HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 - August Agenda PacketGregory Smith, Chair Washing ton County Vernell Doyle
Lloyd Yavener, Vice Chair - Michael Lushbaugh
Ann Aldrich Justin Bedard
Brianna Candelaria Wayne K. Keefer, BOCC Rep
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND
AGENDA
August 7, 2024
Workshop Meeting at 5:30 p.m.
County stone arch bridges
Washington County Administration Complex, 100 West Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD 21740
Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m.
Washington County Administration Complex, 100 West Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD 21740
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
MINUTES
1. Minutes of the July 3, 2024 meeting *
NEW BUSINESS
1. Residential New Construction Permit — 2024-02591- 24807 Linden Avenue. Cascade
(Discussion/Approval) 560 sq. ft. finished space one-story single-family dwelling on
crawl space, with ladder access to 350 sq. ft. storage area above, frame construction,
roof rafters (Pen Mar Rural Village, MIHP — WA -IV -19) *
2. Site Specific Grading Plan — GP -24-008 -13215 Smithsburg Pike (Discussion/Approval)
Wall restoration project for pond connected to spring house. Wall restoration includes
repairing various locations of dry stack stone, as well as some holes on the backside of
the wall to restore its foundation. In addition to the wall restoration, some parts of the
pond floor will be dredged to remove debris with the goal of restoring the ponds
original depth. SWM waived since this is a maintenance project with no increase in
impervious area. *
OLD BUSINESS
1. Tax Credit Application Updates (Discussion/Consensus) — Staff has revised the existing
tax credit application and would like the members to review for any updates/changes.*
2. Grant Program DRAFT (Discussion/Consensus) — For members to review the previous
draft to determine if it is still viable for forwarding to the County Attorney for their
revisions/input. *
747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 240.313.2430 240.313.2431 7-1-1
WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Correspondence
a. Smithsburg Reservoir House
b. CLG Training Funds Available
2. Staff Report
a. Staff Reviews *
b. Tax Credit Brochures (printed for handout at meeting)
c. Membership updates
d. Comp Plan update
e. 250th Website and other updates
ADJOURNMENT
UPCOMING MEETING
1. Wednesday, September 4, 2024, 7:00 p.m.
*attachments
The Historic District Commission reserves the right to vary the order in which the cases are called. Individuals
requiring special accommodations are requested to contact the Washington County Planning Department at 240-
313-2430 to make arrangements no later than ten (10) days prior to the meeting. Notice is given that the agenda
may be amended at any time up to and including the meeting.
MINUTES OF THE
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY
July 3, 2024
The Washington County Historic District Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Wednesday,
July 3, 2024 at 7:00 p.m. in the Washington County Administrative Complex, 100 W Washington Street,
Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Commission members present were: Greg Smith, Chairman, Justin Bedard, Vernell Doyle, Lloyd Yavener,
Michael Lushbaugh and Brianna Candelaria. Staff members present were: Washington County
Department of Planning & Zoning: Meghan Jenkins, GIS Coordinator and HDC Staff member.
MINUTES
Motion and Vote: Ms. Candelaria made a motion to approve the minutes of the June 5, 2024 meeting as
presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bedard and unanimously approved.
OLD BUSINESS
Review and Update of Historic Tax Credit Brochure
Ms. Jenkins distributed copies of the draft Historic Tax Credit brochure. She briefly described changes that
have been made to the brochure. Members had the following recommendations:
• Put a link to the website under the OR code
• Lists should be bulleted or typed in bold so they stand out
• Use blue text instead of gold in the lists
• Paragraphs alignment should be justified
• Use a heavier weight of paper for printing
Ms. Jenkins asked members to review the brochure and send her any additional comments via email. She
also asked for suggestions of locations where the brochures could be distributed. One suggestion was
local hardware stores, such as Lowe's or Ace Hardware.
Ms. Doyle pointed out that in the sentence "Applications should be submitted before the start of work for
which the tax credit is sought", the word should needs to be changed to "must". Members recommended
making the word "must" in bold type.
OTHER BUSINESS
Correspondence — Historic Bridge Review: US 522 over Potomac and CSX (15982)
Ms. Jenkins stated that correspondence was received regarding the bridge over US 522 in Hancock. She
noted that the area of effect is not greater than the SHA right-of-way. According to the SHA's architectural
historian and archaeologist on staff, there will be no adverse effect to any historic or archeological sites.
Consensus: Members have no additional comments.
Staff Report
Staff Reviews - Ms. Jenkins provided a written summary. She noted that the demolition permit for
the property reviewed at the last meeting located in Smithsburg on Cavetown Church Road was
released. Ms. Jenkins stated that the applicant provided an updated salvage plan for the barn,
which has been donated. She also talked to MHT who previously determined the structures were
not eligible for the National Register. Because no improvements had been made to the structures
since that determination, MHT would not require any further review of the property.
The Director of Public Works and the Director of Engineering will be available for a workshop with
the HDC on August 7th at 5:30 pm to discuss County historic bridges, specifically Price's Bridge.
HDC By-laws — The county attorney's office has determined that the Board of County
Commissioners must approve the By-laws prior to recordation. She noted there is a change in
Article 9 regarding recordation and final approval by the Board of County Commissioners.
Discussion: Mr. Yavener pointed out that in Article IX Amendments, the third sentence should be
changed to be grammatically consistent with the first sentence. Also, the last sentence should
begin with the word "Final" not finally. Ms. Jenkins will provide these comments to the County
Attorney for the final review.
o Motion and Vote: Mr. Bedard made a motion to approve the amendments to Article 9
pending ratification of grammatical errors as discussed and that final approval of the By-
laws will rest with the Board of County Commissioners. The motion was seconded by Ms.
Candelaria and unanimously approved.
Design Guidelines — Ms. Jenkins stated she has performed her yearly review of the Design
Guidelines on the web and has updated and fixed all broken links. She has also updated the Tax
Credit Ordinance as well.
Motion and Vote: Mr. Bedard made a motion to adjourn to Closed Session. The motion was seconded by
Ms. Doyle and so ordered by the Chairman.
CLOSED SESSION
To discuss the appointment, employment, assignment, promotion, discipline, demotion, compensation,
removal, resignation, or performance evaluation of appointees, employees, or officials over whom this
public body has jurisdiction; or any other personnel matter that affects one or more specific individuals.
Motion and Vote: Mr. Bedard made a motion to return to Open Session. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Yavener and so ordered by the Chairman.
Motion and Vote: Mr. Bedard made a motion to forward the nominations discussed during Closed Session
to the Board of County Commissioners. The motion was seconded by Ms. Candelaria and unanimously
approved.
ADJOURNMENT
Ms. Candelaria made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:10 pm. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Lushbaugh and so ordered by the Chairman.
Gregory Smith, Chairman
AND
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
To: Washington County Historic District Commission
From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff
Date: August 1, 2024
Subj: Residential New Construction Permit/Stick Built Home, 2024-02591
Staff Report and Analysis
Property Owner: ZOPPI IRENE M L/E, ZOPPI THOMAS J L/E
Applicant: Irene Zoppi
Location: 24807 LINDEN Avenue
Tax Account ID: 14004505
Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 14/19/57/17 18
Legal Description: LTS17&18 PT 19 .2LINDEN AVELOT 125X95
Zoning: Rural Village
Rural Village: WA -IV -019, Pen Mar (MHT-C) Historic Rural Village
Project Description: 560 sq. ft. finished space one story single family dwelling
on crawl space, with ladder access to 350 sq. ft. storage
area above, frame construction, roof rafters
Applicable Law and Review Criteria:
The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD.
Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by
Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A,
Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance."
The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological,
or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be
visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes
may still be subject to building permit procedures.
1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria:
A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure.
B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural,
or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to
achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance.
747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 I P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1
WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET
AND
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private
utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological,
architectural, or cultural value.
D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied.
E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating
Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to
be considered mandatory.
2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to
and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below.
A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship
to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area.
B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of
the structure and to the surrounding area.
C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and
materials proposed to be used.
D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent.
3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to
be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The
HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans
would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures.
For Rural Villages, additional review criteria for applications are listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural
Review of the Zoning Ordinance and include:
1. The exterior appearance of existing structures in the Rural Village, including materials, style,
arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and number of stories, roof style and
pitch, proportion.
2. Building Size and Orientation
3. Landscaping
4. Signage
5. Lighting
6. Setbacks
7. Accessory structures
Secretary of Interior Standards which may be applicable to this project review include:
8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be
disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials,
features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated
from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and
massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.
10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that,
if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment
would be unimpaired.
Washington County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures which may be applicable to
747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 I P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1
WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET
AND
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
this project review include:
Guidelines for New Construction and Accessory Buildings (Page 71)
1. New construction should be sited to avoid demolition of contributing structures.
2. The design of new construction or new accessory buildings should be compatible with the form,
height, scale, proportions, materials and details of the adjacent contributing structures or
landscapes.
3. Consideration of the ratio of built versus open space of the site or the adjacent landscape
should be given.
4. Existing setbacks, landscaping or site grading of adjacent historic resources should be
preserved when siting new construction if those characteristics contribute to the historic site or its
landscape. This includes circulation routes, fences, walls, and yards, etc.
5. Locate new construction and new accessory buildings so that the existing significant visual and
special characteristics of the property are maintained.
6. Locate new construction and new accessory buildings so that significant viewsheds are
maintained or enhanced.
7. See also Key Themes. (p. 57)
Staff Report:
This property is in the Pen Mar Rural Village in the North Eastern portion of Washington County and is
situated along the s/s of Linden Avenue in the village. The project proposes a 560 sq.ft. finished space
dwelling unit on crawl space.
Pen Mar's period of significance ranges from 1878 through 1943 covering a wide range of architecture.
The majority of the contributing buildings in the district are wood construction single family homes.
According to the MIHP, "virtually every street includes modest one-story cottages... with simple lines,
without any notable detailing". The property is flat along in its entirety. The property has no historic
structures and is open with no trees in the area proposed for the house. There is a stone/concrete slab
lying flat on the western half of the parcel. This may have something to do with the adjacent pump
station. The property also appears to have had utilities recently extended to it or upgraded as indicated
by a new concrete structure at the western corner of the property. The property is not listed on the
most recent survey of this district with any detail. The original survey in 1976 was focused on Pen Mar
Park and did not have any photos or full description of Linden Avenue and its resources. Historic aerial
imagery indicates this lot has been vacant since 1960's. The properties adjacent to it are all noted as
contributing with a typical construction date of c.1920 and wood construction with shingle roofs.
Staff Analysis:
The site does not contain any existing resources and based on findings in historic aerial imagery and
survey documentation, it is unlikely to yield any archaeological resources related to the history of the
rural village during construction. The architectural styles in the rural village vary as do setbacks and the
proposed construction is consistent with styles seen and setbacks nearby. The buildings orientation and
placement on the site's Liden Avenue frontage will be consistent with adjacent properties. Details on
747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 I P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1
WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET
AND
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
the exact exterior trim elements are not known, however, it is proposed to have asphalt shingles and
log siding both of which will not detract from the rural village with the shingles being common
throughout the rural village. The included plans show flat arches for windows with minimal trim which
are noted as common in the MIHP for this village. The variation in roof pitch proposed, while not found
on a singular structure in the rural village are found separately throughout the village. There are also
other structures which have mixed roof pitch. Many of the nearby structures are between 1,000 and
1,500 sq. ft. in size making this structure smaller in mass. However, the 40 ft. front width of the
proposed structure is consistent with those nearby and will maintain a similar appearance from the
street. The construction proposed does not conflict with the County Design Guidelines or the Secretary
of Interior Guidelines which are applicable to this construction type. The characteristics detailed in this
application have been reviewed against the characteristics listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review
of the Zoning Ordinance and do not appear to detract from the rural village.
Staff Recommendation:
Recommend approval of this new construction permit, 2024-02591, in the Pen Mar historic rural
village, due to the proposed constructions consistency with the County's Design Guidelines for Historic
Structures, Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Section 5D.5 Architectural Review as
listed in the County's Zoning Ordinance based on details provided in the Staff Analysis of the permit.
Respectfully Submitted,
Meghan Jenkins, GISP
Historic District Commission Staff
Attachments:
• Photos provided by Staff
• Permit Submission Packet
747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 I P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1
WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET
ANEW RESIDENCE FOR:
IRENE ZOPPI
LINDEN AVE
CASCADE, MD 21719
WOOD ROOF TRUSS NOTES:
1. TRUSSES TO BE DESIGNED, FABRICATED AND ERECTED TO MEET PITCH &
DIMS SHOWN ON THE DWGS. AND TO MEET DESIGN LOADING REQTS FOR THIS
LOCATION. TRUSSES SHALL CONFORM TO THE NATIONAL DESIGN
SPECIFICATIONS FOR WOOD CONSTRUCTION ANSI/TPI 1 NATIONAL DESIGN
STANDARD FOR METAL PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES, AND
SHALL INCORPORATE ALL APPLICABLE LOADING COMBINATIONS, INCL.
MIN. REQUIRED BOTTOM CHORD LOADING AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE IBC
CODE. MAX. TRUSS DEFLECTION UNDER ROOF LIVE LOAD TO BE LESS THAN
L/360. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR REVIEW TO ARCHITECT THE TRUSS
DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS SIGNED AND SEALED BY LICENSED
ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE IN WHICH THE PROJECT IS LOCATED.
2. TRUSSES TO BE DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE DRIFT LOADS & EQUIP. WEIGHTS
IN ADDITION TO UNIFORM ROOF DEAD AND LIVE LOADS.
3. LUMBER USED FOR CHORDS AND WEBS TO BE A MINIMUM 2 IN. NOM. WIDTH
SURFACED FOUR SIDES W/ MOISTURE CONTENT NOT EXCEEDING 19%. LUMBER
SHALL BE GRADE STAMPED WITH THE APPROPRIATE WWPA OR SPIB STAMP
INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH PS -20 LUMBER DEFECTS OCCURING IN THE
CONNECTOR PLATE AREA.
4. GALVANIZED STEEL CONNECTOR PLATES TO BE FABRICATED FROM MIN.
0.036 INCH THICK STEEL SHEET CONFIRMING TO ASTM A446, GRADE A & ASTM
A525, C60. PLATES SHALL SECURELY FASTEN EA. JOINT ON BOTH FACES OF
TRUSS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED TI STANDARDS & PROCEDURES AND
BE CAPABLE OF TRANSFERRING THE FULL MEMBER CAPACITIES.
5. SECURELY BRACE TRUSSES DURING ERECTION TO MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE TRUSS PLATE INSTITUTE. ERECTION BRACING SHALL
HOLD TRUSSES STRAIGHT AND PLUMB UNTIL DECKING & PERMANENT BRACING
ARE INSTALLED. INSTALL PERMANENT BRACING AS REQ'D BY DESIGN PRIOR
TO APPLICATION OF LOAD. PERMANENT BRACING SHOWN ON ARCH. DWGS. IS
MIN. REQ'D -- PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PER TRUSS MFR. DESIGN.
6. SECURE TRUSSES TO THE SUPPORTING STRUCTURE WITH GALVANIZED FRAMING
ANCHORS. ANCHORS IN CONTACT WITH P.T. LUMBER SHALL HAVE G90
GALVANIZATION. CONNECTIONS MUST RESIST ALL DESIGN LOADS.
M -P -E NOTES - RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION:
THESE NOTES APPLY TO ALL DRAWINGS:
ALL M -P -E WORK:
1. WORK TO CONFORM TO ALL SECTIONS OF IRC 2018 CODE, INCL. LOCAL AMENDS.
THE DESIGN & INSTALLATION OF ALL HVAC, PLUMB, GAS & ELEC SYSTEMS TO COMPLY.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT CODE OFFICIAL FOR INSPECTIONS
OF ALL THESE SYSTEMS.
2. ALL WORK TO COMPLY w/ NEC 2017.
3. ALL WORK TO COMPLY w/ REQTS. OF LOCAL UTILITIES, INCL DIMS.
4. DRYER DUCTS TO CONFORM WITH SECTION M1501.
5. FULL RADON LOOP SYSTEM (NOT SHOWN) TO BE PROVIDED, INCL. VENT & FAN.
6. HVAC SYSTEM TO MEET WINTER DESIGN TEMP. IN LOCAL ORDINANCE.
7. HVAC UNITS, WATER HEATERS & ELEC. EQUIP. TO BE INSTALLED w/ CLEARANCES
MEETING CODE, U.L., & MFR.'S RECOMS. PROVIDE ADEQ. SERVICING CLEARANCES.
PLUMBING:
1. WATER TO BE SUPPLIED FROM ON -LOT WELL WATER.
SANITARY TO BE HANDLED BY ON -LOT SEPTIC SYSTEM,
2. PLUMBING FIXTURES TO CONFORM TO SECTION P2701.1
3. PLUMBING TO MEET CHAPTER 26, INCL. PROTECTION, TRENCHING
& BACKFILLING, SUPPORT, MATERIALS, AND INSTALLATION.
4. CONNECTIONS SIZES TO MEET CODE. MIN. SIZES FOR
INDIVID. FIXTURES AS FOLLOWS:
SHOWER & TUBS: 1/2 IN. CW, 1/2 IN. HW, 2 IN. DRAIN, 11/2 IN. VENT
SINKS & LAVS: 1/2 IN. CW, 1/2 IN. HW, 11/2 IN. DRAIN, 11/2 IN. VENT
JAN & LAUN. SINKS: 1/2 IN. CW, 1/2 IN. HW, 1 1/2 IN. DRAIN, 1 1/2 IN. VENT
WASHERS: 1/2 IN. CW, 1/2 IN. HW, 2 IN. DRAIN, 2 IN. VENT
TANK TOILETS: 1/2 IN. CW, 4 IN. DRAIN, 2 IN. VENT
EQUIPMENT: PER EQUIP. MFR.'S REQTS.
5. PROVIDE VALVES AS INDICATED AND REQ'D. ALL FIXTURES TO RECEIVE VALVES.
SHUT-OFF VALVES TO BE SHUT-OFF TYPE. TRAPS TO BE P -TYPE.
6. PROVIDE BACKFLOW PREVENTER PER WATER CO. REQTS.
7. INSULATE COLD WATER LINES IN EXT. WALLS.
8. PROVIDE EXP. TANK & ASME 30 PSI TEMP & PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE ON WATER HTR.
GENERAL NOTES - RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION:
THESE NOTES APPLY TO ALL DRAWINGS:
1. ALL WORK TO MEET ALL SECTIONS OF IRC 2018 CODE, INCL. LOCAL AMENDS.
OF PA. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO
CONTACT CODE OFFICIAL REGARDS REQD. INSPECTIONS.
THIS WORK HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR REQTS. IN PLACE DUE TO ZONING, LAND
DEVELOPMENT, FLOOD PLAIN, OR OTHER SITE -RELATED ORDINANCES. IT IS
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE.
2. OPENINGS & PENETRATIONS OF FIRE -RATED WALL, FLOOR ASSEMBLIES, & MEMBRANES TO
MEET SECTION R317.1-3 AS APPLICABLE.
3. STRUCTURAL DESIGN IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IRC CODE.
DESIGN LOAD FOR FRAMING IS AS FOLLOWS:
20 PSF TOTAL ROOF DEAD LOAD (ROOF 3, PLY. 3, FRMG. 3, MISC. 5, & GYP. 4)
MINIMUM DESIGN LIVE LOAD FOR ALL NEW FRAMING IS AS FOLLOWS:
FLOOR - 40 PSF typ, 20 PSF ATTIC STOR, 10 PSF ATTIC w/o STOR.
WIND - 90 MPH BASIC WIND VELOCITY, EXPOSURE B
G.S.L - 30 PSF PLUS DRIFT
CALCULATIONS MAY BE PROVIDED UPON REQUEST.
