or may occur but at depths that exceed 2 feet below the proposed construction depth." The proposed installation includes extension of the existing monopole. The only new federal undertaking pursuant to the 3/7/05 Nationwide Programmatic Agreement is the tower height extension. No excavation outside the current boundaries of the existing lease area will take place; therefore, no archaeological field survey was required. 1° Pursuant to Section VI.D.2,a. of the Nationwide Agreement, Applicants shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify above ground and archeological historic properties, including buildings, structures, and historic districts, that lie within the APE for direct effects. Such reasonable and good faith efforts may include a field survey where appropriate. 'I Under Section VI.D.2.d. of the Nationwide Agreement, an archeological field survey is required even if none of these conditions applies, if an Indian tribe or NHO provides evidence that supports a high probability of the presence of intact archeological Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects. FCC Form 621 January2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET-- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Attachment 10. Effects on Identified Properties For each property identified as a Historic Property in Attachments 8 and 9: a. Indicate whether the Applicant believes the proposed collocation would have a) no effect; b) no adverse effect; or, c) an adverse effect. Explain how each such assessment was made. Provide supporting documentation where necessary. Based on EBI's review of files at the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) on June 14, 2006, no Historic Properties were identified within the APE for direct and visual effects. b. Provide copies of any correspondence and summaries of any oral communications with the SHPO/THPO. None performed to date. c. Describe any alternatives that have been considered that might avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse effects. Explain the Applicant's conclusion regarding the feasibility of each alternative. No adverse effects are expected as a result of the proposed installation. Attachment II. Photographs Except in cases where no Historic Properties were identified within the Areas of Potential Effects, submit photographs as described below. Photographs should be in color, marked so as to identify the project, keyed to the relevant map (see Item 12 below) or text, and dated; the focal length of the lens should be noted. The source of any photograph included but not taken by the Applicant or its consultant (including copies of historic images) should be identified on the photograph. a. Photographs taken from the collocation site should show views from the proposed location in all directions. The direction (e.g., north, south, etc.) should be indicated on each photograph, and, as a group, the photographs should present a complete (360 degree) view of the area around the communications tower or non -tower structure. b. Photographs of all listed and eligible properties within the Areas of Potential Effects. c. If any listed or eligible properties are visible from the proposed collocation site, photographs looking at the site from each historic property. The approximate distance in feet (meters) between the site and the historic property should be included. d. Aerial photos of the APE for visual effects, if available. Photographs.' Please see the attached Photographs, which were taken by EBI Consulting staff on June 14, 2006, unless otherwise noted. A photograph location map is included in Attachment 12, Maps. FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours I. View looking at the existing Subject Property monopole from the south. 