Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10 - October AgendaLloyd Yavener, Chair �" Washington County Michael Lushbaugh Justin Bedard, Vice Chair Tyler Milam Ann Aldrich Gregory Smith Brianna Candelaria Randal Leatherman, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND AGENDA October 1, 2025 Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m. Washington County Administration Complex, 100 West Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD 21740 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL MINUTES 1. Minutes of August 6, 2025, Regular Meeting 2. Minutes of September 3, 2025, Regular Meeting * NEW BUSINESS 1. Residential New Construction Permits (2025-03538 and 2025-04306) - 25609 Military Road (WA -IV -057. Hiahfield Rural Villaae)- (Discussion/Approval) - 2,616 sq. ft. finished space two story single family replacement dwelling on full unfinished welled exit basement, gas fireplace in living room, covered front porch, uncovered rear and left stoops, frame construction, pre-engineered roof trusses AND 624 sq. ft. detached one story two car garage on concrete slab, pre-engineered roof trusses * 2. Residential Addition/Alteration - (2025-#TBD) - 4504 Main Street (WA -III -141 and WA -III -025, Rohrersville Rural Village) - (Discussion/Approval) - restoration and stabilization of the structure * OTHER BUSINESS 1. Staff Resort a. Staff Reviews * b. Letter of support to the Board of County Commissioners for Legislative Priorities * c. Update on Town adoption of MOU's for Tax Credit ADJOURNMENT UPCOMING MEETING 1. Wednesday, November 5, 2025, 6:00 p.m. *attachments 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 240.313.2430 240.313.2431 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY August 6, 2025 The Washington County Historic District Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Wednesday, August 6, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the Washington County Administrative Complex, 100 W. Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, Maryland CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commission members present were: Lloyd Yavener, Chairman; Ann Aldrich, Justin Bedard, Tyler Milam, Greg Smith and Brianna Candelaria (arrived at 6:36). Staff members present were: Washington County Department of Planning & Zoning: Meghan Jenkins, GIS Coordinator and HDC Staff member. MINUTES Motion and Vote: Ms. Aldrich made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 2, 2025 meeting as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bedard and unanimously approved. NEW BUSINESS HTC-25-001 — 32 E Baltimore Street, Funkstown — WA -I-639 Ms. Jenkins explained that we are waiting for the MOU to be signed by the Town of Funkstown giving the HDC the authority to review tax credit applications within the Town. A tax credit application for property located at 32 E. Baltimore Street in Funkstown has been submitted for review. Mr. Byron, the property owner, is currently in the process of making improvements to the home; therefore, staff did not want to delay the progress of the improvements so the application is being reviewed by the Commission this evening. Ms. Jenkins noted that the County's Tax Credit Ordinance requires approval prior to the work being performed. In this case, Mr. Byron has already started the work but has tried to separate the work already completed from what is being proposed within Part 2 of his application. An addition is also being proposed on the structure and a preliminary drawing was included in the agenda packet. The structure is located next to Town Hall in Funkstown and was used as a hospital during the Civil War. Ms. Jenkins showed a slide presentation of the structure while explaining the proposed changes. Mr. Byron was present at the meeting and provided additional information on the improvements currently underway and a brief history of the structure OTHER BUSINESS Staff Report • A written report of staff reviews for July was provided to members in the agenda packet. • Town MOU for Historic Properties Tax Credit Update — Ms. Jenkins provided a spreadsheet to members tracking the progress of the MOU process. She reported all Towns have been contacted with varying success. The Town of Smithsburg intends to present the MOU to its Town Council in September. The Town of Keedysville would like to have a formal presentation; however, they meet at the same time as the HDC. Ms. Jenkins stated she sent all the materials to the Town of Boonsboro again. • Comprehensive Plan Update — The Comprehensive Plan will go before the Board of County Commissioners on August 26th. Ms. Jenkins will provide a time to members when it has been set. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Aldrich made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:45 pm. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bedard and so ordered by the Chairman. Respectfully submitted, Lloyd Yavener, Chairman MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY September 3, 2025 The Washington County Historic District Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Wednesday, September 3, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the Washington County Administrative Complex, 100 W. Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, Maryland CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commission members present were: Lloyd Yavener, Chairman; Ann Aldrich, Justin Bedard, Tyler Milam, Greg Smith, Brianna Candelaria and Ex -officio County Commissioner Randal Leatherman. Staff members present were: Washington County Department of Planning & Zoning: Meghan Jenkins, GIS Coordinator and HDC Staff member. NEW BUSINESS Residential Addition -Alteration (2025-03697) —17827 Spielman Road Ms. Jenkins presented a permit application for property located at 17827 Spielman Road (WA -11-277, Fairplay Rural Village). The applicant is proposing to install 33 — 13.20 kW roof mounted solar panels on the dwelling. The majority of the panels would be installed on the side of the roof that does not face the right-of-way. The panels facing the right-of-way would be on a portion of the dwelling that was added to the original structure. Staff recommends approval of the application. Motion and Vote: Ms. Aldrich made a motion to approve the permit application as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Smith and unanimously approved. HTC-25-002 — 817 The Terrace, WA -HAG -146 (Oak Hill Historic District) Ms. Jenkins presented a tax credit application for several proposed projects on property located at 817 The Terrace. Ms. Jenkins presented pictures of the property as well as a description of each proposed project with a cost estimation. The first project is the colonnade (work already in progress). Phase 2 includes the replacement of windows, storm windows, scraping, painting, etc. at an approximate cost of $60,000. Phase 3 will include the dismantling of existing stairs and walkway, pouring of concrete, replacement of flagstone, etc. at an estimated cost of $85,000. No formal action is required at this time. OLD BUSINESS HTC-25-001 — 32 E Baltimore Street, Funkstown — WA -1-639 Ms. Jenkins reminded members that this property was reviewed during the August meeting. Staff visited the site on August 21, 2025 to discuss details of the project at the request of the owner. The property owner would like the Commission's advice on replacing the basement glass windows with a vertical wood grille backed by a solid backing and making the opening slightly smaller to bring the sill above -grade. He also would like the Commission to comment on the stoop he is proposing at the back of the attached kitchen. The proposed stoop would be similar in construction to the one on Chance Regained as found in the "Washington County Historic Treasures" book but adjusted for the scale of the building. This includes a shed -style roof, no guttering, with simple wood columns. There was a discussion that the door opening on the kitchen was likely added later and the previously attached shed sheltered the opening. Adding the shed roof stoop would protect the opening. Members noted these changes would improve the longevity of both the windows in the basement and the door on the kitchen. They had no additional comments on the updates to the project. OTHER BUSINESS CorresDondence • Section 106 Consultation: 1-70 Bridge Nos. 2111503 and 2111504 over MD 632 — A letter was received from MDOT regarding the replacement of these dual bridges over MD 632. MDOT has determined that no historic properties will be affected by the project. No formal action is required. • HTC-24-002 —Williamson Status Update to Withdrawn — Ms. Jenkins reminded members that Mr. Williamson proposed a gutter project for his home and was proposing to apply for State and County tax credits. Mr. Williamson has withdrawn his application due to issues with the contractor. • Rohrersville Cell Tower— Ms. Jenkins stated that a letter was received asking if the HDC would like to be a consulting party in the review process. She stated that a 199 -foot monopole is proposed on MD 67 next to the Boonsboro Ambulance facility. In preliminary research, it appears the proposed tower would be visible from the Appalachian Trail and Crampton's Gap which are both on the National Register of Historic Places. There are several other National Register eligible resources that would be affected by the placement of this cell tower. Ms. Jenkins responded that the HDC would like to be a consulting party for this proposed project. Staff Report • A written report was provided to members in the agenda packet. • Legislative Priorities Update — Last year the HDC set three priorities: update the tax credits, begin a grant program (County Attorney believes language in State Law is required to enact such a program) and begin a yearly credit program similar to the ag district program. The grant program and yearly credit program are potential candidates for this year's legislative session. Priorities are determined by the Board of County Commissioners. • City of Hagerstown Outreach, Tax Credits — Ms. Jenkins reported that she received a phone call from someone who wanted to apply for a tax credit; however, the project was already fully completed. Unfortunately, the City did not instruct the property owner to apply for the tax credit prior to work beginning. Ms. Jenkins has reached out to City staff to make sure they inform people if they are interested in the tax credits they must apply prior to work starting. She also sent them copies of the tax credit brochure. • Comprehensive Plan Status — Ms. Jenkins announced that the Comprehensive Plan Update has been adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. A few revisions are required and then the document will be available on our website. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Bedard made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:00 pm. The motion was seconded by Ms. Candelaria and so ordered by the Chairman. Respectfully submitted, Lloyd Yavener, Chairman Washington County HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Washington County Historic District Commission From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff Date: September 22, 2025 Subj: Residential New Construction Permit/Stick Built Home, 2025-03538 & Residential New Construction Permit/Garage-Carport, 2025-04306 Staff Report and Analysis Property Owner: BREWBAKER NICHOLAS ALISTAIR, Applicant: Nicholas Brewbaker Location: 25609 MILITARY Road Tax Account ID: 14008896 Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 14/22/409/ Legal Description: PAR A 105X195 .46AC 25609 MILITARY ROAD Zoning: Rural Village Rural Village: Highfield (MHT-C) Historic Rural Village Project Description: 2,616 sq. ft. finished space two-story single-family replacement dwelling on full unfinished welled exit basement, gas fireplace in living room, covered front porch, uncovered rear and left stoops, frame construction, pre-engineered roof trusses AND 624 sq. ft. detached one story two car garage on concrete slab, pre-engineered roof trusses John Lee Chapman, Parcel A Aoolicable Law and Review Criteria: The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD. Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A, Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance." The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological, or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes may still be subject to building permit procedures. 1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria: 747 NorthernAvr+ue Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 240.31 2430 F-240.313,2431 I Hearing Impaired= 7-1-1 WWW-WASH O-MD_NET Washington County HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure. B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance. C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological, architectural, or cultural value. D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied. E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to be considered mandatory. 2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below. A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area. B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of the structure and to the surrounding area. C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent. 3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures. For Rural Villages, additional review criteria for applications are listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance and include: 1. The exterior appearance of existing structures in the Rural Village, including materials, style, arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and number of stories, roof style and pitch, proportion. 2. Building Size and Orientation 3. Landscaping 4. Signage 5. Lighting 6. Setbacks 7. Accessory structures Secretary of Interior Standards which may be applicable to this project review include: 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment 747 NorthernAvr+ue Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 240.31 .Z430 F-240.313,2431 I Hearing Impaired= 7-1-1 WWWWASH O-MD_NET Washington County HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION would be unimpaired. Washington County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures which may be applicable to this project review include: Guidelines for New Construction and Accessory Buildings (Page 71) 1. New construction should be sited to avoid demolition of contributing structures. 2. The design of new construction or new accessory buildings should be compatible with the form, height, scale, proportions, materials and details of the adjacent contributing structures or landscapes. 3. Consideration of the ratio of built versus open space of the site or the adjacent landscape should be given. 4. Existing setbacks, landscaping or site grading of adjacent historic resources should be preserved when siting new construction if those characteristics contribute to the historic site or its landscape. This includes circulation routes, fences, walls, and yards, etc. 5. Locate new construction and new accessory buildings so that the existing significant visual and special characteristics of the property are maintained. 