4. FOUNDATIONS DESIGNED FOR 36" FROST DEPTH & ASSUMED ALLOWABLE NET
SOIL BEARING OF 2500 PSF. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY. OWNER TO PAY FOR
TESTS AND FOR REDESIGN & INCREASED CONSTRUCTION COSTS IF SOIL INADEQUATE.
5. STRUCTURAL STABILITY DEPENDS ON THE DIAPHRAGM ACTION OF THE
ROOF AND FLOORS. CONTRACTOR IS COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR METHODS
OF CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE ALL GUYS, BRACING AND SHORING REQD.
FOR ALL INTERIM LOADING CONDITIONS THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE.
6. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY FLOOR ELEVATIONS IN RELATION TO SITE PLAN.
GRADE TO SLOPE AWAY FROM HOUSE, MIN. 6 INCH DROP IN FIRST 10 FEET.
7. SIGNAGE REQD SHOWING STREET ADDRESS NUMBERS VISIBLE FROM STREET PER IRC R321.
8. FOUNDATION DRAINS TO CONNECT TO STORMWATER PIPING AS REQD. PER SITE PLANS.
9. PROVIDE EROSION PROTECTION TO MEET REQTS OF GOVERNING AUTHORITIES.
10. CONCRETE WORK SHALL TO MEET PROVISIONS OF THE LATEST EDITIONS OF ACI 301 & 318.
CONC. AT PORCHES, EXT. SLABS & STAIRS, AND GARAGE FLOORS TO BE 3500 PSI, AIR
AIR -ENTRAINED. OTHER CONC. TO BE 3000 PSI UNLESS NOTED.
11. CONCRETE PROTECTION FOR REINFORCING BARS SHALL MEET CODE.
REINFORCING SHALL CONFORM TO ACI 315.
11. IF REQ'D. BY CODE OFFICIAL, PROVIDE COPIES OF SHOP DWGS, INCL. TRUSSES,
PRIOR TO INSTALL, SIGNED & SEALED IF REQ'D.
12. FIREBLOCKING TO MEET IRC SECTION R602.8. FIREBLOCKING SHALL BE
INSTALLED IN CONCEALED SPACES OF STUD WALLS AND PARTITIONS, INCLUDING
FURRED OR STUDDED -OFF SPACES OF MASONRY OR CONC. WALLS, AND AT
CEILING OF FLOOR & ROOF LEVELS.
12b.MASONRY TO COMPLY w/ BIA & NCMA RECOMS., INCL. HOT & COLD WEATHER REQTS.
COVER TOPS OF ALL MASONRY WALLS DAILY AGAINST WEATHER.
GROUT BLOCK CELLS SOLID BELOW SLABS, BELOW BEAM & JOIST & LINTEL
BEARING, AT CHANGES IN THICKNESS, AND AT VERT. REINF. MAX. 5' LIFTS.
12c. STEEL WORK TO COMPLY w/ AISC STANDARDS. BEAMS TO MEET
ASTM A992-50. PLATES & ANGLES TO MEET ASTM A36. SHOP PRIME ALL STL.
USE GALV. STL. AT WET AREAS & EXT. WALLS. DO NOT CUT ANY OPNGS.
13. STRUCTURAL WOOD TO BE GRADED - MIN. S.P.F. #2 OR #2 HEM -FIR UNLESS NOTED.
ENGRD. WD. PRODUCTS TO HAVE FOLLOWING STRENGTHS:
LVL: Fb= 2900 PSI MSR-1.6E: Fb= 2000 PSI
LSL: Fb = 2325 PSI MSR-1.9E: Fb= 2250 PSI
I -JOISTS: TJI SIZE & SERIES AS INDICATED OR EQ BY L.P. OR B.C.
TRUSSES: SEE SEPARATE TRUSS NOTES
14. WOOD FRAMING TO MEET REQTS OF NFPA MANUAL FOR HOUSE FRAMING, NAILING SCHED. &
NATIONAL DESIGN SPECS. LUMBER & STR. PLYWD. TO COMPLY W/ GRADING REQTS.
ALSO, REFER TO IRC FIG. R502.8 FOR CUTTING & NOTCHING, TABLES R602.3(1)+(2) FOR
FASTENERS, AND FIG. 602.3(2) FOR STUD WALL FRAMING DETAILS. AT NON-BEARING
INT. & EXT. WALLS, FOR OPNGS. UP TO 7'-0" WIDE, PROVIDE (2) 2x8 HEADER.
EQ. SPACED BRIDGING (MAX 8'-0" o.c.) AT FLOOR JOISTS, EXCEPT PER MFR FOR ENGRD.
15. HURRICANE STRAP MODEL TO BE VERIFIED FOR UPLIFT SHOWN ON TRUSS SHOPS.
TRUSS UPLIFT CONNECTIONS TO BE CONTIN. TO FDN.
16. USE P.T. WD. WHERE IN CONTACT W/ EPDM ROOFING, FLASHING, WATERPRFG.,
MASONRY, CONCRETE OR EARTH. PROVIDE F.R. WD. WHERE REQ'D. BY CODE.
17. WOOD FASTENERS, HANGERS, ETC. IN CONTACT w/ P.T. WD. TO RECEIVE MIN.
G90 GALV., OR GREATER AS REQD BY FASTENER MFR. FOR TYPE OF P.T. CHEMICAL
USED AND/OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.
18. ANCHOR P.T. SILL PLATES AT MAX. 48" O.C., MAX. 12" FROM EA. END OF PLATE,
& MIN. 7 BOLT DIA. FROM EA. END OF PLATE. PROVIDE MIN. (2) BOLTS PER PLATE.
19. ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES TO BE UL CLASS A, FIBERGLASS, LAM. STRIP SHINGLES
AS MFRD. BY TAMKO, CERTAINTEED, GAF, OR EQ. PROVIDE ICE & WATER SHIELD
FROM GUTTERS BACK TO 24" PAST THE INSIDE FACE OF ALL EXT. WALLS,
WITHIN 24 INCHES OF VALLEYS AND AS RECOM. BY SHINGLE MFR.
20. FLASHING TO MEET SMACNA SHEET METAL MANUAL FOR LOCATIONS AND
INSTALL. ALL ROOF DETAILS, INCL. BUT NOT LIMITED TO EDGES, CURBS, AND
PENETRATIONS TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS AND
NRCA RECOMMENDATIONS. ALL FLASHING, GUTTERS & D.S. TO COMPLY W/
SMACNA RECOMS, INCL. WIND & SNOW LOADING. ALL D.S. NOT CONNECTING TO.
U.G. LINES SHALL BE TURNED OUT TO FLOW AWAY FROM BLDG.
21. REFER TO CODE FOR REQ'D. FLASHING LOCS.
22. WALLS AT USABLE SPACES BELOW GRADE TO RECEIVE WATERPROOFING,
EXCEPT SUPERIOR WALL SYSTEMS.
23. INSULATION TO CONFORM w/ CODE & TO HAVE VAPOR RETARDERS ON WARM SIDE.
PROVIDE P.C. SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL D.S.
24. USE SEALANTS AT ALL JOINTS BETW. DISSIMILAR MATERIALS AT C.J.'s AND
E.J.'s AND AS NOTED. PROVIDE RECOM. BACKER MATERIALS, INCL. BACKER RDS &
PREFORMED C.J. GASKETS.
25. GLASS TYPES AT ALL LOCATIONS TO MEET IRC SECTION R308.4.
INCLUDE TEMPERED/SAFETY GLASS LOCATIONS.
26. ALL FIRE -RATED (F.R.) GYP.BD. TO BE TYPE X - 5/8" THICK, U.O.N.
ALL NEW GYP. BD. IN BATHROOMS TO BE MOISTURE & MOLD RESIST. (TYPE XP)
27. ALL FINISHES TO COMPLY w/ SECTION R315.
28. GUARDS TO PRECLUDE PASSAGE OF 4" DIA. SPHERE.
HANDRAILS TO COMPLY w/ ALL PROVISIONS OF IRC R311.5.6.
29. PROVIDE TERMITE PROTECTION PER CODE.
30. PER LOCAL ORDINANCE, WEATHERABILITY IS CLASSIFIED AS SEVERE.
31. CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY CHIMNEY & FIREPLACE TO COMPLY w/ IRC CHPTR. 10,
INCL. CLEARANCES BETWEEN MASONRY AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION
32. ALL WEIGHT -BEARING OPENINGS, WINDOWS & DOORS TO HAVE
(2) 2X10 SPF HEADER OR BETTER UNLESS NOTED ELSE WISE.
31. ALL BOTTOM 24" OF ROOF AREAS, ALL VALLEYS & ALL ROOF SLOPES
W/ 3/12 OR LESS ROOF PITCHES TO HAVE ICE & WATER GUARD APPLIED.
CODE AND LOADING
GENERAL NOTES; INFORMATION;
OCCUPANCY TYPE
-RESIDENTAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH 2018 IRC BUILDING CODE.
2. BUILDER MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ACCURACY BEFORE CONSTRUCTION.
CONSTRUCTION TYPE
-TYPE 5 B
3. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED MEASUREMENTS.
LOADING NOTES
4. EXTERIOR AND BEARING WALLS TO BE 2X6 @ 16" O.C. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
1ST FLOOR LIVE= 40 PSF
5. PROVIDE BRIDGING @ ALL JOIST MIDPOINT UNLESS NOT REQUIRED BY JOIST MANUF.
2ND FLOOR/ATTIC LIVE= 30 PSF
6. ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER SHALL BE SPRUCE -PINE -FUR #2 OR BETTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SNOW LIVE= 30 PSF
7. IF APPLICABLE,WHERE GARAGE IS ATTACHED TO DWELLING UNIT,WALLS BETWEEN GARAGE & HOUSE
TO BE FIRE-RATED=(1) LAYER (1/2) INCH TYPE X FIRE -CODE DRYWALL. DOOR BETWEEN AREAS
TO BE 20 MIN. C -LABEL DOOR W/ FIRE -CODE JAMB.
DEAD LOADS= 10 PSF
8. MECHANICAL AND SUMP PIT LOCATIONS VARY PER SITE GRADING AND BASEMENT CONDITIONS.
BASIC WIND SPEEDS= 115 MPH
9. TEMPERED GLASS REQUIREMENTS -
1. IN WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH -IN (18) INCHES OF WALKING SURFACE.
SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY= B
2. IN ANY INDIVIDUAL PANEL GREATER THAN (9) SQ. FT.
3. IN WINDOWS WITHIN (24) INCHES OF ANY OPENABLE DOOR WHEN DOOR IS IN CLOSED POSITION
FROST LINE DEPTH= 36"
4. IN PANELS WITHIN STAIRWAYS,LANDINGS, AND RAMPS, AND WITHIN (36) INCHES HORIZONTALLY
OF WALKING SURFACE, UNLESS PROTECTED W/ BARS 3" O.C. CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING 50 LB.
ASSUMED SOIL CLASS= GM GC
PER LINEAR FOOT.
5. IN PANELS ADJACENT TO TO STAIRWAY WITHIN (60) INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF THE BOTTOM TREAD
OF A STAIRWAY IN ANY DIRECTION ,AND WHEN THE PANEL IS WITHIN (60) INCHES OF THE TREAD
SOIL BEARING CAPACITY= 2500 PSI
NOSING.
IF SOIL DIFFERS FROM ASSUMED ABOVE
EXCEPTION; IF HANDRAIL OR GUARDRAIL IS PROVIDED, DISTANCE CAN BE REDUCED TO (18) INCHES.
(REFER TO IRC 2018 CODES)
FROM RAILING TO ADJACENT GLAZING, APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE CODE OFFICIAL W/ CUTSHEETS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
10. PROVIDE SMOKE DETECTORS IN EA. BEDROOM, OUTSIDE EA. SLEEPING AREA, AND (1) PER FLOOR ENERGY CODE CO M P LIAN C E
LEVEL, INCLUDING BASEMENTS AND HABITABLE ATTICS. DOES NOT INCLUDE CRAWL SPACES OR
UNHABITABLE ATTICS. SMOKE DETECTORS MUST BE INTERCONNECTED BY WIRING, UNLESS NO POWER
SOURCE IS AVAILABLE, BATTERY OPERATED DETECTORS ARE ALLOWED.
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (ZONE 5-A)
PROVIDE CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS IN EA. SEPARATE SLEEPING AREAS IN THE IMMEDIATE
VICINITY OF THE BEDROOMS IN DWELLING WHEREIN FUEL -FIRED APPLIANCES ARE INSTALLED AND
IN DWELLING THAT HAVE ATTACHED GARAGES. MAX. GLAZING U -FACTOR= .30
11. BASEMENTS AND EVERY SLEEPING ROOM SHALL HAVE AT LEAST (1) OPENABLE EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND CEILING INSULATION= R-49
RESCUE OPENING. A (36) INCH X (80) INCH DOOR DIRECT TO OUTSIDE IS ALLOWED FOR EGRESS (DOORS
TO HAVE BULKHEAD ENCLOSURE)
WALL INSULATION= R-21
EGRESS WINDOWS TO HAVE A MIN. OF (5.7) SQ. FT. CLEAR OPENING, WITH A MIN. (24) INCH OPENING HEIGHT
AND MIN. (20) INCH OPENING WIDTH. GRADE FLOOR OPENING ARE ACCEPTED TO A (5) SQ. FT. CLEAR BASEMENT INSULATION= R-15 CONTINUOUS
OPENING.
OR R-19 CAVITY
ALL EGRESS UNITS SHALL BE OPERATIONAL FROM INSIDE WITHOUT USE OF TOOLS OR KEYS.
FLOOR INSULATION= R-30
WINDOW WELLS -THE MIN. HORIZONTAL AREA OF THE WINDOW WELL SHALL BE (9) SQ.FT. WITH A MIN.
HORIZONTAL PROJECTION AND WIDTH OF (36) INCHES. THE AREA OF THE WINDOW WELL SHALL ALLOW THE
EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENING TO BE FULLY OPENED. SLAB FLOOR INSULATION= R-10,24"
WINDOW SILLS TO BE MIN. 24" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR, WHERE OUTSIDE GRADE EXCEEDS 6' FROM WINDOW SILL.
THE EXTERIOR LANDING AT AN EXTERIOR DOORWAY SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 7 3/4 INCHES BELOW THE CRAWL SPACE WALLS= R-10 CONTINUOUS
THE TOP OF THE THRESHHOLD, PROVIDE THE DOOR, OTHER THAN AN EXTERIOR STORM OR SCREEN DOOR OR R-13 CAVITY
DOES NOT SWING OVER THE LANDING.
DRAWING SCHEDULE
COVER PAGE
1
FLOOR PLANS
2
ELEVATIONS
3
CROSS SECTIONS
4
ELECTRICAL PLAN
5
PLUMBING PLAN
6
J
m _ I
La l
V
z
UoN�
_
c —I
V /
0
0
O
LL
W
Ql
U
Z
W
D
W
LLUJ
W
d
O
NJZ
w
�
;
Q
UJ
Z
N
p
O
Q
U
Z
N
Q
U
J
J
(/)
IJJ
J
J
=
N
Z
O
U
Ln
OO
O
<
(1Z
z
<
U
O
c
O<
W
V)
O
J
LP)
O
w
.
uJ
I-
O
H
OUJFZFUOW
O
V)
W
i_
H u
w w
F- Ll
Q
2 Ln
u Z
Z
Lan
0
N
zuJu<J
G
o
amOUF-Oz-Q
Z
U
m
z
O
0
H-
F
F-
0>(/(,,=
=
V)
V)
z
W
O
Ur
o
_-
D
U
o
a
W
m
z =
Ln U
J
c J
U
W
F_ F -
H}
PROJECT # 5094
DRAWN BY:
C. STOLTZFUS
REVISIONS;
PAGE: 10F6
6
DATE:
6.11.2024
DRAWING TITLE:
COVER PAGE
SHEET NO.
A-1
00
x
m
O
LO
N
Ln
x
m
M
KA
4
MAIN FLOOR
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
14'-0"
CASEMENT EGRESS
L — J
MASTER BEDR OM
- _ _ __
8' FLOOR TO CEILIN
— — —/
L I -
- -
2X8 PF FLOOR JOISTS 16" OC ABOVE
V
-8O"
II
�
LADDER TO
STORAGE II /\
AREA
BATHR(
0
00
x
i�
I
I X1
i
N
I
I
I o o
I
Co
E=====
�I II
x
m 3-6
_El
moo
EEHE-ii—'9.
- _ _ _
C
I L_
— — — �f
— —
0
w
HALLWAY
BEDROOM
8' FLOOR TO CEILING
w
N
N
Q
u
CLOSET
x
1
O 00
B12D °�
- -
6•
- -
F FCTRICR
FRIDGE WITH ICE MAKER & MICROW
__
VE
MAIN FLOOR PLAN
�C 1�
ING
E�
o
I O
I
I
I
I
O
I
I
I
w l
9
I N
m l
= I m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ALL BEARING OPENINGS ON THIS FLOOR TO H
VE
(3) 2X8 SPF HEADER UNLESS NOTED ELSEWISE.
PROVIDE WALL MOUNT
CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR
00
x
m
m
Co
Co
m 0, n
0\0 I
LL
0
O
x
l0
m
L
L
o ALn
4
N
x
00
6 0 �
24
(4
I _
---------------�
x
M
r -I
00
STORAGE AREA
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
14'-0"
STORAGE AREA
14'-0"
N
x
00
N
x
00
0 0 6
K4
r.o cV
---
L
Ol
0
00
r -I
Ol
1
N
Z
0
0
J
U Z
Q
-
Ui
m
j.LfJ
_
J
N
0 a
v
N J
u
s
06
0
w
Ql
U
Z
W
D
W
LL
UJ
O
NJZ
UJ
ZUJ
�
;
Q
LLI
Z
N
p
0
L)
Z
Q
U
J F =
If) w F
J Lf) N L
J } 0 = e
= Ln z Z F- i-c
N F -
z > O F- U L
z o E_ w
O a LL O LL L
C] C] N w C] V
z D= W a= L
v 0 U O N O cn
W Ln Z F_U O W c
V) a o_Jw 0 LLLL Z C
z z 2 0 o z= L
z z O N a V 0 V c
O> O L9 C7 o a
z
m =
C] a a I -
w --L D 5
_ m
C] W W
> Cl)z U_Iw = �-�, } <
a m OV I- O OZ ZC
a C
PROJECT # 5094
kLTZFUI
N BY:
ONS;
PAGE: 20F6
6
DATE:
6.11.2024
DRAWING TITLE:
FLOOR PLANS
SHEET NO.
12 12
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
12 12
/
\
\
\
\
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
rn
O
00
d
N
V
z
N
c)
M
J
UZo
II
M
r v J
J Ln
r ^ -
N
0 a
ei
N J
�
I
A
U
N
L
U
Q
06
4f
I I LL
O
U-
_ _ W
U
D O Q
W N Z
LEFT ELEVATION z o w
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" W - z U
z N
Q U
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
__________________ ___ ////A\\\\ ___ __
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
REAR ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION
SCALE. 3/8" - 1-0
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
I
J u
Q D
J w z
U
Z_ O H U w
O O- O c ~ w w O
w w
H 0 L 2 Q U
L w U H m
Z o J D= w<=
0000 N 0 c~n O
cn < O z w O u Z a
z z O a u U m
a o
N U �Lfl, Q
o m o z z ON
Ln o H UJ H
uJOO
—D mzDcD
w oc Z
m
w U m F —
c"
o w O= F- 0 z=
< m U H O z < o
PROJECT # 5094
DRAWN BY:
C. STOLTZFUS
REVISIONS;
PAGE: 3OF6
6
DATE:
6.11.2024
DRAWING TITLE:
ELEVATIONS
SHEET NO.