2. View looking north towards the Project Site from the access road JL. emanating from Mapleville Road r -I- R,3 it a �w- I.-..=�Z FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET-- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours 3. View looking south towards the Project Site. 4. View looking east towards the Project Site. FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours 11 View looking west towards the Project Site from W. Atlantic Avenue. 1 6. View looking north from the Project Site. FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours 7. View looking south from the Project Site. 8. View looking east from the Project Site. FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET-- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours 9. View looking west from the Project Site. 10. View of existing gravel covered access road to the tower compound. FCC Form 621 January 2005 E CO SUBMISSION PACKET-- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours 13. View of an existing emergency generator located at the northern portions of the tower compound 14. View of an existing equipment cabinet adjacent north- northeast of monopole. FCC Form 621 January 2005 11 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours IS. View of an existing pad - mounted transformer located north-northeast outside fenced tower compound 16. View of an existing Telco cabinet located north outside fenced tower compound. FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET-- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours 17. View of the existing antennas mounted on top of the monopole FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Attachment 12. Maps Include one or more 7.5 -minute quad USGS topographical maps that: a. Identify the Areas of Potential Effects for both Direct and Visual Effects. If a map is copied from the original, include a key with name of quad and date. b. Show the location of the proposed collocation site and any new access roads or other easements including excavations. c. Show the locations of each property listed Attachments 8 and 9. d. Include keys for any symbols, colors, or other identifiers. Attached maps include a Street Map and Topographic Map showing the location of the proposed Project Site (Figures I and 2). Also attached are a Site Sketch (Figure 3), a Photo -location Map (Figure 4), a Historic Resources, and detailed Site Plans/Lease Exhibits provided by the project proponent. The APE for Direct Effects is identified on the attached Site Plans. The APE for Visual Effects is identified on the attached Photo -location Map. The location of the proposed collocation site and any related excavations are shown on the Site Plans/Lease Exhibits. Historic Properties identified in Attachments 8 and 9 are identified on the Historic Resources Map. FCC Form 621 January 2005 rEBI CONSUI-'I' I N C Gearag Value far Your Onslness Legend * Project Site L : Site Buffer at 250, 500', 1000' and 1/2 mile EBI and NWI Figure 1 - Site Location Map 10290/SMITHBURG MD 11664 Mapleville Road Smithsburg, MD 21783 PN: 61062566 AN v 0 500 1060 feet rc7iiEBI C O N S U L T I N G Gen ring Value for Your suzinc', :rap 4S ri4y `ilwiwt6le�il4�tl,',i1 lw w': :\\\yine piIR •�/ ,Y rl�r •_Xc_ ✓r'o It ! g th —M alt v,,.. =�'� wr xw + X4,4• w w ei, Iltie a iti Inc 4r�' w rif,\,) r , �1 I r ii t� M w w {i � �: V� w A 11 w ¶'t "�. ,t ..Y w^ / i ,A A * );ia t*::\s/' 'd -7C/: t r., w `I � \ S//(i7 \4 2X\ Legend * Project Site -L _1 Site Buffer at 250', 500, 1000and 1 /2 mile USGS 24k Quad: Smilhsburg, Maryland Figure 2 - USGS Quad Location Map 10290/SMITHBURG MD 11664 Mapleville Road Smithsburg, MD 21783 PN: 61062566 %)4.;. �U y r \Y 4 Source: Selected data from ESRI, FBI and USGS A N v 0 500 1000 feet EBI CONSULT 1 N O CNdthlg Ve&W for Your 6YtlnfI Pre- Existing Existing heap of fabricated equipment sand septic shelter tanks Existing Block Existing Building Building II Existing pad // ` transformer / Existin su on Er g PP /C? cabinet / / Existing fenced / Existing Emergency lower compou generator %Exisfi�' 112-foot Monopole to be Existing Cingular extended to 156 Support cabinet feet equipment shelter ® / C) ` ` / / Existing Pre - O O O / fabricated / Septic tank / / O4. 44 manufacturin ` building / tanks Figure 3 — Site Plan 10290/ SMITHSBURG MD 11664 Mapleville Road, Smithsburg, Maryland 21783 PN: 61062566 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours Attribution and Bibliographic Standards. All reports included in the Submission Packet should be footnoted and contain a bibliography of the sources consulted. a. Footnotes may be in a form generally accepted in the preparer's profession so long as they identify the author, title, publisher, date of publication, and pages referenced for published materials. For archival materials/documents/letters, the citation should include author, date, title or description and the name of the archive or other agency holding the document. b. A bibliography should be appended to each report listing the sources of information consulted in the preparation of the report. The bibliography may be in a form generally accepted in the preparer's profession. References are appended. FCC NOTICE TO INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT AND THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The FCC is authorized under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, to collect the personal information we request In this form. We will use the information provided in the application to determine whether approving this application is in the public interest. If we believe there may be a violation or potential violation of a FCC statute, regulation, rule or order, your application may be referred to the Federal, state or local agency responsible for Investigating, prosecuting, enforcing or implementing the statute, rule, regulation or order. In certain cases, the information in your application may be disclosed to the Department of Justice or a court or adjudicative body when (a) the FCC; (b) any employee of the FCC; or (c) the United States Government is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. In addition, all information provided in this form will be available for public inspection. If you owe a past due debt to the federal government, any information you provide may also be disclosed to the Department of Treasury Financial Management Service, other federal agencies and/or your employer to offset your salary, IRS tax refund or other payments to collect that debt. The FCC may also provide this information to these agencies through the matching of computer records when authorized. If you do not provide the information requested on this form, the application may be returned without action having been taken upon it or