The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11 - November AgendaMichael Lushbaugh Lloyd Yavener, Chair�Washington County Justin Bedard, Vice Chair Tyler Milam Ann Aldrich Gregory Smith Brianna Candelario Randal Leatherman, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND AGENDA November 5, 2025 Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m. Washington County Administration Complex, 100 West Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD 21740 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL MINUTES 1. Minutes of October 1, 2025, Regular Meeting NEW BUSINESS 1. Residential Demolition Permit (2025-04486) - Wolfsville Road, Smithsburg (WA -IV -078) - (Discussion/Support) - Demolition of old stone mill, will involve tearing down an already collapsed stone mill, comprised of a single story, no windows or framing * 2. Residential Demolition Permit (2025-04522) - 11416 Hanging Rock Road, Clear Spring (WA -V-1 76, Forsythe Rural Village) - (Discussion/Support) - Demolition of existing 1, 182 sq. ft. two story, metal clad log home structure and accessory sheds, no existing foundation * 3. Residential Demolition Permit (2025-04487) - 14219 Maugansville Road, Hagerstown (WA -I-697 and WA -I-248) - (Discussion/Support) - Demolition of old stone mill, will involve tearing down an already collapsed stone mill, comprised of a single story, no windows or framing * 4. HTC-25-003, 102 West Irvin Avenue, Hagerstown (WA -HAG -1 48 and WA - HAG -146) - (Discussion/Comments) - Part 1 and Part 2 application for tax credits at the Bikle House for chimney repair * OTHER BUSINESS 1. Correspondence a. Request for Comment- Telecommunications Project- Sharpsburg, MD (Trileaf#775393) * 2. Staff Report a. Staff Reviews * b. Legislative Priorities Update c. Update on Town adoption of MOU's for Tax Credit i. Keedysville Approved by BOCC 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 240.313.2430 240.313.2431 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ii. Smithsburg Council Presentation Complete iii. Sharpsburg Council discussing in November iv. Boonsboro Council Workshop Presentation October 27th d. Preservation Maryland CLG Workshop Series ADJOURNMENT UPCOMING MEETING 1. Wednesday, December 3, 2025, 6:00 p.m. a. Note that December meeting will be election of chair and vice chair so members should be prepared to discuss. Both existing chair and vice chair are eligible to remain in their position based on attendance. *attachments MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY October 1, 2025 The Washington County Historic District Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Wednesday, October 1, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the Washington County Administrative Complex, 100 W. Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, Maryland CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commission members present were: Lloyd Yavener, Chairman; Ann Aldrich, Tyler Milam, Greg Smith, Brianna Candelaria and Ex -officio County Commissioner Randal Leatherman. Staff members present were: Washington County Department of Planning & Zoning: Meghan Jenkins, GIS Coordinator and HDC Staff member and Debra Eckard, Office Manager. Also in attendance were Katie Greis, Smoky Greis, Cheryl Greis, and Nancy Hall. MINI ITFC Motion and Vote: Ms. Aldrich made a motion to approve the minutes of the August 6, 2025 regular meeting as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Smith and unanimously approved. Motion and Vote: Mr. Smith made a motion to approve the minutes of the September 3, 2025 regular meeting as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Aldrich and unanimously approved. NEW BUSINESS Residential New Construction Permits (2025-03538 and 2025-04306) — 25609 Military Road Ms. Jenkins presented two permit applications for property located at 25609 Military Road (WA -IV -057, Highfield/Cascade Rural Village). The applicant is proposing to construct a 2,616 sq. ft. two-story single- family dwelling on a full unfinished welled exit basement and a 624 sq. ft. detached one-story two car garage. The proposed structure will be of frame construction with siding. The structure's exterior appearance does not conflict with existing structures in the Rural Village including materials, style, arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height, roof style, and pitch proportion. The size and orientation are consistent with other structures in the Rural Village. The proposed setbacks do not conflict with other setbacks in the neighborhood. The accessory garage will be set back from the house slightly. The proposed construction does not conflict with the County's Design Guidelines and the characteristic details described in the application have been reviewed against the architectural review standards in the Zoning Ordinance; It does not appear that these structures would detract from the Rural Village. Staff recommends approval of the new construction permits due to the proposed construction's consistency with the County's Design Guidelines for Historic Structures, Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation and Section 5D.5 Architectural Review as listed in the County's Zoning Ordinance based on details provided. Motion and Vote: Ms. Candelaria made a motion to recommend approval of the permits as presented and in agreement with Staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Smith and unanimously approved. Residential Addition/Alteration (2025-04514) — 4504 Main Street Ms. Jenkins presented an application for property located at 4504 Main Street (WA -III -141 and WA -III - 025) (Barkman Summer Kitchen) in the Rohrersville Rural Village. The applicant is proposing to repair, wherever feasible, and replace, when necessary, with in -kind materials, which are key themes of the County's Design Guidelines and the Secretary of Interior Standards. The goal of this project is the stabilization of the structure with minimal changes to its appearance through the reuse of existing materials or matching in -kind. This proposal does not conflict with the review criteria in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance as there are no changes to the building affecting its materials, style, arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and numbers of stories or roof style. Staff recommends approval of the permit application as presented due to the work's consistency with the County's Design Guidelines for Historic Structures, Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation and Section 5D.5 Architectural Review as listed in the County's Zoning Ordinance based on the details provided. Motion and Vote: Ms. Aldrich made a motion to recommend approval of the permit application as presented and in agreement with Staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Milam and unanimously approved with Mr. Yavener abstaining from the vote. OTHER BUSINESS Citizen Question and Advice Ms. Nancy Hall from Cavetown was present at the meeting and asked members and staff for some advice regarding a historic carriage house located on the property of a water treatment facility on Crystal Falls Drive owned by the City of Hagerstown. The historic structure is deteriorating and Ms. Hall and some of her neighbors would like to preserve it. Ms. Aldrich suggested approaching the City of Hagerstown to develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with plans to restore/rehabilitate the structure. She believes that there would need to be a 501(3)c organized in order to receive grants to help offset the costs. Ms. Jenkins suggested contacting the Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area as a technical resource. Staff Report • A written report was provided to members in the agenda packet. • Legislative Priorities Update — A draft letter was provided to members in the agenda packet. Members had no comments. Mr. Yavener signed the letter to be forwarded to the County Commissioners. • Update of Town adoption of MOUs for Tax Credits o Signed MOU has been received from the Town of Keedysville o Smithsburg will present the MOU to its Town Council on October 7th at 7:00 p.m. o Williamsport anticipates presenting this at its October meeting o Boonsboro will present this at its October meeting o There have been no responses from the Towns of Hancock, Clear Spring, Sharpsburg or Funkstown. Ms. Candelaria will discuss this at the Sharpsburg Planning Commission's October meeting. • A Section 106 notification for a cell tower at Smithsburg High School was received. Ms. Jenkins stated that the proposed cell tower is in the middle of a forest planting that was done by the County. She has informed the applicant of this fact and acknowledged that the HDC would like to be involved in further review of the proposed project. • The HCWHA's mini grant will close at the end of October. Ms. Jenkins also noted that they have released their geo-tour which has been very popular. • The Comprehensive Plan has been adopted and Ms. Jenkins showed members where it is located on the County's webpage. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Aldrich made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:40 pm. The motion was seconded by Mr. Smith, unanimously approved and so ordered by the Chairman. Respectfully submitted, Lloyd Yavener, Chairman l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Washington County Historic District Commission From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff Date: October 9, 2025 Subj: Residential Demolition Permit/Wolfsville Rd, 2025-04486 Staff Report and Analysis Property Owner: SHORTEN DAVID, Applicant: David Shorten Location: Smithsburg/Wolfsville Road Tax Account ID: 07010834 Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 40/19/222/ Legal Description: 2 ACRESSMITHSBURG/WOLFSVILLE RD Zoning: Residential, Transition MD Inventory of Historic Places (MIHP): IV078 Project Description: Demolition of old stone mill, will involve tearing down an already collapsed stone mill, comprised of a single story and no windows or framing Applicable Law and Review Criteria: The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD. Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A, Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance. " The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological, or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes may still be subject to building permit procedures. 1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria: A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure. B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance. C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological, architectural, or cultural value. D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied. E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating 747 Northern Averive•: Hagerstown, ML) 21742-2723 2401 .2430 ! 1:240.313,2431 ! Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW_WASHGO-MD_NET S, Washington County HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to be considered mandatory. 2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below. A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area. B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of the structure and to the surrounding area. C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent. 3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures. Demolition Section — Design Guidelines (pg. 14) Demolition Alternatives • Redesigning the project to avoid any impact to the structures or its setting; • Incorporating the structures into the overall design of the project; • Converting the structures into another use (adaptive reuse); • Relocating the structure on the property; • Relocating the structure to another property. Demolition Mitigation • Documenting the structure as a whole and its individual architectural features in photographs, drawings, and/or text. This documentation should follow the Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Historical Investigations in Maryland and be completed by a professional as listed in those Standards; • Salvaging from the structure historically significant architectural features and building materials. Full Demolition Guidance — Design Guidelines for Historic Structures in Washington County, MD Staff Report: This structure is on the Washington County Historic Sites Survey (MIHP# WA -IV -078, Diffendal Mill) with survey documentation completed in 1978. The mill is noted as a grist mill operation in the 1800's until approximately 1930. The inventory includes a brief description of an associated log structure and millrace. Both of these structures appear to be on separate property from the mill building at this point in time. There was an addendum regarding the mill building in 1982 which included additional information on the products at that site. At the time of the inventory there was still an intact roof but noted deterioration of the mill. The current owner acquired the property in 2022. The structure had partially collapsed prior to their ownership. The owner is considering building within the property but not directly at this site and wants to remove the unstable structure. They have also provided a brief written description addressing demolition alternatives and mitigation. The owner has provided plans to recycle any steel roofing and may reuse the stone for landscaping as practicable. 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 2401 24X ! 1:240.3 1 3 243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW_WASHGO-MD_NET e Washington County HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Staff Analysis: This structure has continued to deteriorate since its original survey nearly 50 years ago to an even more unstable state. The owner has evaluated the demolition alternatives and provided justification for the decision to reuse the materials on site or recycle where possible. The feasibility of converting, reconstructing or moving the building was determined by the current property owner to not be possible for them. Staff contacted the engineering office to determine the mill's susceptibility to flood risks as there is mention of flooding in the 1982 addendum. The engineering staff indicated there was a potential for this site to flood which would make it difficult to be rebuilt or rehabilitate in its current location given its current deteriorated status. Staff Recommendation: Recommend support for demolition permit 2025-04486 for the reasons stated in the staff analysis. Respectfully Submitted, n Meghan Jenkins, GISP Historic District Commission Staff Attachments: • Photos provided by Applicant • Demo Alternative/Mitigation Statement from owner • Permit Submission Packet • MHIP Record 747 Northern Averive•: Hagerstown, M[321742-2723 240-313.243X ! 