VENTED RIDGE CAPPING
m
r1
TOP OF RIDGE
-
rn
TOP OF WALL
9
CM
TOP OF SUBFLOOR
(TYP) ROOF FRAMING:
2X10 SPF RAFTERS @ 24" O.C.
(1) 1-3/4" X 16" LVL RIDGE POLE
5/8" ROOF SHEATHING W/ H -CLIPS
15 LB. (MIN.) FELT PAPER
28 GA METAL ROOF & TRIM
R-49 ROOF INSULATION (TYP)
(TYP) ROOF OVERHANG DETAILS:
12" SIDEWALL OVERHANG & 12" GABLE OVERHANG
VENTED SOFFITS & 2X6 SPF FACEBOARD
(TYP) WALL FRAMING DETAILS:
2X6 STUDS @ 16" O.C.
DB. TOP PLATES
7/16" OSB WALL SHEATHING
TYVEK HOUSEWRAP
WOOD SIDING
P.T. 2X6 SILL PLATE W/ SILL SEALER
ATTACHED TO FOUNDATION WALL
W/ 1/2"X12" GALV. ANCHOR BOLTS 48" O.C.
APPROX GRADE
•
v '
—
ri
0 -
W
Z
O~
N J
IJ
_
(-/)
bJ
Q`
APPROX GRADE
o
CRAWL SPACE
(TYP) FOUNDATION WALL DETAIL:
O
6 COURSES 8" CMU BLOCK
LL
m
w
rn
U
r�
BOTTOM OF FOOTER (MIN. 36" BELOW GRADE)
e
e
Z
- - - - - - -
D
LL.I
>
N
4" CRUSHED STONE BASE 8" THK. X 24" WIDE 3500 PSI CONC. FOOTERS
d
O
<
W/ (2) #4 REBAR CONTIN.
Lu
ALL EXTERIOR FOOTERS TO BE 36" MIN. BELOW GRADE
LU
z
LU
p
Lu
0
-
Z
Q
Q
U
A CROSS SECTION A
2 4 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
TOP OF RIDGE
N
TOP OF WALL
0
00
TOP OF SUBFLOOR
C TOP OF WALL
TOP OF SUBFLOOR
VENTED RIDGE CAPPING
(TYP) ROOF FRAMING:
2X10 SPF RAFTERS @ 24" O.C.
(2) 1-3/4" X 11-7/8" LVL RIDGE POLE
5/8" ROOF SHEATHING W/ H -CLIPS
12
12
15 LB. (MIN.) FELT PAPER
3
3
28 GA METAL ROOF & TRIM
R-49 ATTIC INSULATION (TYP)
STORAGE AREA
(TYP) ROOF OVERHANG DETAILS:
H2.5A HURRICANE TIES
12" SIDEWALL OVERHANG & 12" GABLE OVERHANG
@ EA. RAFTER
VENTED SOFFITS & 2X6 SPF FACEBOARD
R-21 WALL INSULATION
(TYP) ALL EXTERIOR WALLS
c -I
2X8 SPF FLOOR JOISTS @ 16" O.C.
3/4" ADVANTECH T&G SUBFLOOR
(TYP) WALL FRAMING DETAILS
2X6 STUDS @ 16" O.C.
DB. TOP PLATES
7/16" OSB WALL SHEATHING
TYVEK HOUSEWRAP
WOOD SIDING
(TYP) INTERIOR NON-BEARING WALLS:
2X4 STUDS @ 16" O.C.
MAIN FLOOR
NOTE: ALL INTERIOR WALLS & CEILINGS P.T. 2X6 SILL PLATE W/ SILL SEALER
TO HAVE 3/4" T&G PINE FINISH ATTACHED TO FOUNDATION WALL
W/ 1/2"X12" GALV. ANCHOR BOLTS 48" O.C.
- 2X10 SPF FLOOR JOISTS @ 16" O.C.
3/4" ADVANTECH T&G SUBFLOOR
R-30 FLOOR INSULATION (TYP)
6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER ON UNDERSIDE OF JOISTS APPROX GRADE
APPROX GRADE
CRAWL SPACE TYP) 'ACMU BLOCKON WALL
DETAIL:
6COURSES 8
m
BOTTOM OF FOOTER (MIN. 36" BELOW GRADE)
p< p pa
4" CRUSHED STONE BASE 8" THK. X 24" WIDE 3500 PSI CONC. FOOTERS
W/ (2) #4 REBAR CONTIN.
ALL EXTERIOR FOOTERS TO BE 36" MIN. BELOW GRADE
B CROSS SECTION B
2 4 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
J F
J
=
If) LUF.
J Ln N L
J } U =
= ui Z Z F— F_ c
N z > O H u L
Z O� 2 O z c
Lu LLLL C
O a LL o F— LL L
O N w
Z.DW<L =
U O U O N O 2 cn C
Lu N Z F_U O Lu c
a O J Lu O LL Z c
o z= o o z= L
Z Z O N a U O U c
OU Z C7 0 a
Z aC
m
o a Lu U
w- O O c z O C
_ m
CJ Lu w e
F_ F—
> Cl)Z U_Iw = �—�, } <
Q m U F- O z Q c
PROJECT # 5094
kLTZFUI
N BY:
ONS;
PAGE: 40F6
DATE:
6.11.2024
DRAWING TITLE:
CROSS SECTIONS
SHEET NO.
A-4
GENERAL ELECTRICAL NOTES (IF APPLICABLE
1. ALL ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IN COMPLETE COMPLIANCE W/ ALL
APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC)
2. THE DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATIVE OF INTENDED SCOPE OF
WORK TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. DRAWINGS INTENT IS NOT TO SHOW
ALL RACEWAYS, OUTLETS, JUNCTION BOXES, APPURTENANCES AND ACCESSORIES
REQUIRED TO COMPLETE INSTALLATIONS OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS CONSISTENT
WITH THE PROJECT'S IMPLIED SCOPE OF WORK.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE ALL NECCESSARY
RIGGING, LABOR, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE A COMPLETE AND
FULLY OPERATIONAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEM AS INDICATED
4. ALL ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND FIXTURES SHALL BE UL LISTED
AND LABELED AS APPLICABLE FOR APPLICATION.
5. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THIS PROJECT, THE
ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY AN APPROVED STATE
CERTIFIED INSPECTION AGENCY; VERIFY COMPLIANCE IN WRITING BY AGENCY
PRIOR TO ANY NEW SERVICE ACTIVATION
6. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL(S) SHALL BE FURNISHED AND/OR
INSTALLED IN COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH RESPECTIVE MANUF. SPECS.
AND ALL APPROPRIATE TYPICAL DETAILS
CABLE AND WIRING REQUIREMENTS (IF APPLICABLE)
1. SPECIFIED CONDUCTOR DESIGNATIONS ARE AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE SIZES. MIN.
SIZE SHALL BE #12 AWG FOR BOTH POWER CABLE AND GROUND
2. WIRE SIZE #10 AWG AND SMALLER SHALL BE SINGLE STRAND COPPER.
3. ALL WIRES BELOW GRADE TO BE RATED FOR IMMERSION IN WATER AND
AND MARKED WITH A'W' AS PART OF THE IDENTIFICATION CODING SYSTEM.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE OPTION TO INSTALL MULTIPLE POWER CIRCUITS
THRU THE SAME CONDUIT, WHICH SHALL COMPLY TO NEC SIZE REQUIREMENTS
FOR QUANTITY OF WIRES. NO COMMUNICATION WIRE IN CONDUIT WITH POWER
WIRES
5. ELECTRICIAN SHALL BEAR THE FULL RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY ALL SUITABLE
EQUIPMENT AND FIXTURE CONNECTION REQUIREMENTS AS MANDATED BY BOTH
THE CODE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AND RESPECTIVE MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS
6. KEEP CABLE AND WIRE SPLICES AND DEVICE CONNECTIONS TO AN ABSOLUTE
MIN. USING ATTACHMENT BONDING TERMINATORS PER MATERIAL
MANUFACTURER'S SPECS.
7. AWG SIZE FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS AND GROUND
WIRES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEC REQUIREMENTS.
8. DO NOT INSTALL CONDUCTORS IN A "STRAINED" OR "STRESSED"
CONFIGURATION UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE; PROVIDE MINOR ADDITION LENGTH
OF WIRE WHEN ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.
LIGHTING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS (IF APPLICABLE)
1. FIELD VERIFY THE EXACT MOUNTING HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL
LIGHT FIXTURES BASED ON MANUF. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND
SURROUNDING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS. EACH LIGHT FIXTURE SHALL BE RIDGIDLY
SUPPORTED FROM A BUILDING STRUCTURAL ELEMENT.
2. CONNECT EACH EMERGENCY LIGHT BATTERY PACK UNIT TO THE NEAREST LINE
VOLTAGE LIGHTING CIRCUIT AHEAD OF THE SWITCHES THIS WILL ENSURE THAT
THE UNIT IS ON A CONSTANT TRICKLE CHARGE AND WILL ACTIVATE
INSTANTANEOUSLY UPON REGULAR LIGHTING CIRCUIT FAILURE.
CONDUIT AND RACEWAY REQUIREMENTS (IF APPLICABLE)
1. UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE SCH. 40 GREY PVC AT MIN. 18" DEEP
W/ GALV. STEEL LONGSWEEP ELBOWS. VERIFY DEPTH AND PROVIDE ANSI CERTIFIED
MARKING TAPE (12" ABOVE TOP OF CONDUIT) AND 2500 PSI 12" THICK
(AROUND ALL SIDES) CONC. (IF REQUIRED) BY UTILITY.
2. CONDUIT ABOVE GRADE SHALL BE OF TYPE AS APPROVED BY THE N.E.C.;
THE LOCAL CODE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY; OR AS IDENTIFIED ON THE
DRAWINGS. ELECTRICIAN SHALL BEAR THE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR
COMPLIANCE AS AUTHORIZED BY ARCHITECT'S REVIEW.
3. CONDUITS FOR ALL WIRING OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE GREY,
SCHEDULE 40 PVC, UL RATED FOR SERVICE USES AND BE MARKED AS
CERTIFIED FOR IMMERSION IN WATER WITH "W" AS PART OF THE IDENTIFICATION
CODING SYSTEM; EXPOSED TO WEATHER WITH WATERTIGHT SEALS. SUPPORTS
POINTS 4'-0" (ON CENTER) MAX. APART.
4. PROVIDE EXPANSION COUPLINGS ON ALL STRAIGHT RUNS WITH A TOTAL
LENGTH GREATER THAN 75 LINEAL FT.
5. RACEWAY SIZE(S) SHALL BE INCREASED IN SIZE, WHERE NECESSARY, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE N.E.C.
6. MIN. CONDUIT SIZE SHALL BE ONE/HALF IN. INSIDE DIAMETER. RACEWAY SIZE
SHALL BE INCREASED WHERE NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH N.E.C.
7. COMMUNICATION CABLING AND WIRES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN THE SME
CONDUIT WITH A POWER CIRCUIT.
8. BOXES SHALL NEC COMPLIANT FOR EACH RESPECTIVE APPLICATION OF
TYPE(S) AS APPROVED BY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE OWNER(S), ARCHITECT,
AND THE ENGINEER
CIRCUIT PROTECTION (IF APPLICABL
1. ALL WIRING SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY AN N.E.C. COMPLIANT
ARRANGEMENT OF U.L. LISTED AND LABELED AUTOMATIC, IE.... FUSE(S) OR
BREAKER(S), OVERLOAD FAILURE DE-ENERGIZATION SYSTEM.
2. VERIFY AND OR PROVIDE AN APPROPRIATELY RATED - FOR AMPERAGE, AND
VOLTAGE, MAIN BREAKER IN EACH PANEL OR SUBPANEL EITHER AS IDENTIFIED
IN THE PANEL SCHEDULE OR AS REQUIRED BY THE N.E.C. TO PROTECT
EACH CIRCUIT
3. PROVIDE AN APPROPRIATELY RATED - FOR AMPERAGE, (FUSES IF
NECESSARY), VOLTAGE AND NEMA INTEGRATED APPLICATION; U.L. LISTED AND
LABELED; MANUAL OR AUTOMATIC DISCONNECTING DEVICE; OR SWITCH FOR
EACH POWER -CONSUMING APPLIANCE AS IDENTIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS
MANDATED BY A PARTICULAR MANUF. SPECS. OR REQUIRED BY THE N.E.C.
GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS (IF APPLICABL
1. ALL ELECTRICALLY ENERGIZED EQUIPMENT, ELECTRICAL DEVICES, PANELS, AND
TERMINATIONS SHALL BE PROPERLY GROUNDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 250 OF THE MOST RECENT N.E.C. AND UL 467
STIPULATIONS
2. CONNECTION BOXES AND RACEWAYS SHALL NOT - UNDER ANY
CIRCUMSTANCE - BE UTILIZED AS THE SERVICE GROUND.
3. GROUNDING CONNECTORS SHALL COMPLY WITH IEEE 837 AND UL 467.
BOLTED ATTACHMENTS SHALL UTILIZED BOLTED --PRESSURE OR COMPRESSION
TYPE FITTINGS. WELDED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE EXOTHERMIC TYPE AND
GROUNDING CONDUCTOR TERMINATIONS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH USE
OF BOLTED PRESSURE CLAMPS.
4. ROUTE GROUND CONDUTORS BY THE SHORTEST, MOST DIRECT PATH TO THE
MAIN GROUND ARRANGEMENT OR RESPECTIVE UPSTREAM PANEL ASSEMBLY
5. INSTALL GROUND CONDUCTORS AND CONNECTIONS TO NOT PERMIT
ELECTROLYTIC OF GALVANIC DETERIORATION OF MATERIAL --- IN PARTICULAR
NO BONDING OF DISSIMILAR MATERIALS
6. GROUND TERMINATIONS FOR #6 AWG WIRE AND LARGER SHALL BE BY MEANS
OF PRESSURE TYPE LUGS; FOR #10 AND SMALLER, UL LISTED AND LABELED,
HINGED PRESSURE TYPE DEVICES WILL BE ACCEPTABLE.
PANEL REQUIREMENTS (IF APPLICABLE)
1. PANEL SHALL BE LISTED BY UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES (UL) AND BEAR
THE ORGANIZATIONAL SEAL VISIBLE FOR INSPECTION; AND BE PROVIDED WITH
A TYPED CIRCUIT IDENTIFICATION LIST.
2. PANEL SHALL HAVE AMPERE INTERRUPTING CAPACITY (AIC) RATINGS AS
REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY. IF REQUESTED BY CODE
OFFICIAL, SUBMIT ON DEFERRED BASIS.
3. PANEL SHALL HAVE NEMA TYPE 1 CERTIFIED FOR DRY ENVIRONMENTS INDOOR
INSTALLATIONS AND NEMA 3R/12 FOR WEER -AREA APPLICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY
OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER AND/OR ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY.
4. ELECTRICIAN SHALL MAKE EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT AS NECESSARY TO
PROVIDE (EQUAL) BALANCING OF LOADS ACROSS ALL BUSS BARS (PHASES)
WITH RESPECT TO AVAILABLE VOLTAGE.
5. WALL MOUNT PANEL SHALL BE RIGIDLY SUPPORTED PER MANUF. SPECS. WITH
TOP AT APPROXIMATELY 6'-7" A.F.F.
6. PANEL SHALL BE FACTORY ASSEMBLED WITH NEMA AB -1 COMPLIANT
MOLDED -CASE BREAKERS AND ALL COMPONENTS TO ESTABLISH FULL RATING.
7. FOR BREAKER FRAME SIZES 125 AMP AND SMALLER, THEY SHALL BE
PLUG-IN TYPE; LARGER BOLT -IN TYPE
8. INSTALL PANEL WITH ALL PROPERLY BONDED INTERNAL CONNECTIONS AND
MECHANICAL RACEWAY FITTINGS TO ENSURE RIGIDITY OF NEAT ORDERLY
WIRING ARRANGEMENTS
MAIN FLOOR - ELECTRICAL
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
x
00
x
00
1*
48" x 24"
T T1"
iHHHH
II
II
II
II
1
0
i
STORAGE AREA - ELECTRICAL
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
ELECTRICAL LEGEND
ELECTRICAL
COUNT
SYMBOL
BATHROOM EXHAUST FAN
1
50 C FM
CEILING LIGHT
20
O
CHANDELIER
1
o O o
ELECTRICAL METER
1
ELECTRICAL PANEL
1
- -
EXTERIOR LIGHT
2
MINI SPLIT HEAT AC INDOOR UNIT
3
MINI SPLIT HEAT AC OUTDOOR UNIT
1
OUTLET
21
dI4D
OUTLET 220V
3
djj::
OUTLET GFI
4
GFI
SMOKE DETECTOR
3
SWITCH
8
SWITCH 3 WAY
2
x
CO
rn
O
0O
Ol
1
N
N
z
(/')
a
U Z
o
v J
J Ln
Of
v
W
N
,--I =
i
U
o �
N J
v
N
t
a
O
U -
w
rn
U
z
uJ
d
W
N
to
O
Q
c
w
NJ
z
w
w
UJ
z
Q
W
U
z
a
Q U
J
J
Q
_
=
z
O
H
Z<
0O0O
cn
OF
O
U
<
Lo
ci.
O
z
O
LL
0
z
J
N
Z
oac
0
W
N
U
W
O
_
O
=
O LL
z
<o
"0
O
z
J
J
<
z
m
W
>
w
m
Zp
p
O
0
N
z
O
U
N
N
z
<
W
w
=
H
cc
-
(�
z
-
W
=
O
o O
U N
N
o
W z
m ~
O °C
Z
PROJECT # 5094
DRAWN BY:
C. STOLTZFUS
REVISIONS;
PAGE: 5OF6
6
z
O
F-
U
D
F-
N
z
O
U
W
O
LL
W
0
W
>
O
a
Q
W
H
D
z
Q
c
0
DATE:
6.11.2024
DRAWING TITLE:
ELECTRICAL PLAN
SHEET NO.
TO PUBLIC SEWER
TO PUBLIC WATER
PLUMBING:
1. WATER TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBLIC WATER.
SANITARY TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SEWER
2. PLUMBING FIXTURES TO CONFORM TO SECTION P2701.1
3. PLUMBING TO MEET CHAPTER 26, INCL. PROTECTION, TRENCHING
& BACKFILLING, SUPPORT, MATERIALS, AND INSTALLATION.
4. CONNECTIONS SIZES TO MEET CODE. MIN. SIZES FOR
INDIVID. FIXTURES AS FOLLOWS:
SHOWER & TUBS: 1/2" CW, 1/2" HW, 2" DRAIN, 1-1/2" VENT
SINKS & LAVS: 1/2" CW, 1/2" HW, 1-1/2" DRAIN, 1-1/2" VENT
JAN & LAUN. SINKS: 1/2" CW, 1/2" HW, 1-1/2" DRAIN, 1-1/2" VENT
WASHERS: 1/2" CW, 1/2" HW, 2" DRAIN, 2" VENT
TANK TOILETS: 1/2" CW, 3" DRAIN, 2" VENT
EQUIPMENT: PER EQUIP. MFR.'S REQTS.
5. PROVIDE VALVES AS INDICATED AND REQ'D. ALL FIXTURES TO RECEIVE VALVES.
SHUT-OFF VALVES TO BE SHUT-OFF TYPE. TRAPS TO BE P -TYPE.