6. Locate new construction and new accessory buildings so that significant viewsheds are maintained or enhanced. Staff Report: The subject property is located in the Highfield/Cascade Rural Village in the northeastern portion of Washington County. The rural village is situated primarily along Military Road (MD 550) and is comprised of approximately 70 acres and 60 dwellings constructed between the late 19th century to early 20th century. The architectural styles of the village vary and include examples of Queen Anne, Colonial Revival, Craftsman style and more. The community developed as a resort community with vacation homes and transitioned in the 1940's to the rural residential community it is today. The typical construction materials include wood frame on stone foundations. There are varied roof types including gabled or hipped roofs as well as gambrel. Many structures have broad porches covering several elevations. The setbacks in the district vary depending on lot size and topography but many lots include lawns and mature trees. In January of 2024 the previous structure on this property was significantly damaged by a building fire. The structure was demolished, and the lot is currently vacant ahead of the proposed construction. The previous structure was contributing to the district and described as "8. two-story vernacular building of wood construction with multiple -pitched roof; windows are flat-topped exterior shutters; single -story bay window (c. 1900)" — Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties (MIHP) WA -IV -057. There is an accompanying photo on page 107 of the MIHP documentation which is included in the attachments of this report for reference. The previous structure was setback from Military Rd. approximately 100 feet. The projects associated with this review propose a 2,616 sq. ft., two-story single-family dwelling on full unfinished basement with a covered front porch, an uncovered rear stoop and left stoop using frame construction (2025-03538). There is an accompanying 624 sq. ft. detached one story two car garage on 747 NorthernAvr+ue r3agerstawn, MD 21742-2723 240.31 243O F:24031 3,241 I Hearing Impaired= 7-1-1 WWW_WA5H O-MD_NET Washington County HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION concrete slab also proposed (2025-04306). The proposed structures are set back approximately 75 feet from Military Road with the garage proposed to the east or left side of the main house and slightly setback from the main house while its depth puts the structures in line at the rear elevations. The materials to be used for the structures include fiberglass/asphalt shingles, with vinyl siding and wood porches/stoops for the house and the garage proposes a concrete exterior. Staff Analysis: The proposed structures exterior appearance does not conflict with the existing structures in the rural village in terms of the materials, styles, mass and other factors as listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance. The buildings size and orientation within the property are consistent with the existing structures in the village as well. The structures will be slightly closer to the road than the neighboring contributing structure but only by about 25 feet. The setbacks proposed by the project do not conflict with the varying setbacks that are present in the rural village. The accessory garage is setback from the main house with construction that does not conflict with other existing structures. The construction proposed does not conflict with the County Design Guidelines or the Secretary of Interior Guidelines which are applicable to this construction type. The characteristics detailed in this application have been reviewed against the characteristics listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance and do not appear to detract from the rural village. Staff Recommendation: Recommend approval of the new construction permits 2025-03538 and 2025-04306, in the Highfield/Cascade Historic Rural Village, due to the proposed constructions consistency with the County's Design Guidelines for Historic Structures, Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation and Section 5D.5 Architectural Review as listed in the County's Zoning Ordinance based on the details provided in the Staff Analysis of the project. Respectfully Submitted, /rvLLJ---- 9tiJ Meghan Jenkins, GISP Historic District Commission Staff Attachments: • Photos provided by Staff • Permit Submission Packet 747 NorthernAver+ue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723. T• 240.31 .2430 F-240.313,2431 I Hearing Impaired= 7-1-1 WWWWASH O-MD_NE;T Washington County HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Previous Structure — Image Credit: MIHP WA -IV -057 747 NorthernAver+ue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 -' 240,313.2430; F-240-313,2431 I Hearing Impaired= 7-1-1 WWW_WASHco- IVID_NE Washington County HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION • ill. .fil. ��''' :�fr.. f�� Existing Conditions (Sept 2024) Image Credit: Google Street View 747 NorthernAver+ue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 -' 240,313.2430; F-240-313.2431 I Hearing Impaired= 7-1-1 WWW_WASHco- IVID_NE 9 CO M 1.1'-6'1. 10'-0'' 9'-0'' 10'-0" 11'-6" I _ 3'-0" I . 3'-0" I 2'-6" I. 32'-0" 6'-0" 0 ti 9 1 9 N- �� CO J c) 9 CO M 9 1 N N 1 N 9 1 CV N o 1 , - ti 0 ti 2'-6" 38'-0" V I I I I I I I I L------------------I 10'-6" 91-011 10'-6" 6'-0" 1 5 10 o Basement Plan 1 5 10 First Floor Plan I, n n l� n n A001 SCALE: 1/4" 0 15 A001 SCALE: 1/4 0 15 NoeRef tfNorthhNorth INSULATION REQUIREMENTS PRESCRIPTIVE -Requirements Worksheet (R-Values)(Method 1, Option 1) Window U -Factor 0.32 Ceilings R-49 Walls (wood framing) R-20 or 13+5 Mass Walls **R-8 / 13 Basement Walls *R-10 / 13 Floors R-19 (over unheated areas) Slab Perimeter R-10 (2 feet) Crawl Space Wall *R-10 / 13 A. Insulation material used in layers, such as framing cavity insulating sheathing, shall be summed to compute the component R -Value. B. *The first R -value applies to continuous insulation, the second to framing cavity insulation. *10 / 13 means R-1 0 continuous insulation on the interior or exterior of the home or R-1 3 cavity insulation on the interior of the basement wall. C. ** The second R -value applies when more than half the insulation in on the interior of the mass wall. Method 1 - Compliance with Prescriptive Component Requirements (Based on R -Values or U -Factors) 1. The exact location of the building thermal envelope shall be marked out on the plans, details, and cross -sections. 2. Provide all insulation R -values or U -factors, materials, and locations to be installed (walls, ceiling, cantilever floors, floors over garage, crawl space, basement walls etc.) Per Tables: R401.1.2 of R402.1.4. 3. Provide details on how all areas listed in Section R402.4.1.1 (table) will be protected against air leakage. 4. Indicate if crawlspace(s) are conditioned or vented: exposed earth in unvented crawl spaces shall be covered with a Class I vapor retarder with overlapping joints taped / sealed. 5. Indicate duct insulation R -values, Minimum R-6, R-8 in attics. Insulation not required if ductwork is completely within the building thermal envelope. 6. Indicate duct sealing methods per IRC M1601.4.1. Window Schedule Door Schedule R -Values Structural drawings indicate bearing walls with hatching Partition Types See structural drawins for additional information Finish Schedule Window and Door Openings yp Type Size Type yp Notes Do 'ze T e Notes See Section N on 001 - Cover Sheet For Prescriptive Insulation Requirements (R-Values)(Method 1, Option 1) Window U -Factor 0.35 R-49 Walls (wood framing) R-20 or 13+5 Mass Walls **R-8 / 13 Basement Walls *R-10 / 13 Floors R-19 (over unheated areas) Slab Perimeter R-10 2 feet ( ) *R-10 / 13 Exterior Wall Types Yp Interior Wall Types Yp Room Name Base Floor Type Wall Finish Ceiling Finish 1. Must be double studs. 2. Must have double headers. 3. All headers must be set on top of the studs, and must be set on edge. 4. For all single window and door openings, not exceeding 48 inches, the headers shall not be less than double 2x4 supporting one floor or roof. F 5. For all twin openings not exceeding 72 in., the headers shall not be less than double 2x6 supporting one floor or roof. 6. All triple openings not exceeding 8 feet, the headers shall not be less than do��ble 2x8, and not exceeding 10 feet, not less than double 2x10 supporting one floor or roof. All headers must be braced at the top. 7. At least one window in each sleeping room must have a min. net clear opening of 5.7 sq. ft. The min. net clear opening height dim. shall be 24 in. The min. clear opening width dim. shall be 20 in. sill height shall be 44 inches. Grade g floor windows may have only 5 square feet min. net clear opening. Type Finish A DH 3'-0" x 5'-2" Twin As selected by Owner B01 1 3'-0" x 6'-8" Ent ry Insulated Lock and Deadbolt , , Exterior Wall Type 1 8" Concrete with stuccoed exterior16" surface. See IRC for reinforcing sch. Provide Insulation as required O Exterior Wall Type 2 2x6 Wood Studs at " o.c. w/ 6" Batt Insulation 1/2" Gyp bd on the interior 1/2" OSB or plywd exterior with Tyvek. Provide Siding System to match existing. 3 Exterior Wall Tvpe '3' 11 2x6 Wood Studs at o.c. w/ 6" Batt Insulation Interior 1/2" weather proof panel. Exterior prefinished James Hardi Type Panels 4 Exterior Wall Type '4' Existing Wood Studs w/ insulation 1/2" Gyp and 1/2" weather prf panel 5 Exterior Wall Type '5' YpMaximum Match Existing adjacent wall studs w/ 1/2" Gyp and 1/2" weather prf panel O Bearing Wall Wall Type A- 2x6 wood stud, o.c. with 1/2" gyp bd both sides O Bearing Wall 1 1Living Wall Type B -2x4 wood stud, 16" o.c. with 1/2" gyp bd both sides c Non -Bearing Wall Wall Type'C'-2x6 wood stud, at 24" o.c. with 1/2" bd both sides gyp Non-Beanng Wall O Wall Type'D'-2x4 wood stud at 24" 0.C.with 1/2" bd both sides gyp O Non -Bearing Wall Wall Type 'E' -2x4 wood stud at 24" o.c. with 1/2" gyp bd one sides Basement Unfinished DH 3'-0" x 5'-2" Single As selected by Owner 101 _ -8" Entry Insulated Lock and Deadbolt DH 2'-0" x 5'-2"Ceilings Fixed 4'-0" x 5'-2" Picture As selected by Owner 102 PR 2'-6" x 6'-8" Pair As selected by Owner Porch *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted Room*1*1*1 Painted Painted OD DH 3'-0" x 3'-2" Single As selected by Owner 103 PR 2'-0" x 6'-8" Pair Closet As selected by Owner Office *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted DH 2'-4" x 3'-2" Twin As selected by Owner 104 PR1'-0" x 6'-8" Pair As selected by Owner Mudroom *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted OF DH 2'-4" x 5'-2" Single As selected by Owner 105 3'-0" x 6'-8" Stair As selected by Owner Powder *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted Stair *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted © DH 3'-0" x 4'-2" Single As selected by Owner 106 2'-0" x 6'-8" Bath As selected by Owner Famil Room y *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted NOTES: 1. All window finishes and styles to be selected by the owner. 2. Bottom Panel to 3'-0" AFF include 2"x2" structural mesh. 3. All glazing U Factor 0.32 107 PR 3'-0" x 6'-8" Entry Insulated Lock and Deadbolt 108 3'-0" x 6'-8" Passage As selected by Owner 109 3-0„ x 6'-8” Entry Insulated Lock and Deadbolt NOTES: 1. All door finishes and styles to be selected by the owner. 2. All glazing U Factor 0.32 NOTES: 1. All finishes to be selected by the owner 2. Premium Paint finish to be selected by owner. 3. Floor type and finish to be selected by owner. Q E Cl) '-(0 0 CO O W .E o) 50 Q vJ < O _g0a) .2 °v O 0-t3 O U c u C 0J 1O O �O�D -E a 0��CI) �C•° Z 0 O E O O N O `�� 3 >' � c �•QN ca Q O OCD U_ —AWN LL N TO >J O of p i) O Q0 UCCO C U M a.C1) coQcnao-�i 00000aaoou000000 00 (E� F Mg Ry ono p� Gj�oP° �2than FS °�y�o o �o Qiis°°O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r r o r Y o ° O O 0 Y Y 0 o°o o°o 0 0 o°000 �u Qo�o�� a o a EGo C5) ti N 0 a) is U U d) 0) 2 O � N N 7O U (l) U - o J O - Z U N 0 Co < DATE: 8/5/25 DESIGNED: DRAWN: JURISDICTION: Washington Co. PERMIT NUMBER REVISION: DATE: 4\ Egress stairs from basement SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" DRAWING NUMBER: A001 PAGE NUMBER: Page 3 of 11 PROJECT NUMBER: WC -2025-55.01 F:\Projects\ACTIVE\Smokey-Washington County\Drawings\A001 -Plans notes and Schedules.dwg Plot adjustment factor = 96.5 9 CO M 0 co 9 CV 9 cO 9 M W C ti 38'-0" 32'-0" 6'-0" _________ 9'-0" 9'-0" 9 N- 9 N- 9 CV N 9 Co 9 CV 9 CO M 0 Co LC) 0 ti 38'-0" 9'-0" I 9'-0" 1'-61�, 5'-6" 18'-0" 5'-6" ,,1'-6', 3'-0" 3'-0" 7'-0" 18'-0" 7'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 32'-0" 6'-0" 32'-0" 6'-0" 1 5 1° 2 Second Floor Plan 1 10 3 Roof Plan lL n n n II n A102 SCALE: 1/4" 0 15 A102 SCALE: 1/4" ° 15 Ref Ref North North Braced wall panel construction methods Window Schedule Door Schedule R -Values Partition Types Seestructural ura drawings s indicate fordditionali llswittionh tching Finish Schedule R602.10.3 Braced wall panel construction methods. The construction of braced wall panels shall be in accordance with one of the following method 1. Nominal 1 inch by 4 inch continuous diagonal braces let in to the top and bottom plates and the intervening studs or approved metal strap devices installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The let -in bracing shall be placed at an angle not more than 60 degrees or less than 45 degrees from the horizontal. 2. Wood boards of 5/8 inch net min. thickness applied diagonally on studs spaced a max. of 24 inches. Diagonal boards shall be attached to studs in accordance with Table R602.3(1).o.c. Type Li Size DH 3'-0" x 5'-2" Type Single g Notes As selected by Owner Door # 201 Size PR 1'-0" x 6'-8" Type Entry Notes As selected by Owner See Section N on 001- Cover Sheet (R-Values)(Method 1, Option 1) Window U -Factor 0.35 Ceilings R-49 Walls (wood framing) R-20 or 13+5 ** Mass Walls R-8 / 13 Basement Walls *R-10 / 13 Floors R-19 (over unheated areas) Slab Perimeter R-10 (2 feet) *R-10 / 13 Exterior Wall Types Interior Wall Types Room Base Floor T e Wall Finish Ceiling Finish e Finish O Exterior Coric ete wahls Type poed exterior surface. See IRC for reinforcing sch. Provide Insulation as required O Exterior Wall T pe -2- '6" ,� 2x6 Wood Studs at o.c. w/ 6 Batt Insulation 1/2" Gyp bd on the interior 1/2" OSB or plywd exterior with Tyvek. Provide Siding System to match existing. y g O Exterior Wall Type '3' 2x6 Wood Studs at o.c. w/ 6" Batt Insulation Interior 1/2" weather proof panel. Exterior prefinished James Hardi Type Panels Exterior Wall Type '4' Existing Wood Studs w/ insulation 1/2" Gyp and 1/2" weather prf panel Exterior Wall Type '5' Match Existing adjacent wall studs w/ 1/2" Gyp and 1/2" weather prf panel 0 Bearing Wall Wall Type A - 2x6 wood stud, 16" withWIC o.c. 1/2" gyp bd both sides Bearing Wall Wall Type 'B' -2x4 wood stud, 16 with 1/2" gyp bd both sides Non -Bearing Wall Wall with 1/2" '-2x6 wood stud, at 24" o.c. gyp bd both sides O Non -Bearing Wall � 24" Wall Type D -2x4 wood stud at yp O.C. with 1/2" gyp bd both sides O Non -Bearing Wall Wall Type 'E' -2x4 wood stud at 24" o.c. with 1/2" gyp bd one sides Stair Dn *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted © �� �� DH 3-0" x 4 -2 Single As selected by Owner 202 �� �� 2 -6 x 6 -8 Bedroom As selected by Owner *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted HO DH 3'-0" x 3'-2" Single As selected by Owner 203 PR 2'-6" x 6'-8" Pair Closet As selected by Owner Master Bath *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted Laundry *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted 204 2'-6" x 6'-8" Closet As selected by Owner Bedroom #1 *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted 3. Wood structuralpanel sheathing with a thickness not less than 5/16 inch for 16 inch stud spacing and not less than 3/8 inch for 24 inch spacing. Wood structural panels shall be installed in accordance with R602.3(3). 205 2'-6" x 6'-8" Bath As selected by Owner Bath *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted 206 6-0" x 6'-8" Laundry As selected by Owner Bedroom #2 *1 *1 *1 Painted Painted R602.10.4 Length of braced panels. For Methods 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 above, each braced wallpanel shall be at least 48 inches in length, covering a min. of three stud spaces where studs are spaced 16 inches on center and covering a min. of two stud spaces where studs are spaced 24 inches on center. NOTES: 1. All window finishes and styles to be selected by the owner.� 2. Bottom Panel to 3'-0" AFF include 2"x2" structural mesh. 3. All glazing U Factor 0.32 207 2'-6" x 6'-8" Entry As selected by Owner 208 PR 2'-6" x 6'-8" Closet As selected by Owner 209 2'-6" x 6'-8" Bath As selected by Owner 210 2'-6" x 6'-8" Bath As selected by Owner 211 PR 2'-6" x 6'-8" Closet As selected by Owner NOTES: 1. All finishes to be selected by the owner 2. Premium Paint finish to be selected by owner. 3. Floor type and finish to be selected by owner. 212 2'-6" x 6'-8" Bedroom As selected by Owner 1. All door 2. All glazing finishes and styles U Factor 0.32 to be selected by the owner. E '-(0 0 Co ^' W.O Q M a) L ' Q 0 M U M O Q Q co - -CO C .a) °°vim vi30cu C 0JJQ -E O �Oa�� N -E � C•° Z CI) EN4)-a) O `�� � �' c c �•Q Q(o ca OOC-0U_—AWN LL N TO >J O O � O_.