1:240.313,2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 W WASHGO-MD_NPT 0 M A R Y L A N D Washington Count I4i �.,yry f4 r _ 4 l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 3 747 Northern Ave rive•: Hagerstown, M[321742-2723 240.313.2430 ! l.240132431 ! Hearing Impaired- 7-1-1 W W_WAsHc.o-MD_NPT Demolition of Structure Diffandall Mill site -Recycle steel roof panels -Reuse field stone from foundation and walls as fence line or stone landscape walls as practical. A) Relocation of structure -Structure is deteriorated hand laid stone with significant structural failure and collapsed with no possibility of relocation. B) Converting the Structure -Converting the structure is not practical as the structure is not sound. MIII Site it lIL\\'IIIII11111111 I\\ \\, m O I WA -IV -078 Diffendall Mill, site Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse - chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on -site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the "vertical files" at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 03-12-2004 WA -IV -078 District 7 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST Map 52 Parcel 72 MAGI ii 2211685914 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY NAME HISTORIC Diffendall Mill AND/OR COMMON Grist Mill Site OLOCATION STREET& NUMBER Maryland Route 77 CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT (]- VICINITY OF Smithsburg 6 STATE COUNTY CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE -DISTRICT _PUBLIC XOCCUPIED -AGRICULTURE -MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) _XRIVATE -UNOCCUPIED -COMMERCIAL -_PARK -STRUCTURE _BOTH -WORK IN PROGRESS -EDUCATIONAL X PRIVATE RESIDENCE SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE -ENTERTAINMENT _RELIGIOUS -OBJECT _IN PROCESS -YES: RESTRICTED -GOVERNMENT _SCIENTIFIC -BEING CONSIDERED -YES: UNRESTRICTED _INDUSTRIAL _TRANSPORTATION XNO —MILITARY _OTHER DOWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Barret Clark Telephone #: STREET& NUMBER C/O Molly C. Day CITY. TOWN STATE , Zip code Smithsburg VICINITY OF Maryland 21783 DLOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Liber #: 523 COURTHOUSE, Folio # : 026 REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC. Washington County Court House STREET& NUMBER West Washington Street CITY. TOWN STATE Hagerstown Maryland 21740 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE _FEDERAL _STATE -COUNTY LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN STATE uJp 4_ DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE -EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED _UNALTERED XORIGrNAL SITE --MOOD _RUINS XALTERED C 50% _MOVED DATE -FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE • This property is the site of -,a stone grist mill which operated during the 1800's and until about 1930. The mill now stands in ruins. Nearby is a large log house covered with German siding. Apparently, it was part of the mill complex. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW _PREHISTORIC -ARCHEULOGY-PREHISTORIC -COMMUNITY PLANNING -LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _RELIGION _1400-1499 -ARCHEOLOGY-HISTORIC -CONSERVATION _LAW -SCIENCE _1500-1599 XAGRICULTURE -ECONOMICS _LITERATURE -SCULPTURE -1600-1699 X_ARCHITECTURE -EDUCATION _MILITARY _SOCIAL/HUMANITARIAN _1700-1799 _ART _ENGINEERING _MUSIC _THEATER 1800-1899 gCOMMERCE -EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _PHILOSOPHY _TRANSPORTATION _1900- -COMMUNICATIONS XJNDUSTRY _POLITICS/GOVERNMENT _OTHER (SPECIFY) _INVENTION SPECIFIC DATES BUILDER/ARCHITECT STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE This group consisting of a stone mill and log house is reflective of the 19th century in Washington County where grain was an important crop and mills for processing that grain were numerous. See attached data prepared by John Mcgrain and forwarded to the Maryland Historical Trust on July 12, 1982. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY --073 OMAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES CONTINUE ON SEPAMTE SHEET IF NECESSARY GEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY 28 acres VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION L STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE COUNTY STATE COUNTY ®FORM PREPARED BY NAME / TITLE Paula Stoner, Architectural Historian ORGANIZATION DATE Preservation Associates July 1A7R STREET & NUMBER TELEPHONE 109 West Main Street, Box 202 301-432-5466 CITY OR TOWN STATE Sharpsburg Maryland 21782 The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 P6- 1108 DIFFENDALL MILL (Washinton County) WA -IV -078 The 1880 manufacturers census listed Samuel Diffendall's mill with $2,000 capital investment; 3 employees; 20 hp steam sawmill; annual output of 75,000 board feet -north `'#2,000. Thezrist mill had ' 5,000 capital investment; 3 employees, 2 run of burr stones, 150 bu/diem maximum capacity; A 28 -foot fall on Cavetooin Run of Beaver Creek drove a 20 hp overshot wheel 3 ft broad at 5.5 rpm. Output was 800 bbl flour (annually), 50 tons of real, 78 tons of feed, 1.5 tons of hominy, 1 ton of buckwheat; total value of production, ' 8,50C_ The 1880 Maryland Directory listed Samuel Diffendall as miller at Smithsbur. Mentioned in Boonsboro News, iTov. 10, 1955. It was then a stone mill at Smithsbur;, with a sandstone marker in the sable end inscribed "Osborn 1832." It was owned at one time by Samuel Diffendall who had been a miller at Claar Sprint; for Michael Smith. It was owned in 1955 by Leon Morgan. In 1978 (March 4), Mrs. Wm. L. (Lea) :erstinr7 of Chewsville wrote to John McGrain: "I was really impressed by the Diffendall Mill ... I was drivin around huntin; for it and it just loomed up unexpectedly -- auite striking --on the Wolf sville Road, off Rt. 77 .... There is a lire hole in the center of the end wall but otherwise looks a lot better than Charles Mill." John McGrain took photos there before the vegetation came out ;gin April 21, 1979. It is a ruinous stone mill. The chimney once passed out throu:..;h the able peak. No hood for the hoisting.; apparatus. Front wall was falling out. Property posted aainst trespassers. Flooding seems to take place here now,,. Skunk cabba. ;e is comin_-, up. Also wild. flowers. The mill is about 36 by 50 feet, overall. Rectangualt shape. Still has its roof. Across the road are ruins of a stone mill race and an abandoned :jas station. -'t- '-:c 1.5 ,41/S2 ' ✓Jo,,c�r� �� lS'T�Tti'� 'J'/ v// /-'r1(X, w $ r�r�'T, w r•{ 1k/ - :CC C ? ) ;\J if O '-: lli' ! 1_ k,30 000 F[ET '71 ��<".�'�:• �,— -.": i S� � 828 -may 1 j f /'�j�, =g•n ;�:Hagerstorivz._l� i� :.h; •;r ' ��i =0 \ fi eSe7`L' :ln •-' .ice' _ r -� , f %. ::;• Caveto«ro =' r�.i ' ( , 7 !'"!/ ' f�� ;•( '•'/ `fir -- �.:1 ; ;'r / � . / ` •1 '' I:+'r% , � ;i.,`;itl 11 L (11 { 1 , i:./.. r -/.. (i '/- 218 3 I 279 i (MVER 660 000 F( (M 39°373 7 t -y" `5O ? h Mapped by the Army Map Service Edited and published by the Geological Survey Control by USGS and USC&GS Topography from aerial photographs by stereophotogrammetric methods. Aerial photographs taken 1943. Field check 1944 Culture revised by the Geological Survey 1953 Polyconic projection. 1927 North American datum 10,000 -foot grids based on Maryland coordinate system, and Pennsvlvania rnnrriinata <,,zt3m —,,th ,�..- SCALE 1.24000 * 1 0 1000 0 1000 2000 ON 3000 4000 e r i �T�- - -- r i 1 5 0 133 MILS 1'38' T 29 MILS 1. Q -1b tQ/(e wc7c tzr't,,) CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 Fl DATUM IS MEAN SFA t FVFt I ,V�Fs4 Grist Mill Site Md. Rt. 77 Smithsburg Vic. m T_ '.- Grist Mill Site 1�c ,tj 7G Md. Rt. 77 Smithsburg Vic. •, 4r' a� p j4f r �t.. ,' : : Dif fendall 'ill 22 April 1979 crdthsburg Washington County HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Washington County Historic District Commission From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff Date: October 9, 2025 Subj: Residential Demolition Permit/CO. 2382 14219 Maugansville Rd, 2025-04487 Staff Report and Analysis Property Owner: WASH CO COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF, REAL PROPERTY ADMINISTRATOR Applicant: Ashley Shirley Location: 14219 MAUGANSVILLE Road Tax Account ID: 13010323 Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 241/0/1563/ Legal Description: LOT 0.588 ACRES14219 MAUGANSVILLE ROAD Zoning: Residential, Suburban Zoning Overlay: Airport Overlay; Hazardous Wildlife Attractant Management District Rural Village: Maugansville (MHT) Historic Rural Village MD Inventory of Historic Places (MIHP): 1248, Maugansville; 1697, Structure Project Description: Demolition of dwelling and (3) detached accessory structures Applicable Law and Review Criteria: The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD. Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A, Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance." The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological, or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes may still be subject to building permit procedures. 1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria: A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure. B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance. C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological, 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD21742-2723 : =':240.313.2430: F-240.313,2431 - iea.ring Impaired- 7-1-1 WWW-WASHGO-MD-NET Washington County { HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION architectural, or cultural value. D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied. E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to be considered mandatory. 2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below. A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area. B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of the structure and to the surrounding area. C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent. 3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures. For Rural Villages, additional review criteria for applications are listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance and include: 1. The exterior appearance of existing structures in the Rural Village, including materials, style, arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and number of stories, roof style and pitch, proportion. 2. Building Size and Orientation 3. Landscaping 4. Signage 5. Lighting 6. Setbacks 7. Accessory structures Demolition Section — Design Guidelines (pg. 14) Demolition Alternatives • Redesigning the project to avoid any impact to the structures or its setting; • Incorporating the structures into the overall design of the project; • Converting the structures into another use (adaptive reuse); • Relocating the structure on the property; • Relocating the structure to another property. Demolition Mitigation • Documenting the structure as a whole and its individual architectural features in photographs, drawings, and/or text. This documentation should follow the Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Historical Investigations in Maryland and be completed by a professional as listed in those Standards; • Salvaging from the structure historically significant architectural features and building materials. Full Demolition Guidance — Design Guidelines for Historic Structures in Washington County, MD 747 Northern Avenue - Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 240.313.2438 ! F-240.3132431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW_WASHGO-MD_NET Washington County HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Staff Report: This structure is located on the east side of Maugansville Road at the northern end of the Urban Rural Village of Maugansville. Maugansville is northwest of the City of Hagerstown. The structure is included in the Washington County Historic Sites survey for Maugansville as contributing to the Rural Village (2004) with the DOE indicating the overall RV is eligible for the National Register. The structure has an individual DOE (2001) which indicates it is not eligible for the National Register individually. The structure was purchased by the County in 2006 with a Federal Aviation Administration grant which did allow for the acquisition and eventual demolition of the structure. The County did lease the property for residential use through May 2025 after acquisition but it is currently vacant with the tenants leaving personal property throughout the property. The construction of the structure is described as "a frame, two story, three -bay dwelling. The resource faces west and has a stone foundation. Its side -gabled roof is covered with asphalt shingles. An exterior brick flue is located on the north elevation. Window openings are rectangular and contain six -over -six replacement sash. Aluminum shutters flank the window openings. An open porch extends full -width across the front facade and rests upon chamfered wood posts. The porch rests upon stone piers. A large, two-story modem brick addition is attached to the south facade" (MIHP, WA -I-697). Beneath the vinyl siding there is evidence of wood siding remaining on the northern portion of the structure. There is a stone retaining wall running along Maugansville Rd. The brick addition is set back from the original portion of the house and forms and L -Shape. The consistency of the vinyl shutters and windows indicate that when the addition was done, there was likely a replacement of all windows and shutters added to match. There is a frame outbuilding with similar wood siding style to the covered siding on the main house. It is situated to the rear of the house (northeast corner of the property). There is a large mature sycamore tree to the rear of the dwelling. This demolition permit is for the dwelling and all outbuildings as well as the stone wall along Maugansville Road. The stated purpose of the demolition is to improve the airport's ability to maintain the property and its visual appearance while ensuring the airport approach is clear of structures. A separate narrative addressing the demolition alternatives and mitigation have been included in this report. There is also a visual of the airport FAA surfaces with the structure highlighted showing its relationship to airport approaches. Staff Analysis: The dwelling has integrity of location and setting at the edge of the rural village. While some exterior elements such as windows and siding have been updated, original elements do remain especially in the porch construction, the configuration of the bays in the original side of the structure and the stone retaining wall. There are indications that the original siding is intact under the vinyl siding. The 2001 documentation states the structure does not have enough individual integrity with these changes, however, there are still enough similar architectural elements that this structure remains contributing to the larger Maugansville survey area (2004). With these details under consideration, the Airport has provided information that the redesign or incorporation of this structure into airport operations does not align with the regulation of imaginary surfaces in and around the airport as determined by their respective FAA definitions. The conversion of the structure or continued lease/use of the property is not feasible considering the airports fund type 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, ML) 21742-2723 -_`:240.313. 