6. PROVIDE BACKFLOW PREVENTER PER WATER CO. REQTS.
7. INSULATE DOMESTIC WATER LINES IN EXT. WALLS & UNINSULATED CRAWL SPACES
8. PROVIDE EXP. TANK & ASME 30 PSI TEMP & PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE ON WATER HTR.
= 1" DOMESTIC WATER MAIN LINE
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. � 1
=4"SCH.40PVCDWV
• = 2" MIN SCH. 40 PVC VENT THROUGH THE ROOF
m
O
00
rn
1
N
N
z
Uzo
v J
J Ln
N
v
N
U
N J
N
O
U -
w
rn
U
z
UJ
d
w
N
O
z
c
W
N
z
w
w
UJ
Z
a
W
U
z
a U
J ~
Q U
2 D
cn w H
U
N z§ O H U w
O oc H H i O
w
0 oaC Lu < w
Lu w 0 U H m
z J = w Q= D
u OOO N O 2i c,,O
U z U oOUJ
C C7 a
cn < O w w O 'l z O
o z= o o z= w
ZZO v' v O U m
NOU . nNQI-
O m O z z O of D
m w
oc LU
w O 2 F- O °C z
Q m U O z Q o
PROJECT # 5094
DRAWN BY:
C. STOLTZFUS
REVISIONS;
PAGE: 6OF6
6
DATE:
6.11.2024
DRAWING TITLE:
PLUMBING PLAN
PLUMBING PLAN
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
SHEET NO.
P-6
_______ -_•I-. z_&_f - - .r
t Plan at linden Avenue, Cascade, MD
I Is'
3 /
¢
Acres: 0.27
Address: Linden Avenue, Cascade, MD
q�1
I 1
1
•
are ir* & iVSCii:a, C :4;.r4:
�
1;II,aria+ d
'p.
3. ri f Zzi; i *
.cr.
4. 1i f ,• 4W
• i
IId rW � 4p r 4 Mr W 0 IP f ,� +
p 1
. sa :back
. -.*tick:20"
970
} i 1
1
.4 -
... • 4—*. . • • -. - I - -i�� . a a
Owners: Tom & Irene Zoppi ; 443-433-2172/73
2.
3.
'I.
5.
0
0
LEGEND
SUBJECT BOUNDARY
BUILDING SETBACK LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
EASEMENT LINE
ADJOINER BOUNDARY
FENCE (METAL)
FENCE (WOODEN)
DITCH (STREAM)
EDGE OF WATER
WETLAND
FLOODPLAIN
SOIL BOUNDARY
RAILWAY
CENTERLINE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
EDGE OF GRAVEL
CURB
WALL
GUARD RAIL
EDGE OF CONCRETE
BUILDING
MAIL BOX
SIGN (ROAD)
SIGN (SITE)
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES
CONTOUR (INDEX)
CONTOUR (INTERMEDIATE)
SPOTS ELEVATION
VEGETATION AREAS
TREELINE
DECIDUOUS TREES
EVERGREEN TREES
SANITARY SEWER
GRAVITY LINE
FORCE MAIN LINE
LATERAL
MANHOLE
CLEANOUT
VALVE
WATER
COLD WATER LINE
FIRE WATER LINE
HOT WATER LINE
MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
VALVE
METER
WELL
STORM DRAINAGE
STORM SEWER LINE
ROOF DRAIN LINE
MANHOLE
INLETS
CLEANOUT
UTILITIES
GAS LINE
ELECTRICAL LINE
FIBER OPTIC LINE
COMMUNICATION LINE
OVERHEAD LINES
MANHOLE
PEDS, BOX, & ETC
POLE
LIGHT POLE
GAS METER
GAS VALVE
EXISTING
-x x x x x x x-
-O O O O O O O-
-500
/ 501.65 501- - - _
0
SS SS SS
FM FM FM
SS
W W W W
FW FW FW
HW HW HW
O
-----------------------
-----------------------
G G G G
UGE UGE UGE
FO FO FO
COMM COMM
OH OH OH
O
LEGEND - ABBREVIATIONS
AASHTO_AMERICAN
ASSOCIATION OF STATE
HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS
ADS
ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEM
ASTM
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND
MATERIAL
AWWA
AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION
BLDG
BUILDING
BOT
BOTTOM
CIP
CAST IRON PIPE
CL
CENTERLINE
CMP
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
CO
SANITARY SEWER CLEAN -OUT
COMM
COMMUNICATION
CONC
CONCRETE
DA
DRAINAGE AREA
DIA
DIAMETER
EGL
EXISTING GRADE LINE
EX
EXISTING
EIP
EXISTING IRON PIN
FFE
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
FH
FIRE HYDRANT
GV
GATE VALVE
HGL
HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE
HDPE
HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE
INV
INVERT
LF
LINEAR FEET
MAX
MAXIMUM
MB
MAIL BOX
MIN
MINIMUM
MJ
MECHANICAL JOINT
NO
NUMBER
NIC
NOT IN CONTRACT
NTS
NOT TO SCALE
OAC
OR APPROVED EQUAL
PROPOSED
—X—X—X—X—X—X—X—
a a I
MB
500
501.65 507
SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET FOR LEGEND
SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET FOR LEGEND
SS SS SS
FM -FM -FM-
0
FW•
HW-
-W-
-FW-
-HW-
OV
0
O
FW
HW
--------------------------
0
0
G G G G
UGE UGE UGE
FO FO FO
COMM
OH OH
0
OC
ON CENTER
PC
POINT OF CURVE
FCC
POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE
PGL
PROPOSED GRADE LINE
PRC
POINT OF REVERSE CURVE
PT
POINT OF TANGENT
PVC
POINT OF VERTICAL CURVE
PVI
POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION
PVT
POINT OF VERTICAL TANGENT
ROW
RIGHT-OF-WAY
SAN
SANITARY
SCE
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
SDR
STANDARD DIMENSION RATIO
SIP
SET IRON PIN
SD
STORM DRAINAGE
SDMH
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
SF
SQUARE FEET
SS
SANITARY SEWER
SSMH
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
STA
STATION
STD
STANDARD
SY
SQUARE YARDS
TAN
TYPE AS NOTED
TEMP
TEMPORARY
TS
TOP OF STRUCTURE
TG
TOP OF GRATE
TR
TOP OF RIM
TYP
TYPICAL
U/P
UTILITY POLE
VIE
VERIFY IN FIELD
WL
WATERLINE
WM
WATER METER
WV
WATER VALVE
SITE PLAN
FOR
WALL RESTORATION
SITUATED AT 13215 SMITHSBURG PIKE
SMITHSBURG
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND
CLIENT/OWNER/DEVELOPER:
JEFFREY & LAURA UNSWORTH
9701 LARKSPUR LANE FARM
HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740
ATTN: JEFFREY UNSWORTH
EMAIL: JEFF@BRAVEHEARTRIDING.ORG
PHONE: (301) 730-6343
LOCATION PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 100'
APPROVALS
CIVIL ENGINEER / SURVEYOR:
FSA INC.
128 S POTOMAC STREET
HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740
PROJECT MANAGER: KEITH MOORE
EMAIL: KMOORE@FSA-INC.COM
PHONE: (301) 791-3650
0040-0001 - 0203:
PROPERTY ACCOUNT #006748
LANDS OF JEFFREY & LAURA UNWORTH
LIBER: 07359 FOLIO: 00021
25.5 AC
MD-ENG-6A USDA ENGINEER / ARCHITECT DESIGN CERTIFICATION
1/89 SCS I hereby certify this plan for soil erosion and sediment control has
UTILITY NOTIFICATION been designed in accordance with local ordinances, COMAR
The Soil Conservation District makes no representation as to the 26.17.01.07, and Maryland Standards and Specifications for Soil
existence or nonexistence of any utilities at the construction site. Erosion and Sediment Control.
Shown on these construction drawings are those utilities which have
been identified. It is the responsibility of the landowners or operators
and contractors to assure themselves that no hazard exists or damage
will occur to utilities. It is suggested that Miss Utility be contacted at: DATE REG. NO. SIGNATURE
Phone No.
DISTURBED AREA QUANTITY
THE TOTAL AREA TO BE DISTURBED SHOWN ON THESE PLANS
HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE APPROXIMATELY
0.66 ACRES AND THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF EXCAVATION
AND FILL AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS HAS BEEN COMPUTED
TO BE APPROXIMATELY
535.61 CU. YDS. OF EXCAVATION AND APPROXIMATELY
24.94 CU. YDS. OF FILL.
OWNER / DEVELOPERS CERTIFICATION
"I/We certify all/any parties responsible for clearing, grading,
construction and/or development will; be done pursuant to this plan
and responsible personnel involved in the construction project will
have a Certificate of Training at a Maryland Dept. of the Environment
approved training program for the control of soil erosion and
sediment."
DATE PRINTED NAME
SIGNATURE
/If'IKlIT\/ RAAI
In
SHEET INDEX
TYPE NUMBER TITLE
C-001 SHEET 01 COVER SHEET
C-101 SHEET 02 SITE PLAN
C-301 SHEET 03 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
ZONING DATA
ZONING DISTRICT A(R) - AGRICULTURAL (RURAL)
BUILDING HEIGHT 40 FT
MINIMUM YARD SETBACK:
FRONT 40 FT.
*SIDE 15 FT.
*REAR 50 FT.
*EXCEPT WHERE LOT AND PROPOSED USES ABUT AND REQUIRE ACCESS TO A RAILROAD OR RAILROAD SIDING,
THE SIDE OR REAR YARD SETBACK ABUTTING THE RAILROAD OR RAILROAD SIDING SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED
*EXCEPT WHERE THE PROPOSED USES OR BUILDING ABUT A LOT IN A RR, RT, RS, RU OR RM DISTRICT, OR ANY
LOT OCCUPIED BY A DWELLING, THE SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS SHALL BE 100'
SITE DATA
TAX MAP - GRID - PARCEL
0040-0001-0203
ELECTION DISTRICT
07
ACCOUNT NUMBER
006748
LIBER / FOLIO
07359 / 00021
AREA SUMMARY:
PARCEL
25.5 Ac
WATERSHED:
NAME
ANTIETAM CREEK
NUMBER
02140502
FEMA PANEL #
24043C0165D EFF. 08-15-2017
GENERAL NOTES
1. Any damage to adjoining public roads, utilities, etc. during construction will be repaired in kind by the contractor.
2. No subsurface investigation has been performed by Frederick, Seibert and Associates, Inc. to determine ground water, rock,
sinkholes or any other natural or man-made existing features.
3. FSA, Inc. assumes no liability for the location of any above ground and below ground utilities. Existing utilities are shown from the
best available information. Contractor to field verify location and depth of all above and below ground utilities prior to construction.
4. The contractor shall locate existing utilities in advance of construction operations in the vicinity of proposed utilities.
5. The contractor shall take all necessary precautions to protect the existing utilities and to maintain uninterrupted service. Any damage
incurred due to the contractor's operation shall be repaired immediately at the contractor's expense. Contractor to use caution in
areas where low hanging wires exist.
6. All utilities shall be cleared by a minimum of 1'-0". All utility poles shall be cleared by a minimum of 2'-0" or tunneled if required.
7. The Contractor shall notify the following utilities or agencies at least five (5) days before starting work shown on these drawings:
Miss Utility 1-800-257-7777
Potomac Edison 1-800-255-3443
Columbia Gas (New Business) 1-800-440-6111
Columbia Gas (Conflicts) (301) 964-1065
Washington County Soil Conservation District (301) 797-6821
8. The contractor shall be responsible for coordination of his construction with the construction of other contractors.
9. Benchmarks to be established by FSA prior to the start of construction.
10. The contractor shall notify the Architect/Engineer, before construction, of any conflicts between the plans and actual field conditions.
11. The contractor shall protect all utilities and culvert pipes during construction by insuring proper cover, increasing cover, or
constructing roadway and parking through base course before loading site with heavy vehicles.
12. Job site safety is the sole responsibility of the contractor. The Contractor shall perform all excavation in accordance with O.S.H.A.
Regulations for trench safety.
13. The contractor shall perform his own field inspection and surveys (if necessary) to determine the limit of earthwork needed to
complete this project. Any earthwork quantities that may be shown hereon are preliminary estimates only, and are intended for Soil
Erosion Control plan review, if required. There has been no correction made to the earthwork quantities shown hereon due to the
compaction of fill.
14. The contractor shall be aware that in the event of discrepancy between scaled and figured dimensions shown on the plan, the
figured dimensions shall govern.
15. Sediment erosion control measures shall be installed per sediment erosion control plans, details and specifications.
16. The entire area included within the proposed limits of cut and fill shall be stripped of all root material, trash and other organic and
otherwise objectionable, non -complying and unsuitable soils and materials.
17. It shall be distinctly understood that failure to mention specifically any work which would naturally be required to complete the project
shall not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to complete such work.
18. The existing site contours shown hereon are LIDAR 1' contours and field checked by FSA in February 2024. (Contour accuracy is to
plus or minus one half the contour interval).
19. Limit of disturbed areas are to be the limit of property ownership, unless otherwise noted.
20. A complete set of approved plans and a copy of the grading permit must be on site and available for use by the inspector, or other
representative of Washington County.
21. There are no Board of Zoning Appeals Cases for this property.
22. All existing drainage culverts and drainage easements are to be maintained and unaltered.
SENSITIVE AREA NOTICE
TITLE
The stream buffers shown hereon are established pursuant to the requirements of the
Washington County Subdivision Ordinance Article IV, Section 409. In an effort to preserve or
improve water quality, the property owner is required to establish and thereafter maintain in
perpetuity vegative ground cover in accordance with urban best management practices
recommended by the Washington County Soil Conservation District. No permanent structures or
construction are permitted within the stream buffer except those designed to improve water quality
or flow as approved by the Washington County Planning Commission in accordance with all
applicable regulations, laws, and policies. No septic systems shall be constructed within the buffer
nor shall any reserve area be established within the buffer.
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that these documents were prepared
or approved by me, and that I am a duly
licensed
professional under the laws of the State of:
MD , License # 20945
Expiration Date 08-23-2025
E
0.
WN
c
¢aM
QW�
w N
Q O
wm
w
W
v
oar
N
z
Q J O
O
ti
0 U
¢ate
U
U
'
g�
J
m U
W
'
N
tr
LU
w
U
o��
O
LU
N =
M
LL
cv
N
cv
c3
o
N
I -
w
O
0
0
z
w
OW
LU
a
o
LU
w
LU o
LU
LU
Z Z
O
}
N
z
CC
j
_
O
O
CC
O•
N w
cn M
Q o
W
=O
rr M co
D
r H''
W
�OO
WOO
�
LU
Q Z
0
I.'-/ 0
U_
J Q
�
��
J z
Y
�
a =o
rn
>Q
PROJECT NO.
3400.1
DWN BY
DATE
TCH
04-30-2024
PROJECT MANAGER KCM
EMAIL: KMOORE@fsa-inc.com
TAX -GRID -PARCEL
0040-0001-0203
SCALE
AS SHOWN
SHEET TITLE
TITLE
SHEET
C-001
SHEET 01 OF
03
I \ / 1 \I\\
II I \ ) /() \ \ \\ \ '
01 I\
/-i // /`/ // 7//
/ II \\\\\ \ / \
*JI// %��—/ ° �> /' ;--J'//�'// _1 �,
\ -
___ U - > r /
I /
\ \ III( \/ - , I / / � 1 //
\ I ` IIIIll1 � // /) / J // z�
1 J I I I \ ` \ 11 ((( //�/ �/ / I� / / � �/ / /
) \\ \ I\\\\\ �� /v/ / // //4V,___/ I / /1 /�
I/ EEK %/ o / � `I �/�/ J /
TIETA
I I ( \ \ I 'I
I 1 1 / \/UTT�EAN" /��' /� —1 // L 1� //
11
I / 1\ \ ///� �I rte_/\ `1 1 % / ) / / /
4 f / , c r / / / \ \ ,,- /7/
/ / / / (
\\\\\
�i�' 1 ice/ j /J / // / ,' /
'/ / r 1\ I III \ \ 1\ / / 1 // / // / ///
1 1 1 \ 1 ` \ / / /
I r / / ( \ \ 1 // ' / // // // / ///
/ / / I /�// 1 \\\\ 1 1 \ 6�3 Zo /1 �� / / r / / / //
/ / / () / III 1 \ 1 1 \ 1 \ \ m� � � ao� / / / / / / / /
/ I ( / \ \ \ mry 1 / / / / /
/ / ( - / / / / / I I \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ T r \ \ \ ABANDONED OLD SMITHSBURG PIKE / \ o v I / / / / / / / / /'
7/ / J 1 / / \ 1,11 I I \ \ I 1
/ \ 111 / \\\, o�v
// / / / 1 I 1 III \ \ \ \ 1 1 Boa 1 r� x/
/ � // / \ \\ \ 1 1 ) \ \ \ I\ \ \ Y,
\ 1 1 \ II I 1 �/ �\
/ / �\ \ 111 I \ '\I II 1 xo X �'L
/ J 1 \
\ / / � 1 I 1 1 I 1 \ \ I \ 1 I I
J / //i' / 1 I 1 1 I I \ \ \ \ \ I I II \ REPAIR EXISTING W
/// �- I 1 III \ I 1 1 ` ` X/ _-- _,6"
\ \I \ _ \ \\ ALL/ //,- _ \ / \ \ \\ \ \ 1 II ) \ \ \ Hole Behind headwall \ ` DRY STA0K S10NE / \ \
\ INV: 649.48 — 1
\ 1 \ I I (Water raining Arot n^' imam
/ \ \ \ \ ` IrII \ 1 \ 11 / \\ I 1 1 I 1 ` REPAIR EXISTING EROSION /
\ \ \ \ I I � \ \ \ \ \ , I BEHIND WALL PER ENGINEER °y ✓° / DREPONDGE BOTTOM OF \-
\ \ ( \ I I \ INV BEHIND WEIR GATE ° /
\ �� 1 I \ 1 1\ ) 1 \ \ \ 1 I 1 1 I / 1 1 \ y / TO ORIGINAL DEPTH
\\\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ I I \ \ I I ELF V. 648.70 / - / .6�� 1
\ \ \ � \ \ I I S ING WEIR GATE 1 / CONCRETE WITH VALVE 1
\ ( \ 1 \ \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 I I r INV 649.84 / 66� ON TOP
I \ \ \ \ \ I 1 1 1 HEAD W LL \
\ \ \ 1 \ 1 \ \\ 1 \ \ , S WAIERLINE GEOTHERMAL LIN
\ \ r p � TO BE REPLAC
EDGE OF WATER \
\ \ \ '6s>✓-.\ \ 1 1 1 I / \ 1 ,1 1 I _ /
\ \ \ -� \ \ 1 I I 1 �� \ 1 HEAD WALL I I I \ /
\ \ rj \ \ \ 1 I I \ I \ \ /
\\ \ \/ N` 660—--x,649'\�\\ 1 I J \ \ \ III 7 --
II STA��SToti.
\ \ — EDGE 0F\ \R 6Qa/ \ � I �----------- --- �\ -- - -- I 1 /� \
/ DRAIN PIPE: 4" (6"?
.\ I 1 I \ 1 I /\ , ,/ INV 647.50 ) \?