— Oi)U°-6UCUCOCI) U 0L1) M coQ(Aa0-�i 00 (EOFMARy���o 0o c�'�P°�a<han FS °who 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r r o r Y o ° o ° o Y Y o 0 0 o°000 Qo���� u a u a EpGpO C5) ti N 0 75 a) 0 U U a) 0) 2 M O If) N N � U (l) U - o � ca N O - Z N 0 Co < DATE: 7/7/25 DESIGNED: DRAWN: JURISDICTION: Washington Co. PERMIT NUMBER REVISION: DATE: SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" DRAWING NUMBER: A002 PAGE NUMBER: Page 4 of 11 PROJECT NUMBER: WC -2025-55.01 F:\Projects\ACTIVE\Smokey-Washington County\Drawings\A002-Plans notes and Schedules.dwg Plot adjustment factor = 96.5 Truss Heel Ht a Bearing Point Fin. Second Floor 1 Fin. First Floor 1 Fin. Basement Floor ) DH3032 DH3042 DH3042 DH2052 DH2052 TE rnrn ME ME rn flf DH3032 ___ __ _____________ __ _ ____________ __ South Elevation flnnnl r. Bien 1 !1 5 10 n n i /-� VVlLL. I/T 15 -Chimney Cap -Insulated Flue - Ridge Venting -Siding as selectE -Prefabricated FIE - Fiberglass Roof Prefabricated FIE -Prefabricated Dr Gutter not showr 6" Gutter Board -Window with Scr as selected by O -Siding as selectE -Door Type and C as selected by O Window with Scr as selected by O Prefinished Drip 6" Gutter Board - Prefinished Trim Decorative Colur as selected by O Decorative Colur as selected by O -Siding as selectE Fire Place Contil - Steps to grade Finish Grade -Basement wall w Foundation Wall Footing Elements L---------------------------------------------------------------------------------I ---------------------------------------------------------------------------I, Footing Elements I by Owner ;hings hingles Truss Heel Ht Eo i Edge Bearing Point for clarity 9 60 en mer I by Owner Fin. Second Floor n mer en q mer ED n Base mer vered igs Fin. First Floor :h Parging O O Fin. Basement Floor by Owner Edge singles hings Edge or clarity an ner by Owner ;oordinate ;n ner by Owner h Parging �.'.0 r.g. AFf I I Ff I IAA iey Cap ted Flue Venting )ricated Flashings )ricated Drip Edge Class Roof Shingles Class Roof Shingles tter Board )ricated Flashings )ricated Drip Edge not shown for clarity I as selected by Owner tter Board )w with Screen ected by Owner I as selected by Owner Class Shingles ished Drip Edge tter Board ished Trim ative Column acted by Owner •ative Column Base ected by Owner I as selected by Owner Type and Config. ected by Owner Finishes and Config ected by Owner lace Contilevered to grade Grade -O� casement wall with Parging -------------------------------------------------------------------�—--------------- Foundation Wall L---------------------------------------------------------------------L---Footing Elements E L CoCO O ^U) ^' � . OXNE W.O M O) E' cts o - L O 00 C O Q) a) o Fuzz -COa) 1= . °avid Cn - G) O a) (B U C0 JQ a) _26 z a)E(Da)-c O (O�'CC�Qcc Q O a) CD - WN O IL N> O>Ja)O Oi)U°-0 V 2COC uJ U a -.C M 00000aaoou000000 0o c��P°�a<han FS °who r Y o ° O ° ° o°000 �u Q000�� a u a EpGpO O) ti N 5O G a) 0 U U d) O) 2 ry 75 6) O N 0 U) J o (n U ;: z w a V/// > 0 Q N a LL o W DATE: 7/7/25 DESIGNED: DRAWN: JURISDICTION: Washington Co. PERMIT NUMBER REVISION: DATE: SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" DRAWING NUMBER: A003 PAGE NUMBER: Page 5 of 11 PROJECT NUMBER: WC -2025-55.01 F:\Projects\ACTIVE\Smokey-Washington County\Drawings\A003-Elevations.dwg Plot adjustment factor = 96.5 Truss Heel Ht Bearing Point Fin. Second Floor Fin. First Floor Fiberglass Shingles on 15# bldg Felt 30# Ice Guard Bearing Point 1/2" Plywood 10" Truss Joists Band Board — Prefin. Drip Edge --7 North South Section SCALE: 1/4" Fiberglass Shingles on 15# bldg Felt - 1 /2" Plywood Wood Rafters Truss Type A Blocking 3/4" T&G Plywood - Truss Type A 1/2" Gyp. Bd 2 x 6 Bearing Point - 1 /2" Plywood Tyvek Vapor Barrier R-19 Batt Insulation 1/2" Gyp. Bd ----- Typical Details SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0" R-19 Batt Insulation 2x6 Bearing wall --------- 1/2" Plywood Tyvek Vapor Barrier -1x6 Gutter Bd 1/2" Gyp. Bd. Wood Blocking 2x6 Base Plate Prefini Soffit Bd 3/4" T&G Plywood Soffit Venting system Prefin. Trim Board Band Board Blocking Floor Truss Joist Decorative Trim Batt Insulation Decorative Column as Porch ceiling as Seclected by Owner Selected by Owner Porch ceiling as 2 x 6 Bearing Point Selected by Owner 1/2" Plywood C Tyvek Vapor Barriers EJ 12 Typical Details �o Typical Detail A004 %% SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0" A004 SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0" Ridge Venting Built Up Fiberglass Shingles Beyond Opening for Venting See Manuf for Requirements 15# Bldg Felt 5/8" Plywood Tvoical Roof Detail SCALE: LILJ Typical Deck Details SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0" Truss Heel Ht Bearing Point Fin. Second Floor Fin. First Floor Fin. Basement Floor Scissor Tru; Master Bedi Fiberglass on 15# bldg 30# Ice Guz Wood Block 1/2" Plywoo Prefinished Wood Block Prefini Soffit Soffit Ventin 1x6 Gutter E R48 Batt Inc Double Bea Truss See Siding - See 1/2" Gypsur R-19 Batt In 2x6 Wood E 0 2 CU 00 �04 Roof Detail at Master bedroom SCALE: 3/4 (Handrail grip size per IRC R311.5.6.3.) 1 1/4" Dia. Min. II-Jandrail, Continous x N O CV 0) C Cl) 0 C > 0 Ca 10" Min.. Tread Fiberglass Shingles on 15# bldg Felt 30# Ice Guard Wood Blocking 1/2" Plywood ---- Prefinished Drip Edge Wood Blocking Prefini Soffit Bd Soffit Venting 1x6 Gutter Bd Note: Spacimg between intermediate guardmembers to be such that a sphere of 4" dia. shall not pass through any opening Handrails per IRC R311.5.6 Simpson Ballusters to conform Slopped to IRC R312.2 HUC28r or Equal 2X4 Thrust 4" O.C. Block 1/2" Gypsum Board R-19 Batt Insulation (3) 8d Toe nail stringer to thrust block 2x6 Wood Stud Bearing wall Joist or blocking directly 1 /2" Plywood under the bearing point Verify floor finishes, bearing requirements Tyvek Vapor Barrier thickness and applicability for installation. Coordinate the thickness with stair risers Siding - See Elevations to maintain code related height requirements. Field modify elements required to prevent 2x6 Base Plate the cracking or movement of the specific floor finishes. X3/4" T&G Plywood system Wood riser and tread 2 x 10's 1/3 points nder stair Band Board treads provi stiffeners Floor Truss Joist Approved corroison resistive flashing as per MC Code Wood Decking as selected by Owner 4" OR L SS TY I AL Thru wall Bolt see schedule (D Pressure Treated Ledger o PT Wood Framing at Deck @ " TYPI Simpson Deck hanger 0 UJ Prefinished Flashing 2x6 Pressure Treatd Bear'g = M Anchor Bolt ---Spray Insulation w Furring Wall �w 1/2" Gypsum Board 12" Concrete Wall 2" Rigid Insulation/Drainage Compacted sub grade 12" Concrete Wall Below stair install 1/2" gyp. bd. at Ceilings & walls (3) 2X12 Stringers Fire Blocking at Mid -Span Note: Greatest and least thread and riser shall not vary more than 3/8" (per IRC R311.5.3.1 & R311.5.3.2) 7 A004 Typical Stair Detai SCALE: 1=1-0" Nood Top Rail at 3'-0" )od Pickets as r existing (4" less between by code) R48 Batt Insulation -- 2 x 6 Bearing Truss See Sch Siding - See Elevations 1/2" Gypsum Board R-19 Batt Insulation - 2x6 Bearing wall 1/2" Gyp. Bd R-19 Batt Insulation -- 2x6 Bearing wall 1/211 Plywood Tyvek Vapor Barrier -- Siding - See Elevations 2x6 Base Plate 3/4" T&G Plywood systh Band Board Floor Truss Joist ---- 1/2" Gyp. Bd R-19 Batt Insulation 2 x 6 Bearing Point 1/2" Plywood Tyvek Vapor Barrier Siding - See Elevations 1/2" Gyp. Bd R-19 Batt Insulation - 2x6 Wood Stud Bearing wall 1/211 Plywood Tyvek Vapor Barrier Siding - See Elevations -- 2x6 Base Plate Band Board Floor Truss Joist Trim Board 2x6 Pressure Treatd Bear'g Prefin. Metal Flashing 811 Concrete Wall Anchor Bolt Spray Insulation Parging 2 \ Tvnir I fetail A004� SCALE: 3/4 Spray Insulation 8" Concrete Wall —III 2" Rigid Insulation/Drainth Compacted Subbase Waterproofing Barrier =III 4" Conc. with 6 mil III Poly Vapor Barrier ( Expansion Joint —III Wood Riser and Tread 4" Gravel Base X10'S at 1/3 Points Drainage Board Under Stairs Provide Stiffeners Concrete Footing (3) #5 Rebar Continuo #5 Cross Rebar @ 16" o.c. Drainage material around the footing Screening Lvpical Guard Rail Detail F D EI SCALE 1 "=1'-0" ooting ralnage ement around the perimeter of the footing to a gravity outlet 0 L Q T ical Roof Detail SCALE: 3/4 3 ° Typical Detail A004 ° SCALE: 3/4 Additional Radon Requirements The joint between the slab and the walls must be caulked by tooling the slab to receive a bead of sealant. All concrete joints, openings for pipes, wires shall be sealed with polyurethane or equivalent sealant. Provide a short section of 3 inch PVC pipe tee into base course shall be continued from the slab up through the roof. Bituminous mastic waterproofing barrier for Radon from the top of the footing to the finish grade Continuous Vapor retarding barrier on top of the base course and under slab. 6 mil polyethylene 4" Typical Detail �04SCALE: 3/4 0 Q aD E Cl) L C(0 O 00 . OXN OE W .E- 0) 0 � c L� ' @) U O O a) a 'jO co o Fuzz — —Coax C aa))M.-CI)<n °avx)45 C a) Q a) U U4 2 C 0 JQ a).2ci) �C•° z0 a)Ewci c o -a`~�3 >'C c �'Q(0 Q 0 V+-2WN 0CD O N>, >JO 0E°>, � O 0. UCCO C 2 `.-°a o aco cuQ 00000aaoou000000 00 tEOFMARy°�o o�5�P�athan FS°�y�o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r r o r r o ° o ° o Y r o 0 0 Lo"e! o°000 uaoa EC, O) ti (N 0 a) 0 M O d) 2 O LC) N (N ca U) O w J Eo w Q) - — .J O N a DATE: 7/7/25 DESIGNED: DRAWN: JURISDICTION: Washington Co. PERMIT NUMBER REVISION: DATE: SCALE: 1/4" = DRAWING NUMBER: A004 PAGE NUMBER: Page 6 of 11 PROJECT NUMBER: WC -2025-55.01 F:\Projects\ACTIVE\Smokey-Washington County\Drawings\A004-Bldg Section and Details.dwg Plot adjustment factor = 96.5 I I AIILITAIII�L'Y ROAD ,-146 I I I I I I I I EX. SEPTIC TANK N 2400. GAL. I I I I I I PRO. SEWER LINE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I � I I SURVEY & PLAT BY R.F. GAUSS & ASSOC., INC. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 103 E. MAIN ST., P.O. BOX 128 EMMITSBURG, MARYLAND 21727 301-447-2222 FAX 301-447-3158 ff rn -t- MDRT - fit, �:• ° _ _ _ 4dm ifkWNLIWN O \v o 00 0.0 ' 1.00' 1.00' O HO US E �Z o o TOF=1475.0 38.00' 8.44' o �4�4 O STOCK 1 PILE / __ 1468 -46.91' rI 1470 III 24.00' T 1472 GAR,/.t 0 N 0 _J 0 O O O S PTIC TANK TO E REMOVED So' B.Q.L. 75.50' N. A. BREWB KER 7627/3 7 LOD -147 8 S 89°11 '00" E 69,00' OWNERS / DEVELOPERS CERTIFICATION D 76 � LOD 98.95' CJ O o � 1 o v 3600' S 89°19'00" E X. MAC. rT RANC E SE O 0 APPROX. LOC. SEWER LINE ON- ROOFTOP ISCONECT AREA .36 I / WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OF SEDIMENT CONTROL WILL BE IMPLEMENTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT, AND ALL STRUCTURES WILL BE INSTALLED TO THE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AS SPELLED OUT IN THI PLAN AND THAT ANY RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT WILL HAVE A CERTIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE AT A DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT APPROVED TRAINING PROGRAM FOR THE CONTROL OF SEDIMENT AND EROSION BEFORE BEGINNING THE PROJECT. I/WE ALSO AUTHORIZE PERIODIC ON -SITE EVALUATION BY THE FREDERICK SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT PERSONNEL AND COOPERATING AGENCIES. SIGNATURE OF OWNER / DEVELOPER DATE 10 JUNE, 2025 DATE JAMES E. GAUSS P.L.S. # 446 HOUSE #256 13 BASMENT FLOOR 1467.0 FIRST FLOOR 1476.0 GARAGE FLOOR 1472.0 FOR UTILITY WORK ONLY OR FOR OFF -SITE UTILITY WORK 1. DISTURBANCE OUTSIDE OF LODA CAN NOT EXCEED 5000 SQ.FT. 2. PLACE ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL ON HIGH SIDE OF TRENCH. 3. ONLY DO AS MUCH WORK AS CAN BE DONE IN ONE DAY SO BACKFILLING, FINAL GRADING, SEEDING AND MULCHING CAN OCCUR. 4. ANY SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION WILL BE REPAIRED THE SAME DAY. STOCKPILE NOTES 1. NO STOCKPILING ALLOWED ON ASPHALT. 2. ALL STOCKPILES LEFT AT THE END OF THE DAY NEED TO BE STABILIZED UNTIL THE NEXT REDISTURBANCE. -SF- - SILT FENCE -LOD - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE - EXISTING CONTOUR - PROPOSED COUNTOUR SCE - STANDARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE 397.71 - EXISTING ELEVATION DETAIL 22 SILT FENCE 10' MAXIMUM CENTER TO 36MINIMUM LENGTH FENCE POST, CENTER DRIVEN A MINIMUM OF 16' INTO GROUND F16' MINIMUM HEIGHT OF OTEXTILE CLASS F B' MINIMUM DEPTH IN GROUND FLOW FLOW PERSPECTIVE VIEW 36' MINIMUM FENCE POST LENGTH FILTER CLOTH" FENCE POST SECTION MINIMUM 20' ABOVE FLOV GROUND UNDISTURBED EMBED GEOTEXTILE CLASS F TOP VIEW A MINIMUM OF 8' VERTICALLY FENCE POST DRIVEN A INTO THE GROUND MINIMUM OF 16' INTO POSTS THE GROUND SECTION D CROSS SECTION SECTION A STAPLE STANDARD SYMBIL STAPLE JOINING TWO ADJACENT SILT [HSE� FENCE SECTIONS Construction Specifications 1. Fence posts shall be a minimum of 36' long driven 16' minimum into the ground Wood posts shall be 11/2' x 11/2' square (minima) cut, or 13/4' diameter (minimum) round and shall be of sound quality hardwood. Steel posts will be standard T or U section weighting not less than 1.00 pond per linear foot. 2. Geotextile shell be fastened securely to each fence post with wire ties or staples at top and mid -section and shall meet the following requirements for Geotextile Class F, Tensile Strength 50 lbs/In (min) Test: MSMT 509 Tensile Modulus 20 lbs/in (min) Test MSMT 509 Flow Rate 113 gal ft'/ minute (max,) Test: MSMT 322 Filtering Efficiency 752 (min) Test: MSMT 322 3, Where ends of geotexti le fabric come together, they shall be overlapped, folded and stapled to prevent sediment bypass, 4. Silt Fence shall be inspected after each rainfall event and maintained when bulges occur or when sediment accumulation reached 50'/. of the fabric height US, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE I PAGE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE E- b -3 VATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION DETAIL 24 - STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 3' MOUNTABLE BERM (6' MDL) 50' MINIMUM EXISTING PAVEMENT EARTH FILL we GEOTEXTILE CLASS 'C' -PIPE AS NECESSARY O2 BETTER MINIMUM 6' OF 2'-3' AGGREGATE OVER LENGTH AND WIDTH [F EXISTING GROUND STRUCTURE PROFILE w 50' MINIMUM LENGTH T EXISTING 10' MINIMUM 10' MIN. PAVENQNT WIDTH STANDARD SYMBIL PLAN VIEW 10' MIN Construction Specification L Length - minimum of 50' ('30' for single residence lot), 2 Width - 10' minimum, should be flared at the existing road to provide a turning rod ius. 3 Geotextile fabric (filter cloth) shall be placed over the existing ground prior to placing stone. xeThe plan approval authority may not require single family residences to use geotextile. 4. Stone - crushed aggregate (2' to 3') or reclaimed or recycled concrete equivalent shall be placed at least 6' deep over the length and width of the entrance. 5 Surface Water - all surface water flowing to or diverted toward construction entrances shall be piped through the entrance, maintaining positive drainage. Pipe installed through the stabilized construction entrance shall be protected with a mountable berm with 51 slopes and a minimum of 6' of stone over the pipe. Pipe has to be sized according to the drainage. When the SCE is located at a high spot and has no drainage to convey a pipe will not be necessary. Pipe should be sized according to the amount of runoff to be conveyed A 6' minimum will be required. 6 Location - A stabilized construction entrance shall be located at every point where construction traffic enters or leaves a construction site. Vehicles leaving the site must travel over the entire length of the stabilized construction entrance, U.S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT [F ENVIR[4ENT SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE F- 17-3 VATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION Standard Grading and Soil Erosion & Sediment Control Plan for Single Lot Single Family Residential Construction and Minor Earth Disturbances t. Note stating: "No permanent structures (fences, sheds, play equipment, retaining walls, etc.) shall be permitted within any storm drainage easement or drainage easement either shown or described on a final plat or easement plat." u. Note stating: "All grading on lot/parcel, either before or after the construction of a dwelling, or appurtenances, shall be the full responsibility of the lot/parcel owner." v. Note stating: "Any modifications of the approved Standard Grading and Soil Erosion & Sediment Control Plan for Single Lot Single Family Residential Construction and Minor Earth Disturbances shall be reviewed and approved by the Division and the District prior to construction". SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. ALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE "MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL" AS APPROVED BY THE COUNTY. 2. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF INITIAL GRADING. FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS, SEE SECTION G-20-1, 1994 MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, PUBLISHED JOINTLY BY WATER RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION, NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICES, AND THE STATE SOIL CONSERVATION COMMITTEE. 3. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE PLACED PRIOR TO OR AT THE INITIATION OF GRADING. 4. ALL STORM DRAIN AND SANITARY SEWER LINES NOT IN PAVED AREAS ARE TO BE MULCHED AND SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF INITIAL BACKFILL. 5. ELECTRIC POWER, TELEPHONE AND GAS LINES ARE TO BE COMPACTED, SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF INITIAL BACKFILL. 6. ALL EARTH BERMS AND SEDIMENT DAMS ARE TO MULCHED AND SEEDED (SEE SECTION G-20-1 OF ABOVE REFERENCE) WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER GRADING. ALL SOIL STOCKPILES ARE TO BE MULCHED AND SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS. 7. DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND REPAIRED IF NECESSARY. SEDIMENT TO BE REMOVED TO A SUITABLE DISPOSAL AREA AND STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER. (SEE SECTION G-20-1 OF 1994 MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PUBLISHED JOINTLY BY WATER RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION, NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, AND THE STATE SOIL CONSERVATION COMMITEE). 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED. 9. AFTER FINE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE PERMANENTLY MULCHED AND SEEDED (SEE SECTION G-20-1). �uT111�:r•�ylll:•»�y:ra�� 3><�:���r>rir:r_�:�� 11. FOLLOWING INITIAL SOIL DISTURBANCE OR REDISTURBANCE, PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AS TO THE SURFACE OF ALL PERIMETER CONTROLS, DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES, AND ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL (3:1); AND FOURTEEN DAYS AS TO ALL OTHER DISTURBED OR GRADED AREAS ON THE PROJECT SITE. THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO THOSE AREAS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND ARE CURRENTLY BEING USED FOR MATERIAL STORAGE OR FOR THOSE AREAS ON WHICH ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE CURRENTLY BEING PERFORMED. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NECESSARY TO INSURE THAT STABILIZED AREAS CONTINUOUSLY MEET THE APPROPRIATE REQUREMENTS OF THE "1994 MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL." SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: 1. NOTIFY SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTOR 24 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. PRE CONSTRUCTION MRG. CITY 301-695-2803 X3 COUNTY 301-600-3507 2. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF PERIMETER CONTROLS. 3. INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROLS; NOTIFY SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTOR AND OBTAIN APPROVAL BEFORE PRECEEDING FURTHER. 4. COMPLETE ALL REQUIRED CLEARING AND GRUBBING. 5. COMPLETE ROUGH GRADING FOR REMAINDER OF SITE. 6. COMPLETE FINAL GRADING, STABILIZATION, AND TOP SOIL & SEEDING. 8 NOTIFY SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTOR AND OBTAIN APPROVAL TO REMOVE SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL. DISTURBED AREA QUANTITY THE TOTAL AREA TO BE DISTURBED SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE APPROXIMATELY 14,840. SQ.FT. 0.63 ACRES AND THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF EXCAVATION AND FILL AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN COMPUTED TO BE APPROXIMATELY 250 CU.YDS. OF EXCAVATION AND APPROXIMATELY 250 CU.YDS. OF FILL. 1- 10 JUNE, 2025 JAMES E. GAUSS L.S.#446 DATE DESIGN CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES, COMAR 26.17.01.07 AND 2011 MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. 10 JUNE, 2025 DATE JAMES GAUSS REG. NO. #446 SITE PLAN AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ON THE N CHOLAS BREWBAKER PROPERTY SITUATED AT #25609 MILITARY ROAD ELECTION DISTRICT # 14 WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND DATE: 10 JUNE, 2025 SCALE: 1" = 15' PLAT NO, WC14 P-409 ACCT# 14-008896 O M —IN N ti N N SIN O 0 N _IN 0 r M 21'-32" 6'-0" First Floor Plan A001 SCALE: 1/4" Ref North Structural Desian Loads R301.3 Dead Load - The actual weights of materials and construction shall be used for determining dead load with consideration for the dead load of fixed service equipment. See TABLE R301.4 for Minimum Uniformly Distributed Live Loads (in pounds per square foot) Use Live Load Dead Load Design Loads Exterior balconies 60 10 70 Decks *f 40 10 50 Fire Escapes 40 10 50 Passenger vehicle garages *a 50 *a Not Applicable 50 Attics without storage *b, *e 30*g 10 40 Attics with storage *b, *e 30*g 15 45 Rooms other than sleeping rooms 40 15 55 Sleeping rooms 30 15 45 Stairs 40 *c 15 55 Guardrails and handrails *d 200 10 210 *a. Elevated garage floors shall be capable of supporting a 2, 000 pound load applied over a 20 square inch area. *b. No storage with roof slope not over 3 units in 12 units. *c. Individual stair treads shall be desi ned for the,uniformly distributed live load or a 300 pound concentrate load acting over an area ot 4 sq. in., whichever produces the greater stresses. *d.A single concentrated load applied in any direction at any point along the top. *e. Attics constructed with wood trusses shall be designed in accordance with Section R802.10.1. *f. See Section R502.2.1 for decks attached to exterior walls. *g.IRC Section R301.6 Live Load or Snow Load Table R301.6 whichever is greater. 38'-0" 16'-4" 11'-42" 8'-92" 9 r N 5 1 n n L 10 0 15 TABLE R602.10.5 Length Requirements for Braced wall panels Length of Braced Max. Opening Height Wall Panel (Inches) next to the braced wall panel (% of wall height) 8 -Foot wall 9 foot wall 10 foot wall One story 48 54 60 100% 32 36 40 85% 24 27 30 65% Notes: 1 pound per square foot = 0.0479 kN/M2, a. Linear interpolation shall be permitted. Full -height sheathed wall segments to either side of garage openings that support light frame roofs with roof covering dead loads of 3 psi or less shall be permitted to have a 4:1 aspect ratio. 9 (N N N- 9 M 0 cO ti 4 4 '-0'f 10'-6" 9'-0" 10'-6" 32'-0" 38'-0" 6'-O" 5 o Basement Plan 1 10 �01 SCALE: 1/4" 0 14" @ 12" O.C. 00 O C #4 @ 12" O.C. LASS "B" SPLICE � O Q w 12" a 0 M A Typical Stepped Footing Detail A001 SCALE: LUMBER - Continued STEEL LINTEL SCHEDULE PRECAST LINTEL SCHEDULE plywood sheathing nailed or screwed to studs in accordance with applicable code fastener schedules. MEMBER SIZE SPAN Precast Lintel / Bond Beam Requirements Where multiple trusses, rafters, or joists ar indicated on the drawings, they must be mechanically " „ span 3 1/2" x 3 1/2" x 1/4" Steel Angle UP TO 4-0 for up to 5-0 fastened to each other in a manner as to share all superimposed loads including loads from headers 4" x 3 1/2" x 1/4" Steel Angle 4'-0" TO 6'-0" 4" wall: 4"x8" 2-#3 Top & Bottom framing into the member. Wood columns ad posts shall be framed to true end bearings,and shall be ,r ,r 6" wall: 6"x8" 2-#4 Top & Bottom 5" x 1/2"3x 5/16" Steel Angle 6-1 TO 8-0 positively anchored to foundation with approved metal post bases. Columns & posts of treated wood 8" wall: 8"x8" 2-#5 Top & Bottom may be placed directly on concrete or masonry, use treated wood for all floor joists & beams which are LUMBER Min Bearing for concrete lintels 8" each side exposed or within 18" of the ground, or in permanent contact with earth. Lumber shall comply w/ req. of American Institute of Timber Construction & National Forest Products All beams, joists, rafters, and trusses shall bear on 4" minimum continuous woodplates. Floorjoist, Association's National Design Spec. for Wood Construction, all framing shall be: ceiling joists and roof rafters shall have 4" nominal bearing on wd wall plates or wood plates Species / grade: hem / fir #2 mechanically fastened to steel members or masonry. Extreme fiber bending stress (fb0: 1150 psi Nail Description Shear Values Horizontal shear (v): 75 psi Compression perpendicular to grain (f cl): 245 psi 10d 10 Penny Common Nail -9 Ga x 3" Long 118 Compression parallel to grain (fc): 875 psi 16d 16 Penny Common Nail - 8 Ga x 3 1/2" Long 134 Modulus of elasticity (e): 1,400 00 psi Maximum moisture content: 15% 10dx1 1/2 9 Ga x 1 1/2" Long 118 Other species/grades may be substitutedprovided that they meet or exceed all of the above criteria. 16dx2 1/2 8 Ga x 2 1/2" Long 134 Plywooshall e exterior rade identified ith the APA grae-trademark of the American Plywood Ass. and shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and code fastening schedule. N20A .192 x 1 3/4" Long Annular Ring Shank Nail 174 Wood stud bearing walls, interior & exterior stud walls shall be continuously bridged w/ wood blocking. N20AN .192 x 2 1/8" Long Annular Ring Shank Nail 174 at 4'-0" o.c. max. brace exterior building corners in stud walls with 18 ga diagonal metal "T" straps or 9 ti 0 r ti � N 15 ti Design temperatures isolines Design temperatures based upon Figure R301.2(1) Seismic design categories R301.2.2 SEISMIC PROVISIONS LESS THAN 'C' - EXEMPT FROM REQUIREMENTS Detached one and two family dwellings located in Seismic Design Category C are exempt from the seismic requirements of this code Weathering probability for concrete Weathering probability for concrete based upon figure R301.2(3) is Severe Basic wind speeds for 50 year mean recurrence interval R301.2(4) Basic wind speed for 50 year mean recurrence Interval is 90 mph Ground snow loads pg in Ibs/ft2 R301.2(5) Ground snow loads for area 25 lbs per sq. ft Termite infestation probability map R301.2(6) Termite infestation probability Moderate to Heavy Decay probability map R301.2(7) Decay probability slight to moderate Component and cladding pressure zones R301.2(8) Component and cladding pressure zones see Gable Roof Below 10° <0 <450 TABLE R602.10.5 Minimum Length of Braced Wall Panels METHOD (See Table R602.10.4) Minimum Length (Inches) Wall Heigh 8 Ft. 9 Ft. 10 Ft. CS -G 24 27 30 CS-PF 16 18 20 CS-WSP CS-SFB Adjacent Clear Opening Ht (Inches) < 64 24 27 30 68 26 27 30 72 27 27 30 76 30 29 30 80 32 30 30 84 35 32 32 88 38 35 33 92 43 37 35 96 48 41 38 100 44 40 104 49 43 108 54 46 112 50 116 55 120 60 124 128 132 136 Reinforced Concrete and Masonry foundation walls 8 -inch nominal wall thickness Maximum Wall Height (feet) Maximum Unbalanced Backfill Height (feet) Minimum Vertical Reinforcement size and spacing for 8 inch nominal wall thickness Soil classes (b) GW, GP, SW & SP Soils GM, GC SM, SM-SC and ML soils SC, MH, ML -CL and inorganic CL soils 6 5 #4 at 48" o.c. #4 at 48" o.c. #4 at 48" o.c. 6 #4 at 48" o.c. #4 at 40" o.c. #5 at 48" o.c. 4 #4 at 48" o.c. #4 at 48" o.c. #4 at 48" o.c. 5 #4 at 48" o.c. #4 at 48" o.c. #4 at 40" o.c. 7 6 #4 at 48" o.c. #5 at 48" o.c. #5 at 40" o.c. 7 #4 at 40" o.c. #5 at 40" o.c. #6 at 48" o.c. 8 5 #4 at 48" o.c. #4 at 48" o.c. #4 at 40" o.c. 6 #4 at 48" o.c. #5 at 48" o.c. #5 at 40" o.c. 7 #5 at 48" o.c. #6 at 48" o.c. #6 at 40" o.c. 8 #5 at 40" o.c. #6 at 40" o.c. #6 at 24" o.c. 5 #4 at 48" o.c. #4 at 48" o.c. #5 at 48" o.c. 6 #4 at 48" o.c. #5 at 48" o.c. #6 at 48" o.c. 9 7 #5 at 48" o.c. #6 at 48" o.c. #6 at 32" o.c. 8 #5 at 40" o.c. #6 at 32" o.c. #6 at 24" o.c. 9 #6 at 40" o.c. #6 at 24" o.c. #6 at 16" o.c. Notes: For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 foot = 304.8 mm, 1 pound per square foot = 0.0479 kN/M2 a. Mortar shall be Type M or S and masonry shall be laid in running bond. b. Alternate reinforcing bar sizes and spacings having an equivalent cross-sectional area of reinforcement per linear foot of wall shall be permitted provided the spacing of the reinforcement does not exceed 72 inches. Vertical reinforcement shall be grade 60 minimum. The distance from the face of the soil side of the wall to the center of vertical reinforcement shall be at least 5 inches. Q 0 E V) '-(0 0 U Li O cE W . 0 O) E- o M E c < -�O M E -co o ca �Z — C: Co U c W ,wca�.cn�m� U Nc6 L�a)W 0 zO O ~ >,Q)t Q) L 10 H CLN�a)MOQN < 0 c0. .-AWN ' �>+O E>J)O L O 0 U c(fl C O U �c c ca<(nco-, \0 !Iooaao o�g'CP°�athan ES°who o - o O O Y Y r Y Y Y O O o Y Y o 0 0 °o o° `000gR °$H � EG QQQ000 a o000000000�° W a) (N 0 a) M 0 co U a) a) 2 L_ co 0) O E (0 CU L() LL (N 0 0 LL U) rn LL -c co J O • c o � Z - U o mac/ 0 a- L1 o LL DATE: 7/7/25 DESIGNED: DRAWN: JURISDICTION: Washington Co. PERMIT NUMBER REVISION: DATE: SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" DRAWING NUMBER: S001 PAGE NUMBER: Page 9 of 11 PROJECT NUMBER: WC -2025-55.01 F:\Projects\ACTIVE\Smokey-Washington County\Drawings1SO01-Structural Foundation and First Floor Framing.dwg Plot adjustment factor = 96.5 All Outriggers 0 Co co 9 co 0 (N 38'-0" 32'-0" 6'-0" 0 ti 0 ti 0 All Outriggers 2x 6's at 16" o. 32'-0" 6'-0" 1. iIIIXIII Roof Plan 1 5 10 �n A001 SCALE: 1/4" 0 15 TABLE R802.5.1(5) Ref Rafter Spans for common Lumber Speci' round snow load=50 psf, ceiling attached to Rafters, L/O=240) Dead Load = 20 osf Species Grade Maximum rafter Spans (See note a) 2x4 2x6 2x8 2x10 2x12 Maximum rafter Spans (See note a) (feet - (feet - (feet - (feet - (feet - inches) inches) inches) inches) inches) Douglas Fir -larch SS 7-3 11-3 14-2 17-4 20-1 Douglas Fir -larch #1 6-4 9-4 11-9 14-5 16-8 Douglas Fir -larch #2 5-11 8-8 11-0 13-6 15-7 Douglas Fir -larch #3 4-6 6-7 8-4 10-2 11-10 Hem -fir SS 6-10 10-9 13-11 17-0 19-9 a Hem -fir #1 6-2 9-1 11-6 14-0 16-3 Hem -fir #2 5-10 8-7 10-10 13-3 15-5 C Hem -fir #3 4-6 6-7 8-4 10-2 11-10 Q Southen pine SS 7-1 11-1 14-8 18-9 22-10 Southen pine #1 7-0 10-6 13-2 15-8 18-8 Southen pine #2 6-4 9-2 11-9 14-1 16-6 Southen pine #3 4-9 7-1 9-0 10-8 12-8 Spruce -pine -fir SS 6-8 10-5 13-2 16-1 18-8 Spruce -pine -fir #1 5-11 8-8 11-0 13-6 15-7 Spruce -pine -fir #2 5-11 8-8 11-0 13-6 15-7 Spruce -pine -fir #3 4-6 6-7 8-4 10-2 11-10 0 N N 0 CO 9 co 0 N 15'-7" 10'-72" 5'-0" 38'-0" �,,II, 61-0" I,49�� 3'-42" 5'-0" 15' -till 10'-7" (3) 2 x 8 (3) 2 x 12 (3)10" Micro Lam q I I I I I 1 1 I 110" I I I I buss Uoist$ I I at 16" I o.d.I I I I 171 I I I I I I I I I I I I 9 F- 111111111111 11111111111111 �I'11111111111 111II111111II11<I M I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I M M 11 1 111111 I I I I I 111111 I I I I I I 1 11 1 1 = O ,I 111 11 1111 I1 1 ti o I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 " 3)2 10 ( )2 12 3)2 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'I �`D 0O X I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' 10" ss oist at 1 " o.. co 0 O co rI(N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N i SIN O 'I 11111111111 M I I I I I I I I I I (3) x 1 rrrrr I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 M I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "I lJoistlI��J truss at 16 . 