4O! F-240.313,2431 -iea.ring Impaired: /-1-1 WWW_WASHO-MD_NET Washington County { HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION and amount. There have been documented issues in the past with the rental of the property. The airport does handle commercial leasing of other structures but the zoning would preclude this structure from a non-residential use. The structures integrity of location within Maugansville provides the strongest support for its eligibility and relocation of the structure would remove that integrity. The cost of relocating a structure of this type of eligibility is also prohibitive. The demolition contactor has provided a narrative for the salvage of certain materials. This structure is part of one individual documentation and one district evaluation. It is not likely that further documentation will uncover details changing the eligibility of this structure. Staff Recommendation: Recommend support of the demolition permit, 2025-04487, in consideration of the demolition documentation provided by the airport staff and detailed in the staff analysis with the following comments: 1. There are other structures which the airport leases in the vicinity of this structure. Staff recommends that there be a thorough assessment of the Airport's buildings which have been/will be acquired to ensure that they are properly secured at all times and utilize the mothballing methods detailed by the National Park Service Preservation Brief #31 — Mothballing of Historical Buildings. This is especially the case for buildings older than 50 years. 2. The airport should pursue rezonings of property they acquire to ensure that adaptive reuse is feasible by zoning or that residential uses can continue as non -conforming if there is an intent to phase out residential leasing. Respectfully Submitted, ,ll 77JQUA $fiLL) Meghan Jenkins, GISP Historic District Commission Staff Attachments: • Photos provided by Staff • Permit Submission Packet • Property Owner Demolition Narrative • Airport Approach/Clear Zone Map provided by airport staff 747 Northern Avenue; Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 240.313.2430 ! F-240.3132431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW_WASHGO-MD_NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION I Photo 1: Front Facade, Facing East 747 Northern Avenue'; Halters#awn, M[321742-2723 240-313.2438 ! F-240-313,2431 I Hearing Impaired- 7-1-1 WWW WASHCO-MD-NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 2: Front Facade Addition, Facing East 747 Northern Avenue; Hagerstown, M[321742-2723 24031 .Z41J ! F-240313243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET Washington Count r l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 5: North facade, facing southeast 747 Northern Avenue; Hagerstown, M[321742-2723 24031 .Z41J ! F-240-3 1 3 243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 6: Front Steps; retaining wall detail; facing east 747 Northern Avenue; Hagerstown, M[321742-2723 24031 .Z41J ! F-240-3 1 3 243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET Washington Count L . : r rtr ticr s } {fir ; r l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 8: Front porch column detail 747 Northern Avenue: Hagerstown, M[321742-2723 24031 .Z41J ! F-240-3 1 3 243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 9: Outbuilding to rear of dwelling, northeast property corner; facing east 747 Northern Avenue; Hagers#awn, M[321742-2723 24031 .Z41J ! F-240-3 1 3 243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MO NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 10: Outbuilding, north facade, facing southeast 747 Northern Avenue; Hagers#own, M[321742-2723 24031 .Z41J ! F-240-3 1 3 243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET Washington County { HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION fri ft Photo 11: Interior detail of outbuilding 747 Northern Avenue; Hagers#own, M[321742-2723 2403 1..Z4O! F-240313243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION r .J�,m I• 1� 1 1 - ■ a .-i # rte #uI. Photo 12: Main dwelling, wood siding detail, photo taken at rear of dwelling 747 Northern Avenue; Hagerstown, M[321742-2723 240-313.2438 ! F-240-313,2431 I Hearing Impaired- 7-1-1 WWW-WASHCO-MD-NET 14219 MAUGANSVILLE Road, Maryland Residential Demolition Permit 4. Applicant's plan for the recycling of waste generated << to be completed by Allegany Wrecking & Salvage, LLC >> 5. A report or narrative analyzing the following alternatives (listed in descending order of preference) as to the feasibility. The report shall consist of thorough, deliberative analyses of each of the alternatives, explaining why each alternative is or is not feasible and additional photographs should be provided in support of the analysis. In cases where a permit may involve multiple structures, each structure must have its alternatives documented. (a) Redesigning the project to avoid any impact to the structure or its setting; Not feasible due to the proximity of the structure to the airport's primary runway approach zone, an area that needs to be protected for the arrival of aircraft. Since we are seeking the demolition of the house, this was not evaluated by airport staff. (b) Incorporating the structures into the overall design of the project; Not feasible again due to the proximity of the structure to the airport's primary runway approach zone, an area that needs to be protected for the arrival of aircraft. Since we are seeking the demolition of the house, this was not evaluated by airport staff. (c) Converting the structure into another use (adaptive reuse); Airport staff have re-evaluated the adaptive reuse of the property and have determined that it is no longer feasible due to the proximity of the structure to the airport's primary runway approach zone, an area that needs to be protected for the arrival of aircraft. An attempt was made when the airport first acquired the property to try to have an adaptive reuse of the building as a rental house, but the renting of the property is a money loser for the airport, outside of our core competence, and ultimately a distraction. In addition, the airport is being taxed on this property by the state. We are an enterprise fund and receive no outside taxpayer assistance, most years. Finally, past tenants have been abusive to the property, leaving it in a squalid condition. We lack the money to perform upgrades and renovations to a structure we don't ultimately need. The attempt to try to have an adaptive reuse of the property ultimately ended up being a drain on airport resources, hence the move to final demolition of the property. The original grant from the FAA gave us the money to acquire and, ultimately, remove the structure. The time for this demolition is now. (d) Relocating the structure on the property; Not feasible due to the proximity of the structure to the airport's primary runway approach zone, an area that needs to be protected for the arrival of aircraft. Since the building has been deemed as "not historical" in previous survey, the cost of relocating the building would be a waste of limited County funds. We are an enterprise fund and receive no outside taxpayer assistance most years. (e) Relocating the structure to another property; Not feasible due to the proximity of the structure to the airport's primary runway approach zone, an area that needs to be protected for the arrival of aircraft. Since the building has been deemed as "not historical" in previous survey, the cost of relocating the building would be a waste of limited County funds. We are an enterprise fund and receive no outside taxpayer assistance most years. (f) Salvaging from the structure historically significant architectural features and building materials; Evaluation previously has indicated that the structure has undergone extensive renovations, so any architectural features or building materials would not fall into the "historical significant" category. Anything of historical value has been lost to time, due to modifications made to the structure, over time. (g) Documenting the structure as a whole and its individual architectural features in photographs, drawings, and/or text: A previous report from URS, completed in September 2001, has indicated the following: 14219 Maugansville Road is a frame, two story, three -bay dwelling. The resource faces west and has a stone foundation. Its side -gabled roof is covered with asphalt shingles. An exterior brick flue is located on the north elevation. Window openings are rectangular and contain six -over -six replacement sash. Aluminum shutters flank the window openings. An open porch extends full -width across the front facade and rests upon chamfered wood posts. The porch rests upon stone piers. A large, two-story modem brick addition is attached to the south facade. Source: https://apps.mht.maryland.gov/Medusa/PDF/Washington/WA-1-697.pdf Since this report was completed, the Airport was leasing this property for tenant occupation, and over time various tenants made modifications to the interior of the house. Additionally, airport staff have also documented abuse of the property. 6. A site plan illustrating any proposed development or introduction of plantings following demolition (if applicable): The airport intends, when the house is demolished, to return the property to grass. This will help our staff to better care for and maintain the lawn. This will also remove the unattractive and blighted appearance of the property. This will also allow for the protection of a critical runway safety area and preserve the feel of the surrounding Maugansville Area. 14219 Maugansville Road, Maryland Residential Demolition Permit Questionnaire 4. Applicant's plan for the recycling of waste generated. ➢ Allegany Wrecking & Salvage, LLC intends to salvage what materials are possible. Most of the house's material is newer material and has no value. ➢ Brick work and foundation stone have been examined by a potential buyer who determined he has no use for them. So now the stone and brick will be used as hardfill in the building's foundation void. Any hewed beams located in the building will be inspected and salvaged and sold and turned into flooring. ➢ Any materials that cannot be salvaged or sold will otherwise be taken to the Washington County Landfill. Allegany Wrecking & Salvage, LLC 13905 Weaver Avenue P.D. Box 618 Maugansville, MD 21767 Phone: (240) 707-6912 Cell: (240) 329-7835 Email: naH.com Bill To: Hagerstown Regional Airport Name: Terry Stouffer Street Address: City, State, ZIP: Phone: 301-573-0940 Email: -'r,-_Iffer@.vashco-md.net Job Location — 14219 Maugansville Rd, Maugansville, MD Description Scope of work shall consist of: LJI Date: 08/03/2025 Quotation ##: 2382 Contract ID #: 2382 Amount 1. Complete demolition of brick house and detached building. 2. Stone wall to be demolished and removed. 3. All wood, trash and debris will be hauled away to an approved landfill. 4. Sewer and water line to be cut and capped prior to the start of demolition, Allegany Wrecking will cut and cap these utilities within the foundation prior to the start of demolition. 5. Concrete floor to be broke for proper drainage. 6. Foundation walls to be removed 28" below grade. 7. Clean brick, block and concrete will be used to backfill the buildings foundation and installed in lifts and compacted. 8. Any remaining hardfill will be hauled off site. 9. 1 -foot of shale will be dressed on top of hardfill with 6" of topsoil seed and straw. TERMS & CONDITIONS 1. Contractor will furnish all materials, labor, equipment, disposal, supervision and insurance for the work mentioned above. 2. Contractor will adhere to all local, state and federal O.S.H.A./M.O.S.H.A. guidelines. 3. Allegany Wrecking & Salvage, LLC will be responsible for notification to the state and contacting Miss Utilities. 4. Property Owners are to make sure all utilities are disconnected prior to the start of demolition. 5. Allegany Wrecking & Salvage, LLC will be allowed all salvageable materials from the property that remains pertaining to the demolition project from this date of signing. 6. Allegany Wrecking & Salvage, LLC is not responsible for any hazardous materials. 7. If Hazardous materials such as; lead, asbestos, or any other hazardous waste materials are found on site the price below will be subject to change to take the necessary steps of removal. 8. Allegany Wrecking & Salvage, LLC will be responsible for obtaining the demolition permits required. 9. Allegany Wrecking & Salvage, LLC will not be responsible for any driveway, sidewalk or black top/concrete damage. 10. The price below does not reflect any abatement or testing. TOTAL LUMP SUM FOR WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE IS--------- $ 14,800.00 By signing this document, you are agreeing to all services and terms mentioned and agree to pay all monies due to said contractor. Qa2 Jcuiva W. Merrbaugh Owner of Allegany Wrecking & Salvage, LLC q.-Owlep(O'e l (�'t y Property Owner's Name (Please Print) 8/3/232YS Date Pr perty Owner's Signature (Please Sign) Date The above prices will be valid for 120 Days. Please contact our office if you have any questions regarding this estimate. Meghan, Please see the map below: The house we are looking to demolish is circled in red. It is currently touching the RPZ edge, and is within the E-TERPS "X" Approach slope area Sincerely, H� Travel Elevated HAGERSTOWN REGIONAL AIRPORT Washington County, MD Eugene Bolanowski, C.M., A.C.E. Operations / Security Manager 18434 Showalter Road Hagerstown, MD 21742 ebolanowski@washco-md.net I e.bolanowski(« flyHGR.com P: (240) 313-2769 I C: (386) 846-9118 www.flyHGR.com I Facebook NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, the unauthorized disclosure or use of which is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or if you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you. l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Washington County Historic District Commission From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff Date: October 9, 2025 Subj: Residential Demolition Permit/Smith Demolition, 2025-04522 Staff Report and Analysis Property Owner: SMITH ROBERT A, Applicant: Charles Dunn Location: 11416 HANGING ROCK Road Tax Account ID: 15005246 Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 20/23/19/ Legal Description: 2.31 ACRES 11416 HANGING ROCK RD Zoning: Environmental Conservation Rural Village: Forsythe (MHT) Historic Rural Village, WA -V-176 Project Description: Demolition of existing 1,182 sq, ft, two story metal clad log home structure and accessory shed, no existing foundation Applicable Law and Review Criteria: The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD. Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A, Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance." The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological, or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes may still be subject to building permit procedures. 1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria: A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure. B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance. C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological, architectural, or cultural value. D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied. E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating 747 Northern Avenue; Hagerstown, ML321742-2723 240-313.243 ; ,-,-240-3 1 3 243 1 I Hearing Impaired- 7-1-1 W W-WASHGO-MD- IET Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to be considered mandatory. 2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below. A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area. B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of the structure and to the surrounding area. C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent. 3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures. For Rural Villages, additional review criteria for applications are listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance and include: 1. The exterior appearance of existing structures in the Rural Village, including materials, style, arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and number of stories, roof style and pitch, proportion. 2. Building Size and Orientation 3. Landscaping 4. Signage 5. Lighting 6. Setbacks 7. Accessory structures Demolition Section — Design Guidelines (pg. 14) Demolition Alternatives • Redesigning the project to avoid any impact to the structures or its setting; • Incorporating the structures into the overall design of the project; • Converting the structures into another use (adaptive reuse); • Relocating the structure on the property; • Relocating the structure to another property. Demolition Mitigation • Documenting the structure as a whole and its individual architectural features in photographs, drawings, and/or text. This documentation should follow the Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Historical Investigations in Maryland and be completed by a professional as listed in those Standards; • Salvaging from the structure historically significant architectural features and building materials. Full Demolition Guidance — Design Guidelines for Historic Structures in Washington County, MD 747 Northern Avenue; Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 240.313.2430 , F-240-313, 431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW_WASHGO-MD_NET Washington County HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Staff Report: This demolition permit is related to structures situated at the southwestern edge of Forsythe rural village. The documentation for this rural village is very minimal. These structures are not specifically mentioned in photo documentation, however, they were constructed at least 50 years ago based on Tax Assessment information and site visit by staff. The topography of the property includes a steep hill to the rear/west on the property with the dwelling on a mostly flat cleared area of the property. The applicant has indicated that flooding of the dwelling is a concern. There appears to be a french drain attempting to move water around the structure as it comes down the hill. Lanes Run is also nearby but there is no adopted floodplain in this area at this time. The dwelling is situated facing Hanging Rock Road and sits back from the road approximately seventy five feet. The dwelling is a 3 bay 2 story dwelling. There is an enclosed porch running the length of the front facade with at a small 1 story addition on the north gable end. The entire structure has been clad in vertically aligned metal siding. Windows are vinyl/aluminum replacements. The roof is also metal sheeting. The structure is a combination of frame and log construction. The permit states that there is no foundation/basement and due to the metal siding there is no foundation visible upon site visit. The condition of the log portion of the dwelling is unknown as it has been covered in modern materials and altered multiple times. Interior photos and layout have been provided by the applicant for the main dwelling. There is a small shed/barn approximately 10x15 that is frame construction with vertical wood siding that is also included for demolition. It is located to the north of the dwelling. There is also a small concrete block outbuilding to the rear of the dwelling that is built into the hill. Its purpose is unknown from documentation provided. There is a modern shed on the property directly southwest of the dwelling that will be relocated and is not subject to this permit. A brief examination of deeds related to the property reveals that this property was owned by members of the Forsythe family. The deed description relays that the property is part of "Defiance" and mentions a spring near the dwelling formerly owned by Abraham Forsythe. Defiance is a land patent for Lancelot Jacques associated with Green Spring Furnace. There is a nearby Forsythe family property WA -V-174 which may relate to this location and has some more information on the Forsythe family included. Example Deeds: January 1947 (L239 F375) Henry Elmer Forsythe (grantor) to William L. Everly and wf. November 1884 (L86 F428) David Forsythe and Charlott (wf) To Anna Forsythe (Blair) Staff Analysis: Examining the condition of this property, it has been heavily altered over time and has unknown conditions of the structure under the metal siding. The structure has an outdated electrical and plumbing system and additional building code issued outlined by the applicant. The applicant has indicated that the reuse of the structure would require significant accommodations to the building codes including ceiling height, egress issues with the stairs etc. The applicant also indicated that it is not economically feasible to convert or relocate the structure. The applicant indicates in their justification that they are amenable to keeping the original log structure of the dwelling in place. Selective demolition would still be necessary to ensure compliance with local ordinances. The applicant has also noted that there is an issue with water on the property which is likely a combination of the steep slope 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, M[321742-272 :240-313.2430. F-240-313, 431 - iearin9Impaired- 7-1-1 WWW-WASHO-MD-NET Washington County { HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION to the western side of the property and the nearby run/spring head. In combination with the building code issues, these water issues further exacerbate the cost of rehabilitating the dwelling. The outbuildings also have condition issues with missing siding; although the roofs are intact. They do not appear to be great workmanship examples of their construction type. The property is likely associated with the Forsythe family which settled in this area of the County, however, there is a nearby example of log construction that is intact and retains more resources such as the Forsythe family cemetery. There may be some archaeological resources associated with the dwelling, however, the new construction proposed is not near the demolition. Staff Recommendation: Recommend support for the demolition permit, 2025-04522, in consideration of the details provided in the staff analysis with the following comments: 1. The applicant is encouraged to perform a selective demolition of the main dwelling and to utilize the mothballing methods detailed by the National Park Service Preservation Brief #31 — Mothballing of Historical Buildings. 2. The property owner should be cautious in demolition as they may find resources in and around the dwelling. Respectfully Submitted, Ponkt�oj Meghan Jenkins, GISP Historic District Commission Staff Attachments: • Photos provided by Staff • Permit Submission Packet • Applicant provided demolition narrative • Applicant provided photos • Applicant provided floor plans/elevation details 747 Northern Avenue: Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 240.313.2430 , F-240-3 1 3 243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW_WASHGO-MD_NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Front of house, facing west �_ .i{�.�- ts iY, } _ Tw _ Vjp ayµ. 747 Northern Avenue'; Halters#awn, M[321742-2723 240-313.2430 . F-240-313,2431 I Hearing Impaired- 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD-NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 14 4 V Right side of house, facing south 747 Northern Avenue; Hagerstown, M[321742-2723 240.313.2430 , F-240313243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION •-, .'. ter' 1}i ++s Rear of house, facing south 747 Northern Avenue; Halters#awn, M[321742-2723 240.313.2430 , F-240-313, 431 I Hearing Impaired- 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Left side of house, facing north 747 Northern Avenue; Hagers#own, M[321742-2723 240-313.2430 . F-240313243 1 I Hearing Impaired- 7-1-1 WWW WASHCO-MD-NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Barn, facing north 747 Northern Avenue; Hagers#own, M[321742-2723 240.313.2430 , F-240-3 1 3 243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Barn, facing southwest 747 Northern Avenue; Hagerstown, M[321742-2723 240.313.2430 , F-240313243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Barn, facing east 747 Northern Avenue'; Hagerstown, M[321742-2723 240-313.2430 . F-240-313,2431 I Hearing Impaired- 7-1-1 WWW WASHCO-MD-NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION �r Barn, facing northeast 747 Northern Avenue; Hagers#awn, M[321742-2723 240.313.2430 . F-240-3 1 3 243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET l , Washington County r HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Outbuilding, facing north 747 Northern Avenue; Hagers#awn, M[321742-2723 240.313.2430 , F-240313243 1 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WW1 _WASHCO-MD_NET 50, TOTAL LOT AREA: 2,31 ACRES EXISTING DWELLING: 2 ST❑RY, NO BASEMENT, 784 SF, 2-BEDR❑❑M, 1 -BATH PROPOSED DWELLING: 2 ST❑RY, GARAGE UNDER LIVING, 944 SF, 1-BEDR❑❑M, 1 -BATH / -.-- EXIST T, SHED / // DEMOLISHED L �/ % POLE ' L!� EXIST, / / HOUSE TO BE DEMOLISHED r GH, SE ', /� 10,000 SF r /� / Q SEPTIC t / / �ti��' AREA / vJ / PROPOSED / / HOUSE O / 26'x 6' TT0 BE SHED RELOCATED / / Q G.F, = 694 F.F. 703.1 1P0SED GRAVEL / DRIVEWAY /// /�5'x5' C0NC,PAD DECK -' / 24'x8' '/ 100PR0P0SED roO IO G, WELL I T. YELL / ABANDON / / TO '' P0L ,/ , ,V / \ \ — / / in /, / / / / / Z c - Z C_ V C J V Z C C 10 U N z ci W N 1 a OZ Q U y Q m U O • U W a o y c � 0 Historic District Commission Date: October 21th, 2025 To: Washington County Historic District Commission Subject: Residential Demolition Permit (2025-04522) for 11416 Hanging Rock Road At the request of the Washington County Historic District Commission, the following information is provided. 1. The State Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT) indicates the primary structure was built in 1910. This structure consisted of 784 square feet of above grade living area. The structure consisted of log exterior walls and a timber framed roof structure, additions consist of 2x4 wood framed material. Metal panels have been added to the exterior facade as well as multiple porch and shed additions. All original doors and windows have been replaced with new vinyl and metal materials at some point in time. Interior finishes consist of either particleboard paneling, plaster, or drywall. All interior trims and moldings have been updated at some point in time and consist of 1x material. Portions of the interior floors may be original. Interior and Exterior pictures (See Attachment 1) 2. Detail drawings have been attached. (See Attachment 2) 3. Floor Plans for each floor level have been attached (See Attachment 3) 4. All waste removed from the structure, dependent upon condition, will be recycled and reused by the homeowner, contractor or donated to Habitat for Humanity Restore. 5. The homeowner wishes to retain and repurpose the original log & timber structure, minus additions for a proposed Workshop. Remove all additions to include Porch / Bathroom / Entry / Storage not constructed of log. Remove vertical metal siding panels on all facades to expose original log structure. Assess log structure and chinking. Seal / Waterproof as required to provide a watertight structure a) Redesigning the project to avoid any impact to the structure or its setting. Redesigning the existing structure for use as a residential home to meet today's codes and standards would not be feasible. Examples; Section R305 Ceiling Heights, for habitable spaces cannot be met, Section R31 0 Emergency Escape and Rescue Openings cannot be met, Section R311 Means of Egress — R311.4 Vertical Egress cannot be met, R311.6 Hallways cannot be met, R311.7 Stairways cannot be met, R311.7.2 Headroom cannot be met. b) Incorporating the structure into the overall design of the project. The existing structure in a low-lying area and prone to flooding. The new home is being proposed outside of this area. c) Converting the structure into another use (adaptive use). This is what the homeowner is proposing. d) Relocating the structure on the property. Not economically feasible for use as a single-family residence. e) Relocating the structure to another property. Not economically feasible. f) Salvaging from the structure historically significant architectural features and building materials. The original log structure will remain and all historically significant architectural features will remain in place. g) Documenting the structure as a whole and its individual architectural features in photographs, drawings and/or text. The building in its current state has been photographed and documented. The structure will appear truer to its original architectural significance as funding becomes available and project is completed. 