� �_ —647 \-/\6`8.- / ��1 _ I II \ _
J J I I -1- I �t �1-FI-F\ _J /
;IIItI\
/`I \ \ \ \ \ \ / I /
—\\ \ �1�--� / —���% /'^649/ / I I \ 1 I a I \ 7/ —'
7___ I o I I REPAIR EXISTING EROSION
\ __ / 650
I I I I I \ I \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ -- I BEHIND WALL PER ENGINEER Z\ -
- - \ ` � E GE OF WATER _ // ,- _651 - \ I I I I / \\\\\\
\ \ \ ENDWALL J - \ \ - - - REPAIR EXISTING WALL _ -
_�� \ \\ \ \ \ I 1 ` - / / PROPOSED WALL TO
\ - - I \ I I I \ 1 \ \ \ CONCRETE BOX UNDER OLD ROAD '_ 653 ' �g55� / / / I PROTECT FOUNDATION
I
\ \ / \ - / / \ \ \ \ I 1 \ I I I I 1 I \ \ \ \ WITH CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 1 ( \ / / BASEMENT ENTRANCE
\ — J I 1 \ CONTAINING BIN WATERLINE \ `_
/ — \ \ ~ I 1 I \ \ ? I — ' / UNDER PORCH
_ \ \ I \ — — I I I I I \ \ r \ _ • 654 — — / BF- 650.45
\— l '653 I III N J z \ ` \
/ \ 1 / \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ I \ 1 1 CONC. LEDGE
/ e \ \ / 4 _ _ \ ( ( \ I \ \\ \ \ Hole Behind headwa� \ —655 / I ALONG BUILDING
/ / \ / 65 \ 1 I I III I I 1 \ \ \ \ \ INV 649.5 _ / /
— / ` / \ I I I III I \ / \ I \ \ (Water Draining Around Wall) / / ) — I
\ r ~ — — 1 1 \ I I I I 1 / L \ \ \ / / �i 1 DWELLING
\ 1 ( a \ \ I \ I FF - 661.09
/ / \�/ 1 11 III 1 II ` 5 \ \ I \ \\ \ \ 1 ,1z J' // //
\ \� I I I I o 66 \ I \ \ \ \ n / m\ / \
11 I I � 1� \\\ \ \ \ 1 \\l 1 � � � Z i
I > \ \ \ \ /\/
1 I \ \ I 1 1 I i �o \ \ \ 1\ \\ \ \ ,( /� \ —
I I III 1 I I m \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\ �1 I
I C / \ I \ 1 1 1 1 1 I \\\ \ \\ ~\ y o \ BASEMENT ENTRANCE
) \ I ' \ w\ \ \ \ I BE: 650.99
I JI \ I 1 I I I I cn \ \\\ /
/ / I \\ I II I I 1 III \ ) ` \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ , / o / J
/ I \ \ % I I 1 ( I I I I (\ _ m \ I I \ \ \ \ \ I ` o UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
-' \ � 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I \ \\ \ f 1 / \ Z J� POSSIBLY ELECTRIC
1 \ \ I I I 1 111 \ / � \\ 1 I \\ \ 11 \cn
�
/ l\ o l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ 1 \\ \\ s �/ ( /
I I I I I 1 1 1 / \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ ! \ /\\J / /
— \ \ 1 1 1 I I I \\ I\
I `I / \ \ / I I I I I 667 / \ \ \\\\\\\
\\ \ l / / \
I \J \ III I I I I I I I ` ^y \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ /
\ 1 1 II II I III 1 > \\\\\\\\ \\ \I
l \ \ I I I I I I\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
/ I I /
/ l \ / � I I I I I I I \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ OH
\ I I I \ c I N \ APP 0. OO TIO�d OF u�ILITY�OLE/ —o
r \ \ \ I I 1 I \ \ \\\\� ` GRAVEL
I / \ — \ °y I DRIVEWAY J
' I \1 1-� I I 1 I I I I I ` 1� 1 I -/ /
/ / \I I I( I I I I I J y I
SCALE: 1"-20" /— \ I I I
26 0 10 20 40 /�I1 I \\ 1 /7,, r (-7/
/N / / - 7 /////I I / \ 1 I I I /� -\
�-- // �, / I I / \ \ I\ I \ \ \ \ I \ ( /
/J //
/ / / f 1 I I \ \ 0 7
°o o /I ` // / // / // / // / //
X/X/Xf _ \ (� W a I\ \ / J / / // / / ////
/ // // ///
/ / /
A,\\ rLaw \ \ / / //////
1' 1/N \\� � \ I I\ l/ / 1 / / / /// / //// / I
\ \ I\ I I I / / / / /777/7/ / // / //
1\ \ \ I I l/ // /' / / //////// //////////
A, �� —/I / ///////// /7/7 / // / // //� // / j///
// �. o —'�— /////////// / /'//r / //' /'/ ///'
��- /, /////// // �/// //// / / ///
I / / \ f /' / // ' / / / / / / /
77
7////// / / 7/ /7/7
/ / ( / \ N/ —/ / / / // / /v / / /
/ / /` _7
J / /' / /' / / / / /////
'
'656— / // "� / ' / / / / i / / / / / / / / /
I ( — ----654 / /' /' I\ / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / /
659 / I / ' // / /\� / l / / / // / ( I / / / /
/ 1 / / / / / / / I / / I / / / /
I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / ' - / // / / / / / / / /
/ I / / / / / // / r / \
PROPOSED WALL TO I I // I \I �' / // / / I // / / / / / / `\
PROTECT FOUNDATION 1 / I I I / / f // I / / / , l 1
J / / / / / \
/1 / I I I �/ /\ / / / / /' // / / / / / �\
/ II►�i /' 1 /// r r
_ / / /
ARCHWAYIN / _ I I � / / / / / / /
TER ORIGINATING FROM J / / CONC. WALKWAY BEING/ / l I I I / / / / / / l / //
/ / I
SPRING UNDER HOME) J 1 / \ / / / / / l
/ / / RECONSTRUCTED / / / J l / / / / / 7/ I/ / / / / / \ I
( / 66� II / /l \ 1 / II I /
I / \ 1 \\
r/ / / // / / ( r I \ � J J / I (/ I \
�/ / l ) l I I J ► ,� / / J 1 \\
0/7- 1l I
7- / // // I l 1 ► I} l l (_ 1 2 ) 1/ I I \
IN I
/ / , / I ` 1 l `1 // I I 1
// / j// o \ 1 r /' / I / j ►1 / I 1 1 I I
//te I
I \ l` )/l � (I fl / \1
/ � ° cI
/ / I / I / , I II I
/LU
/ 1 / \ �* I / / I I \ \ \
/ /1 \ \
_ I
r� ) J I'`// I
\ 1 / / / /� I ( O I \ I \ I \
\ I 0 / I I /
(� \ I / / �"/�
I 1 \// /BARN ( /
I II / / \ // I I \ / I \ \ \
01 / ) ( I I \ 1 I \ \
( I 1 1/ ' I / 1 \ /
H I / 1 c // 1 I N I I
1 o ) / } \ \ 1 \
I I/ / /7//i / / // *(
\I /
/ ( I/ 1 I I \ \
/ 1 1
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that these documents were prepared
or approved by me, and that I am a duly
licensed
professional under the laws of the State of:
MD , License # 20945
Expiration Date 08-23-2025
E
0.
WN
c
¢a
Qo^
Wm
�LU
LU
W
oar
o
0 U
U
(�
w
N
0
m U
W
'
N
LL,
LLl
Y
oz�
LU
w
O
LLl
N =
N
0
N
Cl)
z
w
0
0
0
z
w
cow
a
0
LU
w
o
cr
cc
-
z z
o
}
N
z
j
O
O
O
�w
U) m D
Q o
(/)
O
°C M
M
W
L¢L r
�z
wz—
Q
o
L�
O
J
J z
Y
rr
�
Q �o
PROJECT NO.
3400.1
DWN BY
DATE
TCH
04-22-2024
PROJECT MANAGER: KCM
EMAIL: KMOORE@fsa-inc.com
TAX -GRID -PARCEL
0040-0001-0203
SCALE
1"=20'
SHEET TITLE
PROPOSED
WORK
C-101
SHEET 02 OF
03
N
0
0
U
0
Maryland's Guidelines To Waterway Construction
DETAIL 1.2: PUMP -AROUND PRACTICE
PLAN VIEW
approved
dewatering device
stream
diversion pumps
discharge hoses --
P intake
p dewatering pump O hose.
flow intake hose I ,' flowt,
--
sediment dike clean water dike / sump —hole
.. ...................-.. •...
.; pool
.•.
(12" to 18" deep
work area 2' dia.)
pumps should discharge length not to exceed
onto a stable velocity that which can be
dissipator made of rip rap completed in one day
or sandbags
OR NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE
ANCHORED
SECTION A —A
impervious sheeting
base flow + 1 foot
work area (2 foot minimum)
cross section of sandbag dike
01
C-301
TEMPORARY WSTREA d
REVILED NOVEMBER RQ)0
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
CONSTRUCTION MEASURES
PAOR L2 -3
WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
STANDARD SYMBOL
02 DETAIL F-4 FILTER BAG
C-301
® FB
a D d D pD ea D ea D ea DD a D p Dea pD ea D°
°8 ca D°D naa°aa°a aca�a�a�a aa°Daa a °eaa°eaae °aaD°°aae p° n
G D a a d e e D 4 e eee Aee eA °CG pD
pD°
oa �DSTRY�Pa I I
dd �aa�p eaDD ea I I �Ca
FLOW a° aeaa eaa I DAD
--- I FILTER BAG I
°9.G
paGG pdCC pD Odd as
�o °DDoa°pa
a°a I
�eq`;o°oa
Do D° 1 I e c
9DM GDDa�GppGCAdG G GC
—
aaa aeapa°°a oaa°a DDa°a °a°eee
eapa°a ° aea°a°aoa°a aDaa°°aeaa°a o°D
PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE 12 IN MIN.
MULCH, LEAF/WOOD COMPOST,
PLAN VIEW WOODCHIPS, SAND, OR STRAW BALES
STRAP
FLOW ./..SLOPE:
••.C .D,Q::% '
�:•• •.' •D da •A �• ;•• ...:
Ca as DDa a DDea a �e aD eDp D aD�OfPD DDd DOpGa nae aeDD eeppp CD0D Dap D F
ELEVATION FILTER BAG
8 IN MIN.
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
1. TIGHTLY SEAL SLEEVE AROUND THE PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE WITH A STRAP OR SIMILAR DEVICE.
2. PLACE FILTER BAG ON SUITABLE BASE (E.G., MULCH, LEAF/WOOD COMPOST, WOODCHIPS, SAND, OR STRAW
BALES) LOCATED ON A LEVEL OR 5% MAXIMUM SLOPING SURFACE. DISCHARGE TO A STABILIZED AREA. EXTEND
BASE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES FROM EDGES OF BAG.
3. CONTROL PUMPING RATE TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE PRESSURE WITHIN THE FILTER BAG IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. AS THE BAG FILLS WITH SEDIMENT, REDUCE PUMPING RATE.
4. REMOVE AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF FILTER BAG UPON COMPLETION OF PUMPING OPERATIONS OR AFTER BAG
HAS REACHED CAPACITY, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. SPREAD THE DEWATERED SEDIMENT FROM THE BAG IN AN
APPROVED UPLAND AREA AND STABILIZE WITH SEED AND MULCH BY THE END OF THE WORK DAY. RESTORE THE
SURFACE AREA BENEATH THE BAG TO ORIGINAL CONDITION UPON REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE.
5. USE NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE WITH DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS USING HIGH STRENGTH THREAD. SIZE SLEEVE TO
ACCOMMODATE A MAXIMUM 4 INCH DIAMETER PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE. THE BAG MUST BE MANUFACTURED FROM
A NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS MINIMUM AVERAGE ROLL VALUES (MARV) FOR THE
FOLLOWING:
GRAB TENSILE 250 LB ASTM D-4632
PUNCTURE 150 LB ASTM D-4833
FLOW RATE 70 GAL/MIN/FT2 ASTM D-4491
PERMITTIVITY (SEC'') 1.2 SEC-' ASTM D-4491
UV RESISTANCE 70% STRENGTH @ 500 HOURS ASTM D-4355
APPARENT OPENING SIZE (AOS) 0.15-0.18 MM ASTM D-4751
SEAM STRENGTH 90% ASTM D-4632
6. REPLACE FILTER BAG IF BAG CLOGS OR HAS RIPS, TEARS, OR PUNCTURES. DURING OPERATION KEEP
CONNECTION BETWEEN PUMP HOSE AND FILTER BAG WATER TIGHT. REPLACE BEDDING IF IT BECOMES
DISPLACED.
MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
2011
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Erosion and Sediment Control Notes
1. All erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed and maintained in continuous compliance with the
latest version of the 2011 Maryland Standards and Specifications for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control.
Y p
2. Sediment controls need to be included indoors at points where there would be potential discharge of pollutants to waters of
the state. Examples of these controls include, but are not limited to, silt fences and sandbags.
3. Temporary platforms, piers, etc. should be covered in plastic sheeting to collect debris, fine debris, and dust.
SCALE: 1" = 20'
luIIuIlIluIIIUI20 0 r0 20 40
03 DETAIL B-1 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
STANDARD SYMBOL
C-501 ENTRANCE
SCE
50 FT MIN.
8 FT
MOUNTABLE BERM MIN. EXISTING PAVEMENT
(6 IN MIN.) 3 FT
EXISTING ; S: y
GROUND
NONWOVEN EARTH FILL
MIN. 6 IN OF 2 TO 3 IN
GEOTEXTILE AGGREGATE OVER LENGTH PIPE (SEE NOTE 2)
AND WIDTH OF ENTRANCE
PROFILE
50 FT MIN.
LENGTH *
LL
z = I
I I EDGE OF
LL I EXISTINGPAVEMENT
I I
Construction Specifications PLAN VIEW o
1. Place stabilized construction entrance in accordance with the approved plan. Vehicles must travel over the entire length of
the SCE. Use minimum length of 50 feet (*30 feet for single residence lot). Use minimum width of 10 feet. Flare SCE 10
feet minimum at the existing road to provide a turning radius.
2. Pipe all surface water flowing to or diverted toward the SCE under the entrance, maintaining positive drainage. Protect
pipe installed through the SCE with a mountable berm with 5:1 slopes and a minimum of 12 inches of stone over the pipe.
Provide pipe as specified on approved plan. when the SCE is located at a high spot and has no drainage to convey, a pipe
is not necessary. A mountable berm is required when SCE is not located at a high spot.
3. Prepare subgrade and place nonwoven geotextile, as specified in Section H-1 materials.
4. Place crushed aggregate (2-3 inches in size) or equivalent recycled concrete (without rebar) at least 6 inches deep over
the length and width of the SCE.
5. Maintain entrance in a condition that minimizes tracking of sediment. Add stone or make other repairs as conditions
demand to maintain clean surface, mountable berm, and specified dimensions. Immediately remove stone and/or
sediment spilled, dropped, or tracked onto adjacent roadway by vacuuming, scraping, and/or sweeping. Washing roadway
to remove mud tracked onto pavement is not acceptable unless wash water is directed to an approved sediment control
practice.
MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
2011
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
04 STANDARD SYMBOL
C-301 DETAIL E-1 SILT FENCE I SF�
6 FT MAX.
CENTER TO CENTER 36 IN MIN. FENCE POST LENGTH
n _ DRIVEN MIN. 16 IN INTO GROUND
V
36 IN MIN. FENCE
POST LENGTH -
WOVEN SLIT FILM-
GEOTEXTILE
EMBED GEOTEXTILE
MIN. OF 8 IN VERTICALLY INTO
THE GROUND. BACKFILL AND
COMPACT THE SOIL ON BOTH
SIDES OF GEOTEXTILE.
POSTS
STEP 1
STAPLE STAPLE
16 IN MIN. HEIGHT OF
WOVEN SLIT FILM GEOTEXTILE
V L8 IN MIN. DEPTH
INTO GROUND
r. rin.,...
FENCE POST 18 IN MIN.
ABOVE GROUND
UNDISTURBED
GROUND
FENCE POST DRIVEN
A MIN. OF 16 IN INTO
THE GROUND
CROSS SECTION
STEP 2
STAPLE STAPLE
TWIST POSTS TOGETHER
STAPLE STAPLE
STEP 3 ® FINAL
CONFIGURATION
STAPLE STAPLE
JOINING TWO ADJACENT SILT
FENCE SECTIONS (TOP VIEW)
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
1. USE WOOD POSTS 13/4 X 13/4 ± %6 INCH (MINIMUM) SQUARE CUT OF SOUND QUALITY HARDWOOD. AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO
WOODEN POST USE STANDARD "T" OR "U" SECTION STEEL POSTS WEIGHING NOT LESS THAN 1 POUND PER LINEAR FOOT.
2. USE 36 INCH MINIMUM POSTS DRIVEN 16 INCH MINIMUM INTO GROUND NO MORE THAN 6 FEET APART.
3. USE WOVEN SLIT FILM GEOTEXTILE AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION H-1 MATERIALS AND FASTEN GEOTEXTILE SECURELY TO
UPSLOPE SIDE OF FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES AT TOP AND MID -SECTION.
4. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER CERTIFICATION TO THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INSPECTION/ENFORCEMENT
AUTHORITY SHOWING THAT THE GEOTEXTILE USED MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION H-1 MATERIALS.
5. EMBED GEOTEXTILE A MINIMUM OF 8 INCHES VERTICALLY INTO THE GROUND. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE SOIL ON BOTH
SIDES OF FABRIC.
6. WHERE TWO SECTIONS OF GEOTEXTILE ADJOIN: OVERLAP, TWIST, AND STAPLE TO POST IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS
DETAIL.
7. EXTEND BOTH ENDS OF THE SILT FENCE A MINIMUM OF FIVE HORIZONTAL FEET UPSLOPE AT
45 DEGREES TO THE MAIN FENCE ALIGNMENT TO PREVENT RUNOFF FROM GOING AROUND THE ENDS OF THE SILT FENCE.
8. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS WHEN BULGES DEVELOP IN SILT FENCE OR WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES
25% OF FENCE HEIGHT. REPLACE GEOTEXTILE IF TORN. IF UNDERMINING OCCURS, REINSTALL FENCE.
MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 2011 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
III\ 1 CREEK ; � / o � / , � � � � � • '
\\1! TIETAM
TILE AN / /(02 FILTER /
LITTLE
f7/2-
�' �- / I� C-301 BAG / /O
/ /
/ \ \ Z / \ w ___.,'j \ LU
00
go
\\\\\\\\
I I I INSTALL SANDBAGS N m l\ ~o Q
\(PHASE(OR
EQUIVALENT) /
\ 1m° I /
\\\\\\\\\I
\\ \ 11 11 \ \
\\\\\\\
1 I I \ \ \ I l
/ \
\ \\\\\ \ I 1 Zm \ \ zL
\ / \ O
\ \ \ \ N 1 \ \ ABANDONED OLD SMITHSBURG PIKE / \ \ o D o `
\\\ \
\ \ \ \ l\ 1 ���
\ \ \ \ \ I oZ zu-
r \
'-'1 \ 1 \ \ \ I 1 ( \ \ \ h / % ' 01 INSTALL SANDBAGS
\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ I� \I`OD \ C-301 (OR EQUIVALENT)
1 1 \ \ II ` ! (PHASE 1) \I\ 1
X o \ \
\ \ \\ \ \ \ 1AL)
\I \ \ <) CE X/X/ LO 1 i i // 01 DRA(TYWDOWN PUMP f I
\ \ 1 1 I I I \ ! FENCE REPAIR EXISTING WALL C-301 WITH 2" DISCHARGE / \
1 \ \ 1 \ HOSE
\\\
STONE WALL ( \ n/
Hole Behind headwall \ `0 DRY STAUK /I \ \
INV: 649.48 ° --J�
\ \ \ \ \ I (Water rainingArovnn' IAraui / /
\ \ \ REPAIR EXISTING ERO ION / __
1 BEHIND WALL PER ENGI EER P DREDGE BOTTOM OF \ �� /
\ \ \ \ \ I ^ O 6�5 / \ '
/ p / TO ORIGINAL DEPTH I /
I (O ,VV BEHIND WEIR GAT / / /
EL 48.7' INSTALL SANDBAGS r
\ \ \ 1 \ SANDBAGS 01 01 (OR EQUIVALENT) 6q)� INSTALL SANDBAGS / ( / \ _
\ \ \ \ - \ P 01 i
\ I (OR INSTALL EQUIVALENT) CCC -301 (PHASE 1) 01 INSTALL SANDBAGS _ (OR EQUIVALENT) 5g. / / /'�
\ 1 (PHASE 2) C-301 i (OR EQUIVALENT) C-301(PHASE 1 I / /
I I I INV. 649.84 / 6S� ON 1 UP_TE WITH VALVE / / / _ /
\ O C-301 (PHASE 1) \ A\
\ \\ \ \ 1 II �\ / HEAD LL \ NE w_W GEOT ER L LINES /\ / //'� /\� \
/ \ 1 \ t I I I EDGE OF WATER \ r % TO BE REP CED /-_/ „// // /X
-
\ I HEAD WALL I I \ / /w ( - 658 / /
\tom \ \\�11 / // / ///
------ ----- -- 1- % / / 1 DRAIN PIPE:4"(6'7 O i 1 I I / /�
- - - - RAY - - - - - - \ I I -I-1- I \ INV: 647.50 7 I / / /
44.5C-- / / /
EWATER 651' / \ oti I l / /�
\ \ \ i \\ \ \\\ \ \ / / / / / \ — EDP o ( �� \ I
\ \ \ \\ \ \ REPAIR EXISTING E SIGN / -652' / / Q `/ �� \ \ I `a / / /
\/ I\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ I BEHIND WALL PER ENGPIEER y\ _ — PROX LOCATION ,l I I // // I
REPAIR EXISTING WALL _ - /
I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ END WALL J /
\ I 1 \ _ / / PROPOSED WALL TO PROPOSED WALL TO � INSTALL \I
/\�-/ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 653 655 / / PROTECT FOUNDATION \ 01 SANDBAGS IN I
CONCRETE BOX UNDER OLD ROAD � / / C-301 SPRING CHANNEL
C. \ \ i BASEMEN
\ \ WITH CONCRETE ENCASEMENT ( \ / i (PHASE 2)
\ z I \ \ CONTAINING BIN WATERLINE 1 s - / UNNR PORCH / I ( �� \
\ \ \ ' \ — 654 / - 650.45 / / I I I I / /
z \ \ \ ARCHWAY! WALL r /
m
1
\ \ \ Hole Behind headwa /Rr m niw_, (WATER G FROM / I I I
\ \ CONC. WALKWAYBEIN /PUMP BYPASS
\ ° INSTALL INDOOR SEDIMENT CRHOME)
\ 0
INV: 4 . 6 95
SPRING FLOW l
D \ \ � CONTROLS IF POLLUTANTS / / UCTED O
\ \ \ (Water Draining Around Wall) / / `
\ \ \ 1 / / �� DISCHARGE SEE SHEEOSPRINGT NOTES) / / / I // C �≥ '(HWATERLINE IS IPE
C17 D \\\\\ \\\\\\\\ 1 / J I OO '-I
/ 1 / / (PHASE 2)
1 \ \ \ / / / /� \/ / / /
\ \ 1 / ` >J L / r / 69 (I / /// / \ /
D I I \\\\\\\
\ \ \\ 1 / TOTALLOD — / \
\ t AREA: 0.68 ac � / O / 0 7 J / / /1/
/ / I I I
c \ \ \ \ \ \ z / / I \ 1 I I
\ / . — /
' C \\\
\ \ 1 , s o �O J BA MENT E NCE / I / J / I
I I cn \ \ W \
\ \ \ \ \ // / 4O1 / / - J�� �� �O � STABILIZED / / I \I
II 1 \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 , / \66�// / 03 CONSTRUCTION % I `
/ \
/ \ \ \ I
I ,651 d UNDERGROUND UTILITIES / / C-301 ENTRANCE / /
11 1I 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ f 1 / \ - - J� POSSIBLY ELECTRIC /\;
I I \ \I \ \1 I I \ 1 \ I 1 \ \ \ I �1 SEPTIC RESERVE AREA / / I i
I 1 1 / \ \ / " /
/ 1 / ,/
1 ' \\ \ m I
1 I I / \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ - " \ 7
/ 0 J I 1!O
661/ \ \\ \ \ \ \
I I I I ` )\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ I/
I I I I I I > \ \ \ \\ \ \ ` \ I
I I I I I / \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ J \__ Oo \`-HH
1\ / a/
I I I I I I 1 \ " /
I1 I I \ \ \ \\\\\/ J °•OH��o \ I
1 I \ I \ APPRO OGATIO� �F IiTJLI\E - - - - / 04 SILT O \ H OH I
FENCE
GRAVEL C-301 (PHASE 2) /�-
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
Pre -Construction Notification - Contractor to contact the Washington County Soil Conservation District inspector at
301-797-6821 and site engineer Frederick, Seibert & Assoc., Inc. (FSA) at 301-791-3650 a minimum of 48 hours
prior to start of construction for a pre -construction meeting. Any spoil and/or borrow material must come from
and/or go to a site with an approved and current Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.
Before beginning construction, limit of disturbance.
1. Contractor to access site through existing paved entrance. Contractor to install stabilized construction
entrance as shown on plans if tracking of mud becomes an issue. If any tracking of mud occurs on any public
roadway, the contractor shall immediately stop work and clean roadway. The contractor at a minimum shall
clean the roadway at the end of each working day, whenever tracking of sediment or debris occur.
2. Contractor to install phase 1 sandbag perimeter controls. Begin on one area of wall repair and begin
de -watering.
3. Upon de -watering of work area, construct wall repairs. Repeat process for all phase 1 wall restoration
locations.
4. Contractor to remove all phase 1 perimeter controls upon completion of all wall restoration locations.
5. Install phase 2 silt fence for designated phase 2 stockpile area.
6. Contractor to install sandbag and pump around practice for phase 2. Begin de -watering pond.
7. Upon completion of de -watering, contractor to begin dredging pond floor, and replace geothermal lines.
8. Contractor to stabilize all areas of work.
9. Contact the Washington County Soil Conservation District inspector at 301-797-6821 to verify site is
adequately stabilized before removing perimeter controls.
10. Remove any remaining erosion and sediment control devices and stabilize any disturbed area.
\ f \ DRIV AY
-sF LOD I\
SF��j�F
NSF � \
O /lam O
V ` / \
0y �N /
- \\ ' STOCKPILE
/_ (PHASE 2)
I
1
/ / I
/l / BARN
I
o) / ) I
l I / I ( 1/
/ ' I
>I ) // /� '?/i \I
// // *
I I I / /,$/ /
1
_ K 7 I
s OO / / /
r — > oo-\ /
\ / o__- - \-J -\
\ \ , / / - -
I J
/
i\/ \
o \ \
1 1
° \ 1
5, -)
s J /
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that these documents were prepared
or approved by me, and that I am a duly
licensed
professional under the laws of the State of:
MD , License # 20945
Expiration Date 0a-23-2025
E
O
o
(/)
Q W 12
gN
0
QoZ
wm
�LU
LU
w
oar
O
O
01
Q J
H
U
z
-
w
Q
¢ate
o �
U
g
m U
06
N
LLI
DO
LLI
U)
UDo
Y
U
oz�
ooa
CE
LU
x�o
�w
0
LLI
N =
t7=
Q
N
C/)
I
W
0
U
U
z
W
('5
a
o
w
Q
LL
o
co
W
W
LU
LU
Z
Z
O
N
F
Q
z
o
(n
CO
Q o
V) N
O
r
j
W
<
o
U) Z
LU
IUIt
O
Q
J �
O
D
Z
Cc
Q
'5
�
>Q
PROJECT NO.
3400.1
DWN BY
DATE
TCH
05-01-2024
PROJECT MANAGER:
KDM
EMAIL KM00RE@fsa-inc.com
TAX -GRID -PARCEL
0040-0001-0203
SCALE
1"=20'
SHEET TITLE
EROSION
&
SEDIMENT
PLAN
C-301
SHEET 03 OF
03
,
Was ington County
Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit
ORDINANCE 2024-23
Part I — Evaluation of Significance
HTC Number (HDC office use only):
v.07/26/2024
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Instructions: Fill out this form for determination of whether the historic structure is located within a
qualifying area.
.............................................................................
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Name
Street Address
City Zip
APPLICANT INFORMATION
ni,,Y.o
Street Address
City
Telephone
Check all designations that apply:
Historic Structure in the Antietam Overlay 1 or 2
Historic Structure in a County Historic District (ex. HP Overlay)
Historic Structure contributing to a Historic Rural Village
Historic Structure under MHT Easement
Historic Structure in an eligible municipality (list below)
Municipality
State
Email Address
PROJECT CONTACT (if different from applicant)
Name
Company
Street Address
Zip
City State Zip
Telephone Email Address
Page 1 1 Part I — Evaluation of Significance
PROPERTY DETAIL INFORMATION
Date(s) of building(s) including source of date(s)
Construction materials (brick, wood frame, etc.)
Date(s) of exterior alteration(s)
Description of the physical appearance (size, number of stories, style)
Statement of significance
Page 2 1 Part I — Evaluation of Significance
APPLICATION CHECKLIST
Application Form — I have filled in all applicable fields. (check Equivalent Documentation
below if applicable)
Signature — I signed and dated the Part 1 application
Ownership — If I am not the fee -simple owner of the property, I have provided a written
statement from the fee -simple owner indicating that he or she is aware of the
application and has no objection to the request for review
Significance justification — I have attached documentation to support the significance of
the historic structure
Photographs — I have attached exterior photographs of all sides of the structure
including areas applicable to the application
Equivalent Documentation — I am attaching an equivalent documentation packet for
review.
I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Properties Tax Credit Application
and that the information provided in this application is true, completed and accurate to
the best of my/our knowledge and belief.
Signature of Applicant
Printed Name of Applicant
Signature of Applicant
Date
Printed Name of Applicant Date
Historic District Commission Use Only
The Historic District Commission has reviewed the Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit — Part I for the above -
named property and has determined that the property:
Is located in an existing qualified area and meets historic structure criteria
Appears to meet the qualifications of a historic structure pending designation through individual Historic
District
Is not a historic structure because it is not in a qualifying area; does not meet criteria for local designation
Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed
Date of HDC Review
Page 3 1 Part I — Evaluation of Significance
,
Was ington County
v.07/26/2024
Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit
ORDINANCE 2024-23
Part II — Description of Rehabilitation
HTC Number (from Part I Application):
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Instructions: Fill out this form for determination of whether the proposed work is consistent with
Washington County Design Guidelines and Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation.
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Name
Street Address
City Zip
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name
Street Address
City State Zip
Telephone Email Address
PROJECT CONTACT (if different from applicant)
Name
Company
Street Address
City State Zip
Telephone Email Address
PROPERTY DATA
Indicate One: Primary/Secondary Residence
Mixed -Use Residential Commercial
Estimated Start Date
Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures
Page 1 1 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation
HTC Number:
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK
Us
LI II J Pd }{C LU UU.3U IL)' dll U ALUI IUI Wll1 IC dl IU I ICW LUI IJLI UL.LIUI I.
Number Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Describe work and impact on feature
Photo Numbers
Drawing Numbers
Number Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Describe work and impact on feature
Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers
Page 2 1 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation
HTC Number:
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK
Us
LI II J Pd }{C LU UU.3U IL)' dll U ALUI IUI Wll1 IC dl IU I ICW LUI IJLI UL.LIUI I.
Number Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Describe work and impact on feature
Photo Numbers
Drawing Numbers
Number Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Describe work and impact on feature
Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers
Page 3 1 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation
HTC Number:
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK
Us
LI II J Pd }{C LU UU.3U IL)' dll U ALUI IUI Wll1 IC dl IU I ICW LUI IJLI UL.LIUI I.
Number Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Describe work and impact on feature
Photo Numbers
Drawing Numbers
Number Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Describe work and impact on feature
Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers
Page 4 1 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation
HTC Number:
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK
Us
LI II J Pd }{C LU UU.3U IL)' dll U ALUI IUI Wll1 IC dl IU I ICW LUI IJLI UL.LIUI I.
Number Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Describe work and impact on feature
Photo Numbers
Drawing Numbers
Number Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Describe work and impact on feature
Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers
Page 5 1 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation
HTC Number:
APPLICATION CHECKLIST
Application Form — I have filled in all applicable fields.
Signature — I signed and dated the Part 2 application
Description of Rehabilitation Work — I have described ALL proposed work planned for the exterior of my
property. I understand that all work must be consistent with the Washington County Design Guidelines
and Secretary of the Interior's Standards and be reviewed and approved by the Historic District
Commission
Supplementary Materials — If applicable to my project, I have attached site plans, demolition plans,
architectural plans, HVAC plans, replacement window/door drawings and/or product specifications.
Photographs — I have attached photographs to support the description of work.
I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Properties Tax Credit Application and that the
information provided in this application is true, completed and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge
and belief.
Signature of Applicant
Printed Name of Applicant Date
Signature of Applicant
Printed Name of Applicant Date
Historic District Commission Use Only
The Historic District Commission has reviewed the Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit — Part II for the above -
named property and has determined that the proposed rehabilitation described herein:
Is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Washington County Historic
Guidelines. Final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described
and a Part 3 application is submitted and approved
Is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation if the attached conditions are met.
A final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part
3 Application is submitted and approved.
Is not consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, eligibility requirements,
and/or does not comply with program requirements and therefore certification is denied.
Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed
Date of HDC Review
Page 6 1 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation
,
Was ington County
v.07/26/2024
Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit
ORDINANCE 2024-23
Part III — Request for Certification of Completed Work
HTC Number (from Part I Application):
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Instructions: Fill out this form at project completion for review of the rehabilitation costs and
determination of project results consistent with Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Name
Street Address
City Zip
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name
Street Address
City State Zip
Telephone Email Address
PROJECT CONTACT (if different from applicant)
Name
Company
Street Address
City State Zip
Telephone Email Address
PROJECT DATA
Project Start Date
Project Completion Date
Total Rehabilitation Costs
Total Ineligible Expenses -
Total Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures (ORE) _
Page 1 1 Part III — Request for Certification of Completed Work
HTC Number:
APPLICATION CHECKLIST
Application Form — I have filled in all applicable fields. (Check Equivalent Documentation below if
applicable)
Signature — I signed and dated the Part 3 application
Itemized Expense Spreadsheet — I have included a spreadsheet of all my itemized expenses, with eligible
and ineligible expenses clearly delineated. For each item on the spreadsheet, I have included supporting
documentation consisting of BOTH (1) a copy of the invoice or receipt, showing which goods or services
were purchased, and (2) certifiable proof of payment such as a credit card receipt or cancelled check.
Photographs — I have attached photographs to support the description of work.
Equivalent Documentation — I am attaching an equivalent documentation packet for review.
I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Properties Tax Credit Application and that the
information provided in this application is true, complete and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge
and belief; and that the completed rehabilitation is consistent with the work described in Part 2 of the
application process. I hereby apply for certification of rehabilitation work described for the purposes of a
Washington County Historic Properties Tax Credit.
Signature of Applicant
Printed Name of Applicant Date
Signature of Applicant
Printed Name of Applicant Date
Historic District Commission Use Only
The Historic District Commission has reviewed the Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit — Part III for the above -
named property and has determined that:
The completed rehabilitation is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation
and is consistent with the historic character of the property and where applicable, the district in which it is
located. Completed projects may be inspected by an authorized representative of the HDC to determine if
the work meets the Standards for Rehabilitation. The HDC reserves the right to make inspections at any
time up to five years after completion of the rehabilitation and to revoke certification, if it is determined
that the rehabilitation project was not undertaken as presented by the owner in the application form and
supporting documentation, or the owner, upon obtaining certification, undertook unapproved further
alterations as part of the rehabilitation project inconsistent with the Secretary's Standards for
Rehabilitation.
The completed rehabilitation is not consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation, eligibility requirements, and/or does not comply with program requirements and therefore
certification is denied
Date of HDC Review
Page 2 1 Part III — Request for Certification of Completed Work
Property Address: Part 3 Itemized Expense Sheet FOR HDC USE ONLY
HTC Number:
COLUMN 1
COLUMN 2
COLUMN 3
COLUMN 4
COLUMN 5
COLUMN 6
COLUMN 7
COLUMN 8
Date of
Payment
Your page #(s) of
invoice / receipt
/ check
Payee for Item (name of contractor,
company, etc.)
Part 2 Work
Item #
Description of Expenditure
Expenditure
Amount
Eligible Expense
Ineligible
Expense
SUBTOTALS (will auto -calculate):
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Part 3 Total Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures as submitted: $0.00
Maryland Historical Trust
Z_Waryland Historic Revitalization Tax Credit
Revised 10/25/2023
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST PART 1 — EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
MHT Project Number (MHT office use only)
Instructions: Fill out this form in accordance with the application instructions. No certification determination will be made until this form is complete. Please note that it is not
necessary for owners of individually listed National Register properties to complete a Part 1 Application.
1. Property Name
Street
City Zip County
MHT Easement property? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Check all designations that apply:
❑ National Register historic district or National Register individual listing
❑ Local historic district or Local individual listing
❑ Pending National Register or local designation (must submit documentation justifying historic district or individual listing)
❑ Eligible curatorship property owned by DNR (must submit DOE justifying eligibility)
❑ Eligible property within a Certified Maryland Heritage Area (must submit documentation from the Maryland Heritage Area Authority justifying eligibility)
Name of Historic
District or Heritage Area
(if applicable)
2. Nature of request (check only one box)
❑ Certification that the building contributes to the significance of the above -named historic district or heritage area.
❑ Certification that the structure has been individually designated under local law and is eligible for the National Register (designation documentation required).
❑ Preliminary determination that the structure will be a certified historic structure pending the official National Register or local designation.
❑ Certification that a building owned by DNR is eligible for listing on the National Register.
3. Project Contact (if different from applicant)
Name
Street
Zip
Telephone
Company
City
Email Address
State
4. Applicant
I hereby attest that the information I have provided is, to the best of my knowledge, correct. I further attest that the structure is not owned by the State of Maryland, a
political subdivision of the State or the Federal government and that [check one box as applicable] (1) LI I am the fee -simple owner of the above -described property
or (2) ❑ if I am not the fee -simple owner of the above -described property, the fee -simple owner is aware of the action I am taking relative to this application and has no
objection, as noted in a written statement from the owner, a copy of which either is attached to this application form and incorporated herein, or has been previously
submitted. I understand that intentional falsification of factual representations in this application is subject to civil penalties and imprisonment for up to 10 years pursuant
to Tax General Article, §§ 13-703 and 13-1002(b), Annotated Code of Maryland.
Name
Street
Zip
Telephone
Signature
City
Email Address
Date
State
MHT Official Use Only
The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application- Part 1 for the above -named property and has determined that the property:
❑ Is a "certified historic structure."
❑ Appears to meet "certified historic structure" criteria, pending official National Register or local designation.
❑ Is not a "certified historic structure" because it is not individually listed in the National Register or designated under local law; does not contribute to the
significance of the above -named historic district or heritage area; is a structure pending National Register or local designation that does not appear to meet
"certified historic structure" criteria; or is not determined eligible for listing in the National Register.
❑ Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed.
Date Maryland Historical Trust Authorized Signature
❑ MHT comments attached
Maryland Historical Trust /100 Community Place, Crownsville, MD 21032 / mht.maryland.gov
HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
PART 1 - EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
Property Name
Street Address
5. Description of physical appearance
Date(s) of building(s) _
Type of construction
(brick, wood frame, etc.)
Has building been moved?
❑ no ❑ yes, specify date
6. Statement of significance
Source of date(s)
Date(s) of alteration(s)
7. Photographs and maps. Submit interior and exterior photographs in accordance with the photographic guidelines. If located within a local historic district
attach the official historic district boundary map with the location of the property clearly marked.