its processing may be delayed while a request is made to provide the missing Information. Your response is required to obtain the requested authorization. We have estimated that each response to this collection of information will take an average of .50 to 10 hours. Our estimate includes the time to read the Instructions, look through existing records, gather and maintain the required data, and actually complete and review the form or response. If you have any comments on this estimate, or on how we can Improve the collection and reduce the burden it causes you, please write the Federal Communications Commission, AMD-PERM, Paperwork Reduction Project (3060-1039), and Washington, DC 20554. We will also accept your comments via the Internet if your send them to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov. Please DO NOT SEND COMPLETED APPLICATIONS TO THIS ADDRESS. Remember - you are not required to respond to a collection of information sponsored by the Federal government, and the government may not conduct or sponsor this collection, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number of if we fail to provide you with this notice. This collection has been assigned an OMB control number of 3060-1039. THE FOREGOING NOTICE IS REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974, P.L. 93-579, DECEMBER 31, 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3). AND THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995, P.1. 104-13, OCTOBER 1, 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507. FCC Form 621 January 2005 CO SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 Estimated Time Per Response: .5 to 10 hours References: Certified local Government Program - http;//erants.cr.nps.gov/CLGs/CLGSearch.cfm American Tower Corporation- http://www.americantower.com/OasisPublic/MapPoint/default.asp Maryland Department of Assessment and Taxation, Washington County website-: http://sdatcert3.resiusa.ori,/rp rewrite/ Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) Historical Commission: File Review: June 14, 2006. Sources reviewed include the Smithsburg, Maryland Quadrangle. Prior NEPA Report— BL Companies, December 14, 2001 Topozone- www.topozone.com USGS Topographic Map, the Smithsburg, Maryland 1994 *Ms. Carissa Cunningham, American Tower Corporation (ATC) was interviewed. Qune 16, 2006) FCC Form 621 January 2005 c2 I 9 Case Number AP2006-112 AFFIDAVIT IN COMPLIANCE WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE - SECTION 25.51-(C) State of Maryland Washington County, To WIT: On this 23RD day of AUGUST , 20 06, before me the subscriber, a Notary of the public of the State and County aforesaid, personally appeared JOHN PHAN and made oath in due form of law as follows: JOHN PHAN will post the zoning notice signs(s) given to me by the Zoning Administrator in accordance with Section 25.51(c) of the Washington County Zoning Ordinance for the above -captioned Board of Appeals case, scheduled for SEPTEMBER 13TH 2006 , and that said sign(s) will be erected on the subject property in accordance with the required distances and positioning as set out in the attached posted instructions. Placard(s) will be posted on AUGUST 29TH , 2006. Subscribed and sworn to before me the day and year first above written. Seal My Commission Expires: 10/5/08 H:\ZONING\ZNINGORD\Posting requirementsRWD.doc REAR ELEVAT�ON II ELDORADO STONE ELDORADO-STONE ra- ELDORADO STONE ELDORADO STONE flu odl� ELDORADO STONE FRONT rioni I - - - 7ELDORADO STQNE 1Tu1r ELDORADO STONE 47T - ...... - H .. HO . K ____ U 1 U ELDORADO STONE JI win ELDORADO STONE Q w iJ / J 00 _ O Z'mZ m i N a3Q 5 (I``_ Q O O (� w I III I1I1I1I1L1I1'11111 II __ 11111111 II - - 111111 III 'IIOw Z a w �1 w N_ W `C 0 a > cc N ELEVATON Wa (I) w cC J a a C, O O c \ II ti w Z Q 0cC : :fr'ti A1.03 ! '-41/2" 1 A1.03 pEGK • ' DNTO 41/2" GRADE OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY NoiE: N 9/0LEND AACHTECT L DER THE LAWS OF THE NEW 5rMP ENGL05URE 5TIULE !' FOG SHALL DE A 1 riOUR RATED °� � A55EMDLY (MINIMUM) ti 4Z-41/2" NOTE: t. "`. 5.g /6-1" I NEW STAIR ENGL05URE 5f1ALL_ DE A 1 HOUP PATED A55EMDLY 0I/Z" y-6„ 6,�, 3/0 9/0 (MlNIMUN) n PROVIDE WOOD WALL MOUNTED O ® GL05 LICENSE���� EXPkiATDN DATE: g — iRNDRAL5 EAG'> SIDE OF 5rAIP5 N 3 9l/Z" d �i e - ---- j V ORGn9COF I — - -- , `- — PORGn900 PRGVIDPWOODWALL nfl L ✓ING 900 OUNT�D JJANDRNL5 DEDCGf1 fA5JDF OF 5rNR5 1110UPDG)OR -- ---- GJ � A55EMDLY J (JOUR DOOR REMOVE EX/5?!NG WrrY GL09ER i155iM6LY DOOR ff GLO%-� F UP 6-4. EDR OM U Cv _ _ _ _ OPENING A5 ,+ 1PED. z (EKING C i WJrJJGL05ER W w a JJfIGdr 9'd !/Z„ 4(/2" 2' 101/Z, 4 2, 4, 4„ 5 /G D'i ry _ --- -- ------------- --- - - --- ---- --------- a PANr9 3/0 PAIM On Vf ¢ m ----- N 2io 5roRArE 5roRnGE 2/o N b q GL05 K GnEN Q V Q rn 0 IY CC " YOUR RAPEDA55EMDLY I '---- is.��I PORGn GntN N NOTE: a m O EQO- « T 5fPAPArE APARTMENTS. PORGn RGOP I HOUR O w RATED N55fMDlY 1, e C) U V LL OC! JO pNTn (TYPICAL-) O ----- T05fPA9NTffPNRT7ENi5 W a DN , — I o o MPGNU Q 4i/2° 41 2„ O b J O N U ¢ rn z 4101/Z" `0 61/2 5 0 5' 9" P 2 WOODRNUNo5 I 2 KTGnfN r U MGR 00 I.1J A1.03 3/0 2 6 e g c 2/6 I A1.03 /, w^ O O a-z"cfiunfr�Jr U Z cn GL05 — ---- -- --- R00 t 4 ® FI (�JO921/2%2 co 41/2 °i2 4-r/2 4d/Z IIhDEo?x y IDrvPx r0Kx Ix N GROOM ____i I 21/2" ` E1UNGnte � I ,� �I SLOPE LGPE "�V✓^. � I 41/2" 4-1/2" L4.1/2 4.1/2" 4 i/ - - ii I w3cr1 jj(J - I AUG 1 1 2006 3/0 9/G 3/0 I9/0 I ----------------------------------I li I I CGVEREDPORGn 209 I I Lnwvt S H E F T WOOD JJMJL WL-5EAGn A1.03 1 .acf'5rn95A5 A1.03 RfQ �fD Al .02 (ThTk1W FLOOR PLANSECONP FLOOR PLAN ti X1.02 1660 soup Fa�r xA�; /'II = i' O"X1.02 1603 FOOT %P.�: v4I - 1' o I M 6 11 AUGUST 2OO6 I" AS NOTED O633 DWS 9r COPYRIGHT 2006 BMGM ARCHITECTS N - �pLANS DIME SIIO ARE SHOWN FROM THE FOLLOWING: OUTSIDE J ACE SONRYWALLSEOTINE OFEXIMAOUTSIDE NEW FR4 INGINC U ING LCONSTRUCTION '- _ ":S,. %OLUMN CENTERLINE, FACE OF INT. MASONRY WALLS AND FACE 'bF INT. FR FRAMING NOT INCLUDING GWS. AND FINISHES; UNLESS DOCUMENTS 4 101 CXl5T7NG — V' GONG. CUPD fX15TlNG 5DEWALK I —GONG %0CK NOTE: NEW VEST 13ULE W OUILT ON EXISTING CONCRETE 5LAD BAWL 5P,t NOTE: AL FOUNDATION WALLS, 'LADS, JOISTS AND DEAM5 ARE fX15T7N6, NO WORK lNDIGATfD FOP T17/5 AREA. rtl5 PLAN POP REFt?ENGe ONLY. GRML e,PA0 exl5TlNG 31.A13 ON 5FADf 12-1/2" 5LADONGR/Df L20' +/- Lcf5 5TONf T-1" 4"- CeILiNG /C&lT D/RTFLOOR 20" +/- ' 5roNf a"FLLYJR ` •-------------- I � � I I I I 8" FLOOR "COG. 2 FOUNDATION PLAN .01137S X1 6ENNI'AL DON. [,WCTION NOT�5 l CONTRACTOR 5YlALL DE Rf5PON/DLE TO MEET ALL 5TATf 8 LOCAL CODf5 REQUIRED THIS PROJECT. 2. GONIRAGTOR 5IALL DE Rf5PON5/DLf TO FIELD VEIFY EXISTING GONDIT7ON5 8 DlMEN5/ON5 PRIOR TO FADRIGATING ANY WORK OR CON5TRUGTION, J. ALL FINAL PINl5Nf5 8 COLOR 5ELEGTlON5 DY Tilt OWNER, 4, ARGI1ITEGT NOT ff5PON5/DLf FOR ANY 5TRUGTURAL DE5/GN/EN6/NffPING. 