6. N/A Thank you for your time, Charles R. Dunn I President Dunn Design + Build, LLC. Attachment 1 - Exterior 4 Attachment 1 - Interior / 1St Floor T i \'IIII ra, Attachment 1 - Interior / 2"d Floor -CA %LiaiI Attachment 1 - Interior / Attic d, � r 14 (f: I za'-a" O i� O) /'-O" �i /' a" C /a' -a" C LN/ING I (O ;�i'�i�i'�i'�A4Fi'�i _____ ________ __________________ ____ ______ _____ 7 :•//,//,// I>KI© f'ORCfl " C)ATI4 _____ __________ fl '�Y, '' / E , Co, E�JTW % In ;TORAGE . , , I,',, / ____ 5'-9" /z'-3„ J.'-6" a) F I T FLOORPLJn 55 cQ. FT.(S-TORAGE) NI COINING /5'--a" 0o KITC++EN OO, [EIUIH I I I I I I I I I I I I I L------------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I cECOrJD FLOOR PLAW 3'2 cO. FT. SCALE: I/it = I' 0" ci: 0 O ci: 0) .c Cd I t .E cn m - - V , j ______ ______ 'H" - - H❑ _ - - r r 4 LEFT ELE\/ATIOIJ 0 REAR ELE\/ATIOIJ A2.� SCALE: 3/15 = ° P ° • SCALE: 3/16 = I -C m _ • E _ _ _ co = ■ _ iii _ U ELI i _ _ U EL] I L I Iii L1 _ J) ______________ 4- -Q RIGOT ELE\/ATIOIs.J FROIJT ELEv/ATIOIJ O A` SCALE: MC=I.O SCALE: 3/16 = I' °' County v.07/26/2024 Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit ORDINANCE 2024-23 Part I — Evaluation of Significance HTC Number (HDC office use only): .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Instructions: Fill out this form for determination of whether the historic structure is located within a qualifying area. Owners of properties that have the Historic Preservation Zoning Overlay do NOT need to complete this form. For structures under MHT Easement, a copy of the easement document must be included. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Name Nida and Philip Bikle 1933 House Street Address 102 W Irvin Ave city Hagerstown zip 21742 Check all designations that apply: Historic Structure in the Antietam Overlay 1 or 2 ❑ Historic Structure contributing to a Historic Rural Village ❑ Historic Structure under MHT Easement ❑� Historic Structure in an eligible municipality Mist below) Municipality City of Hagerstown APPLICANT INFORMATION Name Nida Bikle Street Address 102 W Irvin Ave city Hagerstown State Maryland zip 21742 Telephone Email Address PROJECT CONTACT (if different from applicant) Name Company Street Address City State --- Zip Telephone (000) 000-0000 Email Address Page 1 1 Part I — Evaluation of Significance PROPERTY DETAIL INFORMATION Date(s) of building(s) including source of dates Historic home built in 1933. House is stuccoed masonry with a stone foundation. Date(s) of exterior alteration(s) no alterations of exterior Description of the physical appearance (size, number of stories, style, construction materials) This is a 1.5 story structure, masonry construction with stucco. The roof has steeply gables, metal casement windows and a recessed entrance with thick fluted columns supporting a segmental arched pediment. The roof has asphalt shingles which are rolled at the edges creating a thatched roof effect. There is a one story garage projecting from the west side of the house. Statement of significance The structure has distinctive characteristics which tie it to the professional class residential neighborhood of Oak Hill of which it is a contributing structure (WA -HAG -146) The neighborhood is significant in that many of the city's commercial, industrial, social and cultural leaders resided in the neighborhood. The structure has a unique construction type in its variety of architectural features from the metal casement windows to the rolled asphalt shingles. See attached WA -HAG -148 and WA -HAG -146. Page 2 1 Part I — Evaluation of Significance APPLICATION CHECKLIST ❑� Application Form— I have filled in all applicable fields. (check Equivalent Documentation below if applicable) ❑� Signature — I signed and dated the Part 1 application ❑� Ownership — If I am not the fee -simple owner of the property, I have provided a written statement from the fee -simple owner indicating that he or she is aware of the application and has no objection to the request for review ❑� Significance justification — I have attached documentation to support the significance of the historic structure ❑� Photographs — I have attached exterior photographs of all sides of the structure including areas applicable to the application Equivalent Documentation — I am attaching an equivalent documentation packet for review. I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Properties Tax Credit Application and that the information provided in this application is true, completed and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. Signature of Applicant 533e913-3ed0-4748-9def-2 Digitally signed by 0533e913-3edo41489def-2dsa24da16dt Sa24da16df Date: 2025.10131201: 11 -0400' Printed Name of Applicant Nida Bikle & Philip Bikle Date 10/13/25 Signature of Applicant 533e913-3ed0-4748-9def-2 Digitally signed by 0533e9133ed0-0]489def-2d5a24da 1 thu Sa24da16df Date: 2025 1013 12:01:23 94.00• Printed Name of Applicant Nida Bikle & Philip Bikle Date 10/13/25 Historic District Commission Use Only The Historic District Commission has reviewed the Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit — Part I for the above - named property and has determined that the property: �Is located in an existing qualified area and meets historic structure criteria flAppears to meet the qualifications of a historic structure pending designation through individual Historic District ❑Is not a historic structure because it is not in a qualifying area; does not meet criteria for local designation ❑Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed Date of HDC Review Page 3 1 Part I — Evaluation of Significance Bikle Tax Credit - Part I Photographs of Exterior Front Elevation, Facing North Page 1 of 12 Bikle Tax Credit - Part I Photographs of Exterior Page 2 of 12 2 Story casement window detail, Front Elevation, Facing North Bikle Tax Credit - Part I Photographs of Exterior Page 3 of 12 Front Door, Facing northeast Bikle Tax Credit - Part I Photographs of Exterior Page 4 of 12 Front porch column detail, facing northeast Bikle Tax Credit - Part I Photographs of Exterior Page 5 of 12 Front Door and casement window detail, facing northeast Bikle Tax Credit - Part I Photographs of Exterior Page 6 of 12 Left Elevation, facing northeast Bikle Tax Credit - Part I Photographs of Exterior Left elevation, casement window detail, facing southeast Page 7 of 12 Bikle Tax Credit - Part I Photographs of Exterior Rear elevation, facing south Page 8 of 12 Bikle Tax Credit - Part I Photographs of Exterior Page 9 of 12 Rear Elevation including 2nd story casement window, facing south m , Bikle Tax Credit - Part I Photographs of Exterior Right elevation/east porch detail facing west Page 11 of 12 Bikle Tax Credit - Part I Photographs of Exterior Page 12 of 12 Right elevation/east porch as seen from front elevation, facing north Washington County ` v. 07/26/2024 Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit ORDINANCE 2024-23 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation HTC Number (from Part I Application): .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Instructions: Fill out this form for determination of whether the proposed work is consistent with Washington County Design Guidelines and Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Name Nida and Philip Bikle 1933 House Street Address 102 W Irvin Ave city Hagerstown zip 21742 APPLICANT INFORMATION Name Nida Bikle Street Address 102 W Irvin Ave city Hagerstown State Maryland zip 21742 Telephone Email Address PROJECT CONTACT (if different from applicant) Name Company Street Address City f State --- Zip (000 Telephone ) Email Address PROPERTY DATA Indicate One: Primary/Secondary Residence Mixed -Use OResidential Commercial OOther Estimated Start Date 11/1 0/25 Estimated Completion Date 12/1/25 Estimated Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures $ 10,075.00 Page 1 I Part II — Description of Rehabilitation HTC Number: DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK Us LU UCJL.I IU dli C1LLC1 IUI VVU1 r dl IU I ICVV WI IJLI UL.LIUI I. Number 1 Feature Chimney Describe existing feature and its condition The existing chimney has holes in the crown and the mortar is deteriorated. There are missing mortar joins and water intrusion is occuring. Describe work and impact on feature A concrete crown will be placed to ensure water is shed away. There will be a drip edge installed. Photo Numbers 1-1 through 1-4 Drawing Numbers n/a Number 2 Feature Chimney flue Describe existing feature and its condition The chimney was inspected prior to boiler installation and it was determined by installer that a liner was needed in order for safe operation. Describe work and impact on feature Boiler flue will be relined with insulated stainless steel liner system and components and the damaged flue tiles will be removed. The terracotta thimble will be replaced. Photo Numbers 2-1 through 2-3 Drawing Numbers Page 2 1 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation HTC Number: DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK Us LI II J Pd gC LU UCJL.I IL) dII U ALUI IUI VVUI r dl IU I ICVV %-UI IJLI UL.LIUI I. Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers Page 3 1 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation HTC Number: DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK Us LI II J Pd gC LU UCJL.I IL) dII U ALUI IUI VVUI r dl IU I ICVV %-UI IJLI UL.LIUI I. Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers Page 4 1 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation HTC Number: DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK Us LI II J Pd gC LU UCJL.I IL) dII U ALUI IUI VVUI r dl IU I ICVV %-UI IJLI UL.LIUI I. Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers Page 5 1 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation HTC APPLICATION CHECKLIST Application Form — I have filled in all applicable fields. Signature — I signed and dated the Part 2 application ZDescription of Rehabilitation Work — I have described ALL proposed work planned for the exterior of my property. I understand that all work must be consistent with the Washington County Design Guidelines and Secretary of the Interior's Standards and be reviewed and approved by the Historic District Commission Supplementary Materials — If applicable to my project, I have attached site plans, demolition plans, architectural plans, HVAC plans, replacement window/door drawings and/or product specifications. Photographs — I have attached photographs to support the description of work. ❑ Equivalent Documentation — I am attaching an equivalent documentation packet for review. I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Properties Tax Credit Application and that the information provided in this application is true, completed and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. Signature of Applicant 533e913-3ed0-4748-9def-2 Dgitaly signed by 85336913-3ed047489deI2d5a24da16dt 5a24da16df Date 2825.10191444:32x84 -04088' Printed Name of ApplicantNida Bikle & Philip Bikle Date 10/19/25 Signature of Applicant U533e913-3ed0-4748-9def-2 Digitally signed by Id0533e9133ed0-0748-9def-2d5a24da16if Sa24da16df Date 202510191444:38 -04.00• Printed Name of ApplicantNida Bikle & Philip Bikle Date 10/19/25 Historic District Commission Use Only The Historic District Commission has reviewed the Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit — Part II for the above - named property and has determined that the proposed rehabilitation described herein: ❑Is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Washington County Historic Guidelines. Final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part 3 application is submitted and approved ❑Is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation if the attached conditions are met. A final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part 3 Application is submitted and approved. Is not consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, eligibility requirements, and/or does not comply with program requirements and therefore certification is denied. ❑ Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed Date of HDC Review Page 6 1 Part II — Description of Rehabilitation Bikle Tax Credit - Part II Application -Description of Work Photos 6 1-1, Cracker Mortar at chimney crown 1-2, cr crown 1-3, chimney crown showing terracotta thimble closer Page 1 of 3 Bikle Tax Credit - Part II Application -Description of Work Photos 1-4, Chimn Page 2 of 3 2-1, Chimney flue condition cracks 2-2, Chimney tile condition at 12.9ft Bikle Tax Credit - Part II Application -Description of Work Photos 2-3, Chimney tile condition at 30 feet Page 3 of 3 From: Chimney Sweeps of Sherwood Forest To: Jenkins. Meahan Subject: Re: 102 West Irvin Avenue, #88420 and #88373 Date: Monday, October 20, 2025 5:29:21 PM Attachments: image001.gng imaue002.pna image003.gng imaue004.pna image005.gng imaue006.onu image.nno imaae.pna WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded. Hi Meghan, It was for longevity and durability. I am going to include some pictures that show how the present design is allowing water to come into the house. If it is a requirement to use the Classic Chimney Pots, we will inform the Bikle family. The chimney crown is a piece of concrete we pour to help shed water away from the tiles. The drip edge helps the water not run back to the chimney and drop off to the roof. I am including a picture of a typical concrete crown we have used to repair a chimney that allowed water into the home. In the picture, you will notice in the background a chimney that has not been repaired. We can install the Classic Chimney Pots to finish off the top of the chimney. The crown would overlap the brick to help shed water away from the structure. I hope my explanation makes sense. Please let me know if you have any questions, and if you would like we could schedule a phone call. Take Care, Javier Rosas On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 12:24 PM Jenkins, Meghan <mjenkins@.washco-md.net> wrote: Hello Javier, Ms. Bikle is working with my office to obtain a tax credit related to the chimney work you provided an estimate for on her structure at 102 W Irvin Avenue, Hagerstown. Typically, with our tax credits we provide them for replacement of materials "in kind" but I noticed you were proposing a cast concrete crown with drip edge whereas there is a terracotta crown there now. Would you be able to provide a brief justification/reasoning on why you are using cast concrete? Is it a material availability, a longevity of material, is there a higher cost for repair/replacement of the terracotta there now? Will the concrete have a similar color and shape to the existing terracotta? I just want to be able to provide this information to my commission that reviews the tax credit applications to ensure they are familiar with the reasoning for the material. If you have a photo example of a crown similar to the one you are proposing that would also be extremely helpful. Your assistance with this information is very much appreciated. 