Page 2 of 3
HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
PART 1 - EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
MANDATORY APPLICATION CHECKLIST
Property Address
Instructions: After completing your Part 1 application, fill out this checklist to ensure that your application contains at least the minimum documentation
required for MHT staff review. This checklist is based on the detailed information included in the Homeowner Instructions. Read and check each line carefully;
the application review period will not begin until a completed application with checklist is submitted.
❑ APPLICATION FORM- I have filled in all applicable fields. I understand that MHT staff may not fill in any missing
information on my behalf; therefore if my application is missing information it will be returned to me for completion.
❑ SIGNATURE- I signed and dated the Part 1 application and Mandatory Application Checklist in accordance with MHT's
signature guidelines.
❑ OWNERSHIP- If I am not the fee -simple owner of the property, I have provided a written statement from the fee -simple
owner indicating that he or she is aware of the application and has no objection to the request for certification.
❑ DESIGNATION JUSTIFICATION - I have attached the required documentation if applicable.
❑ HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP- If located within a local historic district, I have attached the official historic district boundary
map and clearly marked the property's location within the district.
❑ PHOTOGRAPHS - I have prepared all photographs in accordance MHT's photographic guidelines.
❑ MOVED BUILDINGS- My property was moved (or I plan to move it) and therefore I am submitting additional information
in accordance with the Homeowner Application Instructions.
❑ MULTIPLE BUILDINGS- My property contains multiple structures (such as garage, barn, shed, etc.) and therefore I am
submitting additional information in accordance the Homeowner Application Instructions.
❑ DUPLICATE COPY OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS- I have saved a complete copy of all materials for my records.
❑ I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application and
Instructions.
Name
Signature
Date
Page 3 of 3
Maryland Historical Trust
Z�Waryland Historic Revitalization Tax Credit
Revised 10/25/2023
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST PART 2— DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION
MHT Project Number (MHT office use only)
Instructions: Fill out this form in accordance with the application instructions. This page must bear the applicant's electronic signature and must be dated. The
Maryland Historical Trust's certification decision is based on the descriptions in this application form. In the event of any discrepancy between the application form and
other supplementary material submitted with it (such as architectural plans, drawings and specifications), the application form shall take precedence.
1. Property Name
Street
City Zip County
MHT Easement Property? 0 Yes 0 No 0 Unknown
O A Part 1 — Evaluation of Significance was submitted Date submitted Date of certification
(if applicable)
2. Project Data
Q Primary/secondary residence Q Mixed -use residential/commercial j Owner -occupied residential co-op unit
Date of building construction Floor area before / after rehabilitation / sq ft
Start date (estimated) Completion date (estimated)
CHECK IF YOU ANTICIPATE RECEIVING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Insurance claim reimbursement funds Other local and/or state funding (i.e. grants or loans) Specify funding source
*Estimated qualified rehabilitation expenditures are capped at $250,000 and
should not include additional state/local funding, insurance reimbursements or *Estimated Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures
ineligible expenses including new construction, site work, appliances, etc.
3. Project Contact (if different from applicant)
Name Company
Street City State
Zip Telephone Email Address
4. Applicant
I hereby attest that the information I have provided is, to the best of my knowledge, correct. I further attest that the structure is not owned by the State of Maryland, a
political subdivision of the State or the Federal government and that [check one box as applicable] (1) ❑ I am the fee -simple owner of the above -described property
or (2) ❑ if I am not the fee -simple owner of the above -described property, the fee -simple owner is aware of the action I am taking relative to this application and has no
objection, as noted in a written statement from the owner, a copy of which either is attached to this application form and incorporated herein, or has been previously
submitted. I understand that intentional falsification of factual representations in this application is subject to civil penalties and imprisonment for up to 10 years pursuant
to Tax General Article, §§ 13-703 and 13-1002(b), Annotated Code of Maryland.
Name
Street
Zip
Telephone
Signature
City
Email Address
Date
State
MHT Official Use Only
The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application — Part 2 for the above -named property and has determined that the proposed
rehabilitation described herein:
is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. A final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein
described and a Part 3 Application is submitted and approved.
is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation if the attached conditions are met. A final certification can be issued only after the
rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part 3 Application is submitted and approved.
is not consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, eligibility requirements, and/or does not comply with program requirements and
therefore certification is denied.
Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed
Date Maryland Historical Trust Authorized Signature
MHT conditions or comments attached
Maryland Historical Trust /100 Community Place / Crownsville, MD 21032 / mht.maryland.gov
HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
PART 2- DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION
Property name
Property address
5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information.
Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction.
Number Feature Date of Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Photo numbers
Describe work and impact on feature
Drawing numbers
Number Feature Date of Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Photo numbers
Describe work and impact on feature
Drawing numbers
Page 2 of 6
HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
PART 2- DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION
Property name
Property address
5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information.
Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction.
Number Feature Date of Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Photo numbers
Describe work and impact on feature
Drawing numbers
Number Feature Date of Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Photo numbers
Describe work and impact on feature
Drawing numbers
Page 3 of 6
HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
PART 2- DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION
Property name
Property address
5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information.
Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction.
Number Feature Date of Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Photo numbers
Describe work and impact on feature
Drawing numbers
Number Feature Date of Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Photo numbers
Describe work and impact on feature
Drawing numbers
Page 4 of 6
HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
PART 2- DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION
Property name
Property address
5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information.
Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction.
Number Feature Date of Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Photo numbers
Describe work and impact on feature
Drawing numbers
Number Feature Date of Feature
Describe existing feature and its condition
Photo numbers
Describe work and impact on feature
Drawing numbers
Page 5 of 6
HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
PART 2- DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION
MANDATORY APPLICATION CHECKLIST
Property Address
Instructions: After completing your Part 2 application, fill out this checklist to ensure that your application contains at least the minimum documentation
required for MHT staff review. This checklist is based on the detailed information included in the Homeowner Instructions. Read and check each line carefully;
the application review period will not begin until a completed application with checklist is submitted.
APPLICATION FORM- I filled in all applicable fields. I understand that MHT staff may not fill in any missing information
on behalf of me; therefore if my application is missing information it will be returned.
Q SIGNATURE- I signed and dated the Part 2 application and Mandatory Application Checklist in accordance with MHT's
signature guidelines.
Q DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK- I have described ALL proposed work planned for the next 24 months to the
interior and exterior of my property, including ineligible work items that I do not anticipate receiving a tax credit for. I
understand that all work must meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and be reviewed and approved by MHT.
Q SUPPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS- If applicable to my project, I have attached site plans, demolition plans, architectural
plans, HVAC plans, replacement window/door drawings and/or product specifications.
Q PHOTOGRAPHS- I have prepared all photographs in accordance MHT's photographic guidelines.
Q REVIEW FEE - I will pay a $10 Part 2 review fee when sent an electronic invoice by the Maryland Historical Trust. I
understand that payment must be made within ten (10) days of receiving the invoice.
DUPLICATE COPY OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS- I have saved a complete copy of all materials for my records.
❑ I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application and
Instructions.
Name
Signature
Date
Page 6 of 6
Maryland Historical Trust
Ma ry l a n d Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Revised 10/25/2023
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST PART 3— REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETED WORK
MHT Project Number (MHT office use only)
Instructions: This page must bear the applicant's electric signature and must be dated. A copy of this form will be provided to the Comptroller of the Treasury.
1. Property Name
Street
City Zip County
Is the property a certified historic structure? ❑ yes ❑ no If yes, date of MHT certification OR date of National Register/local listing
2. Project Data Project start date Project completion date
Did the project take more than 24 months to complete? ❑ yes* ❑ no *If answer is yes, you may only claim expenditures incurred in a 24 month period ending
with or within the taxable year.
Is the required "Part 3- Itemized Expense Spreadsheet" included with corresponding paid invoices/receipts? ❑ yes
Total rehabilitation costs (including new construction, site work, appliances, etc.) $
Total ineligible expenses attributed to new construction, site work, appliances, etc. - $
Total ineligible funding, including but not limited to state or local grants or _ $
insurance reimbursement funds as described in the Part 2 (see instructions).
Total Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures (ORE) -Do not round numbers o $
(the 20% tax credit will be based on this amount, which may not exceed $250,000)
3. Project Contact (if different from applicant)
Name Company
Street City State
Zip Telephone Email Address
4. Applicant List all additional owners on next page.
/ hereby apply for certification of the rehabilitation work described above for purposes of the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit. I hereby attest that, to the best of my
knowledge, the information provided is correct, and that the completed rehabilitation is consistent with the work described in Part 2 of the Maryland Historic
Revitalization Tax Credit Application Part- 2 certified by the Maryland Historical Trust. I also attest that the structure is not owned by the State of Maryland, a political
subdivision of the State, or the Federal government, and that I own, as my residence, the property or the portion of the property, described above, excepting those
curatorship properties owned by DNR. I understand that intensional falsification of factual representations in this application are subject to civil penalties and
imprisonment for up to 10 years pursuant to Tax General Article §§ 13-703 and 13-1002(b), Annotated Code of Maryland.
Name Signature Date
Last 4 digits of SSN (or Taxpayer Identification Number)
Street City State
Zip Telephone Email Address
MHT Official Use Only
The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application — Part 3 for the above -listed "certified historic structure" and has determined that
the completed rehabilitation is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and is consistent with the historic character of the property and,
where applicable, the district in which it is located. Effective the date indicated below, the rehabilitation of the "certified historic structure" is hereby designated a "certified
rehabilitation." Questions concerning specific tax consequences or interpretations of Maryland tax law should be addressed to the Comptroller of the Treasury. Completed
projects may be inspected by an authorized representative of the MHT Director to determine if the work meets the Standards for Rehabilitation. The MHT Director
reserves the right to make inspections at any time up to five years after completion of the rehabilitation and to revoke certification, if it is determined that the rehabilitation
project was not undertaken as presented by the owner in the application form and supporting documentation, or the owner, upon obtaining certification, undertook
unapproved further alterations as part of the rehabilitation project inconsistent with the Secretary's Standards for Rehabilitation.
❑ the completed rehabilitation is not consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, eligibility requirements, and/or does not comply with
program requirements and therefore certification is denied.
Date Maryland Historical Trust Authorized Signature
❑ MHT comments attached
Maryland Historical Trust /100 Community Place / Crownsville, MD 21032 / mht.maryland.gov
HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
PART 3- REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETED WORK
Property name
Property address
5. Additional Owners Continue on additional sheets as needed to list all owners.
Name
Street Address
City
SSN or Taxpayer Identification Number
State Zip
Name SSN or Taxpayer Identification Number
Street Address
City State Zip
Name SSN or Taxpayer Identification Number
Street Address
City State Zip
Name
Street Address
City
SSN or Taxpayer Identification Number
State Zip
6. Itemized Expense Spreadsheet Attach the itemized spreadsheet and supporting documentation (paid invoices/receipts/cancelled checks) to the Part 3 Application.
Supporting documentation must be keyed to the spreadsheet. Include both eligible and ineligible expenses.
Page 2 of 3
HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION
PART 3- REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETED WORK
MANDATORY APPLICATION CHECKLIST
Property Address
Instructions: After completing your Part 3 application, fill out this checklist to ensure that your application contains at least the minimum documentation
required for MHT staff review. This checklist is based on the detailed information included in the Homeowner Instructions. Read and check each section
carefully; the application review period will not begin until a completed application with checklist is submitted.
APPLICATION FORM- I filled in all applicable fields including the last 4 digits of the social security number of all owners
(if jointly owned). I understand that MHT staff may not fill in any missing information on behalf of me; therefore if my
application is missing information it will be returned.
■ SIGNATURE- I signed and dated the Part 3 application and Mandatory Application Checklist in accordance with MHT's
signature guidelines.
ITEMIZED EXPENSE SPREADSHEET- I have included a spreadsheet of all of my itemized expenses, filled out according to
the instructions, with eligible and ineligible expenses clearly delineated. For each item on the spreadsheet I have
included supporting documentation consisting of BOTH (1) a copy of the invoice or receipt, showing which goods or
services were purchased, and (2) certifiable proof of payment such as a credit card receipt or canceled check. All
supporting documentation is keyed to the spreadsheet.
PHOTOGRAPHS - I have prepared all photographs in accordance MHT's photographic guidelines.
REVIEW FEE- I will pay the remainder of review fee when sent an electronic invoice by the Maryland Historical Trust. I
understand that payment must be made within ten (10) days of receiving the invoice. The review fee is 3% of the credit
amount based on the GREATER of the Part 2 estimated Total Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures (QRE) or the final total
QRE in the Part 3 application, minus the $10 Part 2 review fee.
- If Part 3 final QRE is higher than the estimated Part 2 QRE: ((Part 3 QRE x .20) x .03)- $10 = final review fee
- If Part 3 final QRE is lower than the estimated Part 2 QRE: ((Part 2 QRE x .20) x .03)- $10 = final review fee
DUPLICATE COPY OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS- I have saved a complete copy of all materials for my records.
❑ I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application and
Instructions.
Name
Signature
Date
Page 3 of 3
5. HISTORIC PROPERTY GRANT PROGRAM
5.01 Establishment of the Historic Property Grant Program
5.01 a There is a Historic Property Grant Program established to assist in the protection,
preservation, and enhancement of Washington County's rural historic properties las
authorized by § 9-204 of the Tax -Property Article of State Code. Commented [JM75]: County Attorney assistance
needed to define authorization
5.01 b The rehabilitation activities referred to in this Ordinance shall be in conformance with
the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation and subsequent
revisions and with the Washington County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures and
subsequent revisions.
5.02 Grant Funding Source for the Historic Property Grant Program
5.02a The funding source and yearly allocated amount for this grant program shall be:
i) Any listed below or combination thereof:
(1) Recordation Tax
(2) Ag Transfer Tax
(3) General Fund
ii) The yearly allocated amount for this grant program shall be a minimum of
$150,000 or greater as determined by the County.
5.03 Grant Amounts for a Historic Property Grant
5.03a An individual grant shall be a minimum of $5,000.
5.03b An individual grant cannot exceed $50,000.
5.04 Eligibility for a Historic Property Grant
5.04a Eligible applicants include individual property owners and non-profit organizations
i) lApplicants must not have outstanding County permit or zoning violations.L
ii) Non-profit organizations must be in good standing with the State of Maryland
Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT), be qualified to do business in
Maryland, and have the legal capacity and authority to incur obligations involved
under the grant program.
WIi
Commented [JM76]: Not sure where this needs
placed in here but it needs to be discussed
somewhere and hammered out by the appropriate
departments and Commissioners
Commented [JM77R76]: CFO review needed on the
wording and funds. Obviously Commissioner input as
well.
Commented [JM78]: Inquire about whether good
standing with taxes should be included in elgibility
Commented [JM79R78]: Check with MHT MHAA
Grant wording SDAT
Commented [JM80R78]: Non-profit wording
updated to follow MHAA grant guidelines. Excluded
the link which was also in the guidelines. This
information could be included in a grant guideline
document such as the ones put out by MHAA or
Frederick County each cycle.
Commented [JM81]: This is a tricky statement but is
included in Frederick County. This is wide ranging to
me, since its for an owner. That means if they own
multiple properties and something has a violation
they can't use this to resolve it or keep another
property in good order.
Commented [JM82R81]: Valid point per discussions
with Jill. Leaving in.
5.04b Criteria of Eligible properties include:
i) (Located in unincorporated areas of Washington County; and l
Commented [JM83]: For the time being,
ii) The property is in a Historic Preservation Area; or
recommendation would be to determine if the
iii) The fLandowner has placed the property in a Maryland Historical Trust
program is working in unincorporated areas where
County has jurisdiction and review authority before
permanent easement, that provides additional review and restrictions to the exterior
contemplating extension to the municipal areas.
appearance and maintenance of the historic structures; oft
Commented [JM84]: Says MHT explicitly
iv) The landowner has placed the property in a Historic Preservation District as
defined by the Washington County Zoning Ordinance; or
v) The property is located in the Antietam Overlay 1 - Battlefield Buffer or the
Antietam Overlay 2 - Approach as defined by the Washington County Zoning
Ordinance and listed with the Maryland Historical Trust on the Maryland Inventory of
Historic Properties; or
vi) (The property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, individually or
as a contributing property in a National Register District; or
vii) The property is determined to be eligible by the Maryland Historical Trust for
National Register designation; or
viii) The property is in a County adopted Historic Rural Village; and the structure is
a contributing resource to the Historic Rural Village.)
5.05 Procedures for Historic Property Grant
5.05a (Applications will be accepted once a year from December through February and;
i) Applications will be reviewed by Planning Department
Staff for completeness and to give applicants the opportunity to submit a revised
application.
5.05b
Commented [JM85]: We do not have review
authority or any control on NR Districts or NR
nominations so there is a potential that investment
could be made and subsequent updates could be
against design guidelines or SOI standards. We do
have review in the RV though so it is recommended to
at least keep that option to be consistent with other
incentive updates
ii) Applicants may revise final applications through March 31 of each year.1
Commented [JM86]: Timing is from Frederick
County. That seems like a good time of year to do
many exterior project reviews since they are likely to
After receipt of a final application for a Historic Property Grant:
go to construction in the spring.
i) The Historic Property Grant Subcommittee shall review and rank the
Commented [JM87R86]: Per Jill this timing seems to
applications based on competitive selection criteria established in this Ordinance,
work for us as well. Leaving as is.
ii) Award recommendations will be presented to the Historic District Commission
for approval or revision and subsequent recommendation to the County
Commissioners.
iii) Final award recommendations will be presented to the County Commissioners
for approval or revision.
5.05c If neither the Historic Property Grant Subcommittee nor the Historic District
Commission recommends the award of grant funding, the grant application shall be deemed
denied and the County shall notify the Applicant tatin the reasons Commented [JM88]: Should this be applicant?
for denial. Property owner? Which is more consistent with this
and other ordinances? (County Attorney Question)
20
5.05d The County may approve a Historic Property Grant only if:
i) The property meets the eligibility criteria established under this Ordinance and
any Regulations associated herewith;
ii) The grant application has been reviewed by the Historic Property Grant
Subcommittee;
iii) Approval of the grant has been recommended by the Historic District
Commission.
5.05e Award of grant funding shall not occur until:
i) The County approves the grant application;
ii) All parties have executed a (Historic Property Grant Agreement. Commented [JM89]: GrantAgreement with Grant
Management and what they would need to assist with
this.
5.06 Historic Property Grant Subcommittee
5.06a The Historic Property Grant Subcommittee may be appointed by the I 1i5toric Ditrit
Commission (-H-B€ Chairperson and shall consist of five (5) members. The cChairperson may
invite representatives to serve on the Subcommittee or may use the HBECommission
members as the Subcommittee. Members may be from, but are not limited to, the following:
i) IP, staff member of the D st1ituiteiit of Plnnn ad ZoiiiuiPlanning
Department
ii) A staff member of the County Division of Permits and Inspections
iii) A member of the I istoric DistrictCommission
iv) A member of the Historic Advisory Committee
v) A staff member of the County Office of Grant Management[ Commented [JM90]: Do we need to specify this? Its
not in Frederick County's but I thought it might be
pertinent to outline who should be involved in the
5.07 Eligible Activities and Expenses for HistoriVroperty Grants initial review.
Commented [JM91R90]: There is more specificity in
Prince Georges where Frederick pulled from here:
5.07a Costs for work funded by grant funds are NOT eligible for the Washington County Attachment a (with additions corresponding to Piret
Property Tax Credits for Improvements to Historic Specified Historic Structures. letter to Turner 9 (pgparks.com)
5.07b Eligible Activities include the stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration and/or
preservation to the EXTERIOR of a historic property. Examples of Qualified Rehabilitation
Expenses include, but are not limited to:
i) Roof Repair and Replacement
ii) Chimney Repair and Replacement
iii) Window Restoration
iv) Masonry Repointing
v) Structural Repairs
21
5.07c Ineligible activities include, but are not limited to:
i) previously completed rehabilitation work; or
ii) rehabilitation work that is underway; or
iii) new construction; or
iv) Landscaping, with the exception of historic landscaping,
man-made objects or features (such as stone walls or fences); o________
v) projects that do not conform to the Secretary of Interior's Standards and
Guidelines for Rehabilitation and subsequent revisions and with the Washington
County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures and subsequent revisions.