5. ARGl1ITCCT NOT RE5PON5/DLE FOP ANY MEGIIANICAL/ELECTRICAL 8 PLUMOIN5 DESIGN/fN5/NffpIN6, 6. ARCHITECT NOT PE5PON5/DLE FOR ANY CIVIL EN6/NEEp/NC, DE5I6N, 2"x4" WOOD STUD___, 816" O.G. 2"x4" 5/LL PLATE 5ecURE TO FLOOR WOOD DA5f HOUR 5EP l LAYER 5/5" FIREGODE GYPSUM 1 0ARD fAGY15ipe OF WALL, 3-1/2" UN -PAGED PIDERGLA55 DATT 1N5ULATION FOP SOUND CONTROL. lNl5HED FLOOR ARATION INALL SECTION %ALE: 1-1121 %M -E: 1/4" - 1,01 fXI5T1NG 5/DEWALK 4X8+/ - ON 5TONf DA5f 4x4 .240.0, A-✓/- 5PAGf STONE "' +/' 5TONf DRIGK VE,NteR 5LA D ON GRADE TALE 601 TABLE 601 FIRE -RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING ELEMENTS (hoursl NOTE: I UNIT ON Tile P/R5T FLOOR MUST Df 11ANp/GAPPED AGGf55/DLf AND ADAPTADLf TO Of ADACOMPU4NT DKCK VENEER ACGf55 ZWAY— DR,�K SHELVES VtNCCR I I0tPtD POP NEN TYPE I TYPE II TYPE III TYPE IV_ TYPE V A B Ad B Ad B Ad B BUILDING ELEMENT HT Strurnual frame' Including columns, girders, trusses 3" 2° I 0 1 0 HT 1 0 Bearing walls Exterior 3 2 1 0 2 2 2 Interior 36 2b 1 0 1 0 I 1/HT 1 ] 0 0 Nonbearing walls and partitions Exterior See Table 602 Nonbearing walls and partitions Interiof 0 0 0 0 0 0 See Section 60' .2.4.6 0 i4 0 Floor construction - Including supporting beams and joists 2 2 1 0. 1 0 HT 1 0 Roof construction 1 I=c 1' I° Including supporting beams and joists 01 I° 0 HT 1° 0 2"x4" WOOD .160.0. 2" x 4" 5/U PLATE_ 5fGURETO FLOOR WOOD CA5f- 4-1/2" —1/2" GYPSUM DOARD EACH 9/DC OF WALL. —3-1/2" UN -PAGED FIDERGLA55 DATT INNULAi7ON FOR SOUND CONTROL TYPICAL NON -RATED INTERIOR PALL PARTITION %n,F: 11/2" _ Al2J 131/2 ON DEDPOO/l 8'-0" GEIUNG tiastir __ I I i A1.03 J ® J c_liN 3/0 j--� Vf5TIDU I ® I I I I 8-Il" GfIUNG fit/stir N tXI5T1NG DeNALK I I 5/Of NS 5DEWALK I_NfW2xlOFLOOP J0/5T r IC 00. I25�R5 I I DIMENSION NOTE: PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN FROM THE FOLLOWING: OUTSIDE FACE OF EXIST. WALLS, OUTSIDE OF NEW FRAMING INCLUDING SHEATHING MASONRY COLUMN CENTERLINE,WALLS FACE OT INCLUDING NT.MASONRY WALLS AND FACE OF INT. FRAMING NOT INCLUDING GWB. AN0 FINISHES; UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. ii 1 SCALED HI DNI T0A5fI1fNT DxP TORAGf II 1 R H SEALED NDON I 3`Lz 7M GiE — _ TH -4d/2�Gi1UNG nfi� I I HALL DEN � O NUTf: I oo ln0U RATED A55EMDLYToSt I OATH I ---- -----_ —_ (TYPCA) I — I LSI II I I ; 5CCADADAThPOOM _ - PLANON HI i I 001 3 virGI O AI.03 I i ?-101/2"cfluNY�nfGnT ' _ _ _ I L1✓'N5 ROOM 8'-0" Gf/UNS nee friviNs R00M I I NO 1 8'-0" Cf1UNG nf/Sti fREDPORG PT N0.2 NOTE; ALL EXTERIOR B /NTfRIOR DEARlN6 WALL5 ARE TO REMNN, ALL WALLS, FLOOD J015T5 A1.03 AND CA15 ARE EXl5TIN6. NO WORK lNDIGATfD FOP Tnn5 AREA, 771/9 PLAN FOR RfFfRENGE ONLY. � FIRST FLOOR PLAN NOif: .0� 15g6 5QL1 001 SCALE: I/ a" = I' 0" PROViDf WOOD_ nANDRNL5 EAGn 5/DC OF 5TNR5 A5 REIXARED. BUILDING PESIGN CRITERIA 1. BUILDING GORE GOMPLI>NGE:---------------- INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CORE "IBC"-xOO3 EDITION 2. ADA GORE ---------------------------------DEPT. OF JUSTICE 28 GFR PART 56, 5• USE AND OCCUPANCY: JULY 1, 1994 EDITION --------------------------"R21I RESIDENTIAL GROUP "R" 4. GENERAL BUILDING HEIGHT'S $ AREA_: (APARTMENT HOUSE -6 UNITS) 5• TYPE OF GON5TKUCTION: 5 STORY, 12,000 SO. FEET ------------------- _TYPE 5A (PROTECTED) * SEE TABLE 6O1 THIS SHEET 6. FIRE RESISTANCE RATED GON5TRUGTION: (►NOOD FRAMED STRUCTURE) _--__--_-1 HOUR RATING 1. EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE: "R" 2OO FEET (NO SPRINKLER SYSTEM) S. MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA ALLowANCE5 PER OCCUPANT: 200 GROSS (RESIDENTIAL) 9. MINIMUM NO. OF EXITS/EGRESS: ------------------------? REQUIRED. 