4[SHERWOOO FOREST INC. EXPERIENCE WOFESSrNAL SEAM ES" 13030 Old National Pike Mt. Airy, MD 21771 (301)829-3588 ESTIMATE Date 88373 10-16-2025 DESCRIPTION BILL TO Bikle, Nida 102 West Irvin Ave Hagerslown,Md 21742 JOB ADDRESS 102 West Irvin Ave Hagerstown, Md 21742 Deposit Technician 0.00 Javier Rosas PRICE I TAX Quote for relining boiler flue, replace thimble, tile removal. Crown repair to address water entry and $ 0.00 NT point up of some missing mortar in the chimney. Scaffolding set up to do repairs safely Remove damaged flue tiles to install a insulated stainless steel liner system and components Install the insulated stainless steel liner with a terra cotta thimble replacement City of Hagerstown Permit $ 1,500.00 NT $ 1,500.00 $ 2,575.00 NT NT $ 0.00 NT $ 200.00 NT FINANCING NOW AVAILABLE! SUBTOTAL: $5,775.00 We offer a variety of programs, including no -interest options! DISCOUNT: ($0.00) **Call our office for the financing option that fits your needs** TAX: $a_00 TOTAL: $5,775.00 4[SHERWOOO FOREST INC. EXPERIENCE WOFESSrNAL SEAM ES" 13030 Old National Pike Mt. Airy, MD 21771 (301)829-3588 ESTIMATE Date 88420 10-16-2025 DESCRIPTION BILL TO Bikle, Nida 102 West Irvin Ave Hagerslown,Md 21742 JOB ADDRESS 102 West Irvin Ave Hagerstown, Md 21742 Deposit Technician 0.00 Javier Rosas PRICE I TAX 2. Quote for relining boiler flue, replace thimble, tile removal. Crown repair to address water entry $ 0.00 NT and point up of some missing mortar in the chimney - To address the exterior water entry we recommend repairing the top with a cast concrete crown with $ 3,100.00 NT a drip edge and install two flue tiles. Point up soft and missing mortar joints. Acid wash and water repellant If we can do this work while the chimney liner repairs and being completed it will save cost on having to come back at a later date and erect scaffolding. FINANCING NOW AVAILABLE! We offer a variety of programs, including no -interest options! **Call our office for the financing option that fits your needs** SUBTOTAL DISCOUNT TAX L__ TOTAL $ 750.00 NT $ 450.00 NT $ 0.00 NT $4,300.00 ($0.00) $1100 $4,300.00 £TRI LEAF environmental architecture engineering 303 International Circle, Suite 150, Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030 - 410.853.7128 - www.trilea£com October 13, 2025 Washington County Historic District Commission 747 Northern Ave Hagerstown, MD 21742 Phone: 240-313-2430 Email: askplanning@washco-md.net RE: Milestone Towers — Bakersville / Trileaf Project # 775393 7116 Houser Road, Sharpsburg, MD 21782 Washington County, Williamsport Quadrangle (USGS) Latitude: 39° 30' 32.47" N, Longitude: 77° 46' 18.14" W To whom it may concern: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a NEPA Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to construct a 146 -foot monopole communications tower with an overall height of 147 feet, including attachments. Associated equipment will be located within a 77 -foot by 30 -foot (2,310 square feet) fenced compound. The project includes a 10 -foot wide gravel access drive, parking and turn around extending west away from the compound approximately 157 feet to Houser Road. The proposed location is vegetated land. The antennas will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf is requesting information regarding this tower's potential effect on Historic Properties. All information received will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as part of the NEPA review process. Additionally, this invitation to comment is separate from any local planning/zoning process that may apply to this project. If you wish to comment or be considered a consulting party, please respond within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If a response is not received within thirty (30) days, it will be assumed that you have no objections to this undertaking. A site topography map and aerial photograph are enclosed for your reference. Please call me at (410) 853-7128 or email m.grasham@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, McKayla Ordak Senior Project Scientist Site Location & Surrounding Properties Site Location - - - - Easement wwb Aerial Photographs (2025) Milestone Towers — Bakersville 7116 Houser Road Sharpsburg, MD 21782 , /' '. &TRILEAF environmental architecture engineering Williamsport Quadrangle, Maryland (2023) Contour Interval = 20 Feet Scale 1 Inch = -1,500 Feet Latitude: 39° 30' 32.47" N, Longitude: 77° 46' 18.14" W O SPRECHER RD O 1 � C � 1 Mercersville Site Location �• Terrapin Neck Site Vicinity Map Milestone Towers — Bakersville 7116 Houser Road Sharpsburg, MD 21782 North Fairplay ip Salem �Chu`rc Cern 144 01 £TRILEAF environmental architecture engineering Milestone Towers SITE INFORMATION SCOPE OF WORK: 1. INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS. 2. INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 3. INSTALL TEMPORARY GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD TO COMPOUND. 4. CLEAR AND GRADE SITE TO FINAL SUBGRADE ELEVATION. 5. INSTALL MONOPOLE FOUNDATION AND MONOPOLE. 6. INSTALL GROUNDING, TELCO PULL BOXES, UTILITY WIREWAY. 7. INSTALL VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT SLAB AND CARRIER EQUIPMENT. 8. INSTALL ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE CONDUIT AND HAND HOLES. 9. INSTALL FENCE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 10. INSTALL VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS, CABLES, RRHS AND EQUIPMENT. JURISDICTION: WASHINGTON COUNTY PARCEL: 0711/0006/0046 PARCEL AREA: 70.6400 A.C. PARCEL OWNER: SHAW, THOMAS E & JUDITH ANN PREMISES ADDRESS: 7116 HOUSER ROAD, SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 MAILING ADDRESS: 7272 TOMMYTOWN ROAD, SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 12-009739 NEIGHBORHOOD: N/A ZONING: EC (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DISTRICT) STRUCTURE TYPE: RAW LAND - NEW MONOPOLE GROUND ELEVATION: ±416.2' NAVD88 LATITUDE: N 39 30' 35.408" LONGITUDE: W 77' 46' 17.590" EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0 SF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3,667 SF NOTE: MONOPOLES AND COMMUNICATION TOWERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH ANSI/EIA/TIA-222, STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR STEEL ANTENNA TOWERS AND ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRUCTURES. PROJECT TEAM MILESTONE TOWERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP V D/B/A MILESTONE TOWERS APPLICANT: 12110 SUNSET HILLS RD, SUITE 600, RESTON, VA 20190 MR. LEN FORKAS (703) 620-2555 ENTREX COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD, SUITE 430, ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 CAMILLE SHABSHAB (202) 408-0960 BAKERSVILLE 7116 ROUSER ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 NEW 145' MONOPOLE VICINITY MAP 6a rti��s tea• sprecher Rd. Spy' SITE `$ Tarr.: ...n Ta $ totJd+ng Rd. MOOT GRID MAP A88 SCALE: 1" = 2,000' TRUE NORTH CODE COMPLIANCE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES. - 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE - 2018 INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE - 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE - 2018 NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE - AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE - AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION - ANSI/TIA-222-H SHEET INDEX T-1 TITLE SHEET Z-1 SITE PLAN Z-2 ADJOINERS Z-3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN Z-4 COMPOUND PLAN Z-5 MONOPOLE ELEVATION Z-6 SITE DETAILS Z-7 SIGNAGE PLAN DRAWING APPROVALS SIGNATURE DATE OWNER REPRESENTATIVE SITE AQUISITION CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ZONING RF ENGINEER CALL UTILITIES NOTIFICATION MISS UTILITY 811 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING nowbelow. Call 811 before you do \I/ entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers BAKERSVILLE 7116 HOUSER ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 VING: EC (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION) TAX MAP: 0071 GRID: 0006 PARCEL: 0046 ELECTION DISTRICT: 12.000 SEAL: F, i Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 08-27-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW A 09-09-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW B 09-19-2025 RELOCATE SITE 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.478 DESIGNER: C.S. ENGINEER: M.A. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER: T-1 SITE VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 1,500' TRUE NORTH SITE INFORMATION & NOTES 1. SITE NAME: BAKERSVILLE 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY AND IS NOT TO BE USED FOR THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY. 3. THE SUBJECT PARCEL INFORMATION; OWNER: SHAW, THOMAS E & JUDITH ANN PREMISES ADDRESS: HOUSER RD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 MAILING ADDRESS: 7272 TOMMYTOWN RD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 COUNTY: WASHINGTON COUNTY, MD TAX MAP:0071 GRID:0006 PARCEL: 0046 DISTRICT NUMBER: 12 ACCOUNT NUMBER: 009739 ZONING: EC USE: AGRICULTURAL 4. THE RECORDED REFERENCES FOR THE SUBJECT PARCEL ARE AS FOLLOWS: DEED BOOK 06290, PAGE 00123 AREA: 70.6400 ACRES 5. THE DATUM'S ARE NAD 83 AND NAVD 88, AND THE BEARING BASE IS STATE GRID. 6. NO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED, THE PRESENCE OF ANY SUCH UTILITIES MUST BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. 7. NO WETLANDS HAVE BEEN DEFINED AND ANY AREAS SHOWN AS MARSH, PONDS OR DITCHES ARE DONE SO FROM VISIBLE SURFACE FEATURES AND IN NO WAY CONSTITUTE A DEFINED WETLAND. 8. THE FLOOD ZONE OF THE PROPOSED TOWER IS AS FOLLOWS; FLOOD ZONE X, AREA OF MINIMUM FLOODING. SOURCE, FEMA FLOOD MAP FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MD. COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 24043C 0295D. REVISED, AUGUST 15, 2017. 9. A TITLE REPORT WAS REVIEWED FOR THIS SURVEY. 10. THE DATA COLLECTED AND SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTION OF A CELLULAR TOWER, ANY NECESSARY ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT AND ALL APPROPRIATE EASEMENTS. 11. NO UNRECORDED EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY AND IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SUCH EASEMENTS IMPACT THE SITE. 12. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ALL MATTERS OF PUBLIC RECORD. 13. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED TOWER IS AS FOLLOWS; THE VALUES LISTED BELOW ARE WITHIN ±50' HORIZONTAL AND ±20' VERTICAL. LATITUDE: N 39 30' 32.474" LONGITUDE: W 77' 46' 18.143" ELEVATION: 418.0' NAVD88 14. THIS SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE APPALACHIAN TRAIL CORRIDOR SPECIAL PLANNING AREA, THE ANTIETAM OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT OR THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONING DISTRICT 15. THE SITE IS LOCATED MORE THAN 345' FROM ANY EXISTING DWELLING, SCHOOL, CHURCH, OR INSTITUTION FOR HUMAN CARE. 16. THE CLOSEST EXISTING TOWER IS A 199' US CELLULAR MONOPOLE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 2.54 MILES SOUTH-SOUTHWEST (COORDINATES 39.66494, -77.66750) 17. THERE ARE NO OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES WITHIN TWO TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE TOWER. 18. EXISTING HEAVY MATURE VEGETATION WILL BE USED IN LIEU OF NEW LANDSCAPING. MONOPOLE SETBACKS COMPOUND SETBACKS REQUIRED PROPOSED REQUIRED PROPOSED FRONT YARD R.O.W. (WEST) 145.0' 145.0' FRONT YARD R.O.W. (WEST) 50.0' 73.9' REAR YARD (EAST) 145.0' 800.6' REAR YARD (EAST) 50.0' 793.1' / / 2 SIDE YARD (NORTH) 145.0' 1,534.6' SIDE YARD (NORTH) 50.0' 1,510.2' / / SIDE YARD (SOUTH) 145.0' 881.5' SIDE YARD (SOUTH) 50.0' 874.0' CLOSEST HOUSE 290.0' 458.4' (WEST) CLOSEST HOUSE 50.0' 398.6' WEST LEG O E E xx END FOUND PROPERTY CORNER UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHOR LIGHT POLE CULVERT LINE TYPES BOUNDARY LINE - SUBJECT PARCEL UNSURVEYED LINE - BOUNDARY OF ADJOINERS EASEMENT BOUNDARY RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT EDGE OF GRAVEL CURB FENCE LINE - CHAIN - x- x- x- x- x- x- x- x- x- x - OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE OHUL OHUL OHUL OHUL TREE OR VEGETATION LINE /®/ SITEPLAN SCALE: 1" = 200' Z1 1 TRUE NORTH 881.5' 874.0' ROPOSED 145' MONOPOLE RID N:671904.661 RID E:1094589.472 ATITUDE: 39°30'32.474" ONGITUDE: -77°46'18.143" ROUND ELEVATION: 418.0' NAVD88 AT BASE 'F, • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers BAKERSVILLE 7116 HOUSER ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 LING: EC (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATI TAX MAP: 0071 GRID: 0006 PARCEL: 0046 ELECTION DISTRICT: 12-000 SEAL: 11111 ///,��'' r S'Sq'q'G4: "iiii Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that lam a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date; 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 08-27-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW A 09-09-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW B 09-19-2025 RELOCATE SITE 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.478 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE O 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Z-1 SUBJECT PARCEL ACCOUNT NO: 12-009739 N/F SHAW, THOMAS E & JUDITH ANN L/E MAILING ADDRESS: 7272 TOMMYTOWN ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 PARCEL ADDRESS: HOUSER ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 AREA: 70.6400 AC PRESENT USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING EC ADJOINERS ACCOUNT NO: 129-014066 N/F MILLER, JOSHUA J & LINDSAY H MAILING ADDRESS: 16951 SPRECHER SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 PARCEL ADDRESS: 16951 SPRECHER SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 AREA: 138.6800 AC PRESENT USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING EC ACCOUNT NO: 12-008554 N/F HARRIS, PHILIP S & CYNTHIA L MAILING ADDRESS: 3660 CHESTNUT KEEDYSVILLE, MD 21756 PARCEL ADDRESS: 17103 SPRECHER SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 AREA: 36.6500 AC PRESENT USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING EC RD RD GROVE RD ACCOUNT NO: 12-006721 N/F SHAW, JUDITH A & THOMAS E MAILING ADDRESS: 7272 TOMMYTOWN SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 PARCEL ADDRESS: 7234 TOMMYTOWN SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 AREA: 208.5100 AC PRESENT USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING: EC ACCOUNT NO: 12-002904 N/F HARTLE, RICHARD J JR MAILING ADDRESS: 20512 RENO MONUMENT RD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 PARCEL ADDRESS: 7036 TOMMYTOWN RD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 AREA: 1.0000 AC PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: EC RD II' ACCOUNT NO: 12-010443 N/F GREGER, DONALS KEITH & CYNTHIA MAILING ADDRESS: 7025 TOMMYTOWN RD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 PARCEL ADDRESS: TOMMYTOWN RD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 AREA: 3.1800 AC PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: EC ACCOUNT NO: 12-010494 N/F GREGER, DONALS KEITH & CYNTHIA MAILING ADDRESS: 7025 TOMMYTOWN RD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 PARCEL ADDRESS: 7025 TOMMYTOWN RD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 AREA: 3.1500 AC PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: EC ACCOUNT NO: 12-010435 N/F DUFIEF, JAMES S III & LESA A ETAL MAILING ADDRESS: 6945 TOMMYTOWN SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 PARCEL ADDRESS: 6945 TOMMYTOWN SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 AREA: 3.3700 AC PRESENT USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING EC ACCOUNT NO: 12-010486 N/F BOND, RICHARD L & MICHELE L MAILING ADDRESS: 9614 KENSINGTON KENSINGTON, MD 20895 PARCEL ADDRESS: 6836 TOMMYTOWN SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 AREA: 45.1800 AC PRESENT USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING EC ACCOUNT NO: 12-001231 N/F GAYLOR, CONNIE S MAILING ADDRESS: 7014 HOUSER RD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 PARCEL ADDRESS: 7014 HOUSER RD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 AREA: 31,798 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: EC RD RD PKWY RD entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers BAKERSVILLE 7116 HOUSER ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 VING: EC (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION) TAX MAP: 0071 GRID: 0006 PARCEL: 0046 ELECTION DISTRICT: 12.000 SEAL: i≥;: F F, .Q. I Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 08-27-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW A 09-09-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW B 09-19-2025 RELOCATE SITE 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.478 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: PROPERTY ADJOINERS SHEET NUMBER: Z-2 AREA TABULATION SITE AREA: COMPOUND AND ACCESS ROAD LOD 70.64 AC 4,998 SF (0.1147 AC) EX. IMPERVIOUS AREA: O SF PROPOSED INCREASE: 3,520 SF (0.0808 AC) SPOIL AND/OR BORROW NOTE ANY SPOIL AND/OR BORROW, MUST COME FROM AND/OR GO TO, A SITE WITH AN APPROVED AND CURRENT SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. LEGEND O FOUND PROPERTY CORNER A BENCH MARKS UTILITY POLE D SIGN LIGHT POLE TP TELEPHONE PEDESTAL INDIVIDUAL TREE - DECIDUOUS CE TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SP STOCKPILE (IF NEEDED) LINE TYPES CONCRETE CURB FENCE LINE - CHAIN - x- x- x- x- x- x- x- x- x- x - EX. 1' CONTOUR LINE EX. 5' CONTOUR LINE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE - tool tool tool tool SILT FENCE - LOD/ E LOD/ E LOD/ E LOD/ E ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' Z-3 TRUE NORTH 'F, • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers BAKERSVILLE 7116 HOUSER ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 LING: EC (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATI TAX MAP: 0071 GRID: 0006 PARCEL: 0046 ELECTION DISTRICT: 12-000 SEAL: 11111///,��'' F.S'Sq'q'G4: Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that lam a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No.17641, Expiration Date; 12/21/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 08-27-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW A 09-09-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW B 09-19-2025 RELOCATE SITE 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.478 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE O 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Z-3 'F, • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 77'-0" 71'-l" 5'-11" 8'-0" 12'-0" 3'-0" 12'-0" 3'-0" 12'-0" 3'-0" 12'-6" 5'-7" W J O d O O O MILESTONE TOWERS 12'-0"WIDE GATE �x - x- x- x- x x- x- x- x- x- x- x- - x- x- x- x- x- x- x- x- xx x- x- x- x- x- x- x- x x- x x- x- x- x- x- x- x- x x- x- x- x- x- x- x 1 x I x x MILESTONE TOWERS 10' 2,310 SF COMPOUND - r r i P x WITH TURN CAROUNDIVE / LEASE AREA I I I I I x + I I I I I I I: + I I I I I ------ i I` a. + I I I I I x I I I I ®[' o I I I I ___�__J I x I I I I I I x PROPOSED VERIZON I I I I I I I I I \ E e N I' WIRELESS ICE BRIDGE x I I I f I: MILESTONE TOWERS I I 12' x 20' LEASE AREA I I 12' x 20' LEASE AREA I 12' x 20' LEASE AREA I 2'x2TELCO VAULTS I I I I x I I I I \ A I I x I I I I I I ,A • x r I I I I I I I I r: x I I I I I - x -- I I I I I I �' fl x •� I OF MONOPOLE k kl ° O I I I I I I x m° TRANSFORMER x L---------------] L ---------------J L---------------� ° ��>` I _ o PROPOSED VERIZON x b x PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS - 12'-6" x 21'-0" LEASE AREA WIRELESS EQUIPMENT :: • •'' _j & GENERATOR ON 1'-6" L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONCRETE PADS - - - - - x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x- x- x- x x x x x x x PROPOSED MILESTONE TOWERS 145' MONOPOLE MILESTONE TOWERS METER CENTER FRAME MILESTONE TOWERS 8'-0" CHAIN LINK FENCE COMPOUND PLAN 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Z-4 TRUE NORTH Milestone Towers BAKERSVILLE 7116 HOUSER ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 LING: EC (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATI TAX MAP: 0071 GRID: 0006 PARCEL: 0046 ELECTION DISTRICT: 12-000 SEAL: 11111 ///,��'' r S'Sq'q'G4: "iiii Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that lam a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No.17641, Expiration Date: 12/21/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 08-27-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW A 09-09-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW B 09-19-2025 RELOCATE SITE 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.478 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: COMPOUND PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Z-4 TOP OF LIGHTNING ROD TOP OF MONOPOLE EL. ±623.0' VIEW LOOKING WEST MONOPOLE ELEVATION 1 SCALE: 1/8=1-0" Z-5 DESIGN NOTES PROPOSED ANTENNA, ANTENNAS ARRAYS, CABLES, AND OTHER MONOPOLE ATTACHMENTS WILL BE PAINTED GRAY TO BETTER BLEND WITH GALVANIZED METAL MONOPOLE AND FURTHER MINIMIZE THE VISUAL IMPACT. \I/ entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers BAKERSVILLE 7116 HOUSER ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 VING: EC (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION) TAX MAP: 0071 GRID: 0006 PARCEL: 0046 ELECTION DISTRICT: 12.000 SEAL: i≥;: F F, Q' • 17 111I I I Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 08-27-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW A 09-09-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW B 09-19-2025 RELOCATE SITE 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.478 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: MONOPOLE ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER: Z-5 5'-0" _ I 5'-0„ NEW 3"� SCH 40 PIPE (GALV) I WITH PIPE CAP, TYPICAL I w I O N COMPOUND FENCE, - - SEE PLAN -H I I \--NEW P1000 STEEL UNISTRUT, LIMIT OF 6" (TYP. 11'-0" LONG W/ 1 /2"0 GALV. #57 STONE SURFACING STEEL U -BOLTS AND LOCK EXISTING WASHERS (TYP.) GRADE I I I NEW CONCRETE PIER, TYPICAL FINISH GRADE MIRAFI 500X COMPACT SUBGRADE AND G L G SURFACING TO 95% MAX. .I I I I DRY DENSITY TO PRODUCE ` .I : I k -III-III I -III -III- ` I : I --- - -` .I : I - I�I`I I�`I AN UNYIELDING SURFACE _ •< II.<I.. < -- G' ' - -- <' < -_�� <' III _�� Gk L� I I I I <I •- I I , G -I I I- I I' G I- I� ii" G -I ` I I- z'I' I I `' ! l l- IIC E L / I I I =11 f G , I I` .L I NOTE: COMPOUND AREA SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED. REMOVE UNSUITABLE LOOSE OR SOFT SOIL, i']: �I�GI-III4<�1-III 4 I I I I �I II ORGANIC MATERIAL OR RUBBLE TO FIRM GRADE. FILL UNDERCUT AND COMPACT UP TO 6" I= BELOW FINISH GRADE. PLACE A MIRAFI 50OX SOIL STABILIZATION FABRIC ON SUBGRADE. - I 14 I I 4 _ lG -III G I I I G I I I -II I FILL WITH 6" OF AASHTO 57 STONE TO FINISH GRADE. 1'-6"0 TYP. FRONT ELEVATION UTILITY FRAME DETAIL , COMPOUND SURFACING DETAIL SCALE: 3/4"=l' -O" Z-6 SCALE: 1"=l' -O" Z-6 3 5 12 15 11 1 6'-0" SEE PLAN 6'-0" MAX. 1 8 2 co 4 10 14 9 56 COMPOUND GRADE 6" OF CRUSHER %\%/�\\% . I I RUN /ABC \ •I I 10'-0" ACCESS ROAD 1 1/2" SM-9.5A '.Ll: LJa . I 12" o �LJ . p� GATE CENTER STOP I MATCH EXISTING 2 1/2" IM-19.OA 18" 24' REFERENCE NOTES: f� I _If� 24' 18"\�\ I _If� f� \ \ \ / / \ /�\/�\/�\/�\�\�\�\�\�\�\� \ \ \ \ \ \/�\/�\/. EXISTING 10 8 21A GRADE -_ - -_�.,.,.,:.5,. GATE POST: 6" NOMINAL SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. GENERAL NOTES: \ ,,...(�,.,.,,.....,,`: �.................. y ... �_ __� 'ff r III III I I I 1_I 1=1_I I 1=111-111-I CORNER, END OR PULL POST: 4" NOMINAL SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. 9O 3/8" DIAGONAL ROD WITH GALVANIZED STEEL -III-III-III111=111=111=111=111=111=1 I I111=111=1I II I1=1I 1=1I I �I I ----- LINE POST: 3" SCHEDULE 40 PIPE, PER ASTM-F1083. LINE TURNBUCKLE OR DIAGONAL THREADED ROD. 1. INSTALL FENCING PER ASTM F-567 2. INSTALL SWING GATES PER ASTM F-900 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MIRAFI 500X OR APPROVED EQUAL _ III -III -III -III -III -III -III- I -III -III -III -III -III -III -III -III -11 ' I=1 I I=1 11=1 I I -III -III -III -III- 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I -III -III -III -III- �' ' POSTS SHALL BE EQUALLY SPACED AT MAXIMUM 6'-0" O.C. 10 FENCE CORNER POST BRACE: 1 5/8" DIA. 3. FENCE PIPE AND COMPONENTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED. COMPACTED SUBGRADE I=1 I I -III -III -I I1=1 11=1 11=1 I I 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I-' '1-111.=111=111=111-1II,,III,,III, O3 TOP RAIL & BRACE RAIL: 1 1/2" PIPE, PER ASTM-F1083. EACH CORNER EACH WAY. 4. GATE FRAMES SHALL BE WELDED. SEE NOTES COMPACTED SUBGRADE FABRIC: 9 GA CORE WIRE SIZE 2„ MESH, CONFORMING TO 11 GATE FRAME: 1 1/2" PIPE, PER ASTM-F1083. WELDING SHALL BE COATED WITH (3) COATS OF COLD GALV. (OR EQUAL). ASTM-A392. 12 STYMIE MULTI -LOCKING DEVICE W/ KNOX PAD LOCK 5. POSTS SHALL HAVE END -CAPS. ACCESS ROAD: 6. GATES SHALL HAVE LOCKING HARDWARE. ASPHALT WALKWAY NOTES: TIE WIRE: MINIMUM 11 GA GALVANIZED STEEL AT POSTS AND RAILS A SINGLE WRAP OF FABRIC TIE AND AT TENSION WIRE 13 NOT USED 7. PROVIDE GATE STOPS TO SECURE GATES IN OPEN FILL, UNDERCUT AND COMPACT TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD UP TO 6" BELOW FINISH GRADE. PLACE MIRAFI, 50OX STABILIZATION 1. TOPSOIL, LARGE ROCKS, AND OTHER LOW QUALITY SOILS SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED. BY HOG RINGS SPACED MAX. 24" INTERVALS. POSITION. FABRIC ON SUBGRADE. PULL TIGHT AND STAKE IN PLACE. 2. THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% of THE DRY WEIGHT DENSITY PER AASHTO DESIGNATION 14 GATE FRAME BRACE: 1 5/8" DIAMETER. PLACE AND COMPACT 6" DEPTH OF CRUSHER RUN/ABC TO FINISH GRADE T-180 METHOD C OR D. IF THE SOIL CANNOT BE COMPACTED TO THE 95% OF THE DRY WEIGHT DENSITY, THEN THE SOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED BE COMPACTED TO THE 95% OF THE DRY WEIGHT DENSITY PER AASHTO T99. O TENSION WIRE: 9 GA. GALVANIZED STEEL. 15 CENTER GATE STOP COMPACTION NOTES: 3. THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE TREATED WITH AN APPROVED HERBICIDE PRIOR TO PLACING THE BASE COURSE. O7 NOT USED 1. SURFACE COURSE AND BASE COURSE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 98% MAX. DRY DENSITY STANDARD PROCTOR. 4. THE TOP COARSE AND BASE COURSE THICKNESS SHALL BE THE COMPACTED THICKNESS. 2. SUBGRADE SOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% MAX. DRY DENSITY STANDARD PROCTOR. 5. THE ROAD SURFACE SHALL BE SLOPED A MINIMUM OF 1.5%/FT OR HAVE A CROWN IN THE MIDDLE. STRETCHER BAR. 6. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. ASPHALT DRIVEWAY DETAIL 6 GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. Z-6 GALVANIZED STEEL FENCE AND GATE DETAIL 4 5 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-6 SCALE: NTS Z-6 'F, • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers BAKERSVILLE 7116 HOUSER ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 LING: EC (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATI TAX MAP: 0071 GRID: 0006 PARCEL: 0046 ELECTION DISTRICT: 12-000 SEAL: Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that lam a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No.17641, Expiration Date; 12/21/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 08-27-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW A 09-09-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW B 09-19-2025 RELOCATE SITE 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.478 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: SITE DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: Z-6 SITE SIGNAGE DETAILS 0 entrex communication services, inc. Milestone Towers N CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL: XXX-XXX-XXXX SITE: XXXXXX FCC NO. XXXXXXX LEASING: XXX-XXX-XXXX MARKETING I ID SIGN SCALE: N.T.S. S-7 WHITE BACKGROUND N Q W/ RED LETTERING TRESPASSING 18"H X 24"W VIOLATORS WILL BE PROSECUTED NO TRESPASSING SIGN 2 SCALE: N.T.S. S-7 GENERATOR SIGNAGE DETAILS BOTTOM ®®TOP BOTTOM SIGN KEY PLAN SCALE: N.T.S. WHITE BACK GROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING POSED NEW GENERATOR CRETE PAD #6 #9 TOP #8 BOTTOM #6 #7 #9 TOP BOTTOM BLUE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING DIESEL FUEL NO SMOKING NO OPEN FLAMES (()> Radio l►oquoncy f .ids beyond this paint n.ay raced the FCC Wmeral public aapoau(r 111,111. Obis - pNN sly..... s t• M wwalq Iw r.i.s rrN"MO BLUE BACKGROUND W/ WHITE LETTERING WHITE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING 12'W X 18"H W/ BLACK LETTERING LOCATE ON FRONT OF GATE RF NOTICE SIGN 3 SCALE: N.T.S. S-7 Ax NOTICE Ax iQ ALL PERSONNEL SHOULD HAVE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (EME) AWARENESS TRAINING. ALL PERSONNEL ENTERING THIS SITE SHOULD BE AUTHORIZED. 0 OBEY ALL POSTED SIGNS. ASSUME ALL ANTENNAS ARE ACTIVE iQ BEFORE WORKING ON ANTENNAS, NOTIFY OWNERS AND DISABLE APPROPRIATE TRANSMITTERS. MAINTAIN MINIMUM 3 FEET CLEARANCE FROM ALL ANTENNAS. DO NOT STOP IN FRONT OF ANTENNAS. 0 USE PERSONAL RF MONITORS WHILE WORKING NEAR ANTENNAS. 0 NEVER OPERATE TRANSMITTERS WITHOUT SHIELDS DURING NORMAL OPERATION. DO NOT OPERATE BASE STATION ANTENNAS IN EQUIPMENT ROOM. RF NOTICE SIGN 2 SCALE: N.T.S. S-7 SIGN DIMENSIONS: 4" WIDE X 14" HIGH RED BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING YELLOW BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING WHITE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING DANGER - DIESEL FUEL - SIGN #1 6 SCALE: N.T.S. S-7 DIESEL FUEL 240 GALLONS GREEN W/ WHITE LETTERING SIGN DIMENSIONS: 30" WIDE X 12" HIGH FUEL TANK -SIGN #3 8 SCALE: N.T.S. S-7 AWARNINGA Beyond this point; Radio frequency fields at this site exceed the FCC rules for human exposure. 