5.07d Eligible expenses for the grant will be those directly associated with the stabilization,
rehabilitation, restoration, and/or preservation of the property.
5.07e Ineligible expenses are those expenses associated with predevelopment costs
necessary to prepare the application, such as fees for architectural plans and/or structural
and/or condition assessments, or other expenses not directly associated with the
rehabilitation of the property.
Commented [JM92]: Reword to make sure its clear
that only non -historic landscaping maybe add to 111
permissible.
Commented [JM93R92]: County attorney verify
wording, historic landscaping should be allowed and
also man made objects like stone walls and fences
would be allowed, just not things like new plantings
or new walls or new pools etc.
5.07f Work must be completed byllicensed contractors who have demonstrated applicable Commented [JM94]: Or supervised by?? Want to
preservation skills and/or experience. make sure trade programs under supervision are
applicable with the statement as is or if the "or
supervised by" needs included
5.08 Competitive Selection Criteria for Historic Property Grants Commented [JM95R94]: Historic building
tradespeople
5.08a The Historic District Commission, in coordination with the Historic Property Grant
Subcommittee, may adjust the points to be awarded and the subcategories criteria before
the call for applications each year through regular meeting vote; however, the Historic
Property - Forty (40) points, Project - Forty (40) points, and Project Management - Twenty (20)
points, shall remain overall categories and points for ranking.
5.08b A grant match is considered, but not required. Inclusion of a match will be considered
during the evaluation and selection process. In -kind matches of labor and materials are
22
Commented [JM96]: Follow the state MHT guidelines
for in kind matches
Commented [JM97R96]: MHAA Grant Matching: All
grants must be matched by a grantee's contribution
to the project in an amount at least equal to the grant
(dollar -for -dollar match). A matching contribution
means money, or donated goods and/or services,
that the applicant organization also spends on the
project. Applicants will be asked to identify which
project expenses will be covered by grant funds and
Maryland Heritage Areas Authority FY 2024 Grant
Guidelines Page 10 of 30 match funds in their
application budgets.
Commented [JM98R96]: MHT Non Capt Grant
Matching: Local Jurisdictions require one-to-one
match. Non profits are exempt from matching.
Historic and cultural significance
Urgency of need for financial
of the resource(s) What is the
assistance
historical and cultural significance of
Is the property at risk because of
the property? Does it have local,
development or deferred
state, or national significance? Does
maintenance? Is there a special
it contribute to a district? For
window of opportunity for the
example, a property with low to
applicant to rehabilitate this
medium significance at a local level
property? Is it critical to the
would score lower than a property
operation of the property? A
with high significance at the local
property at risk of collapse, for
and state and/or national level,
example, could be scored at 10
points.
0-10 points
0-10 points
Diversity of resource types
Equitable countywide distribution
Continued use of resource
Extent to which the property would
of funds
Historic resource has an identified
expand the diversity of resource
Extent to which the project would
use and will not be left vacant
types within the current funding
contribute to the equitable
cycle,
geographic distribution of the grants
For example, if applicant pool is
funds across the County within the
mostly houses but one� consists of a
current funding year.
barn, the barn) application would
For example, if most grant awards or
score 5 points,
applications have been received
from the southern part of the County
but one or two applications are from
the northern and eastern parts of the
County, then those two applications
could score 5 points.
0-5 points
0-5 points
0-10 points
Retention of historically significant
Provision for long-term resource
Realistic and feasible budget
material or details
preservation
Does the budget provide enough
If the property has extensive and/or
Will this project provide long-term
detail and rationale to complete the
original materials, features, and
protection of the resource?
project?
finishes, is extra effort being
For example, if the project will
expended in their retention?
stabilize or weatherize a resource
For example, if the project involves
and protect it From further
retaining all the original materials in
deterioration, then it should receive
the resource, then the maximum
the maximum number of points.
number of points should be awarded
versus a project that calls for the
majority of materials to be replaced.
0-15 points
0-15 points
0-10 oints
Readiness to initiate and complete the project
Administrative capability
Can the project begin and finish on schedule?
Does the applicant demonstrate a thoughtful and orderly
approach to organizing information? Is the proposed
project well -presented, and does it meet the goals of the
program?
0-10 points
0-10 points
23
Commented [ES99]: Is this to be one or only?
Commented [ES100]: Should this be barn instead of
bar?
Commented [JM101]: Is this too much to explicitly
state?
Commented [JM102R101]: Information is directly
from Frederick County, amended slightly.
Commented [JM103R101]: Leave as is to get all
stakeholders feedback on this section including HDC,
Commissioners and other staff.
Commented [E5104]: Should be it not if.
From:
Nancy Hall
To:
Jenkins. Meghan
Subject:
Re: Smithsburg Reservoir House
Date:
Thursday, July 18, 2024 10:27:00 PM
Attachments:
imaae001.nna
image002.ong
image003.gng
imaae004.ana
image005.gng
WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper
judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this
email.
Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded.
Hi Meghan,
I hope this springtime of 2024 finds you well.
Regarding the barn/carriage house on the property of the Smithsburg Reservoir I was
eventually directed to Nancy Hausrath, director of Utilities Dept in Hagerstown. She looked
into the building (Jan 2023 and said plans for the reservoir were being talked about
and in 12 -18 months she might know something. That time frame has passed and she has not
responded to my emails.
When I walked into the meeting some months ago someone jokingly asked if I wanted to
adopt a building? There are local people nearby to the barn/carriage house on the Smithsburg
Reservoir site that are interested in helping the building to be preserved or at least its decline
arrested. Is that a serious possible thing for a group of neighbors to do? What would it entail?
I fear time is taking its toll.. and the city water folks that I've encountered there said they think
the building is slated to be razed. What can we do to have that not happen?
Many thanks for any direction you can give,
Nancy Hall (and other interested nearby residents)
Cavetown, MD
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 9:21 AM Jenkins, Meghan <mjenkinsnwashco-md.net> wrote:
Hello Ms. Hall,
Thank you for stopping by the meeting yesterday to discuss the property at the Smithsburg
Reservoir. I have attached the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties (MIHP) listing for
the property. The other attachment is the tax account information which is another identifier
for the property.
For determining the future plans for the property, I would suggest reaching out to the City of
Hagerstown staff. I would start with Steve Bockmiller(SBockmiller(&.hagerstownmd.org)
because he is familiar with historic resources and may be able to direct you to the
appropriate City Department or staff that oversees the plans for the property.
Sincerely,
Meghan
Washington County
Meghan Jenkins, GISP
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Coordinator I Historic District Commission
(HDC) Staff
747 Northern Avenue
Hagerstown, MD 21742
P: (240) 313-2439 1 F: (240) 313-2431
www.washco-md.net
(Pronouns: she/her/hers)
Get Connected and See Updates
NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential, proprietary and privileged information, the unauthorized disclosure or use of which is prohibited. If you are not
the intended recipient of this email or if you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply
email and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you.
From: Nell Ziehl -MDP-
To: Nell Ziehl -MDP-
Subject: NEW EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CLGS
Date: Thursday, July 25, 2024 3:43:51 PM
WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when
opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email.
• Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded.
CALLING ALL CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENTS! Do you need some additional training from
the Maryland Association of Historic District Commissions or the National Alliance of Preservation
Commissions before the end of the year? Do you want to attend the National Trust's PastForward conference in
October? We have an additional $18,000 in FFY23 education and training funds that must be spent by November
29, 2024!
CLGs may apply for up to $5,000 for any eligible education and training expenses incurred between May 17, 2023
and November 29, 2024. Applications submitted by August 2, 2024 will receive first priority, although applications
will remain open through August 16. You can complete the simple application form
here: https://us.grantreguest.com/api2lication.aspx?sid=1777&fid=35302.
Questions? Email me or Leslie Gottert at director@mandc.org.
Good luck!
Nell Ziehl
Chief, Office of Planning, Education and Outreach
Maryland Historical Trust
Maryland Department of Planning
(410) 697-9592
❑ she, her, hers
mht.maryland.gov
Planning. Marvland.aov
Historic Review Activity 06/21/2024 thru 07/26/2024
Record
Record #
Type
MIHP#
Open Date
Date Assigned
Location
Description
Workflow Info
Status
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
MOBILE HOME REPLACEMENT, NO DECKS OR
Residential Addition-
5-02-004 13202 SAINT PAUL
2024-01567
V023 Review
05 -Apr -24
21 -Jun -24
PORCHES, FRONT AND REAR STOOPS AS
Passed - Info
21 -Jun -24
Historical Review
Updated by Script from EPR.
Alteration Permit
ROAD, LOT 1
REQUIRED BY CODE, MODEL: NORRIS 1996
Days in Review:
0
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
20925 FISH HATCHERY
SP -24-016
Site Plan
110160 In Review
02 -May -24
27 -Jun -24
ROAD
SITE PLAN FOR A BANQUET HALL
Approved
01 -Jul -24
Historic District
Updated by Script from EPR.
HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740
Commission
Days in Review:
4
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
22637 CAVETOWN CHURCH
OF CAVETOWN CHURCH RD. PROPOSED SELF
PC -24-003
Preliminary Consultation
IV270 In Review
15 -May -24
22 -May -24
ROAD
STORAGE BUILDINGS WITH POSSIBLYTWO
Approved
05 -Jul -24
Historic District
Updated by Script from EPR.
SMITHSBURG, MD 21783
OTHER COMMERCIAL/DRIVE THRU
Commission
Days in Review:
44
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
REMAINING 220 ACRES. DEVELOPING PER STD
SASHA BOULEV
Historic District
PC -24-004
Preliminary Consultation
1075; 1063 In Review
16 -May -24
21 -May -24
RT ZONING REQUIREMENTS USING THE
Approved
05 -Jul -24
Updated by Script from EPR.
HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742
Commission
CLUSTERING PROVISION AS APPROVED BY THE
Days in Review:
45
560 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE ONE STORY SINGLE
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
Residential New
LOR 24807 LINDEN AVE,
FAMILY DWELLING ON CRAWL SPACE, WITH
2024-02591
Review
30 -May -24
17 -Jul -24
Note
17 -Jul -24
Historical Review
Added to the agenda for the August HDC Meeting
Construction Permit
LOTS 17 & 18
LADDER ACCESS TO 350 SQ. FT. STORAGE AREA
ABOVE, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, ROOF RAFTERS
Days in Review:
0
AGE RESTRICTED RESIDENTIAL CONCEPT
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
1230 MOUNT AETNA ROAD
CONSISTING OF 52 SEMI-DETACHED DWELLING
Historic District
PC -24-005
Preliminary Consultation
1437 In Review
05 -Jun -24
11 -Jun -24
Approved
17 -Jul -24
Updated by Script from EPR.
HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742
UNITS ON 52 LOTS. PROPOSED PUBLIC STREETS,
Commission
WATER & SEWER UTILITIES AND SWM.
Days in Review:
35
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
The majority of disturbance is to the rear of existing structures which are on the MIHP. Disturbance is
Historic District
Note
21 -Jun -24
largely limited to an area that has already been disturbed by existing dog runs. Requesting standard note
18126 LAPPANS ROAD
CONSTRUCT A 192' BY 21' ENCLOSED DOG
Commission
SP -24-021
Site Plan
110020 In Review
12 -Jun -24
20 -Jun -24
addition.
FAIRPLAY, MD 21733
KENNEL.
Revisions Required
21 -Jun -24
Historic District
Updated by Script from EPR.
Commission
Days in Review:
1
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON FULL
Residential New
S-23-059 11175 DAM
2024-02864
V109 Review
13 -Jun -24
21 -Jun -24
UNFINISHED BASEMENT WITH BILCO DOOR,
Passed - Info
21 -Jun -24
Historical Review
Updated by Script from EPR.
Construction Permit
NUMBER 5 ROAD, LOT 5
GAS FIREPLACE IN GREAT ROOM, INTEGRAL
Icf
Days in Review:
0
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING TO BE UTILIZED AS A
MODEL HOME, SLAB ON GRADE, ATTACHED
Passed - Info
21 -Jun -24
Historical Review
Updated by Script from EPR.
TWO CAR GARAGE, SUNROOM, COVERED
Residential New
SP -23-007 8449 SYMPHONY
2024-02961
110061; 110062 Review
19 -Jun -24
21 -Jun -24
FRONT PORCH, COVERED SIDE PORCH,
Note
21 -Jun -24
Historical Review
in Fahrney Keedy, not an HDC review area.
Construction Permit
DRIVE, RIGHT SIDE
ELECTRIC FIREPLACE IN GREAT ROOM, FRAME
CONSTRUCTION, PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF
Passed - Info
28 -Jun -24
Historical Review
Updated by Script from EPR.
TRUSSES
Days in Review:
7
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
464 SQ. FT. ATTACHED OPEN DECK TO REAR OF
Note
26 -Jun -24
Antietam Overlay
In AO2 which does not need HDC review for residential activities.
Residential New
S-89-161 18906 GEETING
DWELLING, PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER, STEPS
Zone Review
2024-03062
Approved
26 -Jun -24
26 -Jun -24
Construction Permit
ROAD, LOT 5
TO GRADE
Antietam Overlay
WILLIAM H REAMS ET UX, LOT 5
Passed - Info
26 -Jun -24
Zone Review
Days in Review:
0
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING, REMOVAL OF
EXISTING LOBBY RECEPTION DESK AND
Note
17 -Jul -24
Historical Review
property is not located in a review area for the HDC and permit is for interior only. no review required.
Non -Residential
PLEXIGLASS SURROUND, FRAME TWO NEW 2X4
SP -15-003 13121 BROOK
2024-03138
Addition -Alteration
1140 Review
28 -Jun -24
17 -Jul -24
WALLS TO CREATE A NEW RECEPTION OFFICE,
Passed - Info
17 -Jul -24
Historical Review
D,.....;
LANE
m CVICI ACC 1AnAlnnSn! DACC TUDnI ICU Uni C
Historic Review Activity 06/21/2024 thru 07/26/2024
Record
Record #
Type
MIHP#
Open Date
Date Assigned
Location
Description
Workflow Info
Status
AND COUNTERTOP, AND CLOSE OFF THE ENTRY
Approved
18 -Jul -24
Historical Review
Updated by Script from EPR.
INTO A HALLWAY WITH A NEW METAL DOOR
Days in Review:
1
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
576 SQ. FT. DETACHED PREFABRICATED ONE
Passed - Info
17 -Jul -24
Historical Review
Updated by Script from EPR.
Residential New
LOR 1021 JEFFERSON BLVD,
STORY GARAGE ON CONCRETE SLAB, METAL
2024-03245
Review
08 -Jul -24
09 -Jul -24
Construction Permit
LOT 21
ROOF AND SIDES
Note
17 -Jul -24
Historical Review
Not in an HDC Review area
ANTIETAM HEIGHTS, LOT 21
Days in Review:
8
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
Note
17 -Jul -24
Historical Review
Not in an HDC review area; not reviewable work type
Residential Addition-
LOR 21373 MOUNT LENA
INSTALL 26 LNFT OF BASEMENT GUTTER ALONG
2024-03280
Approved
09 -Jul -24
10 -Jul -24
Alteration Permit
ROAD
THE PERIMETER OF THE BASEMENT
Passed - Info
17 -Jul -24
Historical Review
Updated by Script from EPR.
Days in Review:
7
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
CONNECTED TO SPRING HOUSE. WALL
Site Specific Grading
13215 SMITHSBURG PIKE
Historic District
GP -24-008
IV029
In Review
09 -Jul -24
10 -Jul -24
RESTORATION INCLUDES REPAIRING VARIOUS
Note
17 -Jul -24
Added to August HDC agenda for review and comment.
Plan
SMITHSBURG, MD 21783
Commission
LOCATIONS OF DRY STACK STONE, AS WELL AS
Days in Review:
7
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
Historic District
Request addition of Antietam Overlay to be shown on property; no historic resources on the subdivided
17000 SHEPHERDSTOWN
Note
17 -Jul -24
CREATE 40 ACRE PARCEL B FOR AG USE ONLY,
Commission
portion. No note requested regarding the 110375 number.
SI-24-016
Simplified Plat
110375
In Review
10 -Jul -24
11 -Jul -24
PIKE
NOT FOR DEVELOPMENT. SEE OM -24-006
Historic District
SHARPSBURG, MD 21782
Revisions Required
17 -Jul -24
Updated by Script from EPR.
Commission
Days in Review:
6
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
Zoning Ordinance
REQUEST TO APPLY THE RB FLOATING ZONE ON
Historic District
Staff reviewed this as the historic resources on the property are excluded. Comments were provided to
RZ-24-002
In Review
16 -Jul -24
25 -Jul -24
12635 FLYING DUCK LANE
Note
26 -Jul -24
Amendment
6.82 ACRES
Commission
the planner.
Days in Review:
1
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
FINISH DRYWALL AND PAINT ENTIRE INTERIOR,
COMPLETE "ROUGHED IN" 1ST FLOOR
Note
25 -Jul -24
Historical Review
Not in an HDC review area
Residential Addition-
LOR VILLAGE MILL
2024-03474
1808
Review
18 -Jul -24
22 -Jul -24
BATHROOM, KITCHEN, AND LAUNDRY ROOM
Alteration Permit
DRIVE
DRIVE
AS WELL AS 2ND FLOOR BATHROOM, REFINISH
Passed - Info
25 -Jul -24
Historical Review
Updated by Script from EPR.
ALL HARDWOOD FLOORING AND INSTALL TILE
Days in Review:
3
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
INSTALL 18 LNFT OF BASEMENT GUTTER ALONG
Note
25 -Jul -24
Historical Review
Not in a review area and also not a reviewable project type
Residential Addition-
LOR 11605 ERNSTVILLE
2024-03495
Review
19 -Jul -24
19 -Jul -24
THE PERIMETER OF THE BASEMENT, FOR
Alteration Permit
ROAD
WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Passed - Info
25 -Jul -24
Historical Review
Updated by Script from EPR.
Days in Review:
6
Folder Status
Status Date
Task Name
Comments
DWELLING DUE TO FIRE DAMAGE, THE
Residential Demolition
Structure was listed as not contributing to Weverton and is not individually listed; also due to fire; unsafe
2024-03598
Review
25 -Jul -24
26 -Jul -24
LOR 1326 WEVERTON ROAD
EXISTING SEPTIC AND WATER WILL BE CAPPED
Passed - Info
26 -Jul -24
Historical Review
Permit
conditions, no hdc review required.
OFF FOR FUTURE USE AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES
Days in Review:
0
Activity Count:
19
Review Activities Summary
ication Type
Application Number Approved Note Passed - Info Revisions Total
Non -Residential Addition -Alteration Permit
Total
1
1
1
0 1
Preliminary Consultation
Total
3
0
0
0 3
Residential Addition -Alteration Permit
Total
0
3
4
0 4
Residential Demolition Permit
Total
0
0
1
0 1
Residential New Construction Permit
Total
0
4
4
0 5
Record # Type
Record
MIHP# Open Date
Status
Date Assigned
Location
Description
Simplified Plat
Total
0
1
0
1
Site Plan
Total
1
1
0
1
Site Specific Grading Plan
Total
0
1
0
0
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Total
0
1
0
0
Total
I 5
I 12
I 10 I
2
Workflow Info