1O. AROVIDE PER TABLE xO'1.9.1.9 AUDIBLE 4 FIRE ALARMS 11. PROVIDE PORTABLE FIRE EXTjpGUI5HER5 PER INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE. 12. NO AUTOMATIC, SPRINKLER 5YETEM PROVIDED, ,� 'Y' eAsuOe j>s... KEI9OVE EXI5TING DOOR, PfPLAGEWlrti 3/O DOOR. DeDR M EXl5T6 WALL - 91 N -U' t 'I- I I' 31/Z" L4z' ADA G -AO DAR MATGYi Ex,/STING EXISTING WALL V/ ALL Tt1/GKNE55 , ,,,� _ Zx4DRAGING e 16" O.G. 1/l6"05D —_—-----_- 5t'EATtl/NG 1ST FLOOR APA BATHROOM LAYOUT 0 SCALE: 1/4' - II,OII 1/16" OSD rric /Th61EArtlING WOOD t1ANDRPoL WIT/1 GROOVED OUTSPAGE '5 FOR PAWSrPR5 gx_ n x Zx2PAWSTEP5 MAX. 4" CLEAR SPACING r_ FIDERGLA55 5rNGLE5 I N W/#30 ?OOF r5 ' Z x 6 GE11ING J& T5 a 9/16" 05D ROOF 57JEATYlING1 2 x 6 RAFTERS Poor EDGE f- Z x 6 FA5G1A _ - - 2 4 POTrOM RAL 4x4 4 P.T. p05r- RAI RAIL IM OETAI L 36" 1IGYIWOOD- P.T. RACING, 5EE NO SCALE PETAL. 2 x 6 P.T. DECKING 2 x 8 PT, JOIST_ 16" O.G. W/t1ANC-7�5 2 x 8 P.T. LEDGFI< DOA.RD/1 LAG TO EX15T/NCB 5rRJ Y—'= A5 PEOU/RED 4x4 4 PLPOST_.. GROSS PPAGIN( A5 REOUIPED EXISTING ROOF_ II ' GRADE — (APPROX) —Zx6 LEDGER SECURE TO 4t/ALL PEADED VINYL 50FF/IGEILING SUIILI7INS SECTION @ ORCH %k -S- /4" 'lH 4 2x4GE/L/NG a16"OG. 2x6ROOPR, 624: O.G. Z x 8 DEAM- 6 x 6 PT, POST: 2 x 10 P.T. GRADE (Ax'PROX) IaI I� 1=�I III ! I II DEDR00 00 Jrll l 00 low: j AR1E5�� 00 TO 28" O.G. U U U U REN ORGti WINSRCOM L05 U 0 - .____ 00 jW/NS W/1I rCntt4a a BEDR�O i 00 A5EME c--1/ SUILPINS SECTION x l0 POOP RAPIERS /6" 0.G. 20 YR. ARGNIT-EGTURAL w' 5t1/NGLE5 1 4 CEILING JOIST g,I tl .16" O.G. 2x6FA5GA C05 2 4 DOUPLE PLATE x 45TUD WALL .16" O.G. 7/16" 05D StlEArl1/NG 214 GEiL1NG Jo/Sr STAIRWELL/2 / 24O.C. iFR5 2'.F FASCIA ?/ 05D 54T/1/NS x 4 STUD WALL l6"'O.G. RAPIER PEAKING N _ _ Z JOIST PEAKING 2 x 10 PT. JO/5T Sx6PT, POST I I 1 PtR5rFLOOK it I I GONGRErE FOOTING II I I 7/N. 36" DEEP -I II NV DECK OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DU.Y LICENSED ARCIITECT IN)ER THE LAWS OF THE STATE M? X20 1 Qp wif", r EXPRATION DATE: !CO/DG Ui g 1 Z Lv N �G W Iv U Z I° gu ro C Q twit' Q=0nn1 W �_ W u rqi Q U o U O fV aq) On I �- m U Z cn U D�C�COt AUG 1 1 2fl J 0 Z O W Ln S N E c T A1.03 ti OMB� 11 AUGUST 2006 AS NOTED 0633 DWS COPYRIGHT 2006 BMGM ARCHITECTS DIMENSION NOTE: CO �� �� I O PLAN O DIMENSIONS LS SHOWN FROM FRAMING INCLUDING OUTSIDE FACE I EXIST. WALLS, OUTSIDE LLS OF NEW FIN INCLUDING COLUCE MASONRY WALLS (NOT INCLUDINGMARY LAN DOCUMENTS COLUMN CENTERLINE, NOT, FACE I N TNT. M. ANDRV WALLS AND FACE ICOTHERWISE. HE NOT INCLUDING GWB. AND FINISHES; UNLESS INDICATED O ■ ■ ALUMINUM ROOF ErGE 6' ' ALUMINUM FASCIA ALUMINUM FLASHING RME VENT RInGE VENT ELPOM0 5fM VENEER a ❑ ❑ n u a ❑ ❑ t?InE GE VENT VINYL GABLE ENN LOUVct? WIfN SCREEN— ALUMINUM GOOF EnGE T 25 A� Al2CNITECPJ AL GRAPE FI6ERGLA55 ____ ALUMINUM FLASHING- 6" ALUMINUM FASCIA- ALUMINUM FLASHING 5NINGLE5 VINYL GABLE EN7 WITH SCREEN ALUMINUM ROOF EZG e 2 e ALUMINUM ROOF EnGE A UMINUM FLASHING 6" ALUMINUM FASCIA ALUMINUM GUi V ANP POWN5POV5 H :+a_LOUVER IHE HE 6" ALUMINUM FASCIA _,. _ __ DDffl H H ____ IIIIi _ fl _ __-_- - H - _ __ _ _ __ VINYL 5U71NG & TRIM __ �� r G ` / f\�N I ��(� V����N P7 CORK1 E DRACKEf5 ANPI,MN 3052 W!TN VIN11 SNU1fER FIR5f FLOOR p jCgf_; 4 - I' 0'' ANt7ER5EN3052-3 (1WOF2) ___� ANMZ5EN 3O52-2 -- — 5HUMR5 WTH VINYL[flHRWO HIDIHI ELbOp.A170 5fONE VENEER H _ _MU _ __ GARAGE FLOOR — ___ — 9' x 7' IN5U,ATE7 GARAGE i i n00R5 (TPICAL OF 2) j GRADE ( VARIES) ..• ` T T' T 1 [X CONCRETE FOOTING 10" CONCRETE BLOCK WITHC2)#4DAR5 VINYL GABLE ENt7 LOUVER WTH SCREEN- - -_ -8 8 F - OUtUNE OF ROOF 6EYONn EwlE JE_E' 11 u. LHHU ... . ____ __ __ FIRST FLOOR p nruu o EWIDI � _ GARAGE FLOOR � I },^ T , ' /I 1 y /� yl O, 1 _ �_ �, _•y, .. �(,�/ UNIII V 1 � N 4—+---__u` —T— _ � I I � -- T — — .y, 1• '{7 " - .