1 1 1 110 cOill<III'I I I l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U) N "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'I SIN co 1 1 1 (3J 2 x 1 1 1 1 1 1 (3) P x 11 1 1 1 1 (3) x112 I I I I II T I I I I I I I l I I I l l l r I I I I I I I lI I I I I I I I I I I 1I4' Tr ss 4ists t 16' o.c. 11 o I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I n I I I I I Eo CD 1 1 1 1 III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111 1 1 1 1 I I I I I II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •• I I I I I 9'-0" 7'-0" Second Floor Plan A001 SCALE: 1/4" Ref North 18'-0" 9'-0" 7'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 32'-0" 6'-0" 5 0 15 0 N N 0 co RACKFILL Free draining granular backfill shall be used against all foundation walls unless the foundation has been designed to resist greater lateral earth pressures. No backfill shall be placed against walls until slabs on grade and framed floors are in place, with all concrete having reached its design strength and all wood floor diaphragms in place and properly braced. Maximum height of backfill against walls shall not exceed 7'-0" where required on both sides of walls, backfill both sides simultaneously in 6" lifts to 95% dry density, with the grade difference not to exceed 2'-0" at any time. LATERAL LOADS ON FOUNDATION WALLS Walls built to retain to support the lateral pressure of earth or water or other superimposed loads have been designed assuming pressure equivalent to that exerted by fluid weighing 40 pounds per cubic foot and having a depth equal to that of the retained earth. FOUNDATIONS Bottoms of all exterior footings shall be below the frost line, as determined by the building official. All footings shall be as shown on the foundation plans and bear on undisturbed, existing natural soil or engineered structural fill having allowable bearing capacity as recommended in "soil bearing" section footing size shall be subject to change if soil conditions are other than assumed. SLABS ON GRADE Except where otherwise noted, all slabs shall be 4" thick, reinforced with 6x6, w1.4 x w1.4 welded wire mesh. Lap mesh 6" in each direction. Slabs shall be placed over a layer of 6 mil polyethylene sheeting over 4" layer of crushed stone. Refer to drawings for location of all below slab thermal insulation. Vertical Load Transfer All structural posts must be vertically aligned and blocked to provide continuous bearing to foundation. If a double top plate of less than (2) 2x6's or (2)3x4's is used, joists and trusses must be centered directly over and below bearing studs or double studs at 12" o.c. must be used, unless certified by a structural engineer. Interior bearing walls: at least one side of all interior bearing walls supporting more than one floor must be sheathed with either 1/2" plywood fastened according to code. Recommendations or a diagonal metal "T" strap installed according to mauf. instructions prior to installation of all supported structure. I UMBER Lumber shall comply with the requirements of American Institute of Timber Construction and the National Forest Products Association's National Design Specification for Wood Construction, Unless otherwise noted, all framing shall be: Species / Garde: Hem / Fir #2 Extreme Fiber Bending Stress (Fb0: 1150 PSI) Horizontal Shear (V): 75 PSI Compression Perpendicular to Grain (F cl): 245 PSI Compression Parallel to Grain (Fc): 875 PSI Modulus of Elasticity (E): 1,400,00 PSI Maximum Moisture Content: 15% Other species/grades may be substituted provided that they meet or exceed all of the above criteria. Plywood shall be exterior grade identified with the APA grade -trademark. of the American Plywood Association, and shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and code fastening schedule. Wood stud bearing walls, interior and exterior stud walls shall be continuously bridged with wood blocking at 4'-0" o.c. max. brace exterior building corners in stud walls with 18 ga diagonal metal "T" straps or plywood sheathing nailed or screwed to studs in accordance with applicable code fastener schedules. Where multiple trusses, rafters, or joists are indicated on the drawings, they must be mechanically fastened to each other in a manner as to share all superimposed loads including loads from headers framing into the member. Wood columns and posts shall be framed to true end bearings, and shall be positively anchored to foundation with approved metal post bases. Columns and posts of treated wood may be placed directly on concrete or masonry, use treated wood for all floor joists and beams which are exposed or within 18" of the ground, or in permanent contact with earth. All beams, joists, rafters, and trusses shall bear on 4" minimum continuous wood plates. Floor joist, ceiling joists and roof rafters shall have 4" nominal bearing on wood wall plates or wood plates mechanically fastened to steel members or masonry. Structural Notes Wood Truss or Rafter Tie down requirements IRC Wood Truss Requirements and Framing Requirements R802.3 Framing Details: TABLE R802.11 R802.9 Framing of openings. R802.10 Wood Trusses. Rafters shall be framed to ridge board or to each other with agussetplate as a tie. Ridge board shall be at g Required strength of truss or rafter tie down connections to resist wind uplift forces Openings in roof and ceiling framing shall be framed with header and trimmer joists. When the R802.10.1 Truss design drawings. Truss design drawings, prepared in conformance with Design Wind Total Roof Width Including Overhang (feet) least 1 -inch nominal thickness and not less in depth than the cut end of the rafter.At all valleys and hips there header joist span does not exceed 4 feet, the header joist may be a single member the same size as the ceiling joist or rafter. Single trimmerjoists may be used to carry a single headerjoist Section R802.10.1, shall be provided to the building official and approved prior to installation. Truss design drawings shall include, at a minimum, the information specified below. shall be a valley or hip rafter not less than 2 inch nominal thickness and not less in depth than the cut end of the rafter. Hip and valley rafters shall be supported at the ridge by a brace to a bearing partition or be that is located within 3 feet of the trimmer joist bearing. When the header joist span exceeds Trussdesign drawing shall be provided with the shipment of trusses delivered to the jobsite. Load (psf) 24 28 32 36 40 designed to carry and distribute the specific loadat that point. Where the roof pitch is less than three units 4 feet, the trimmer joists and the header joist shall be doubled and of sufficient cross section to Approved hangers shall be used for the header joist to trimmer joist connections when the header 1. Slope or depth, span and spacing. 2. Location of all joints. _ 20_ _ _ 192 _ _224 _ _ 256_ _ 288 _ _ 320 _ vertical in 12 units horizontal (25 percent slope), structural members that support rafters and ceiling joists, such a ridge beams, horizontal (25 percent slope), structural members that support rafters and ceiling joists, joist span exceeds 6 feet. Tail joists over 12 feet long shall be supported at header by framing 3. Required bearing widths. 30 432 504 576 648 720 hips and valleys, shall be designed as beams. anchors or on ledger strips not less than 2 inches by 2 inches. R802.10.2 Wood Truss design. 4. Design loads as applicable. 4.1 Top chord live load (including snow loads). — — — — 40 — — — — 672 — — — 784 — — — 895 — — — — 1,008 — — — — 1,120 R802.6 Bearing. The ends of each rafter or ceiling joist shall have not less than 1 1/2 inches of bearing on wood or metal Wood trusses shall be designed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. The design and manufacture of metal plate connected wood trusses shall comply with ANSI/TPI 1. The 4.2 Top chord dead load. 4.3 Bottom chord live load. 50 912 1064 1,216 1,368 1,520 and not less than 3 inches on masonry or concrete. R802.8.1 Bridging. truss design drawings shall be prepared by are registeredprofessional where required by the g g p p g q 4.4 Bottom Chord dead load. 60 1,152 1,344 1,536 1,728 1,920 Rafters and ceiling joists having a depth -to -thickness ratio exceeding 6 to 1 based on nominal dimensions statutes of jurisdiction in which the project is to be constructed in accordance with Section R106.1. R802.10.3 Bracing 4.5 Concentrated loads and their points of application. 4.6 Controlling wind and earthquake loads. a. Wind uplift forces are based on 24 inch spacing of roof trusses or rafters. For spacing shall st supported laterally by solid blocking, diagonal bridging (wood or metal) or a continuous 1 inch by 3 inch wood strip nailed across the rafters or ceilingjoists at intervals not exceeding 8 feet. other than 24 inches, forces shall be adjusted accordingly. Trusses shall be braced to prevent rotation and provide lateral stability in accordance with 5. Adjustments to lumber and joint connector desi n values for conditions of use. j g R802.9 Framing b. Inter olation is ermitted for intermediate values of wind u lift ressures and roof widths. p p p p the re uirements s ecified in the construction documents for the buildin and on the individual q p g 6. Each reaction force and direction. of openings. Openings in roof and ceiling framing shall be framed with header and trimmer joists. When the header joist c. The rated capacity of approved tie downs can include 60% increase for wind effects as per material truss design drawings. In the absence of specific bracing requirements, trusses shall be braced in accordance with TPI/HIB. thickness orand the 7. Joint connector type and description ( e.g., size, gauge) 4 feet, the header joist may be a single member the same size as the ceiling joist or rafter. Single trimmer d. Figure R301.2(4) and Table R301.2(2) shall be used in determining the design wind load. R802.10.4 Alterations to trusses. dimensioned location of each joint connector except where symmetrically located relative to the joint interface. may be used to carry a single headerjoist that is located within 3 feet of the trimmerjoist bearing. When joists g the header joist span exceeds 4 feet, the trimmer joists and the header joist shall be doubled and of sufficient Truss members shall not be cut, notched, drilled, spliced or otherwise altered in any way without the approval of a registered design professional. Alterations resulting in the addition of load 8. Lumber size, species and grade for each member. Roof S h eath i n Re uirements cross section to support the ceiling joists or rafter framing into the header.Approved hangers shall be used for (e.g., HVAC equipment, water heater) that exceeds the design load for the truss shall not be 9. Connection requirements for: 9.1 Truss to truss girder. TABLE R803. 1 the header joist to trimmer joist connections when the header joist span exceeds 6 feet. Tail joists over 12 feet long shall be supported at header by framing anchors or on ledger strips not less Minimum thickness of lumber roof sheating permitted without verification that the truss is capable of supporting such additional loading. R802.11 Roof tie -down. 9.2 Truss ply to ply. Rafter or beam spacing (inches) Minimum Net Thickness (inches) than 2 inches by 2 inches. Roof assemblies subject to wind uplift pressures of 20 pounds per square foot or greater, as in Table R301.2(2), for height Table R301.2(3), 9.3 Field splices. 10. Calculated deflection ratio and/or maximum description for live and total load. established adjusted and exposure per shall have rafter or truss ties provided at bearing locations in accordance with Table R802.1 1. A 11. Maximum axial compression forces in the truss members to enable the building 24 5/8" continuous load path shall be provided to transmit the uplift forces the rafter or truss ties to designer to design the size, connections & anchorage of the permanent continuous lateral bracing. Forces shall be shown on the truss drawg or supplemental documents. 48 (Min 270 Fb / 340,000 E.) 1 1/2 T & G the foundation. Wind area of 100 square feet and Zone 1 in Table R301.2 2 q ( ) Q Q O E V) '—(0 0 U () O .CXNDE W.O c~ a) co c E CU O V c a' E cp o,U) a O .AU) E -co ocaC Z — Ocoa) c ai�.OU)�n 2U)C �a)fl--OJ V fz�a��ia)a co _000L�(O o : > H Crc LNa)�QN < OUC�V_.-AWN O J IL �>,a H o_M>O�)O,2 !.2 O 0 W - 22 '0 O O� o d c ca co < U) c0 —, \O !Iooaao o�c�'CP°�athan ES°who o - o o o 0 0 i°000gR °$H � EG oo��oo a o000000000�° W N 0 a) 0 co o a) O) 2 E 0 Q 0 Of (O N CD 0 0 U- N O a) C/) w w Q) O r/ Q a- L1 o (J) DATE: 7/7/25 DESIGNED: DRAWN: JURISDICTION: Washington Co. PERMIT NUMBER REVISION: DATE: SCALE: 1/4" = DRAWING NUMBER: S002 PAGE NUMBER: Page 10 of 11 PROJECT NUMBER: WC -2025-55.01 F:\Projects\ACTIVE\Smokey-Washington County\Drawings1S002-Second Floor and Roof Framing.dwg Plot adjustment factor = 96.5 16d Nail at 24 inches o.c. LGypsum wall board installed in accordance with Chapter 7 (Interior) Wood structural panel installed in accord. with Table 602.3(1) (Exterior) 8d Nail at 6 inch o.c. on all framing members at panel edges and 12 inches o.c. on all framing members not at panel edges (Exterior wood panels) (b) Inside Corner Detail FIGURE R602.10.5 16d Nail at 24 inches o.c. Gypsum wall board installed in accordance with Chapter 7 (Interior) Wood structural panel installed in accord. with Table 602.3(1) (Exterior) 8d Nail at 6 inch o.c. on all framing members at panel edges and 12 inches o.c. on all framing members not at panel edges (Exterior wood panels) (a) Outside Corner Detail Typ. Exterior Corner Framing for cont. structural panel sheathing showing stud to stud nailing Exterior Corner Detail - Braced Wall Detail S003 SCALE: 1 1/2" 3/4" T&G PLYWOOD DECK -2X WOOD BEAMS SEE �O3 H Typical Structural Detail SCALE: 1 1/2" s SPLICE MIN. 4'-0" 2X CRIPPLE STUDS AT 16" O.C. —(4) 16d NAILS CONNECTING BEAM TO OOD STUD WOOD LUMBER HEADER See Framing Ian for size. INTERNAIL WITH 3 ROWS 16d COMMON NAILS AT 16" O.C. WOOD POST OR MULTIPLE 2X JACK STUDS: INTERNAIL JACK STUDS WITH 2 ROWS OF 10d COMMON NAILS AT 12" O.C. 2X KING STUD CONTIN. FROM SILL TO TOP OF BEAM. INTERNAIL TO POST OR STUD WITH 2 ROWS OF 10d NAILS AT 12" O.C. F Typical Structural Detail S003 SCALE: 1 1/2" —(4) 16d NAILS CONNECTING BEAM TO STUD Spray Insulation METAL POST CAP FASTEN AS PER MANUF. REQMNTS 8" Concrete We 2" Rigid Insulati Compacted Sul Waterproofing E 4" Conc. with 6 Poly Vapor Ban 0 0 Expansion Join / \ 4" Gravel Base Drainage Boarc o 0 WOOD LUMBER HEADER See Framing Plan for size. Concrete Footir II\ITERI\IAIL WITH 3 ROWS 16d COMMOI\I I\TAILS AT 16" O.C. (3) #5 Rebar Cc #5 Cross Reba WOOD POST OR MULTIPLE 2X JACK STUDS: II\ITERI\TAIL JACK STUDS WITH 2 ROWS OF 10d COMMON I\TAILS AT 12" O.C. Drainage mater the footing ScrE 2X KII\IG STUD CONTIN. FROM SILL TO TOP OF BEAM. II\ITERNAIL TO POST OR STUD WITH 2 ROWS OF 10d NAILS AT 12" O.C. Footing Draet around the peril footing to a gray QE Typical Structural Detail S003 SCALE: 1 1/2" VVIILIIIUJUJIr VJIIVLALIIL.,IA VVIILIIIUVUNI y V1ILALALIIVV Braced Wall Line VVIILIIIU'JU I VJIIVLALII'. l REQUIREMENTS Braced Wall Line Braced Wall Line Return Panel: 24" for braced wall lines sheathed with wood structural panels // / 32" for braced wall lines sheathed with structural fiberboard 8" Mi �' ac \� ac ac Distance D*: 24" for braced wall lines sheathed I Adjacent A�ace t I' A I with wood structural panels ENTS P el C P el a C arrft P el 32" for braced wall lines sheathed a e d � O enin a e d 0 �� o! O enii� a e d 0 g� with structural fiberboard fwa fwa fwa Hold Down 800 lbs. capacity fastened to the Line Line Line Device: edge of the braced wall panel closest to the cornerand the // foundation or floor framing below Extent of Header Double Portal Frame (Two Braced Wall Panels Extent of Header Single Portal Frame (One Braced Wall 2' - 18' Finished Width of Openina for single or Double Portal I I Pony Wall Height I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II 0 ✓o/ / D' / 0 / ,O / /o or o o I I I I °1°1 1°1 I I I I 0l°1 1°1 I I I of to I I °101 Io10 I I I I 0101 1010 I I I 1 I 0101 1010 I I I I I I I I 0101 1010 I I °101 1010 1 1 1 1 0101 1010 I I I I 0101 1010 I I I I 0101 1010 1 1 1 1 1 I I °101 101° I 1 I I 0101 1010 I I I I 0101 1010 I I I I oloi 1010 I I I I 0101 I00 1 1 1 1 0101 1010 0101 1010 I I I°1° 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 7o 0 0 in. 3"xl 1.25" Net Header 2'-0" to 18'-0" 1,000 Lb Strap opposite sheathing Similar to LSTA24 Header to jack stud strap per table R602.10.6.4 on both sides of opening opposite side of sheathing Min. Double 2x4 framing covered with min. 7/16" thick wood structural panel sheathing with 8D common or galvanized box nails at 3" o.c. in all framing (studs, Blocking and sills) Typ. Min. Length of panel per Table R602.10.5 8'-0" and 9'-0" High Wall Portal Header Height Method CS-PF SOD 16" and 18" wide Wall Wood Structural Panel Sheathing continuous over band or rim joist 00 0 .. OVER RAISE WOOD FLOOR OVERLAP OPTION END CONDITION 3 END OF BRACED WALL LINE Tension strap per Table 602.10.6.4 (On opposite side of sheathing) ------I----------- I — — — 1I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Hold Down Device Li END CONDITION 2 END OF BRACED WALL LINE Mil . 3"xl .25" Net Header Braced wall line continuously sheathed with wood structural panels If Needed Panel Splice Edges shall be attached to common blocking within 24" of wall Mid Height one row of 3" O.C. nailing I I is required in each panel edge If 2x4 Blocking is 1 1 used, the 2x4's must be nailed together with (3) 16D Sinkers I I I I Typical Portal Frame 1 1 Construction Nail Sole Plate to Joist Attached sheathing to per Table R602.3(1) I I I I band or rim joist with I i 8D common nails at 3" 1 1 o.c. top and bottom I 1 Wood Structural Panel over Approved Band or rim joist FIGURE R602.10.6.4 Method CS-PF - Continuously Sheathed Portal Frame Panel Construction Cont. Sheathed Portal Frame Construction S003 SCALE: 1 1/2" �• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r1----------1� 1 1 1 1 I I 01 1010 I I I I 101 lobo I I I 1 0101 Iolo I I I I I 1 I I 0101 1010 0101 1010 I I 1 1 °101 1010 0101 I 1 lobo 1 I 0 010--------010 I I I 1 0 0 0 I I 1 1 0101 I 1 0101 1010 1 I 1010 I I 0101 I 1010 I 1 oloi 1 I o10 I I I I 101° °101 I I 0101 1010 0101 1010 - L 1 ---------i_ L. 