1.'.. In rM, al pilaw" rl(n. rno am (MMInn to, k.r(111160 MW1n:f tnAN,n,.Va fOrlp IfS.ti..l...-gyUntil,, I,Ivr., ..�..—.......... ORANGE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING ORANGE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING WHITE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING 12'W X 18"H LOCATE AT BASE OF TOWER RF WARNING SIGN SCALE: N.T.S. S-7 ORANGE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING 12"W X 18"H IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL: XXX (NON -SPILL RELATED) SITEIXIXIXIXIXIXIXIX SIGN DIMENSIONS: 20" WIDE X 14" HIGH SITE ID - SIGN #2 7 SCALE: N.T.S. S-7 EMERGENCY SPILL RESPONSE AND RECOVERY CALL 24 -HOUR HOTLINE XXX - SIGN DIMENSIONS: 8" WIDE X 4" HIGH WHITE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING 2" HIGH BLACK LETTERS ON WHITE BACKGROUND (STICKERS) WHITE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING EMERGENCY RESPONSE - SIGN #4 SCALE: N.T.S. S-7 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 w) Milestone Towers BAKERSVILLE 7116 HOUSER ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 VING: EC (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATI TAX MAP: 0071 GRID: 0006 PARCEL: 0046 ELECTION DISTRICT: 12.000 SEAL: ``��I►t%U 11111111��'/ OF. M4 QN A ; //1111111111" Professional Codification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duty licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No.17641, Expiration Date: 12/21/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 08-27-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW A 09-09-2025 ZONING PLAN REVIEW B 09-19-2025 RELOCATE SITE 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.478 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: SIGNAGE SHEET NUMBER: Z-7 From: Jenkins. Meahan To: "m.arasham(abtrileaf.com" Subject: RE: Request for Comment- Telecommunications Project- Sharpsburg, MD (Trileaf#775393) Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:17:00 PM Attachments: image002.gng imaae003.ona image004.gng imaae005.ona image006.gng imaae007.ona image008.gng Hello McKayla, The Historic District Commission does wish to participate in this process. Staff has noted that this proposed tower is outside of our local Antietam zoning overlay area however it is within 2 miles of the Antietam National Battlefield property, and it is important to ensure that its visibility from the battlefield is minimal to none. Please consider both the battlefields property ownership extent as well as the observation tower on the battlefield for whether this tower (77°44'10"W 39°28'10"N ) will be visible from either. The C&O Canal is also nearby and should be evaluated for viewshed impacts. The below is a list of existing NR properties we are aware of. We area also aware of several properties on the MIHP within a visible distance of this site and would encourage their inclusion in any analysis. WA -II -0502 Y 18 BUILDING HOGMIRE-BERRYMAN FARM HOGMIRE-BERRYMAN FARM WA -II -0446 Y 18 BUILDING WILLIAM HAGERMAN FARMSTEAD WILLIAM HAGERMAN FARMSTEAD WA -II -0130 Y 19 BUILDING MARSH MILL SPEILMAN MILL COMPLEX WA -II -0350 Y 19 BUILDING <Null> MUMMA FARM Thank you. Meghan .�w 1Vashington County Meghan Jenkins, GISP Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Coordinator I Historic District Commission (HDC) 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 P: (240) 313-2439 1 F: (240) 313-2431 www.washco-md.net (Pronouns: she/her/hers) Get Connected and See Updates M1313OX NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, the unauthorized disclosure or use of which is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or if you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you. ❑® Book time to meet with me From: Jenkins, Meghan <mjenkins@washco-md.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 7:37 AM To: Jenkins, Meghan <mjenkins@washco-md.net> Subject: FW: Request for Comment- Telecommunications Project- Sharpsburg, MD (Trileaf#775393) - Washington County Meghan Jenkins, GISP Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Coordinator I Historic District Commission (HDC) 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 P: (240) 313-2439 1 F: (240) 313-2431 www.washco-md.net (Pronouns: she/her/hers) Get Connected and dd((See Updates NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, the unauthorized disclosure or use of which is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or if you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you. ❑■ Book time to meet with me From: McKayla Grasham <m.grashamla�trileaf.com> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 2:16 PM To: Planning Email <askplanning�washco-md.net> Subject: Request for Comment- Telecommunications Project- Sharpsburg, MD (Trileaf#775393) You don't often get email from m.grashamntrileaf.com. Learn why this is important WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded. Hello, Please see the attached documents pertaining to the proposed telecommunications project in Sharpsburg, MD. As part of our property consultation, we invite a local government association to comment, if desired, on the potential effects the project may have on historic properties. Let me know if you have any questions. McKayla Ordak Assistant Project Manager &TRILEAF environmental architecture engineering 303 International Circle, Suite 150 Hunt Valley, MD 21030 Office: (410) 853-7128, ext. 909 Mobile: (410) 303-4058 Historic Review Activity 09/18/2025 thru 10/23/2025 Record # Type MIHP# Recor Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info Status Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments 19986 BEAVER CREEK :CREATE (1) 2.48 ACRE LOT WITHOUT ROAD 5-25-018 Preliminary -Final Plat 110146 Approval 06 -Jun -25 I 22 -Sep -25 ROAD :FRONTAGE WITH 115.47 ACRES IN THE Approved 22 -Sep -25 Historic District Updated by Script from EPR. Letter Issued :HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 :REMAINING LANDS. SEE OM -25-001. Commission Days in Review: 0 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments FINISHES AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, NO :STRUCTURAL CHANGES, EXISTING ROOMS TO In Progress 09 -Oct -25 Historical Review Non -Residential ;SP -07-052.R03 14150 :BE USED AS (2) OFFICES, (4) ACTIVITY AREAS, 2025-03083 : Addition -Alteration : IV262 : Approved : 03 -Jul -25 09 -Oct -25 :RESERVOIR ROAD, :KITCHEN, LOBBY, VESTIBULE, WOMAN'S Note 09 -Oct -25 Historical Review No HDC Review required for fit outs Permit :BUILDING 521 RESTROOM, MEN'S REST ROOM, COAT :CLOSET, (5) STORAGE ROOMS, AND Passed - Info 09 -Oct -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. MECHANICAL ROOM, ZONING CERTIFICATION Days in Review: 0 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments SINGLE FAMILY REPLACEMENT DWELLING ON FULL UNFINISHED WELLED EXIT BASEMENT, Note 02 Permit was reviewed at 10/1 meeting and approval recommended by HDC, staff report is attached in Residential New LOR 25609 MILITARY -Oct -25 Historical Review documents for reference. 2025-03538 Review 26 -Jul -25 29 -Aug -25 :GAS FIREPLACE IN LIVING ROOM, COVERED Construction Permit .ROAD, PARCEL A :FRONT PORCH, UNCOVERED REAR AND LEFT Approved 02 -Oct -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. :STOOPS, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, PRE - Days in Review: 34 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments :SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON 2,088 SQ. FT. :UNFINISHED WALK OUT BASEMENT WITH Passed - Info 18 -Sep -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 2025-03673 Residential New IV072 Review 01 21 [OR 12968 ROWE ROAD ;ROUGH IN FOR FUTURE BATH AND 263 SQ. FT. Construction Permit -Aug -25 -Aug -25 Customer previously demo'd historic structure without permits. No exterior design review is required CONDITIONED CRAWL SPACE, ATTACHED TWO Note 18 -Sep -25 Historical Review in this area and therefore no HDC review. :CAR GARAGE, COVERED FRONT PORCH, Days in Review: 28 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments 624 SQ. FT. DETACHED ONE STORY TWO CAR Permit was reviewed at 10/1 meeting and approval recommended by HDC, staff report is attached in Residential New LOR 25609 MILITARY :GARAGE ON CONCRETE SLAB, PRE- Note 02 -Oct -25 Historical Review documents for reference. 2025-04306 Review 08 -Sep -25 16 -Sep -25 Construction Permit :ROAD, PARCEL A ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES :JOHN Approved 02 -Oct -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. LEE CHAPMAN, PARCEL A Days in Review: 16 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments DWELLING TO BE USED AS A MASTER Residential Addition- ;SI-09 009 16603 FAIRVIEW BEDROOM, BATHROOM, AND LAUNDRY ON Note 07 -Oct -25 Historical Review Not a rural village with new construction review. 2025-04354 Alteration Permit Review 10 -Sep -25 03 -Oct -25 CHURCH ROAD :FULL UNFINISHED BASEMENT WITH BILCO DOORS Passed - Info 07 -Oct -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. MOUNT TABOR EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Days in Review: 4 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments INVOLVE TEARING DOWN AN ALREADY 2025-04486 Residential Demolition IV078 Review 17 :SMITHSBURG/WOLFSVILLE 19 MILL, A Note 22 : Permit -Sep -25 -Sep -25 ROAD :COLLAPSED STONE COMPRISED OF -Sep -25 Historical Review Will need to go on the November 5 HDC agenda. SINGLE STORY AND NO WINDOWS OR Days in Review: 3 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments Residential Demolition ; :LOR 14219 MAUGANSVILLE ;DEMOLITION OF DWELLING AND (3) 2025-04487 1697 Review 17 -Sep -25 01 -Oct -25 Note 08 -Oct -25 Historical Review Scheduled for November 5 HDC Meeting Permit ROAD ; :DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Days in Review: 7 Historic Review Activity 09/18/2025 thru 10/23/2025 Record # Type MIHP# Record Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info Status Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO INCLUDE STABILIZATION AND SHORING UPPER LEVEL OF Note 02 -Oct -25 Historical Review reviewed at the 10/1 HDC meeting and approved, staff report is attached for reference. Residential Addition - 2025 -04514 111141 Review 18 -Sep -25 24 -Sep -25 4504 MAIN STREET BUILDING, RECONSTRUCTION OF Alteration Permit FOUNDATION WALLS USING SALVAGED Approved 02 -Oct -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. STONE, INSTALLING WOODEN PLATES AT TOP Days in Review: 8 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments DEMOLITION OF EXISTING 1,182 SQ, FT, TWO Residential Demolition LOR 11416 HANGING ROCK STORY METAL CLAD LOG HOME STRUCTURE Very basic survey done of Forsythe which details a few buildings and has minimal photos. This 2025-04522 Review 19 -Sep -25 19 -Sep -25 Note 22 -Sep -25 Historical Review Permit ROAD AND ACCESSORY SHED, NO EXISITNG structure isn't photographed. SDAT listing is 1910 for building date. Adding to November 5 agenda. FOUNDATION Days in Review: 3 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments DWELLING WITH TWO CAR GARAGE AT only demolition permit associated is reviewable by the HDC, no review for this rural village for new BASEMENT LEVEL WITH EGRESS WINDOW, 150 Note 01 -Oct -25 Historical Review Residential New LOR 11416 HANGING ROCK construction. 2025-04520 Review 19 -Sep -25 30 -Sep -25 SQ. FT. FINISHED BASEMENT TO BE USED AS Construction Permit ROAD UTILITY SPACE AND A CLOSET, GAS FIREPLACE Passed - Info 01 -Oct -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. IN LIVING ROOM, OPEN FRONT DECK, FRAME Days in Review: 1 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments 864 SQ. FT. POLE BUILDING ON CONCRETE Residential New LOR 11131 WHITE HALL SLAB TO BE USED AS A GARAGE, 9' (3) Note 01 -Oct -25 Historical Review Not in a review area for new construction 2025-04666 1907 Approved 29 -Sep -25 29 -Sep -25 Construction Permit ROAD OVERHEAD DOORS, METAL ROOF, METAL Passed - Info 01 -Oct -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. SIDES, PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES Days in Review: 2 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments COMMERCIAL STOREFRONT, 11 FT. AT THE Non -Residential New SP -25-007 9250 TACTICAL 2025-04902 1456 Review 13 -Oct -25 14 -Oct -25 HIGHEST POINT, 200 LINEAR FEET TOTAL, 8 FT. Passed - Info 17 -Oct -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Construction Permit WAY CHAIN -LINK FENCE, 3,000 SQ. FT. CONCRETE Days in Review: 2 SUBDIVIDE 24.56 ACRES INTO 3 LOTS AND Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments 11805 PLEASANT VALLEY REMAINING LANDS. MERGE 2.41 ACRE Historic District S-25-032 Preliminary -Final Plat IV075 In Review 14 -Oct -25 15 -Oct -25 ROAD Revisions Required 17 -Oct -25 Updated by Script from EPR. PARCEL A INTO OTHER LANDS OF HOCH. Commission SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 ASSOCIATED FCE Days in Review: 1 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER, (1) 33 SQ. HDC has reviewed this tower previously as part of the 106 process. Corresponding site plan had FT. CONCRETE PAD FOR EQUIPMENT CABINET, SP -24-032 21546 Note 23 -Oct -25 Historical Review minimal changes from that review process. No HDC review for the permit as review is completed Non -Residential New (1) 28 SQ. FT. CONCRETE PAD FOR 2025-04936 Review 15 -Oct -25 21 -Oct -25 LEITERSBURG SMITHSBURG through other process. Construction Permit GENERATOR, RELATED GROUND EQUIPMENT, ROAD 9 FT. HIGH SECURITY FENCE FOR MILESTONE Approved 23 -Oct -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. TOWERS, ZONING CERTIFICATION FOR Days in Review: 2 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments 13850 CRAYTON BOULEV, A CONVENIENCE STORE/GAS STATION WITH SP -25-043 Site Plan 1471; 1866 In Review 22 -Oct -25 23 -Oct -25 SUITE#A AUTO AND DIESEL FUELING ISLANDS. THE Revisions Required 23 -Oct -25 Historic District Updated by Script from EPR. Commission HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 PROPOSED SITE DISTURBED AREA IS 9.8 Days in Review: 0 Activity Count: 16 Review Activities Summary Application Type Application Approved In Progress Note Passed - Info Revisions Total Non -Residential Addition -Alteration Permit Total 0 1 1 1 0 1 Non -Residential New Construction Permit Total 1 0 1 1 0 2 Preliminary Consultation Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 Preliminary -Final Plat Total 1 0 0 0 1 2 Residential Addition -Alteration Permit Total 1 0 2 1 0 2 Residential Demolition Permit Total 0 0 3 0 0 3 Residential New Construction Permit Total 2 0 5 3 0 5 Site Plan Total 0 0 0 0 1 1 Total I5I 1 12 6 2 16