� �� — _� _, ,1 ','_� '•�-- y ---- J �_�—�� '4 —_ — z � — DIMENSIONIME NOTE: PLAN OreXISONB ARE SHOWN FROM THE FOLLOWIINC UDJtScDE NO INO FACE EXIST.WAILS, ALSI(NOFNEW FRAMIND FINISHES) IN CENTERLINE MASONRY WALLS (NOT IPACE OF NT MASONNO FINISHES)• SHEACOLUMN OF INT. FRAMING NOINCLUDING OWE. ANC FNB ES; UNLESSRY WALLS AND INDICATED OTHERWISE. PLANS SHOULD BE AM NOT SCALSOI 5Cl�. � ; 74" _ � � _ Q i i CONCRETE FGOt1NG 10" CONCRTf E DLOCK REVISIONS WTH(2)#43Pf'5 ❑ FI,POPAPO 5TONF VFNFFP 2� APCHITFCTUPALU- GPAPF NI3Xp61.A55 yr1INCAI,F5 00 oa ALUMINUM POOF W6G ALUMINUM FLASHH6 ALUMINUM WMP ANP POWN5POUT5 6'' ALUMINUM FA5CIA LH ❑ ❑ H__ EEE EEE __E_ p u, VINYL 51PING & TRIM_ILL______ ro FIP5TFI,OOP O ANPFP5FN 3O52 FLPOPA0O 5TONF VFNFFP ( TYP OF 2) 6068 15 LITF N5ULATFP 5TFFL FNTPY Poop colffAF FLOOp GPAPF (VAP.IF5) 6'x6' GAPAGF POOP I REAR ELEVATI❑N CONC IE FOanNG Q1 CONCPFTF BLOCK 9 LITF 2 PANFL SCALE. 1/4" — 1'- 0" WITH (2) #4 F�A5 INSU1-ATFP STFFL FNTPY POOP PI-UMIMN6 NOTF5 MFCFANICAL NOh5 FLFCTP,ICAI. NOTES k Al plumbing work to be nstalled in accordance to IPC or governing local code, 1 Mechanical system design (HVAC) shall be designed and installed bq mechanical contractor in I Al electrical work to be done in accordance with IFC or governing local codes. 2, Plumbing contractor to properly size all water, sewer and vent lines. Provide venting as required accordance to IMC or governing local code. 2. Flect ical rough -in and conduit to be coordinated with masonry and structural trades to minimize per code requirements! Coordinate with General Contractor/ Owner or all roof penetrations and 2. Mechanical contractor to coordinate piping and duct runs as required with other trades including nutting and damage to structural members, flashing as required Vo brite metal to be exposed ( paint black or match roof odor as directed locations of duct chases as required. Po not disrupt any structra' members, 5, Tie Into existing electric panel bq Owners) 5. Puctwork layout shall be performed to minimize lengths of runs and tuns in the ductwork, 4, Provide electric powered smoke detectors connected at main panel with battery back-up. 5. Provide frost free hose bibs as shown. 4 Puctwork shall be installed and sealed to reduce leacage according to 5MACNA standa-ds, 5. Provide phone and data jacks per Owner's direction, 4, Plumbing rough -in is to be coordinated with masonry and structural trades to minimize cutting and 5. Coordinate with general contractor duct runs and chases as rewired to efficientq layout 6. Provide ceiling lights In center of room and wire for future ceiling fans separate from light circuit, damage to structural nembers ductwork. Pucts run below flea- system shall be bulkheaded in op. bd as needed, 7, Provide conduit for cable TV per Owner's direction, 5. Al plumbing fixtures shall be water -saver types. 6. Hot water piping in exposed locations shall be Insulated to minimum P'9. 7, Cdd water piping in bulkhead enclosures shall be insulated to min, P -S to avoid condensation and dripping. DIMENSION NOTE: PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN FROM THE FOLLOWING: OUTSIDE FACE OF EXIST. WALLS, OUTSIDE OF NEW FRAMING INCLUDING SHEATHING, MASONRY WALLS (NOT INCLUDING FINISHES), COLUMN CENTERLINE. FACE OF INT. MASONRY WALLS AND FACE OF INT. FRAMING NOT INCLUDING OWE. AND FINISHES: UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE PLANS SHOULD BE READ NOT SCALEDI REVISIONS