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 Wood Structural Panel over Approved Band or rim joist END CONDITION 1 END OF BRACED WALL LINE -Fasten top plate to header with two row of 16D Sinker Nails at 3" O.C. Typ. Min. 7/16" wood structural panel Sheathing it Sole Plate st per Table R602.3 (1) d Structural Panel over Approved Band or rim joist �03 BraceWall End Conditions SCALE: 1/4" 16" � D #4 @ 12" O.C. DAD D' CLASS 11611 ° ° D SPLICE p ° o° o ° D ° D O ° O ° U d 0 6 1'-6" Kc/'57 Typical Structural Detail S003 SCALE: 1 1/2" TROWEL CONC FINISH I, 1, 3/8" 3/4" J o o 381NT D SCORE 0 4 o' 00 6"X6" W.W.F. D, Gip p� L o � p 4 CpMpA Ep CRUSHED ATGGREGATE o O O o COMPACTED SUBBGRADE o i O O '000_ Typical Structural Detail SCALE: 1 1/2" 0 O 0 O 77J C TROWEL CONC FINISH 1/2" JOINT SEALING MATERIAL COLOR TO MATCH CONCRETE 6"X6" W.W.F. DISCONTINUE AT EXPANSION JOINT 4" COMPACTED CRUSHED AGGREGATE COMPACTED SUBBGRADE �03 A Typical Structural Detail SCALE: 1 1/2" W 411 811 � 4.. i 4 Typical Footingl Detail S003 SCALE: 3/4 SEE FINISH SCHEDULE FOR ---------------- ------- 3/4" T&G PLYWOOD DECK WEB STIFFENERS AS PER MANUFACTURER STRUCTURAL FRAMING TO TRANSFER LOAD WOOD TRUSS JOIST 2 Bearing Plates See Plan for the wall type 3 Typical Structural Detail 4"NP S003 SCALE: 1 1/2" =1NISH 0 6" P 6" TYP I 5/8" Dia Anchor Bolts tied to reinforcing 3000 PSI Concrete 611__-7 ebar 611 pp_ _ 1'0" ea) Q o E CD 0 07 (/) _'Co (oE W .gip MO) E ,© �O coE —4- < 'i-O a� o Fuzz °°vi�vi3�� X00-;0 C)4 2 C pJJQ a).2CI) mac.° z 0CI) Ewci c o —vQccoo Q O N CD C)+-�WN Od - O_.- OL)U°-oQ2COC uJ o a.a -°Q co co<U) o� 00000aaoou000000 00 tE0FMgRy°�o o�5�P�athan FS°�y�o r r o ° o ° ° o Y r o o°000 Qo�o�� u a o a EGo 6) ti (N O a) M 0 ww� (I) 2 Z L > N rr d7 O LO N co cU 70 co C-) w '^ J v ) o z U �/ Q Ez O 0 DATE: 7/7/25 DESIGNED: DRAWN: JURISDICTION: Washington Co. PERMIT NUMBER REVISION: DATE: SCALE: Varies DRAWING NUMBER: S003 PAGE NUMBER: Page 11 of 11 PROJECT NUMBER: WC -2025-55.01 F:\Projects\ACTIVE\Smokey-Washington County\Drawings\S003-Typical Structural Details and Notes.dwg Plot adjustment factor = 96.5 Wood Truss or Rafter Tie down requirements TABLE R802.11 Required strength of truss or rafter tie down connections to resist wind uplift forces Design Wind Total Roof Width Including Overhang (feet) Load (psf) 24 28 32 36 40 20 192 224 256 288 320 30 432 504 576 648 720 -------- 40 672 --- 784 --- -------- 895 1,008 1,120 50 912 1064 1,344 1,216 1,368 1,536 1,728 1,520 1,920 60 1,152 a. Wind uplift forces are based on 24 inch spacing of roof trusses or rafters. For spacing other than 24 inches, forces shall be adjusted accordingly. b. Interpolation is permitted for intermediate values of wind uplift pressures and roof widths. c. The rated capacity of approved tie downs can include 60% increase for wind effects as per material d. Figure R301.2(4) and Table R301.2(2) shall be used in determining the design wind load. Roof Sheathing Requirements TABLE R803.1 Minimum thickness of lumber roof sheating Rafter or beam spacing (inches) Minimum Net Thickness (inches) 24 5/8" 48 (Min 270 Fb / 340,000 E.) 1 1/2 T & G 12 a8 ------------ Fiberglass Shingles 15# bldg Felt - 1 /2" Plywood Wood Truss 1/2" Plywood Prefinished Drip Edge 'IRC Truss Tie down at 30# Ice Guard roof truss connection to Wood Blocking base plate, as per code requirements and Simpson fastener recommendations. H I/ IRC Anchor Bolt Requirements _ 1/2" diameter anchor bolt, o o Gutter Board embed at least 7" into concrete ° ° Soffit Venting wall at least 6'-0" on center D o min. two anchor bolts per section, ° Prefinished Soffit Bd end bolts must be 12" from edge D o D Pressure Treated Base Plate Anchor Bolt as per 4 Section Detail IRC Requirements G001 SCALE: 3/4" 8" Concrete wall with pattern and coloring Reinforced Concrete and Masonry foundation walls 8 -inch nominal wall thickness Maximum Maximum Minimum Vertical Reinforcement size and spacing for Wall Unbalanced 8 inch nominal wall thickness Soil classes (b) Height Backfill GW, GP, GM, GC SC, MH, (feet) Height SW & SP SM, SM-SC ML -CL and (feet) Soils and ML soils inorganic CL soils 5 #4 at 11 #4 at 11 #5 at 11 6 #4 at 11 #5 at 11 #6 at 11 9 48" #6 at 48" #6 at 32" 9 #6 at 40" o.c. #6 at 24" o.c. #6 at 16" o.c. Notes: a. Alternate reinforcing bar sizes and spacings having an equivalent cross-sectional area of reinforcement per linear foot of wall shall be permitted provided the spacing of the reinforcement does not exceed 72 inches. Vertical reinforcement shall be grade 60 minimum. The distance from the face of the soil side of the wall to the center of vertical reinforcement shall be at least 5 inches. I FL J� L ----------- -------------------------------------------J D Elevation �01 SCALE: 1/4" I L ------------------------------------------------ B Elevation �Joi SCALE: 1/4" )r 11 r 3I e ei e it U e in 8" Concrete w pattern and cc Finish Grade Compacted S Waterproofing Expansion Joi 4" Concrete S Vapor Barrier 4" Gravel Bas Drainage Boa Concrete Foo- Drainage mate the footing Sc Footing Drain around the pe footing to a gr..., .,.�.,.,. 411, 811 _411 •j,_ Section Detail G001 SCALE: 3/4" Finish Grade Varies Footing below - I I Eiiii----------------------------------------------J C Elevation �01 SCALE: 1/4" Ridge Vent - - - - 8 � 12 8 Fiberglass Shingles------------- Prefinish Drip Edge Trim Board Siding to match house Roof Guard under Shingles at roof edge Prefinished metal drip edge 1x6 Gutter Board Trim-------- Prefinished Soffit -__-- Trim Board Optional Gutter (Not shown) Window Unit Garage Door Unit _, 8" Concrete wall with pattern and coloring Finish Grade Varies I i Footing below - --------—-------------------------------J A Elevation SCALE: 1/4" �01 II Rafter Bearin I a 0 3 G001 Garage Level N Frost Level 0 (N 0 1 M 9 1 Garage 3 �l �-- G001 I I I I I I I I LL+il J 2-011 24-011 � 2'-0" II U) 0 1 1 O 0 11 1 1 O 9 CV Co L 11 0o II N T' (2)2x12's - - T_ II CV II I[�r�• 2'-0" 3'.0" 81.011 2'-0" 81.011 31.011 2'.011 ''7ThPlan G001 SCALE: 1/4" G001 Ref North 24'-0" I = i (I\ o r--------. -----------------------� i q I I I I 8" Concrete wall 01 I 3'-0" x 4'-0" Window ------------ i I G 1 p 1'-4" x 8" Concrete Footing 1 6X 4" Concrete Flooring Sloped toward rolling door I • = I I I I I i 411 8'4" 411 8 '� 4" o N N I i Garage i I I NI I I I I I I I I E G01 _ i G01 I I 8" Concrete wall - � p X 3'-0" x 4'-0" Window N------- 3-0" x 6'-8" Door ------- 31.011x61_ 11 I "' 1'-4" x 10" Concrete Footing o I I � I o Garage Door Garage Door I I I 3'-0" 81-011 21-011 81.011 31-O" Plan A G001 SCALE: 1/4" G001 M 0 1 0 N Q a) E Cl) .� L '-(00 } o . .OxN(E W .S p E M c 0 O a � co �O O Q) co E a� o �Z a)M cow °0Ui U C pJJQ aD a).= L ° �•° ••°Eaa)a)— O ca.- > Crl) N Q ° 0 C- U- AWN O N >,U >J o) _ I O'— O OD V (t O= o .co c ca<cAo- a) ti N 0 W O cJ U U o W a) s ca O) O N o N N 0 w (I) ~ W °� n n < Co a o a. DATE: 9/16/25 DESIGNED:I DRAWN JURISDICTION: Washington Co. PERMIT NUMBER REVISION: DATE: 9/16/25 10Anchorage bolt requirements SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" DRAWING NUMBER: A001 PAGE NUMBER: Page 3 of 11 PROJECT NUMBER: WC -2025-55.05 OO 0 F:\Projects\ACTIVE\Smokey-Garage-2025\Drawings\G001-Garage.dwg Plot adjustment factor = 96.5 I I AIILITAIII�L'Y ROAD ,-1 46 I I I I I I EX. SEPTIC TANK N 2400. GAL. I I I I I I PRO. SEWER LINE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I � SURVEY & PLAT BY R.F. GAUSS & ASSOC., INC. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 103 E. MAIN ST., P.O. BOX 128 EMMITSBURG, MARYLAND 21727 301-447-2222 FAX 301-447-3158 ff L Ii Mk MDRT 89°11'00" W 10 00- I 1i ~� 464 EASEMENT 40' B.R.L. TXIST. GRAVEL 0 BE GRASS O 01 81.06' � \v o 90 1.00' 1.00' O HO US E o o TOF1475.0 38.00' 8. o �4�4 OI V _ STOCK 1 PILE / __ 1 1468 -46.91' 1470- 24.00' 0 O1 O 1472 GAR,/.t Ih 0 O p 24. o O O P S PTIC TANK TO E REMOVED 50' B..L. L. 75.50' N. A. BREWB14KER 7627/3 7 LOD -147 47B S 89°11 '00" E 69.00' OWNERS / DEVELOPERS CERTIFICATION D 76 � IL 0 D 98.95' CJ O r� 48Z - o o v 3600' S 89°19'00" E —IEX,MAC. NTR,4NGFz SE APPROX. LOC. SEWER LINE ON- ROOFTOP ISCONECT AREA .36 WJa1 I / WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OF SEDIMENT CONTROL WILL BE IMPLEMENTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT, AND ALL STRUCTURES WILL BE INSTALLED TO THE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AS SPELLED OUT IN THI PLAN AND THAT ANY RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT WILL HAVE A CERTIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE AT A DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT APPROVED TRAINING PROGRAM FOR THE CONTROL OF SEDIMENT AND EROSION BEFORE BEGINNING THE PROJECT. I/WE ALSO AUTHORIZE PERIODIC ON -SITE EVALUATION BY THE FREDERICK SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT PERSONNEL AND COOPERATING AGENCIES. SIGNATURE OF OWNER / DEVELOPER DATE 10 JUNE, 2025 DATE JAMES E. GAUSS P.L.S. # 446 HOUSE #256 13 BASMENT FLOOR 1467.0 FIRST FLOOR 1476.0 GARAGE FLOOR 1472.0 FOR UTILITY WORK ONLY OR FOR OFF -SITE UTILITY WORK 1. DISTURBANCE OUTSIDE OF LODA CAN NOT EXCEED 5000 SQ.FT. 2. PLACE ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL ON HIGH SIDE OF TRENCH. 3. ONLY DO AS MUCH WORK AS CAN BE DONE IN ONE DAY SO BACKFILLING, FINAL GRADING, SEEDING AND MULCHING CAN OCCUR. 4. ANY SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION WILL BE REPAIRED THE SAME DAY. STOCKPILE NOTES 1. NO STOCKPILING ALLOWED ON ASPHALT. 2. ALL STOCKPILES LEFT AT THE END OF THE DAY NEED TO BE STABILIZED UNTIL THE NEXT REDISTURBANCE. -SF- - SILT FENCE -LOD - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE - EXISTING CONTOUR ____ - PROPOSED COUNTOUR SCE - STANDARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE 397.71 - EXISTING ELEVATION DETAIL 22 SILT FENCE 10' MAXIMUM CENTER TO 36MINIMUM LENGTH FENCE POST, CENTER DRIVEN A MINIMUM OF 16' INTO GROUND F16' MINIMUM HEIGHT OF TLOTEXTILE CLASS F B' MINIMUM DEPTH IN GROUND FLOW FLOW PERSPECTIVE VIEW 36' MINIMUM FENCE POST LENGTH FILTER CLO1HFENCE POST SECTION MINIMUM 20' ABOVE FLOV GROUND UNDISTURBED EMBED GEOTEXTILE CLASS F TOP VIEW A MINIMAL OF 8' VERTICALLY FENCE POST DRIVEN A INTO THE GR[UD MINIMUM OF 16' INTO POSTS THE GRO)ND SECTI[N B CROSS SECTION SECi[ON A STAPLE STANDARD SYM[L STAPLE JOINING TWO ADJACENT SILT [HSE� FENCE SECTIONS Construction Specifications 1. Fence posts shall be a minimum of 36' long driven 16' minimum into the ground Wood posts shall be 11/2' x Ill?' square (minimUn) cut, or 13/4' diareter (minimum) rouid and shall be of sound quality hardwood. Steel posts will be standard T or U section weighting rat less than 1,00 pond per linear foot. 2. Geotextile shall be fastened securely to each fence post with wire ties or staples at top and mid -section and shall noel the following requirements for Geotextile Class F: Tensile Strength 50 lbs/In thin.) Test: MSMT 509 Tensile Modulus 20 [bs/in (min) Test MSMT 509 Flow Rate 113 gal ft'/ minute (max,) Test: MSMT 322 Filtering Efficiency 75% (min) Test MSMT 322 3. Where ends of geotextile fabric come together, they shall be overtopped, folded and stapled to prevent sediment bypass, 4. Silt Fence shall be inspected after each rainfall event and maintained when bulges occur or when sediment accumulation reached 50'/. of the fabric height U.S, DEPARTMENT IF AGRICl1T1 E I PAGE ItflD DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE E- b -3 VATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION DETAIL 24 - STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 3' MOUNTABLE BERM (6' MEN) 50' MINIMUM EXISTING PAVEMENT " EARTH FILL ww GEOTEXTILE CLASS 'C' -PIPE AS NECESSARY OR BETTER MINIMUM 6' OF 2'-3' AGGREGATE OVER LENGTH AND WIDTH [F EXISTING GROUND STRUCTURE PROFILE C 50' MINIMUM LENGTH T l 0' M I N EXISTING 10' MINIMAL 10' MIN. PAVENQNT WIDTH STANDARD SYMBCL PLAN VIEW 10' MIN 1 Construction Specification 1, Length - minimum of 50' ('30' for single residence lot), 2 Width - 10' minimum, should be flared at the existing road to provide a turning radius. 3 Geotextile fabric (filter cloth) shall be placed over the existing ground prior to placing stone. xxThe plan approval authority may not require single family residences to use geotextlle, 4. Stone - crushed aggregate (2' to 3') or reclaimed or recycled concrete equivalent shalt be placed at least 6' deep over the length and width of the entrance. 5, Surface Water - all smrface water flowing to or diverted toward construction entrances shall be piped through the entrance, maintaining positive drainage. Pipe installed through the stabilized construction entrance shalt be protected with a mountable berm with 51 slopes and a minimum of 6' of stone over the pipe. Pipe has to be sized according to the drainage. When the SCE is located at a high spot and hos no drainage to convey a pipe will not be necessary. Pipe should be sized according to the amount of runoff to be conveyed A 6' minimum will be required. 6 Location - A stabilized construction entrance shall be located at every point where construction traffic enters or leaves a construction site. Vehicles leaving the site must travel over the entire length of the stabilized construction entrance, U,S, DEPARTMENT [F AGRICULTURE PAGE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT [F ENVIRONMENT SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE F- 17 -3 WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION Standard Grading and Soil Erosion & Sediment Control Plan for Single Lot Single Family Residential Construction and Minor Earth Disturbances t. Note stating: "No permanent structures (fences, sheds, play equipment, retaining walls, etc.) shall be permitted within any storm drainage easement or drainage easement either shown or described on a final plat or easement plat." u. Note stating: "All grading on lot/parcel, either before or after the construction of a dwelling, or appurtenances, shall be the full responsibility of the lot/parcel owner." v. Note stating: "Any modifications of the approved Standard Grading and Soil Erosion & Sediment Control Plan for Single Lot Single Family Residential Construction and Minor Earth Disturbances shall be reviewed and approved by the Division and the District prior to construction". SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. ALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE "MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL" AS APPROVED BY THE COUNTY. 2. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF INITIAL GRADING. FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS, SEE SECTION G-20-1, 1994 MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, PUBLISHED JOINTLY BY WATER RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION, NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICES, AND THE STATE SOIL CONSERVATION COMMITTEE. 3. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE PLACED PRIOR TO OR AT THE INITIATION OF GRADING. 4. ALL STORM DRAIN AND SANITARY SEWER LINES NOT IN PAVED AREAS ARE TO BE MULCHED AND SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF INITIAL BACKFILL. 5. ELECTRIC POWER, TELEPHONE AND GAS LINES ARE TO BE COMPACTED, SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF INITIAL BACKFILL. 6. ALL EARTH BERMS AND SEDIMENT DAMS ARE TO MULCHED AND SEEDED (SEE SECTION G-20-1 OF ABOVE REFERENCE) WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER GRADING. ALL SOIL STOCKPILES ARE TO BE MULCHED AND SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS. 7. DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND REPAIRED IF NECESSARY. SEDIMENT TO BE REMOVED TO A SUITABLE DISPOSAL AREA AND STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER. (SEE SECTION G-20-1 OF 1994 MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PUBLISHED JOINTLY BY WATER RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION, NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, AND THE STATE SOIL CONSERVATION COMMITEE). 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED. 9. AFTER FINE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE PERMANENTLY MULCHED AND SEEDED (SEE SECTION G-20-1). �uTl�:r•�yllr•»�y:n�� 3��:���ralliir:lr_�:�� 11. FOLLOWING INITIAL SOIL DISTURBANCE OR REDISTURBANCE, PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AS TO THE SURFACE OF ALL PERIMETER CONTROLS, DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES, AND ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL (3:1); AND FOURTEEN DAYS AS TO ALL OTHER DISTURBED OR GRADED AREAS ON THE PROJECT SITE. THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO THOSE AREAS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND ARE CURRENTLY BEING USED FOR MATERIAL STORAGE OR FOR THOSE AREAS ON WHICH ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE CURRENTLY BEING PERFORMED. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NECESSARY TO INSURE THAT STABILIZED AREAS CONTINUOUSLY MEET THE APPROPRIATE REQUREMENTS OF THE "1994 MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL." SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: 1. NOTIFY SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTOR 24 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. PRE CONSTRUCTION MRG. CITY 301-695-2803 X3 COUNTY 301-600-3507 2. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF PERIMETER CONTROLS. 3. INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROLS; NOTIFY SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTOR AND OBTAIN APPROVAL BEFORE PRECEEDING FURTHER. 4. COMPLETE ALL REQUIRED CLEARING AND GRUBBING. 5. COMPLETE ROUGH GRADING FOR REMAINDER OF SITE. 6. COMPLETE FINAL GRADING, STABILIZATION, AND TOP SOIL & SEEDING. 8 NOTIFY SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTOR AND OBTAIN APPROVAL TO REMOVE SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL. DISTURBED AREA QUANTITY THE TOTAL AREA TO BE DISTURBED SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE APPROXIMATELY 14,840. SQ.FT. 0.63 ACRES AND THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF EXCAVATION AND FILL AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN COMPUTED TO BE APPROXIMATELY 250 CU.YDS. OF EXCAVATION AND APPROXIMATELY 250 CU.YDS. OF FILL. 10 JUNE, 2025 JAMES E. GAUSS L.S.#446 DATE DESIGN CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES, COMAR 26.17.01.07 AND 2011 MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. 10 JUNE, 2025 DATE JAMES GAUSS REG. NO. #446 SITE PLAN AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ON THE NICHOLAS BREWBAKER PROPERTY SITUATED AT #25609 MILITARY ROAD ELECTION DISTRICT # 14 WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND DATE: 10 JUNE, 2025 SCALE: 1" = 15' PLAT NO, WC14 P-409 ACCT# 14-008896 MEMORANDUM Washington To: Washington County Historic District Commission From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff Date: September 23, 2025 Subj: Residential Addition -Alteration Permit/Barkman Summer Kitchen, 2025-04514 Staff Report and Analysis Property Owner: YAVENER LLOYD D, Applicant: Lloyd David Yavener Location: 4505 MAIN Street Tax Account ID: 08005753 Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 81/10/191/ Legal Description: .5 ACRE 50X1504504 MAIN ST Zoning: Rural Village Rural Village: Rohrersville (MHT-C) Historic Rural Village MD Inventory of Historic Places (MIHP): WA-III-141(lndividual) and WA -III -025 (Rural Village) Project Description: 384 sq. renovations to restore 19th century accessory structure to include stabilization and shoring upper level of building, reconstruction of foundation walls using salvaged stone, installing wooden plates at top of foundation walls as needed, masonry reconstruction of center section of upper story brick wall, rebuild small chimney on the south side of structure, restore or replace rafters, facia, metal roof, wood windows and doors, installing lintels above doorways as needed Applicable Law and Review Criteria: The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD. Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A, Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance." 747 Northern Avenue]Hagerstown, Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 l F:240.313.2431 1 Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET Washington The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological, or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes may still be subject to building permit procedures. 1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria: A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure. B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance. C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological, architectural, or cultural value. D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied. E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to be considered mandatory. 2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below. A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area. B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of the structure and to the surrounding area. C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent. 3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures. For Rural Villages, additional review criteria for applications are listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance and include: 1. The exterior appearance of existing structures in the Rural Village, including materials, style, arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and number of stories, roof style and pitch, proportion. 2. Building Size and Orientation 3. Landscaping 4. Signage 5. Lighting 6. Setbacks 7. Accessory structures Secretary of Interior Standards which may be applicable to this project review include: 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 1 F:240.313.2431 1 Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET 2 Washington HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. Washington County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures which may be applicable to this project review include: Guidelines for Existing Accessory Buildings (Pg.55) 1. Accessory buildings that significantly contribute to the principal structure or are significant should be retained, well -maintained, and preserved, including their siting, orientation, design, scale, materials of construction, and detailing. Adaptive reuse of these structures to enable continued utility of the structure is encouraged when necessary. 2. Deteriorated accessory buildings, and their distinctive features and details, should be repaired if necessary, using the same materials or ones that are similar in scale, form, texture, and color. Ordinary maintenance is encouraged. 3. Those that are deteriorated beyond repair may be replaced with new ones that should resemble the original in siting, scale, proportion, fenestration, materials, and color as closely as possible. 4. Fading, painted, historic mural signs — "ghost signs" — on the exterior of the structure should be left as found. 5. See also Key Themes. (p.48) Guidelines for Masonry Exteriors (Pg.58) 1. If a masonry wall has historically been painted, it should continue to be painted, ideally in colors that are sympathetic to its historic color scheme. Remove paint from historically painted walls only in preparation for repainting. Avoid painting historically unpainted masonry walls. 2. If cleaning a masonry wall is appropriate, it should be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Typically, this means using water, detergent, and brushes. Power washing, chemical 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET Washington HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION cleaning, or more aggressive methods should be used only if the gentlest means does not work. 3. Re -pointed mortar joints should match the original in size, depth, profile, color, composition, and finishing detail. The type of mortar joint used contributes to the character of a masonry wall. Examples of mortar joints include struck, concave, weathered, raked, flush, vee, or extruded. Avoid the use of incompatible mortar and retain material and composition when possible. "Mortars for repointing should be softer or more permeable than the masonry units and no harder or more impermeable than the historic mortar to prevent damage to the masonry units." (Preservation Brief #2: Re -pointing Mortar Joints in Historic Masonry Buildings) 4. Applying waterproof coatings to masonry walls can cause moisture to be trapped inside a masonry cavity. Waterproof coatings should be applied only after careful consideration and professional consultation. 5. See also Key Themes. (p.57) Guidelines for Entrances (Pg.62) 1. It is not recommended that secondary facades have entrance changes in size, shape or location if such changes detract or confuse the primary entrance of the structure. 2. If a new opening is required, it should be on a secondary facade and not visible from the public right-of-way. 3. Weatherstripping and caulking to improve energy efficiency are acceptable. 4. Screen doors are usually appropriate on residential and sometimes appropriate on commercial buildings. On primary facades, screen doors should be constructed of wood or a material that is appropriate for the building and should not detract or fully cover the entry door. Secondary facades may have metal screen/storm doors, but use of careful installation should ensure minimized damage to the opening. 5. See also Key Themes. (p.57) Guidelines for Windows (Pg. 64) 1. Preserve the position, number, and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. 2. Openings should not be resized or enclosed on primary facades. 3. Wood windows on primary facades should not be replaced with windows constructed of alternative materials such as metal or vinyl. When replacing windows on a secondary facade, the HDC should be consulted to determine the appropriate design and material of the replacements. 4. Inappropriately designed, non -original windows should be replaced with appropriately designed ones based on documentary or photographic evidence. If no such evidence exists, the design of the replacement should be compatible with the character of the facade in which it is located. 5. Shutters and their hardware should not be replaced with new materials. Whether operational or not, they should be sized to appear to cover the window if closed. 6. Existing or replacement storm windows and screens should match as closely as possible the historic windows in size, profiles of sash and frame, color, and other character -defining features. In cases where exterior storm windows were not used historically, interior storm windows may be considered. Clear glass should be used for glazing all storm windows. 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 l F:240.313.2431 1 Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET Washington 7. See also Key Themes. (p.57) Guidelines For Roofs (Pg. 67) 1. Avoid altering the roof pitch and shape. 2. Exposed roof rafters and soffits should not be cut back. 3. The size, color, reflectivity, reveal, and material of roofing and flashing should be maintained through repair. If replacement is necessary, roofing materials should have similar characteristics. 4. Missing or severely damaged towers, dormers, finials, cresting, chimneys and other character - defining roof elements should be replaced based on documentary or photographic evidence. If no evidence of the appearance of the element exists, a new element should be designed to be compatible with the overall character of the building. 5. New skylights, mechanical and service -related equipment or pipes, chimneys or other projections, including solar panels should be located so that they are not visible from a public right-of-way. If able, roof mounting of mechanical equipment and solar panels should be avoided. If ground mounted these systems should still not be visible from the public right-of- way. 6. Existing dormers should not be resized or have architectural features diminished. 7. See also Key Themes. (p.57) Staff Report: Rohrersville is located in southern Washington County. The majority of the rural village's 68 contributing structures are located along Main Street which is just west of Maryland 67. There are a few resources also along Rohrersville School Road. The subject property is contributing to the rural village and has an individual number on the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties (MIHP). The log house (demolished in 1999) and the summer kitchen (subject of this permit) are related to David Barkman and the mill complex which was located across Main Street (WA -III -139) from these buildings. The details of the survey indicate the structures date from the early 19th century and that "the summer kitchen windows are original with six over six sash beneath wide wooden lintels, a window type associated with the mid 19th century. One window is protected by a pair of paneled shutters." The current property owner has provided a brief additional history in the attachments. The project proposes to reconstruct and repair the stone foundation, reconstruct and repair the brick walls on the north side of the structure. The west side (front) will also have the stone foundation reconstructed and repaired. The brick in this portion will have some replacement sourced by the contractor to match and repairs will be made to the remainder. The east side of the structure will involve repair and repointing of the brick and stone. The south side of the structure will undergo some replacement of brick in the walls, repair and reconstruction of the foundation. The project notes indicate the rafters, fascia, metal roof, wood windows and doors and again any lintels will be repaired where feasible and replaced in kind. A full description from the applicant is included in the attachments along with corresponding photos and engineered drawings. 747 Northern Avenue]Hagerstown, Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 l F:240.313.2431 1 Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET Staff Analysis: The project proposes to repair wherever feasible and replace when necessary with in kind materials which are key themes of the County Design Guidelines for all applicable sections noted in this report as well as the Secretary of Interior Standards. The project goal is the stabilization of the structure with minimal changes to its appearance through the reuse of existing materials or matching in kind. The proposal does not conflict with the review criteria in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance as there are no changes to the building affecting its materials, style, arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and number of stories, or roof style. Staff Recommendation: Recommend approval of the Residential Addition -Alteration Permit/Barkman Summer Kitchen, 2025- 04514, in the Rohrersville Historic Rural Village, due to the proposed work's consistency with the County's Design Guidelines for Historic Structures, Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation and Section 5D.5 Architectural Review as listed in the County's Zoning Ordinance based on the details provided in the Staff Analysis for this project. Respectfully Submitted, Meghan Jenkins, GISP Historic District Commission Staff Attachments: Photos and description of work provided by Applicant Permit Submission Packet 747 Northern Avenue]Hagerstown, Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET Permit Application Supplement David Barkman Stone and Brick Kitchen MIHP Reference WA -III -141 4504 Main Street, Rohrersville, MD 21779 Map 0081 Parcel 0191 Account ID 005753 July 2025 This permit application covers the stabilization and restoration of the stone foundation and brick walls of a structure located at 4504 Main Street in Rohrersville. The structure is believed to be a summer kitchen associated with the adjacent log home built in the early to mid -19th century that was consumed by fire in the 1990s. David Barkman and later his son GG Barkman NI1 �II lived in the log home and operated the grist mill known then as Barkman's Mill. Prior to Barkman's ownership, the mill was part of Samual Rohrer's adjacent farm and known as Rohrer's Mill. After the fire, the property was abandoned as the owners at the time moved away and never rebuilt the home. Over the years, the property was completely overgrown and used frequently as a dump site for trash and discarded items. The property was acquired in 2022 to clean up and beautify the area and restore the summer kitchen for use as an outbuilding. Description of Work Shoring -- Stabilize and shore upper level of building using 1. Through -wall needle beams 2. Rachet straps around the perimeter 3. Temporary interior walls in basement and principal floor North Side Side Wall -- Stone Foundation 1. Dismantle foundation stone wall, stopping approximately two feet from the NW corner. Leave corner intact. Salvage stone for use in reconstruction. 2. Reconstruct foundation wall using stone salvaged during dismantling, and repoint to the corner. Use NHL 5.0 lime with a joint profile and in a color to match original. 3. Install lintel above doorway and wooden plate at top of foundation wall as needed. Side Wall -- Brick Wall 1. Dismantle center section of upper story brick wall. This area would extend approximately five feet from bottom course of bricks and to within two feet of each corner. Leave corners intact. Salvage any suitable brick for use in reconstruction, though most of the existing brick are too soft and would be inappropriate for the repair. 2. Reconstruct center section of the upper story brick wall. Use any appropriate original brick salvaged during dismantling and 19th century brick from Gruber-Latimer's inventory for repair. Use NHL 3.5 lime with a joint profile and in a color to match original. West Side - Front Front Wall -- Stone Foundation 1. Excavate trench in front of building with bottom at the floor level of the basement. Excavate soil approximately 5' away from foundation on the top half of the trench. Leave 2' shelf halfway down so that the lower half of the trench is 3' from the foundation. 2. Dismantle foundation stone wall, stopping approximately two feet from each corner. Leave corners intact. Salvage stone for use in reconstruction. 3. Reconstruct foundation wall using stone salvaged during dismantling, and repoint to corner. Use NHL 5.0 lime with a joint profile and in a color to match original. 4. Install wooden plate at top of foundation wall as needed. Front Wall -- Brick Front 1. Dismantle entire upper story brick wall. Leave corners intact if possible. Salvage any suitable brick for use in reconstruction, though most of the existing brick are too soft and would be inappropriate for the repair. 2. Reconstruct center section of the upper story brick wall, recreating the openings for the door and two windows. Reuse lintels if possible; otherwise, replace. Use any appropriate original brick salvaged during dismantling and 19th century brick from Gruber-Latimer's inventory for repair. Use NHL 3.5 lime with a joint profile and in a color to match original. East Side - Back Back Wall -- Stone Foundation 1. Repair/dismantle foundation stonework above and below the window. Salvage the stone for use in reconstruction. 2. Reconstruct any dismantled foundation stonework using stone salvaged during dismantling. Use NHL 5.0 lime with a joint profile and in a color to match original. 3. Repoint exterior of east foundation wall using NHL 5.0 lime mortar with a joint profile and color that matches existing. Back Wall -- Brick Wall 1. Repair/dismantle brickwork below the window. 2. Reconstruct any dismantled brickwork using 19th century brick from Gruber- Latimer's inventory 3. Use NHL 3.5 lime with a joint profile and in a color to match original. South Side Side Wall -- Stone Foundation 1. Repair/dismantle foundation stonework at the SW corner. Salvage the stone for use in reconstruction. 2. Reconstruct any dismantled foundation stonework using stone salvaged during dismantling. Use NHL 5.0 lime with a joint profile and in a color to match original. 3. Repoint exterior of south foundation wall using NHL 5.0 lime mortar with a joint profile and color that matches existing. Side Wall -- Brick Wall 1. Repair/dismantle brickwork in these areas: a. Lower SW corner b. Under window c. Above window d. Gable 2. Gable window 3. Use NHL 3.5 lime with a joint profile and in a color to match original. Miscellaneous 1. Reconstruct any dismantled brickwork using 19th century brick from Gruber- Latimer's inventory. 2. Replacement Bricks -- Cut and out replace up to 200 brick. Use brick from Gruber-Latimer's inventory for repair and NHL 3.5 lime with a joint profile and in a color to match original. 3. Lintels -- Replace seven window/door lintels. If, upon inspection, Gruber - Latimer determines that a lintel(s) does not need to be replaced, we will subtract that incremental amount from the invoice. N O N 0) I I IIIIIIIIIIT /L ______ I_i.... GRADE NEW SWALE AND_________________________________ _____________________________ I L INSTALL FRENCH DRAIN bA O � M E o • I I O O d TAMPED SOIL o 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 1/4" PER FOOT GRASS COVER SLOPE MIN. GRADE CLEAN GRAVEL w 0O �� 11-111=1 11=111=1 I I �� WRAP TRENCH w/ RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION O FABRIC SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" (GEOTEXTI CLEAN 1" TO 2" STONE SIMILAR) Z (#57s or 4"0 PERFORATED PVC \\\\ \\,` PIPE. SLOPE TO DAYLIGHT 1/8" MIN. PER FOOT. z 1'-4" I I II I I I I II LJ Z U I I I I H — DRAINAGE TRENCH III III I Ld SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" W ≥ 111111 Cl) II 111111 11111 81111 111.11 " BEARING db (/) FOR LINTELS z = RESTORE DOORS AND WINDOWS OR REPLACE IN -KIND I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o 0 0 I Q I o o I I I I I I I I I I I I I o I I I I I I FRONT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION 0 SCALE: 1/4"=l' -O" SCALE: 1/4"=l' -O" Q Si I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME AND I AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER 3 UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND Qf LICENSE NO.: 19350 EXPIRATION DATE: 8-31-2027 N O (N 00 0) 16'-4" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O � U IC 1'-8" STONE TYP. O Oo x i) p N w Z I 0 I N 16'-O" 9" TYP. (2 WYTHES OF BRICK) � M o ID o a� FOUNDATION AND FIRST FLOOR FRAMING FIRST FLOOR WALLS AND ROOF FRAMING w SCALE: 1/4"=l' -O" SCALE: 1/4"=l' -O" W O Q w H w 0O CC Uom NOTES: 1. WORK SHOWN IS TO RESTORE A 19th -CENTURY OUTBUILDING WITH A RUBBLE STONE MASONRY BASEMENT WALL AND BRICK FIRST FLOOR WALLS. RESTORATION INCLUDES REBUILDING LARGE PORTIONS OF THE MASONRY, WHICH IS DESCRIBED IN GRUBER-LATIMER'S MAY 1, 2025 PROPOSAL. THESE DRAWINGS SHOW THE WALLS AS COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT PROPOSAL. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TEMPORARY SHORING. 3. THE PLAN SHOWN IS SCHEMATIC. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONFIRM DIMENSIONS AND COORDINATE WITH THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION. ANY CONDITIONS DISCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION THAT MAY AFFECT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 4. THE POOR CONDITION OF THE EXISTING FRAMING REQUIRES THAT ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS BE U) REPLACED. ALL NEW TIMBERS SHALL BE ROUGH -SAWN, TRUE DIMENSIONED LUMBER EQUIVALENT TO #2 GRADE, APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. W 5. DESIGN ROOF LOADING: 30 psf GROUND SNOW LOAD. FLOOR FRAMING: 40 psf LIVE LOAD. z 0 S2 I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME AND I AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND LICENSE NO.: 19350 EXPIRATION DATE: 8-31-2027 N O N 1'-4" OO REBUILD SINGLE-WYTHE 16" SQUARE BRICK CHIMNEY NEW 1"x 6" RIDGE BOARD ii L F - o I w N NEW 2"x 4" ROUGH -SAWN RAFTERS O 24" O.C. L` J"x 8" SIMPSON SIDS SCREWS EACH RAFTER INTO CEILING JOISTS 1"x 4" SKIP SHEATHING 16" O.C. O bA • � cd E D-0 STANDING -SEAM METAL ROOFING M va -r N E o � t 1"x 8" RAFTER BEARING 1 % 6" SOFFITT W -� PLATE w/ CONCRETE SCREWS RE- SE 1"x 5" SHIP -LAPPED AND FASCIA J TO BRICK ® 16" O.C. CEILING FINISH AND SUPPLEMEN w/NEW AS REQUIRED REPLACE 4" x 8" WOOD NEW W6x9 STEEL BEAM w - LINTELS WHERE DAMAGED o OAK TREATED w/ NEW 2"x 6" ROUGH -SAW UNDER INSIDE FACE OF (WHITE CEILI G JOISTS @ 24" 0. . REBUILT CHIMNEY PRESERVATIVE FOR DURABILITY) ALIG ED WITH RAFTERS 00 PRESSURE -TREATED 1x8 JOIST BEARING PLATE N Z RESTORE WINDOWS AND DOORS OR REPLACE IN -KIND O NEW 3"x 6" ROUGH -SAWN JOISTS O O O @ 20" O.C. Ld O 4" DIAM PERFORATED PIPE > REPAIR DIAMOND BARS o SLOPED TO DISCHARGE z OR REPLACE IN —KIND o TO DAYLIGHT, TYPICAL 3 SIDES. O Lii> III mac, H w O < < REBUILD AND REPAIR STONE WALLS PER GRUBER LATIMER'S PROPOSAL O U U m E __________________ C _ BUILDING SECTION SECTION AT CHIMNEY z SCALE: 1/2"=l' -O" SCALE: 1/2"=l' -O" 0 U W cn S3 I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR O f 3 APPROVED BY ME AND I AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND LICENSE NO.: 19350 EXPIRATION DATE: 8-31-2027 Plot Plan 4504 Main Street Rohrersville Map 0081 Parcel 0191 Account ID 005753 109' 93' 322' Summer Kitchen 1/ Legend ❑ 1/4" = 7.5' Historic Review Activity 08/23/2025 thru 09/18/2025 Record Record # Type MIHP# Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info Status Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments 11009 SASHA BOULEV 91 SINGLE FAMILY AND 100 DUPLEX LOTS WITH Historic District PP -25-001 Preliminary Plat 1075; 1063 In Review 07 -Apr -25 25 -Aug -25 Approved 29 -Aug -25 Updated by Script from EPR. HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE Commission Days in Review: 4 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments THE INTERSECTION OF ANTIETAM DRIVE AND SP -25-009 Site Plan 1123 In Review 07 -Apr -25 11 -Sep -25 SECURITY ROAD. PARK CONSISTS OF 11 PAVED Approved 12 -Sep -25 Historic District Updated by Script from EPR. PARKING SPACES, CONCRETE WALKWAY TO A Commission Days in Review: 1 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments 20513 BEAVER CREEK ROAD Historic District SP -25-023 Site Plan 110054 In Review 25 -Jun -25 16 -Sep -25 SITE PLAN FOR A PARISH OFFICE Approved 16 -Sep -25 Updated by Script from EPR. HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 Commission Days in Review: 0 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments Approved 29 -Aug -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. REMOVAL OF STAIRS FROM REAR SECOND Residential Addition- S-22-024 6720 REMSBURG LEVEL EXISTING BALCONY, REINFORCING Not a fully documented district, there is an indiv listing on the property but there is no clear evidence 2025-03105 110103 Approved 07 -Jul -25 27 -Aug -25 Alteration Permit ROAD, LOT 1 BALCONY WITH IRON BEAM (23 SQ. FT.) they are the same structure, this has zero visibility from the RoW and is being used to stabilize the porch, Note 29 -Aug -25 Historical Review PHILIP BAKER-SHENK, LOT 1 not changing the profile of the porch on the structure which is more modern already. No HDC review required for this one for these reasons. Days in Review: 2 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments SINGLE FAMILY REPLACEMENT DWELLING ON Residential New LOR 25609 MILITARY ROAD , 2025-03538 Review 26 -Jul -25 29 -Aug -25 FULL UNFINISHED WELLED EXIT BASEMENT, Note 05 -Sep -25 Historical Review Put on the October 1 HDC meeting for new construction design review. Construction Permit PARCEL A GAS FIREPLACE IN LIVING ROOM, COVERED Days in Review: 7 ILSUU Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments WINDOWS TO KITCHEN/DINNING AREA, NEW Residential Addition 2025-03599 Review 30 -Jul -25 10 -Sep -25 LOR 8025 SHARPSBURG PIKE SIDING, CABINETS, AND COUNTERS, WILL NOT Passed - Info 10 -Sep -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Alteration Permit BE MOVING SINK, ADD 98 SQ. FT. HALF Days in Review: 0 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON 2,088 SQ. FT. UNFINISHED WALK OUT BASEMENT WITH Passed - Info 18 -Sep -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Residential New 2025-03673 IV072 Review 01 -Aug -25 21 -Aug -25 LOR 12968 ROWE ROAD ROUGH IN FOR FUTURE BATH AND 263 SQ. FT. Construction Permit Customer previously demo'd historic structure without permits. No exterior design review is required in CONDITIONED CRAWL SPACE, ATTACHED TWO Note 18 -Sep -25 Historical Review this area and therefore no HDC review. CAR GARAGE, COVERED FRONT PORCH, FRAME Days in Review: 28 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments Residential Addition INSTALLATION OF (33) 13.20 KW ROOF Approved 05 -Sep -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 2025-03697 Approved 05 -Aug -25 05 -Aug -25 LOR 17827 SPIELMAN ROAD Alteration Permit MOUNTED SOLAR PANELS ON DWELLING Reviewed by the HDC at their 9/3 meeting and approved. Staff report and approval letter attached in the Note 05 -Sep -25 Historical Review docs. Days in Review: 31 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments 304 SQ. FT. ADDITION TO LEFT OF DWELLING Note 03 -Sep -25 Historical Review Not in an HDC review area for new construction. Residential Addition 2025-04132 Approved 28 -Aug -25 02 -Sep -25 LOR 14902 NATIONAL PIKE ON CRAWL SPACE TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE, Alteration Permit PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES Approved 03 -Sep -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Days in Review: 1 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments Note 10 -Sep -25 Historical Review Added to October 1 agenda, taking with related new construction house. 624 SQ. FT. DETACHED ONE STORY TWO CAR Residential New LOR 25609 MILITARY ROAD, GARAGE ON CONCRETE SLAB, PRE-ENGINEERED No Comments 2025-04306 Review 08 -Sep -25 08 -Sep -25 16 -Sep -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Construction Permit PARCEL A ROOF TRUSSES Received JOHN LEE CHAPMAN, PARCEL A Note 16 -Sep -25 Historical Review Added to October 1 agenda, taking with related new construction house. Days in Review: 8 f1N r nNrRFTF CI AP Tfl OF I ICFo AC A PPI\/ATF Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments Historic Review Activity 08/23/2025 thru 09/18/2025 Record Record # Type MIHP# Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info Status WORKSHOP, WITH STORAGE ROOM, DETAIL Note 09 -Sep -25 Historical Review Not in a review area for new construction Residential New S-22-024 6720 REMSBURG 2025-04308 110103 Review 08 -Sep -25 08 -Sep -25 ROOM, LOUNGE/KITCHENETTE, FULL Construction Permit ROAD, LOT 1 BATHROOM, ARTS AND CRAFTS ROOM, AND Passed - Info 09 -Sep -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. WORKSHOP, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, PRE - Days in Review: 1 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments CONSTRUCTION OF A COUNTY ROAD, GRAVEL Preliminary Plat Site 18225 SHOWALTER ROAD Historic District PSP-25-004 1471; 1866 In Review 09 -Sep -25 11 -Sep -25 OVERNIGHT TRUCK PARKING LOT, AND MASS- Revisions Required 12 -Sep -25 Updated by Script from EPR. Plan HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 Commission GRADING FOR A FUTURE CONVENIENCE STORE. Days in Review: 0 Activity Count: 12 Review Activities Summary Application Type Application Number Approved No Comments Received Note Passed - Info Revisions Required Total Preliminary Plat Total 1 0 0 0 0 1 Preliminary Plat Site Plan Total 0 0 0 0 1 1 Residential Addition -Alteration Permit Total 3 0 3 1 0 4 Residential New Construction Permit Total 0 1 4 2 0 4 Site Plan Total 2 0 0 0 0 2 Total 6 1 7 3 1 12 Lloyd Yavener, Chair � Washington County Michael Lushbaugh Justin Bedard, Vice Chair J_ Tyler Milam Ann Aldrich Gregory Smith Brianna Candelaria Randal Leatherman, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND September 22, 2025 The Honorable John C. Barr President, Washington County Board of County Commissioners 100 W. Washington Street Hagerstown, MD 21740 Dear Mr. Barr, On behalf of the Washington County Historic District Commission (HDC), please accept this letter of support for the legislative priorities provided by the Department of Planning and Zoning related to historic resource incentive programs. The HDC has duties outlined in the Washington County Zoning Ordinance which include the recommendation of programs and legislation to the Board of County Commissions (BOCC), that encourage historic preservation. The HDC has found that our County lacks the opportunity to implement additional programs to benefit our citizen stewards of historic resources. It is imperative that the County and its citizens be provided with the option to implement additional programs which are either proven successful by our neighboring jurisdictions or which show an innovative approach to retain resources vital to our heritage. The priorities the HDC strongly recommends include the ability to implement a historic resources grant program similar to one in place in neighboring Frederick County. The HDC also feels that the impacts of historic resources on our heritage tourism economy warrant a program similar to the agriculture district program in place within our County. That program provides a yearly county property tax credit for agricultural properties. These programs are proposed to assist with citizen concerns which include the rising cost of replacement insurance for historic structures, the increased cost of skilled labor to make repairs to historic structures and the lack of funding to complete projects on historic structures. 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 240.313.2430 240.313.2431 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET The HDC recommends the BOCC to forward these priorities and support their adoption into state law. Our commission is ready to work closely with the BOCC to adopt the corresponding local ordinances for these programs. A robust incentive program is necessary to show the County's continued commitment to the stewardship of these finite resources. Sincerely, Lloyd Yavener Chairperson, Washington County Historic District Commission